Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Functional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> Chapter 3<br />
positive re<strong>in</strong>forcer is to conduct a REINFORCER TEST. A re<strong>in</strong>forcer test <strong>in</strong>volves experimentally<br />
compar<strong>in</strong>g levels of the behavior <strong>in</strong> phases where the item be<strong>in</strong>g evaluated is delivered<br />
immediately after the behavior to that <strong>in</strong> another phase where the consequence is provided<br />
just accord<strong>in</strong>g to a set time such as every 5 s or noncont<strong>in</strong>gently (Cooper et al., 2007).<br />
This test may entail us<strong>in</strong>g an ABAB research design (Mart<strong>in</strong> & Pear, 2011) where the A<br />
phase consists of a series of sessions where noncont<strong>in</strong>gent delivery of the item be<strong>in</strong>g tested<br />
occurs and <strong>in</strong> B phase consists of a series of sessions where the consequence is provided<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g each occurrence of that behavior. These phases are alternated <strong>in</strong> an ABAB fashion<br />
to rule out confound<strong>in</strong>g variables or alternative explanations for the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. If levels of<br />
the behavior are higher when the item is delivered cont<strong>in</strong>gently (phase B) compared to<br />
when it is not (phase A), then that item has been demonstrated to function as a positive<br />
re<strong>in</strong>forcer. See the Table 13 below for an example of how the effectiveness of treatment can<br />
be evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g an ABAB research design.<br />
Table 13<br />
Example of graphed data with an ABAB research design demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g that the re<strong>in</strong>forcer<br />
delivered immediately after the behavior dur<strong>in</strong>g the treatment or B phase <strong>in</strong>creases that behavior<br />
as compared to the noncont<strong>in</strong>gent delivery condition or basel<strong>in</strong>e phase.<br />
A PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT is an efficient method to identify a potential re<strong>in</strong>forcer<br />
by evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s choice for a variety of objects, events, or stimuli (Cooper et<br />
al., 2007). One type of preference assessment is a paired-stimulus assessment (Fisher et<br />
al., 1992). A paired-stimulus assessment <strong>in</strong>volves identify<strong>in</strong>g the stimulus the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
chooses most when pairs of stimuli are presented across trials (See the Table below for the<br />
preference assessment procedure).<br />
39