06.09.2021 Views

Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a

Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a

Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Functional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> Chapter 3<br />

gesture, or use of assistive technology devices (Mancil & Boman, 2010). For example, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual may be taught to say “Stop” <strong>in</strong>stead of engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> self-<strong>in</strong>jury dur<strong>in</strong>g nonpreferred<br />

groom<strong>in</strong>g activities (Steege et al., 1990). More examples of how a communication<br />

replacement behavior can be taught can be seen <strong>in</strong> the Table 12 below.<br />

Table 12<br />

Examples of communication responses related to the function of the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g<br />

behavior be<strong>in</strong>g taught<br />

Problem<br />

Behavior<br />

Scream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

For Attention<br />

Hitt<strong>in</strong>g Others<br />

To Be Sent To<br />

Another Room<br />

Grabb<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Food<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ger<br />

Flick<strong>in</strong>g<br />

For Visual<br />

Stimulation<br />

Replacement<br />

behavior that<br />

results <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same re<strong>in</strong>forcer<br />

Ask<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

attention<br />

Ask<strong>in</strong>g to go to<br />

another room<br />

Ask<strong>in</strong>g for food<br />

Click<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

a computer<br />

screen for an<br />

engag<strong>in</strong>g video<br />

display<br />

Consequence-based <strong>in</strong>terventions work to decrease problem behavior by manipulat<strong>in</strong>g events<br />

and/or stimuli that occur immediately after particular behaviors. S<strong>in</strong>ce every treatment program<br />

should <strong>in</strong>clude positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement, the procedures used to identify positive re<strong>in</strong>forcers<br />

will be described. Then, commonly used practices schedules to adm<strong>in</strong>ister re<strong>in</strong>forcement<br />

and ext<strong>in</strong>ction procedures to decrease challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior will be reviewed.<br />

<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>gredient for an effective behavior change program is positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement.<br />

A positive re<strong>in</strong>forcer is an object or event that <strong>in</strong>creases the behavior it follows. As<br />

reviewed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 1, the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement states that when a positive<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcer is delivered immediately after a behavior, that behavior is more likely to occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> future similar situations (Mart<strong>in</strong> & Pear, 2011). Without consideration of positive<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcement, the factors responsible for the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior may still<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> it, despite efforts to curtail that behavior. Additionally, programm<strong>in</strong>g re<strong>in</strong>forcers<br />

to <strong>in</strong>crease the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s desirable behavior may result <strong>in</strong> the challeng<strong>in</strong>g behaviors be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

‘supplanted’ or over-ridden s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g one behavior will naturally elim<strong>in</strong>ate the likelihood<br />

of engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> other behaviors that are re<strong>in</strong>forced less or cannot occur at the same<br />

time. Application of a positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement procedure is not only an effective practice<br />

but also an ethically sound step to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong> any <strong>in</strong>tervention program. There are several<br />

considerations when us<strong>in</strong>g a re<strong>in</strong>forcement procedure, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: (a) <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g knowledge<br />

of the function for the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior <strong>in</strong>to treatment design; (b)<br />

validat<strong>in</strong>g that the consequence is <strong>in</strong>deed a re<strong>in</strong>forcer (be-it positive re<strong>in</strong>forcer or negative<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcer); and (c) maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s motivation for that re<strong>in</strong>forcer.<br />

It is important to demonstrate that the consequence you believe acts as a re<strong>in</strong>forcer<br />

does <strong>in</strong>deed do so. The most accurate way to ensure that you have identified an effective<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!