Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Functional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> Chapter 6<br />
The Case of Bye, Bye, I am Gone!<br />
From: Lang, R., Davis, T., O’Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni,<br />
G., & Regester, A. (2010). <strong>Functional</strong> analysis and treatment of elopement<br />
across two school sett<strong>in</strong>gs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 113-118.<br />
Client Description & Background: “Joe, a 4-year-old boy who had been diagnosed<br />
with Asperger syndrome participated,” (Lang et al., 2010, p. 114) runs out of the classroom<br />
10-20 times per day, no matter the go<strong>in</strong>gs-on. John is <strong>in</strong> a regular classroom with 20 other<br />
children 2 teacher’s aides, and 1 teacher.<br />
Problem Behavior: Elopement from the classroom. Def<strong>in</strong>e this behavior so that it can<br />
be measured and observed reliably:<br />
Procedure: <strong>Functional</strong> analysis was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g a multielement research design<br />
with the follow<strong>in</strong>g 5-m<strong>in</strong> conditions:<br />
Attention condition: “The therapist sat next to Joe <strong>in</strong> her chair at the table, assumed<br />
the appearance of read<strong>in</strong>g a notebook, and <strong>in</strong>structed him to play. Joe had free access to<br />
toys. If he eloped, the therapist retrieved him and provided verbal and physical attention,<br />
which cont<strong>in</strong>ued for 5 s after the therapist had guided Joe back to the table” (Lang et al.,<br />
2010, p. 114).<br />
Escape condition: “The therapist delivered task demands based on Joe’s <strong>in</strong>dividualized<br />
education plan. If he did not respond to the demand with<strong>in</strong> 5 s, the therapist provided a<br />
gestural or model prompt <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the correct response. If he still did not respond, the<br />
therapist used a physical prompt. Follow<strong>in</strong>g elopement, the therapist retrieved him us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a m<strong>in</strong>imal amount of physical contact (e.g., guid<strong>in</strong>g lightly by the arm) and refra<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g verbal attention. The therapist delayed presentation of the next demand for an<br />
additional 5 s once she returned Joe to the table” (Lang et al., 2010, p. 114-115).<br />
Tangible condition: “In the tangible condition, a television and DVD player, which the<br />
class used frequently, were present. The therapist played Joe’s preferred DVD for 10 s prior<br />
to the session, turned off the TV via remote control to start the session, and turned on the<br />
TV with the remote follow<strong>in</strong>g elopement. After the TV was turned on, Joe would either<br />
return to the area or the therapist would retrieve him <strong>in</strong> the same manner as described for<br />
the escape condition” (Lang et al., 2010, p. 115).<br />
Play condition: “Joe had unrestricted access to toys. The therapist did not present task<br />
demands, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed close proximity to Joe, provided verbal praise and physical contact<br />
about every 10 s, and ignored elopement” (Lang et al., 2010, p. 115).<br />
110