06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

switch was closed matched the durations <strong>of</strong> the dots and dashes that operated the<br />

relay’s magnet. The ability <strong>of</strong> a telegraph company to communicate messages over<br />

very long distances depended completely on the relays that were interspersed along<br />

the company’s network.<br />

This dependence upon relays played a critical role in the corporate warfare<br />

between competing telegraph companies. In 1874, the only relay in use in the telegraph<br />

industry was an electromagnetic one invented by Charles Grafton Page; the<br />

patent for this device was owned by Western Union. An imminent court decision<br />

was going to prevent the Automatic Telegraph Company from using this device in<br />

its own telegraph system because <strong>of</strong> infringement on the patent.<br />

The Automatic Telegraph Company solved this problem by commissioning<br />

Thomas Edison to invent a completely new relay, one that avoided the Page patent by<br />

not using magnets (Josephson, 1961). Edison used a rotating chalk drum to replace<br />

the electromagnet. This is because Edison had earlier discovered that the friction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a wire dragging along the drum changed when current flowed through the wire.<br />

This change in friction was sufficient to be used as a signal that could manipulate<br />

the gate controlling the circuit between the source and the drain. Edison’s relay was<br />

called a motograph.<br />

Edison’s motograph is <strong>of</strong> interest to us when it is compared to the Page relay.<br />

On the one hand, the two devices performed the identical function; indeed, Edison’s<br />

relay fit exactly into the place <strong>of</strong> the page relay:<br />

First he detached the Page sounder from the instrument, an intensely interested<br />

crowd watching his every movement. From one <strong>of</strong> his pockets he took a pair <strong>of</strong><br />

pliers and fitted [his own motograph relay] precisely where the Page sounder had<br />

been previously connected, and tapped the key. The clicking—and it was a joyful<br />

sound—could be heard all over the room. There was a general chorus <strong>of</strong> surprise.<br />

‘He’s got it! He’s got it!’ (Josephson, 1961, p. 118)<br />

On the other hand, the physical principles governing the two relays were completely<br />

different. The key component <strong>of</strong> one was an electromagnet, while the critical<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the other was a rotating drum <strong>of</strong> chalk. In other words, the two relays were<br />

functionally identical, but physically different. As a result, if one were to describe the<br />

purpose, role, or function <strong>of</strong> each relay, then the Page relay and the Edison motograph<br />

would be given the same account. However, if one were to describe the physical<br />

principles that accomplished this function, the account <strong>of</strong> the Page relay would be<br />

radically different from the account <strong>of</strong> the Edison motograph—so different, in fact,<br />

that the same patent did not apply to both. Multiple realization is the term used to<br />

recognize that different physical mechanisms can bring identical functions to life.<br />

The history <strong>of</strong> advances in communications and computer technology can<br />

be described in terms <strong>of</strong> evolving multiple realizations <strong>of</strong> relays and switches.<br />

Electromagnetic relays were replaced by vacuum tubes, which could be used to<br />

36 Chapter 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!