06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chase, V. M., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Visions <strong>of</strong> rationality. Trends in <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />

2(6), 206–214.<br />

Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). Ten years <strong>of</strong> the rational analysis <strong>of</strong> cognition. Trends in <strong>Cognitive</strong><br />

<strong>Science</strong>s, 3(2), 57–65.<br />

Chauvin, Y., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1995). Backpropagation: Theory, architectures, and applications.<br />

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. T. (2007). Gibsonian affordances for roboticists. Adaptive Behavior, 15(4),<br />

473–480.<br />

Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149–178.<br />

Cheng, K. (2005). Reflections on geometry and navigation. Connection <strong>Science</strong>, 17(1–2), 5–21.<br />

Cheng, K. (2008). Whither geometry? Troubles <strong>of</strong> the geometric module. Trends in <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />

12(9), 355–361.<br />

Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring<br />

theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 1–23.<br />

Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104(2),<br />

367–405.<br />

Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality,<br />

contingency, and prediction. In H. L. Roitblat & J.-A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to<br />

cognitive science (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model <strong>of</strong> causal induction. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 545–567.<br />

Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review,<br />

99(2), 365–382.<br />

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany; New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.<br />

Chomsky, N. (1959a). On certain formal properties <strong>of</strong> grammars. Information and Control, 2, 137–167.<br />

Chomsky, N. (1959b). A review <strong>of</strong> B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.<br />

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history <strong>of</strong> rationalist thought (1st ed.). New<br />

York, NY: Harper & Row.<br />

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.<br />

Christensen, S. M., & Turner, D. R. (1993). Folk psychology and the philosophy <strong>of</strong> mind. Hillsdale, NJ:<br />

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Churchland, P. M. (1985). Reduction, qualia, and the direct introspection <strong>of</strong> brain states. The Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Philosophy, LXXXII, 8–28.<br />

Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

Churchland, P. M., & Churchland, P. S. (1990). Could a machine think? Scientific American, 262, 32–37.<br />

Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

Churchland, P. S., Koch, C., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1990). What is computational neuroscience? In E. L.<br />

Schwartz (Ed.), Computational neuroscience (pp. 46–55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

References 433

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!