06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Ewald, 1996). Peirce extended Boole’s work on secondary propositions by stipulating<br />

an additional algebraic law <strong>of</strong> propositions: for every element x, either x = 0 or x<br />

= 1, producing a system known as “the two-valued algebra” (Lewis, 1918).<br />

The two-valued algebra led to the invention <strong>of</strong> truth tables, which are established<br />

in the literature in the early 1920s (Post, 1921; Wittgenstein, 1922), but were<br />

likely in use much earlier. There is evidence that Bertrand Russell and his then student<br />

Ludwig Wittgenstein were using truth tables as early as 1910 (Shosky, 1997). It<br />

has also been argued that Charles Peirce and his students probably were using truth<br />

tables as early as 1902 (Anellis, 2004).<br />

Truth tables make explicit an approach in which primitive propositions (p,<br />

q, r, etc.) that could only adopt values <strong>of</strong> 0 or 1 are used to produce more complex<br />

expressions. These expressions are produced by using logical functions to<br />

combine simpler terms. This approach is known as “using truth-value systems”<br />

(Lewis & Langford, 1959). Truth-value systems essentially use truth tables to determine<br />

the truth <strong>of</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> propositions (i.e., <strong>of</strong> logical combinations <strong>of</strong> propositions).<br />

“It is a distinctive feature <strong>of</strong> this two-valued system that when the property, 0<br />

or 1, <strong>of</strong> the elements p, q, etc., is given, any function <strong>of</strong> the elements which is in the<br />

system is thereby determined to have the property 0 or the property 1” (p. 199).<br />

Consider Table 2-1, which provides the values <strong>of</strong> three different functions (the<br />

last three columns <strong>of</strong> the table) depending upon the truth value <strong>of</strong> two simple propositions<br />

(the first two columns <strong>of</strong> the table):<br />

p q pq p + q p(p + q)<br />

1 1 1 1 1<br />

1 0 0 1 1<br />

0 1 0 1 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0<br />

Table 2-1. Examples <strong>of</strong> the truth value system for two elementary propositions<br />

and some <strong>of</strong> their combinations. The possible values <strong>of</strong> p and q are given<br />

in the first two columns. The resulting values <strong>of</strong> different functions <strong>of</strong> these<br />

propositions are provided in the remaining columns.<br />

Truth-value systems result in a surprising, simplified approach to defining basic or<br />

primitive logical functions. When the propositions p and q are interpreted as being<br />

only true or false, then there are only four possible combinations <strong>of</strong> these two propositions<br />

that can exist, i.e., the first two columns <strong>of</strong> Table 2-1. A primitive function<br />

can be defined as a function that is defined over p and q, and that takes on a truth<br />

value for each combination <strong>of</strong> these variables.<br />

Given that in a truth-value system a function can only take on the value <strong>of</strong> 0<br />

or 1, then there are only 16 different primitive functions that can be defined for<br />

Multiple Levels <strong>of</strong> Investigation 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!