06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hid the underlying musical structures from the audience’s perception, the minimalists<br />

desired to create a different kind <strong>of</strong> composition. When presented minimalist<br />

compositions, the audience would hear the musical processes upon which<br />

the pieces were built. Reich (2002, p. 34) said he was “interested in perceptible<br />

processes. I want to be able to hear the process happening throughout the sounding<br />

music.”<br />

Reich made processes perceptible by making them gradual. But this didn’t<br />

make his compositions less musical.<br />

Even when all the cards are on the table and everyone hears what is gradually happening<br />

in a musical process, there are still enough mysteries to satisfy all. These<br />

mysteries are the impersonal, unintended, psychoacoustic by-products <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intended process. (Reich, 2002, p. 35)<br />

Reich’s recognition that the listener contributes to the composition—that classical<br />

music is a cool medium, not a hot one—is fundamental to minimalist music. Philip<br />

Glass (1987) was surprised to find that he had different experiences <strong>of</strong> different performances<br />

<strong>of</strong> Samuel Beckett’s Play, for which Glass composed music. He realized<br />

that “Beckett’s Play doesn’t exist separately from its relationship to the viewer, who<br />

is included as part <strong>of</strong> the play’s content” (p. 36). Audiences <strong>of</strong> Glass’ Einstein on the<br />

Beach had similar experiences. “The point about Einstein was clearly not what it<br />

‘meant’ but that it was meaningful as generally experienced by the people who saw<br />

it” (p. 33).<br />

Modern music has many parallels to embodied cognitive science, and has<br />

many characteristics that distinguish it from other traditions <strong>of</strong> classical music.<br />

Alternative views <strong>of</strong> composition, the role <strong>of</strong> the audience, and the control <strong>of</strong> a performance<br />

are clearly analogous to embodied concepts such as emergence, embodiment,<br />

and stigmergy. They also lead to a very different notion <strong>of</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

music, in its transition from “hot” to “cool.” Not surprisingly, the radical differences<br />

between classical and modern music are reflected in differences between classical<br />

and embodied cognitive science’s study <strong>of</strong> musical cognition, as is discussed in the<br />

next section.<br />

6.6 The Embodied Approach to Musical Cognition<br />

A well-established modern view <strong>of</strong> classical music is that it has meaning, and that<br />

its purpose is to convey this meaning in a fashion that is consistent with Reddy’s<br />

(1979) conduit metaphor.<br />

Composers and performers <strong>of</strong> all cultures, theorists <strong>of</strong> diverse schools and styles,<br />

aestheticians and critics <strong>of</strong> many different persuasions are all agreed that music has<br />

Classical Music and <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Science</strong> 301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!