06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, there is general agreement that Romantic music exhibits,<br />

a preference for the original rather than the normative, a pursuit <strong>of</strong> unique<br />

effects and extremes <strong>of</strong> expressiveness, the mobilization to that end <strong>of</strong> an<br />

enriched harmonic vocabulary, striking new figurations, textures, and tone colors.<br />

(Plantinga, 1984, p. 21)<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> composers who were musical Romanticism’s greatest practitioners begins<br />

with Beethoven, and includes Schubert, Mendelssohn, Schumann, Chopin, Berlioz,<br />

Liszt, Wagner, and Brahms.<br />

Romantic music can be used to further develop the analogy between classical<br />

music and cognitive science. In particular, there are several parallels that exist<br />

between musical Romanticism and connectionist cognitive science. The most general<br />

similarity between the two is that both are reactions against the Cartesian view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mind that dominated the Enlightenment.<br />

Romantic composers wished to replace the calculated, rational form <strong>of</strong> music<br />

such as Bach’s contrapuntal fugues (Gaines, 2005; H<strong>of</strong>stadter, 1979) with a music<br />

that expressed intensity <strong>of</strong> feeling, which communicated the sublime. “It was<br />

a retrogression to the primitive relationship that man had had to music—to the<br />

mysterious, the exciting, the magical” (Einstein, 1947, p. 8). As a result, musical<br />

Romanticism championed purely instrumental music; music that was not paired<br />

with words. The instrumental music <strong>of</strong> the Romantics “became the choicest means<br />

<strong>of</strong> saying what could not be said, <strong>of</strong> expressing something deeper than the word had<br />

been able to express” (p. 32). In a famous 1813 passage, music critic E. T. A. H<strong>of</strong>fman<br />

proclaimed instrumental music to be “the most romantic <strong>of</strong> all the arts—one might<br />

almost say, the only genuinely romantic one—for its sole subject is the infinite”<br />

(Strunk, 1950, p. 775).<br />

Connectionist cognitive science too is a reaction against the rationalism and<br />

logicism <strong>of</strong> Cartesian philosophy. And one form <strong>of</strong> this reaction parallels Romantic<br />

music’s move away from the word: many connectionists interpreted the ability <strong>of</strong> networks<br />

to accomplish classical tasks as evidence that cognitive science need not appeal<br />

to explicit rules or symbols (Bechtel & Abrahamsen, 1991; Horgan & Tienson, 1996;<br />

Ramsey, Stich, & Rumelhart, 1991; Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986a).<br />

A second aspect <strong>of</strong> musical Romanticism’s reaction against reason was its<br />

emphasis on the imaginary and the sublime. In general, the Romantic arts provided<br />

escape by longingly looking back at “unspoiled,” preindustrial existences<br />

and by using settings that were wild and fanciful. Nature was a common inspiration.<br />

The untamed mountains and chasms <strong>of</strong> the Alps stood in opposition to the<br />

Enlightenment’s view that the world was ordered and structured.<br />

For example, in the novel Frankenstein (Shelley, 1985), after the death <strong>of</strong><br />

Justine, Victor Frankenstein seeks solace in a mountain journey. The beauty <strong>of</strong> a<br />

valley through which he travelled “was augmented and rendered sublime by the<br />

Classical Music and <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Science</strong> 281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!