06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scribner’s own work (Scribner & Tobach, 1997) was inspired by Vygotskian<br />

theory but aimed to extend its scope by examining practical cognition. Scribner<br />

described her research as the study <strong>of</strong> mind in action, because she viewed cognitive<br />

processes as being embedded with human action in the world. Scribner’s studies<br />

analyzed “the characteristics <strong>of</strong> memory and thought as they function in the larger,<br />

purposive activities which cultures organize and in which individuals engage”<br />

(p. 384). In other words, the everyday cognition studied by Scribner and her colleagues<br />

provided ample evidence <strong>of</strong> cognitive scaffolding: “Practical problem solving<br />

is an open system that includes components lying outside the formal problem—<br />

objects and information in the environment and goals and interests <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />

solver” (pp. 334–335).<br />

One example <strong>of</strong> Scribner’s work on mind in action was the observation <strong>of</strong><br />

problem-solving strategies exhibited by different types <strong>of</strong> workers at a dairy<br />

(Scribner & Tobach, 1997). It was discovered that a reliable difference between<br />

expert and novice dairy workers was that the former were more versatile in finding<br />

solutions to problems, largely because expert workers were much more able<br />

to exploit environmental resources. “The physical environment did not determine<br />

the problem-solving process but . . . was drawn into the process through worker<br />

initiative” (p. 377).<br />

For example, one necessary job in the dairy was assembling orders. This<br />

involved using a computer printout <strong>of</strong> a wholesale truck driver’s order for products<br />

to deliver the next day, to fetch from different areas in the dairy the required<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cases and partial cases <strong>of</strong> various products to be loaded onto the driver’s<br />

truck. However, while the driver’s order was placed in terms <strong>of</strong> individual units (e.g.,<br />

particular numbers <strong>of</strong> quarts <strong>of</strong> skim milk, <strong>of</strong> half-pints <strong>of</strong> chocolate milk, and so<br />

on), the computer printout converted these individual units into “case equivalents.”<br />

For example, one driver might require 20 quarts <strong>of</strong> skim milk. However, one case<br />

contains only 16 quarts. The computer printout for this part <strong>of</strong> the order would be 1<br />

+ 4, indicating one full case plus 4 additional units.<br />

Scribner found differences between novice and expert product assemblers in<br />

the way in which these mixed numbers from the computer printout were converted<br />

into gathered products. Novice workers would take a purely mental arithmetic<br />

approach. As an example, consider the following protocol obtained from a<br />

novice worker:<br />

It was one case minus six, so there’s two, four, six, eight, ten, sixteen (determines<br />

how many in a case, points finger as she counts). So there should be ten in here.<br />

Two, four, six, ten (counts units as she moves them from full to empty). One case<br />

minus six would be ten. (Scribner & Tobach, 1997, p. 302)<br />

Elements <strong>of</strong> Embodied <strong>Cognitive</strong> <strong>Science</strong> 227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!