06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

operations, “actions which are quite elementary: putting things in piles, separating<br />

piles into lots, making alignments, and so on” (Inhelder & Piaget, 1964, p. 291).<br />

Other theories <strong>of</strong> cognitive development share the Piagetian emphasis on the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> the world, but elaborate the notion <strong>of</strong> what aspects <strong>of</strong> the world are involved<br />

(Vygotsky, 1986). Vygotsky (1986), for example, highlighted the role <strong>of</strong> social systems—a<br />

different conceptualization <strong>of</strong> the external world—in assisting cognitive<br />

development. Vygotsky used the term zone <strong>of</strong> proximal development to define the<br />

difference between a child’s ability to solve problems without aid and their ability<br />

to solve problems when provided support or assistance. Vygotsky was strongly critical<br />

<strong>of</strong> instructional approaches that did not provide help to children as they solved<br />

problems.<br />

Vygotsky (1986) recognized that sources <strong>of</strong> support for development were not<br />

limited to the physical world. He expanded the notion <strong>of</strong> worldly support to include<br />

social and cultural factors: “The true direction <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> thinking is not<br />

from the individual to the social, but from the social to the individual” (p. 36). For<br />

example, to Vygotsky language was a tool for supporting cognition:<br />

Real concepts are impossible without words, and thinking in concepts does not<br />

exist beyond verbal thinking. That is why the central moment in concept formation,<br />

and its generative cause, is a specific use <strong>of</strong> words as functional ‘tools.’<br />

(Vygotsky, 1986, p. 107)<br />

Clark (1997, p. 45) wrote: “We may <strong>of</strong>ten solve problems by ‘piggy-backing’ on reliable<br />

environmental properties. This exploitation <strong>of</strong> external structure is what I mean<br />

by the term scaffolding.” <strong>Cognitive</strong> scaffolding—the use <strong>of</strong> the world to support or<br />

extend thinking—is characteristic <strong>of</strong> theories in embodied cognitive science. Clark<br />

views scaffolding in the broad sense <strong>of</strong> a world or structure that descends from<br />

Vygotsky’s theory:<br />

Advanced cognition depends crucially on our abilities to dissipate reasoning: to<br />

diffuse knowledge and practical wisdom through complex social structures, and to<br />

reduce the loads on individual brains by locating those brains in complex webs <strong>of</strong><br />

linguistic, social, political, and institutional constraints. (Clark, 1997, p. 180)<br />

While the developmental theories <strong>of</strong> Piaget and Vygotsky are departures from typical<br />

classical cognitive science in their emphasis on action and scaffolding, they are<br />

very traditional in other respects. American psychologist Sylvia Scribner pointed<br />

out that these two theorists, along with Newell and Simon, shared Aristotle’s “preoccupation<br />

with modes <strong>of</strong> thought central to theoretical inquiry—with logical operations,<br />

scientific concepts, and problem solving in symbolic domains,” maintaining<br />

“Aristotle’s high esteem for theoretical thought and disregard for the practical”<br />

(Scribner & Tobach, 1997, p. 338).<br />

226 Chapter 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!