06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the current phase <strong>of</strong> this debate, modern contingency theories have been proposed<br />

as alternatives to Rescorla-Wagner learning. While in some instances equilibria for<br />

the Rescorla-Wagner model predict the conditional contrasts defined by a formal<br />

contingency theory like the power PC model, in other situations this is not the case<br />

(Cheng, 1997). However, the result above indicates that differences in equilibria do<br />

not necessarily reflect differences in system abilities. Clearly equilibrium differences<br />

cannot be used as the sole measure when different theories <strong>of</strong> contingency<br />

are compared.<br />

4.8 Connectionist Algorithms: An Overview<br />

In the last several sections we have explored connectionist cognitive science at the<br />

computational level <strong>of</strong> analysis. Claims about linear separability, the in-principle<br />

power <strong>of</strong> multilayer networks, and the interpretation <strong>of</strong> output unit activity have all<br />

been established using formal analyses.<br />

In the next few sections we consider connectionist cognitive science from<br />

another perspective that it shares with classical cognitive science: the use <strong>of</strong> algorithmic-level<br />

investigations. The sections that follow explore how modern networks,<br />

which develop internal representations with hidden units, are trained, and<br />

also describe how one might interpret the internal representations <strong>of</strong> a network<br />

after it has learned to accomplish a task <strong>of</strong> interest. Such interpretations answer the<br />

question How does a network convert an input pattern into an output response? —<br />

and thus provide information about network algorithms.<br />

The need for algorithmic-level investigations is introduced by noting in Section<br />

4.9 that most modern connectionist networks are multilayered, meaning that they<br />

have at least one layer <strong>of</strong> hidden units lying between the input units and the output<br />

units. This section introduces a general technique for training such networks, called<br />

the generalized delta rule. This rule extends empiricism to systems that can have<br />

powerful internal representations.<br />

Section 4.10 provides one example <strong>of</strong> how the internal representations created<br />

by the generalized delta rule can be interpreted. It describes the analysis <strong>of</strong> a multilayered<br />

network that has learned to classify different types <strong>of</strong> musical chords. An<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the connection weights between the input units and the hidden units<br />

reveals a number <strong>of</strong> interesting ways in which this network represents musical regularities.<br />

An examination <strong>of</strong> the network’s hidden unit space shows how these musical<br />

regularities permit the network to rearrange different types <strong>of</strong> chord types so that<br />

they may then be carved into appropriate decision regions by the output units.<br />

In section 4.11 a biologically inspired approach to discovering network algorithms<br />

is introduced. This approach involves wiretapping the responses <strong>of</strong> hidden<br />

units when the network is presented with various stimuli, and then using these<br />

158 Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!