06.09.2021 Views

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

Mind, Body, World- Foundations of Cognitive Science, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sections 4.5 through 4.7. These sections investigate the kinds <strong>of</strong> tasks that artificial<br />

neural networks can accomplish and relate them to those that can be accomplished<br />

by the devices that have inspired the classical approach. The general theme <strong>of</strong> these<br />

sections is that artificial neural networks belong to the class <strong>of</strong> universal machines.<br />

Sections 4.8 through 4.13 focus on the algorithmic level <strong>of</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong><br />

connectionist theories. Modern artificial neural networks employ several layers <strong>of</strong><br />

processing units that create interesting representations which are used to mediate<br />

input-output relationships. At the algorithmic level, one must explore the internal<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> these representations in an attempt to inform cognitive theory. These<br />

sections illustrate a number <strong>of</strong> different techniques for this investigation.<br />

Architectural issues are the topics <strong>of</strong> Sections 4.14 through 4.17. In particular,<br />

these sections show that researchers must seek the simplest possible networks for<br />

solving tasks <strong>of</strong> interest, and they point out that some interesting cognitive phenomena<br />

can be captured by extremely simple networks.<br />

The chapter ends with an examination <strong>of</strong> the properties <strong>of</strong> connectionist cognitive<br />

science, contrasting the various topics introduced in the current chapter with<br />

those that were explored in Chapter 3 on classical cognitive science.<br />

4.1 Nurture versus Nature<br />

The second chapter <strong>of</strong> John Locke’s (1977) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,<br />

originally published in 1706, begins as follows:<br />

It is an established opinion among some men that there are in the understanding<br />

certain innate principles; some primary notions, characters, as it were, stamped<br />

upon the mind <strong>of</strong> man, which the soul receives in its very first being, and brings<br />

into the world with it. (Locke, 1977, p. 17)<br />

Locke’s most famous work was a reaction against this view; <strong>of</strong> the “some men” being<br />

referred to, the most prominent was Descartes himself (Thilly, 1900).<br />

Locke’s Essay criticized Cartesian philosophy, questioning its fundamental<br />

teachings, its core principles and their necessary implications, and its arguments<br />

for innate ideas, not to mention all scholars who maintained the existence <strong>of</strong> innate<br />

ideas (Thilly, 1900). Locke’s goal was to replace Cartesian rationalism with empiricism,<br />

the view that the source <strong>of</strong> ideas was experience. Locke (1977) aimed to show<br />

“how men, barely by the use <strong>of</strong> their natural faculties, may attain to all <strong>of</strong> the knowledge<br />

they have without the help <strong>of</strong> any innate impressions” (p. 17). Locke argued for<br />

experience over innateness, for nurture over nature.<br />

The empiricism <strong>of</strong> Locke and his descendants provided a viable and popular<br />

alternative to Cartesian philosophy (Aune, 1970). It was also a primary influence on<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the psychological theories that appeared in the late nineteenth and early<br />

126 Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!