06.09.2021 Views

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82 4. Generating Functions<br />

• Problem 202. In Problem 201.b you gave the generating function for the<br />

number of partitions of an integer into parts of size at most m. Explain<br />

why this is also the generating function for partitions of an integer into at<br />

most m parts. Notice that this is the generating function for the number of<br />

partitions whose Young diagram fits into the space between the line y =0<br />

and the line y = m. (h)<br />

• Problem 203. When studying partitions of integers, it is inconvenient to<br />

restrict ourselves to partitions with at most m parts or partitions with maximum<br />

part size m.<br />

(a) Give the generating function for the number of partitions of an integer<br />

into parts of any size. Don’t forget to use q rather than x as your<br />

variable. (h)<br />

(b) Find the coefficient of q 4 in this generating function. (h)<br />

(c) find the coefficient of q 5 in this generating function.<br />

(d) This generating function involves an infinite product. Describe the<br />

process you would use to expand this product into as many terms of<br />

a power series as you choose. (h)<br />

(e) Rewrite any power series that appear in your product as quotients of<br />

polynomials or as integers divided by polynomials.<br />

⇒<br />

Problem 204. In Problem 203, we multiplied together infinitely many power<br />

series. Here are two notations for infinite products that look rather similar:<br />

∞∏<br />

1+x + x 2 + ···+ x i and<br />

i=1<br />

∞∏<br />

1+x i + x 2i + ···+ x i2 .<br />

i=1<br />

However, one makes sense and one doesn’t. Figure out which one makes<br />

sense and explain why it makes sense and the other one doesn’t. If we want<br />

a product of the form<br />

∞∏<br />

1+p i (x),<br />

i=1<br />

where each p i (x) is a nonzero polynomial in x to make sense, describe a<br />

relatively simple assumption about the polynomials p i (x) that will make the<br />

product make sense. If we assumed the terms p i (x) were nonzero power<br />

series, is there a relatively simple assumption we could make about them<br />

in order to make the product make sense? (Describe such a condition or<br />

explain why you think there couldn’t be one.) (h)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!