Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a
Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a
Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
176 D. Hints to Selected Problems<br />
86.b. If you average a bunch of numbers and each one is bigger than one, what can<br />
you say about the average?<br />
86.c. Note that there are 2 (n 2 ) graphs on a set of n vertices.<br />
86.d. A notation for the sum over all colorings c of K m is<br />
∑<br />
c:c is a coloring of K m<br />
,<br />
and a notation for the sum over all subsets N of M that have size n is<br />
∑<br />
N:N⊆M, |N|=n<br />
86.e. If you interchange the order of summation so that you sum over subsets first<br />
and colorings second, you can take advantage of the fact that for a fixed subset<br />
N , you can count count the number of colorings in which it is monochromatic.<br />
86.f. You have an inequality involving m and n that tells you that R(n, n) > m.<br />
Suppose you could work with that inequality in order to show that if the<br />
inequality holds, then m is bigger than something. What could you conclude<br />
about R(n, n)?<br />
87. Remember, a subset of [n] either does or doesn’t contain n.<br />
90.b. A first order recurrence for a n gives us a n as a function of a n−1 .<br />
91. Suppose you already knew the number of moves needed to solve the puzzle<br />
with n − 1rings.<br />
92. Ifwehaven − 1circles drawn in such a way that they define r n−1 regions, and<br />
we draw a new circle, each time it crosses another circle, except for the last<br />
time, it finishes dividing one region into two parts and starts dividing a new<br />
region into two parts.<br />
Additional Hint: Compare r n with the number of subsets of an n-element<br />
set.<br />
98. You might try working out the cases n =2, 3, 4 and then look for a pattern.<br />
Alternately, you could write a n−1 = ba n−2 + d, substitute the right hand side<br />
of this expression into a n = ba n−1 + d to get a recurrence involving only a n−2<br />
, and then repeat a similar process with a n−2 and perhaps a n−3 and see a<br />
pattern that is developing.<br />
102.a. There are several ways to see how to do this problem. One is to draw pictures<br />
of graphs with one edge, two edges, three edges, perhaps four edges and figure<br />
out the sum of the degrees. Another is to ask what deleting an edge does