06.09.2021 Views

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C.4. The Product Principle for EGFs 159<br />

· Problem 395. In Problem 385, why is the family of people actually making<br />

phone calls (assuming nobody is calling outside the telephone network) at<br />

any given time, with the added relationship of who is calling whome, a<br />

species? Why is the family of sets of people who are not using their phones<br />

a species (with no additional construction needed)?<br />

The second essential feature of our examples of products of EGFs is that products<br />

of EGFs seem to count structures on ordered pairs of two disjoint sets (or more<br />

generally on k-tuples of mutually disjoint sets). For example, we can determine<br />

a five coloring of a set S by partitioning it in all possible ways into two sets and<br />

coloring the first set in the pair with our first two colors and our second pair with<br />

the last three colors. Or we can partition our set in all possible ways into five parts<br />

and color part i with our ith color. We don’t have to do the same thing to each<br />

part of our partition; for example, we could define a derangement on one part and<br />

an identity permutation on the other; this defines a permutation on the set we are<br />

partitioning, and we have already noted that every permutation arises in this way.<br />

Our combinatorial interpretation of EGFs will involve assuming that the coefficient<br />

of xi<br />

i!<br />

counts the number of structures on a particular set of of size i in a species<br />

of structures on subsets of a set X. Thus in order to give an interpretation of the<br />

product of two EGFs we need to be able to think of ordered pairs of structures on<br />

disjoint sets or k-tuples of structures on disjoint sets as structures themselves. Thus<br />

given a structure on a set S and another structure on a disjoint set T, we define the<br />

ordered pair of structures (which is a mathematical construction!) to be a structure<br />

on the set S ∪ T. We call this a pair structure on S ∪ T. We can get many structures<br />

on a set S ∪ T in this way, because S ∪ T can be divided into many other pairs of<br />

disjoint sets. In particular, the set of pair structures whose first structure comes<br />

from F and whose second element comes from G is denoted by F·G.<br />

Problem 396. Show that if F and G are species of structures on subsets of<br />

a set X, then the pair of structures of F·Gfor a species of structures<br />

Given a species F of structures, the number of structures using any particular<br />

set of size i is the same as the number of structures in the family using any other<br />

set of size i. We can thus define the exponential generating function (EGF) for the<br />

family as the power series ∑ ∞<br />

i=1 a i xi<br />

i! , where a i is the number of structures of F that<br />

use one particular set of size i. In Problems 372, 373, 376, 377, 378, 380, 382, 383,<br />

387, and 388, we were computaing EGFs for species of subsets of some set.<br />

Problem 397. If F and G are species of subsets of X, how is the EGF for<br />

F·Grelated to the EGFs for F and G? Prove you are right. (h)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!