06.09.2021 Views

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, 2004a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2. Groups Acting on Sets 121<br />

Problem 292.<br />

(a) If G is a group, how is the set {τσ | τ ∈ G} related to G?<br />

(b) Use this to show that y is in the multiorbit Gx multi if and only if<br />

Gx multi = Gy multi .<br />

Problem 292.b tells us that, when G acts on S, each element x of S is in one and<br />

only one multiorbit. Since each orbit is a subset of a multiorbit and each element x<br />

in S is in one and only one orbit, this also tells us there is a bijection between the<br />

orbits of G and the multiorbits of G, so that we have the same number of orbits as<br />

multiorbits.<br />

When a group acts on a set, a group element is said to fix an element of x ∈ S if<br />

σ(x) =x. The set of all elements fixing an element x is denoted by (x).<br />

Problem 293. Suppose a group G acts on a set S. What is special about the<br />

subset (x) for an element x of S?<br />

• Problem 294. Suppose a group G acts on a set S. What is the relationship<br />

of the multiplicity of x ∈ S in its multiorbit and the size of (x)?<br />

Problem 295. What can you say about relationships between the multiplicity<br />

of an element y in the multiorbit Gx multi and the multiplicites of other<br />

elements? Try to use this to get a relationship between the size of an orbit<br />

of G and the size of G. (h)<br />

We suggested earlier that a quotient principle for multisets might prove useful.<br />

The quotient principle came from the sum principle, and we do not have a sum<br />

principle for multisets. Such a principle would say that the size of a union of disjoint<br />

multisets is the sum of their sizes. We have not yet defined the union of multisets<br />

or disjoint multisets, because we haven’t needed the ideas until now. We define the<br />

union of two multisets S and T to be the multiset in which the multiplicity of an<br />

element x is the maximum5 of the multiplicity of x in S and its multiplicity in T .<br />

Similarly, the union of a family of multisets is defined by defining the multiplicity of<br />

an element x to be the maximum of its multiplicities in the members of the family.<br />

Two multisets are said to be disjoint if no element is a member of both, that is, if<br />

no element has multiplicity one or more in both. Since the size of a multiset is the<br />

sum of the multiplicities of its members, we immediately get the sum principle for<br />

multisets.<br />

The size of a union of disjoint multisets is the sum of their sizes.<br />

5We choose the maximum rather than the sum so that the union of sets is a special case of the union<br />

of multisets.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!