06.09.2021 Views

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Witt & Tani, TCPI 9. Liability without Fault?<br />

<strong>and</strong> burst into flames near Lynchburg, Virginia, spilling 30,000 gallons of crude oil into the James<br />

River.<br />

The U.S. Department of Transportation has called the transporting of crude oil by rail “an<br />

imminent hazard” to the public. Jad Mouwad, U.S. issues Safety Alert for Oil Trains, N.Y. TIMES,<br />

May 7, 2014. According to the Association of American Railroads, however, “99.9977% of rail<br />

hazmat shipments . . . reach their destination without a spill.” In the last decade, the Association<br />

contends, “pipelines have spilled 474,441 barrels of oil,” but rail cars have only spilled 2,268<br />

barrels of oil. Bryan Walsh, North Dakota Derailment Shows Dark Side of America’s Oil Boom,<br />

TIME, Dec. 31, 2013, available at https://perma.cc/5Y5C-LQPK.<br />

Should an increase in shipments of dangerous chemicals on the nation’s railroads change<br />

the way we think about Judge Posner’s Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad opinion?<br />

D. Nuisance<br />

Nuisance is one of the most amorphous <strong>and</strong> protean areas of the law of torts. Classically,<br />

the common law divides up the law of nuisance into two categories: private <strong>and</strong> public. Private<br />

nuisances are unreasonable interferences with the use <strong>and</strong> enjoyment of l<strong>and</strong>. Public nuisances<br />

are unreasonable interferences with a right of the general public. Both doctrines rely heavily on<br />

conceptions of what counts as reasonable under the circumstances. In this sense, both doctrines<br />

share a lot in common with the law of negligence. But as we shall see, both doctrines also contain<br />

significant domains of strict or ostensibly strict liability.<br />

1. Private Nuisance<br />

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., 114 So. 2d 357 (Fla. App. 1959)<br />

PER CURIAM.<br />

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order temporarily enjoining the appellants from<br />

continuing with the construction of a fourteen-story addition to the Fontainebleau Hotel, owned<br />

<strong>and</strong> operated by the appellants. Appellee, plaintiff below, owns the Eden Roc Hotel, which was<br />

constructed in 1955, about a year after the Fontainebleau, <strong>and</strong> adjoins the Fontainebleau on the<br />

north. Both are luxury hotels, facing the Atlantic Ocean. The proposed addition to the<br />

Fontainebleau is being constructed twenty feet from its north property line, 130 feet from the<br />

mean high water mark of the Atlantic Ocean, <strong>and</strong> 76 feet 8 inches from the ocean bulkhead line.<br />

The 14-story tower will extend 160 feet above grade in height <strong>and</strong> is 416 feet long from east to<br />

west. During the winter months, from around two o’clock in the afternoon for the remainder of<br />

the day, the shadow of the addition will extend over the cabana, swimming pool, <strong>and</strong> sunbathing<br />

areas of the Eden Roc, which are located in the southern portion of its property.<br />

In this action, plaintiff-appellee sought to enjoin the defendants-appellants from<br />

proceeding with the construction of the addition to the Fontainebleau (it appears to have been<br />

roughly eight stories high at the time suit was filed), alleging that the construction would interfere<br />

with the light <strong>and</strong> air on the beach in front of the Eden Roc <strong>and</strong> cast a shadow of such size as to<br />

500

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!