06.09.2021 Views

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Witt & Tani, TCPI 1. Introduction<br />

those claims, <strong>and</strong> whether to withdraw from prosecuting them. The result is that almost all parties<br />

settle their disputes before trial.<br />

Settlement has been widespread in American tort law for as long as modern tort law has<br />

existed, for more than a century <strong>and</strong> a half, <strong>and</strong> there is reason to think settlement is growing even<br />

more common in the past fifty years. In 2003, the American Bar Association Litigation Section<br />

held a symposium titled The Vanishing Trial, which concluded that the “portion of federal civil<br />

cases resolved by federal trial fell from 11.5 percent [of all filings] in 1962 to 1.8 percent in<br />

2002.” Marc Galanter, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials <strong>and</strong> Related Matters in<br />

Federal <strong>and</strong> State Courts, 1 J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. 459, 459 (2004). Between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2012,<br />

a mere “0.56 percent or slightly more than one-half of one percent of all terminations” occurred<br />

by civil jury trials. Charles S. Coody, Vanishing Trial Skills, A.B.A. (May 22, 2013),<br />

https://perma.cc/QE5C-LPNS. The following chart, compiled by Marc Galanter, who led the<br />

ABA study, <strong>and</strong> his co-author, shows the stark picture of settlement in civil litigation generally:<br />

Percentage of Civil Terminations During or After Trial, U.S. District Courts, 1962-2010<br />

Source: Marc Galanter & Angela Frozena, The Continuing Decline of Civil Trials in American Courts, POUND<br />

CIVIL JUSTICE INST. 1, 3 (2011), https://perma.cc/9NFE-AP2M.<br />

Parties settle because, as the Vosburgs <strong>and</strong> Putneys learned, litigation is expensive <strong>and</strong><br />

time-consuming. Many parties are risk-averse; they have a preference for the certainty that<br />

settlement offers. Moreover, there is reason to think that on the plaintiffs’ side, lawyers paid on a<br />

contingency basis, as a percentage of any settlement or award, will have an interest in avoiding<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!