Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Griswold can be appended as evidence of commitment of faculty effort and institutional resources to the proposed PSSHM planning grant process. Summary and Scope The CGS/Ford project will provide grants to a significant number of member universities to participate in the collaborative research and demonstration project on professional master’s education. The core of the project is the development of models of professional master’s programs that serve specific employment needs of business, industry, government, and non-profit sectors. The models will provide additional insight into the trajectories of master’s education in relation to societal needs. We are hopeful that the results of this PSSHM planning/development project will provide a compelling basis for a second series of grants to implement some of the proposed PSSHM programs. CGS will make a maximum of 60 PSSHM planning grants of up to $6,000 across a broad range of social science and humanities disciplines in universities reflecting the variety of CGS member institutions: private and public; minority and majority serving; research/doctoral and master’s focused. This coverage will demonstrate most effectively the broad applicability of the concept of professional master’s education and provide sufficient numbers of models to attract the attention of colleagues and peers and to serve as templates for replication of the programs in other departments and institutions. Activities to be undertaken in the assessment and program planning process The grants will provide support for activities such as: • Contacting prospective non-academic employers and engaging them in a discussion with departmental faculty and institutional officers concerning the skills and backgrounds they expect of new employees and realistic projections of workforce needs for PSSHM graduates. • Establishing an external board to advise on curricular issues, offer information, serve as external mentors to PSSHM students, and sponsor internships for students in PSSHM programs. • Conducting information sessions/focus groups/surveys among likely pools of prospective PSSHM students in order to determine interest and to project enrollments. • Assessing institutional and departmental commitments to and capabilities of developing PSSHM programs, either by establishing new degree programs or by revising existing master’s degree programs and incorporating professional components. • Developing a proposal for implementing one or more model PSSHM programs, provided employer, student, faculty, and institutional support are sufficiently strong. The proposal will include a PSSHM curriculum with appropriate dis- 54
Composing a Proposal ciplinary core strength, components that develop high-level communications and professional skills, and employer commitments for internship experiences. A business plan will be required that includes projection of tuition appropriate for the applicant pools, contributions for program funding from employers and the institution, internship stipends/salaries, and other revenue sources that allow the program to be developed and sustained at a cost acceptable to the institution. Application materials for an assessment and planning grant Institutions are encouraged to submit proposals for as many as three PSSHM assessment and planning grants per institution. The body of the proposals for each program area should not exceed five pages 2 . The proposals must: • Demonstrate an interest in and commitment to master’s education by faculty and the institution, including appropriate credit for faculty through the university review and reward system • Propose strategies to seek the participation of minorities and other underrepresented groups • Commit appropriate matching funds and effort to accomplish the goals of the planning grant: in most cases we anticipate these goals would include a proposal to create a PSSHM program • Indicate an interest in establishing PSSHM programs in two or more departments • List activities to be used to determine needs, interest, and institutional capacity for developing PSSHM programs Appended material as required to: • Document that faculty from departments that would be most likely to develop PSSHM proposals are committed to the project (department letters that express interest in and commit faculty efforts to the project are particularly relevant.) • Assure that the activities and intent of the grant are consistent with and complementary to the institutional mission and strategic plans (a letter of endorsement by the chief academic officer or president would be particularly useful.) • Provide evidence of endorsement by the graduate school (a letter from the graduate dean or other person responsible for graduate education at the institution.) Project time-line July 2003: CGS sends RFP to member institutions and posts on CGS website October 15, 2003: Deadline for response to RFP for CGS/Ford PSSHM planning grant 55
- Page 23 and 24: 1 The Great Instauration: Restoring
- Page 25 and 26: The Great Instauration Updated and
- Page 27 and 28: The Great Instauration 5. Action Co
- Page 29 and 30: The Great Instauration • Always t
- Page 31 and 32: The Great Instauration • Use case
- Page 33 and 34: The Great Instauration “The proce
- Page 35: The Great Instauration works cited
- Page 38 and 39: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 40 and 41: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 42 and 43: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 44 and 45: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 46 and 47: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 48 and 49: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 50 and 51: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 52 and 53: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 54 and 55: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 56 and 57: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 58 and 59: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 60 and 61: Griswold orientation meetings as ne
- Page 62 and 63: Griswold So at this point I had two
- Page 64 and 65: Griswold All the while I am hoping
- Page 66 and 67: Griswold anyone whose primary acade
- Page 68 and 69: Griswold pendix A). I dang well wan
- Page 70 and 71: Griswold Unfortunately, we were not
- Page 74 and 75: Griswold Oct.-Nov. 2003: Evaluation
- Page 76 and 77: Griswold such a program would confe
- Page 78 and 79: Griswold have been hired with exper
- Page 81 and 82: 4 Disciplinary Identities: Professi
- Page 83 and 84: Disciplinary Identities fessional w
- Page 85 and 86: Disciplinary Identities courses, th
- Page 87 and 88: Disciplinary Identities been genera
- Page 89 and 90: Disciplinary Identities sites for e
- Page 91 and 92: Disciplinary Identities ing others.
- Page 93 and 94: Disciplinary Identities responsibil
- Page 95 and 96: Disciplinary Identities well-known
- Page 97 and 98: Disciplinary Identities uncritical,
- Page 99 and 100: Disciplinary Identities departments
- Page 101 and 102: Disciplinary Identities has never,
- Page 103 and 104: Disciplinary Identities 2. Separate
- Page 105: evising
- Page 108 and 109: Ashe and Reilly question impressed
- Page 110 and 111: Ashe and Reilly humanities. In addi
- Page 112 and 113: Ashe and Reilly developing academic
- Page 114 and 115: Ashe and Reilly administrators may
- Page 116 and 117: Ashe and Reilly porate aspects of P
- Page 118 and 119: Ashe and Reilly requirements in the
- Page 120 and 121: Ashe and Reilly developing a system
Griswold<br />
can be appended as evidence of commitment of faculty effort <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />
resources to the proposed PSSHM plann<strong>in</strong>g grant process.<br />
Summary <strong>and</strong> Scope<br />
The CGS/Ford project will provide grants to a significant number of member universities<br />
to participate <strong>in</strong> the collaborative research <strong>and</strong> demonstration project on professional<br />
master’s education. The core of the project is the development of models of professional<br />
master’s programs that serve specific employment needs of bus<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />
government, <strong>and</strong> non-profit sectors. The models will provide additional <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
trajectories of master’s education <strong>in</strong> relation to societal needs. We are hopeful that the<br />
results of this PSSHM plann<strong>in</strong>g/development project will provide a compell<strong>in</strong>g basis for<br />
a second series of grants to implement some of the proposed PSSHM programs.<br />
CGS will make a maximum of 60 PSSHM plann<strong>in</strong>g grants of up to $6,000 across a<br />
broad range of social science <strong>and</strong> humanities discipl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> universities reflect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
variety of CGS member <strong>in</strong>stitutions: private <strong>and</strong> public; m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>and</strong> majority serv<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
research/doctoral <strong>and</strong> master’s focused. This coverage will demonstrate most effectively<br />
the broad applicability of the concept of professional master’s education <strong>and</strong> provide sufficient<br />
numbers of models to attract the attention of colleagues <strong>and</strong> peers <strong>and</strong> to serve as<br />
templates for replication of the programs <strong>in</strong> other departments <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />
Activities to be undertaken <strong>in</strong> the assessment <strong>and</strong> program plann<strong>in</strong>g process<br />
The grants will provide support for activities such as:<br />
• Contact<strong>in</strong>g prospective non-academic employers <strong>and</strong> engag<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> a discussion<br />
with departmental faculty <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional officers concern<strong>in</strong>g the skills <strong>and</strong><br />
backgrounds they expect of new employees <strong>and</strong> realistic projections of workforce<br />
needs for PSSHM graduates.<br />
• Establish<strong>in</strong>g an external board to advise on curricular issues, offer <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />
serve as external mentors to PSSHM students, <strong>and</strong> sponsor <strong>in</strong>ternships for students<br />
<strong>in</strong> PSSHM programs.<br />
• Conduct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation sessions/focus groups/surveys among likely pools of<br />
prospective PSSHM students <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>and</strong> to project enrollments.<br />
• Assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>and</strong> departmental commitments to <strong>and</strong> capabilities of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
PSSHM programs, either by establish<strong>in</strong>g new degree programs or by<br />
revis<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g master’s degree programs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g professional components.<br />
• Develop<strong>in</strong>g a proposal for implement<strong>in</strong>g one or more model PSSHM programs,<br />
provided employer, student, faculty, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional support are sufficiently<br />
strong. The proposal will <strong>in</strong>clude a PSSHM curriculum with appropriate dis-<br />
54