06.09.2021 Views

Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a

Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a

Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 Models of <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g / <strong>Technical</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration: Reflections of a Serial Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator at<br />

Syracuse University<br />

Carol Lipson<br />

Over a thirty-year career at Syracuse University, I have been <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up programs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g (PTW) more<br />

than once, <strong>and</strong> I have also had some <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g lay the groundwork<br />

for two other programs. The contexts for these various experiences differed<br />

greatly, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> all cases local circumstances <strong>and</strong> negotiation of immediate<br />

local <strong>and</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g campus cultures had a lot to do with the outcome<br />

of such efforts. My reflections <strong>in</strong> the pages that follow attempt to expla<strong>in</strong><br />

through example the complex ways that programs are based on human networks,<br />

not on theory <strong>and</strong> scholarship alone. I try to provide a sense of the<br />

decisions I made as I determ<strong>in</strong>ed how best to function with<strong>in</strong> the different<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

The programs I’ve helped develop <strong>and</strong> worked with<strong>in</strong> illustrate two<br />

major frameworks. The first <strong>in</strong>volves develop<strong>in</strong>g a PTW program with<strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional culture whose leadership structure encourages the separation<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence of program/course leaders. The <strong>in</strong>dividual responsibilities<br />

of such leaders are segregated (<strong>in</strong> my case, separate program leaders <strong>in</strong> technical<br />

writ<strong>in</strong>g, composition, <strong>and</strong> English as a Second Language). The <strong>in</strong>tellectual,<br />

pedagogical <strong>and</strong> curricular agendas are developed <strong>in</strong>dependently, <strong>and</strong><br />

they affect one another only tangentially. The second major framework is one<br />

<strong>in</strong> which the various str<strong>and</strong>s of writ<strong>in</strong>g—composition/rhetoric <strong>and</strong> technical<br />

writ<strong>in</strong>g, for <strong>in</strong>stance—are <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed. The responsibility for leadership<br />

of each program is more distributed, less hierarchal. While neither of these<br />

approaches is <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> a particular department structure, the first is more<br />

common <strong>in</strong> English departments, where no strong tradition exists of collaboration<br />

<strong>in</strong> scholarship, teach<strong>in</strong>g, or adm<strong>in</strong>istration. And though the second<br />

framework is more common to <strong>in</strong>dependent writ<strong>in</strong>g programs, my experience<br />

makes clear that writ<strong>in</strong>g program leaders can assume power <strong>in</strong> multiple ways,<br />

<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g totally different degrees of collaboration with <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement of<br />

others. Both frameworks provide opportunities <strong>and</strong> both <strong>in</strong>volve difficulties.<br />

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2010.2348.2.16<br />

297

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!