Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Reid to be evaluated, which need to be edited, and so on. A project management application, like 37signal’s Basecamp, would greatly reduce both work load and cognitive load. Charman’s idea is to turn these individuals into “evangelists” for the application’s use and eventually into trainers. This might work out a little differently on the student level. However, to continue my example, if the student editor of the literary magazine started using Basecamp and convinced other students to use it as well, they would quickly discover whether or not the application did make their lives easier. If so, they might start experimenting with using it for other purposes. With this bottom-up approach, it is important at this point that someone from the top does not come down and restrict these uses. If the students use the application to plan a party, or for other non-academic social purposes, this should be encouraged or at least not discouraged. Simultaneously, one would seek to foster adoption among instructors and faculty, perhaps pointing out how project management software might help with managing longer, multi-assignment, projects in the classroom. It might also benefit full-time faculty with other service obligations like tracking curriculum development or assessment. Thus, when Basecamp is introduced into a classroom a number of the students might already know the application and have positive associations with it. These students can help the instructor by supporting the other students. Likewise, more experienced users among the instructors and faculty can serve as an informal resource for their colleagues. Of course, such work can only go so far without some top-down support. Student use must be supported by instructors and faculty, both by incorporating the application into coursework and encouraging non-academic uses the students discover. Likewise, instructors and faculty need support from administrators. They need the work they do to learn new technologies and incorporate them into teaching to be recognized and rewarded in their personnel evaluations. They need the service they provide as trainers and as support resources to be factored into their workload. As Charman point out, it’s also important that the adoption of a new technology be reflected in the institutional hierarchy and its daily workings. It’s difficult to encourage students to use electronic communication if the teacher always responds on paper. Likewise, faculty will find it difficult to value a new mode of information sharing, like a wiki for example, if the department chair keeps sending out paper memos or even emails. Furthermore, these initial users-turned-trainers will eventually need assistance from the college’s formal technical support personnel. As adoption of an application grows, the college’s support professionals will be more generally available to answer questions from students in their dorm rooms and faculty at home. In other words, at some point, a bottom-up approach will stall out unless 270
The Write Brain it is affirmed by some clear signal coming down the institutional structure. Ross Mayfield refers to this coming together of the bottom and top as the creation of a “middlespace.” While faculty development and the challenges of adopting new technologies may seem tangential to the curricular goals of Professional Writing, these issues actually fit in quite well. Indeed, as Jon Udell’s articulation of screencasting describes, one of the growing needs in his industry is for writers who can not only perform the “technical writer” task of describing an application’s various functions but also can succeed at the more creative challenge of reaching potential users and helping them to envision how a new application might fit into their social practices. This rhetorical goal, put more generally, is part of the skill set Daniel Pink identifies for workers in the post-knowledge economy: the ability to empathize with users and design powerful user experiences. The task of fostering the adoption of emerging technologies within an undergraduate program becomes one instance of the rhetorical work graduates will later find themselves doing. moving forward The Web 2.0 technologies I’ve been describing here are the current emerging technologies. Indeed blogs and wikis have been around for several years. EDUCAUSE and the New Media Consortium produce an annual “Horizon Report,” which identifies emerging technologies. In that report, they identify the technologies I have been discussing as those that are currently being implemented or will be implemented in higher education in the next year or so. Beyond that, they point to the growing functionality of mobile phones and the influence of educational gaming in the next two to three years; and the implementation of what they term “augmented reality,” “enhanced visualization,” and “context-aware environments and devices” in the next three to five years. Most of these latter technologies are already seeing use in the sciences, medicine, and engineering. The role they will play in Professional Writing curricula is obviously uncertain. This does not mean that current technologies will fade away, though it is likely they will change. It is not too difficult to imagine how a podcast or wiki might evolve to work with a mobile phone or in a “context-aware” environment. And with a little imagination, one can see how these folksonomic information structures might operate using a game-like interface or via three-dimensional, virtual modeling. Regardless, inasmuch as these emerging technologies compose, design, communicate, and organize information for user experiences, they will have rhetorical elements that our discipline will be able to address. And 271
- Page 238 and 239: Ballentine engineering schools and
- Page 240 and 241: Ballentine engineers outside of the
- Page 242 and 243: Ballentine However, as student grou
- Page 244 and 245: Ballentine want to know more about
- Page 246 and 247: Ballentine Client Letter The letter
- Page 248 and 249: Ballentine and implementation. Natu
- Page 250 and 251: Ballentine Most English departments
- Page 252 and 253: Ballentine Regardless of these indu
- Page 254 and 255: Ballentine unique attributes. Regar
- Page 256 and 257: Ballentine 25 Florman, Samel C. The
- Page 259: futures
- Page 262 and 263: Di Renzo Greater Expectations: A Ne
- Page 264 and 265: Di Renzo for that site, decisions w
- Page 266 and 267: Di Renzo ultimately is impossible (
- Page 268 and 269: Di Renzo Great Society. In the resu
- Page 270 and 271: Di Renzo and screaming, from the cl
- Page 273 and 274: 14 The Write Brain: Professional Wr
- Page 275 and 276: The Write Brain foundation of our k
- Page 277 and 278: The Write Brain of media and the id
- Page 279 and 280: The Write Brain tween design and fu
- Page 281 and 282: The Write Brain most interesting ap
- Page 283 and 284: The Write Brain that one can chart
- Page 285 and 286: The Write Brain the faculty develop
- Page 287: The Write Brain uses for new techno
- Page 291 and 292: The Write Brain com) is an example
- Page 293: post-scripts by veteran program des
- Page 296 and 297: Dubinsky I wish I could promise tha
- Page 298 and 299: Dubinsky sional writing, unlike man
- Page 300 and 301: Dubinsky During conversations with
- Page 302 and 303: Dubinsky to use for support, we the
- Page 304 and 305: Dubinsky The funding enabled us to
- Page 306 and 307: Dubinsky educational leadership / o
- Page 308 and 309: Dubinsky periential learning. I arg
- Page 310 and 311: Dubinsky currency. Service-learning
- Page 312 and 313: Dubinsky notes 1 In 1998, the depar
- Page 314 and 315: Dubinsky Norstedt, Johann, and Joyc
- Page 316 and 317: Lipson My goal here is not to recom
- Page 318 and 319: Lipson faculty having scholarly int
- Page 320 and 321: Lipson It is important to note, how
- Page 322 and 323: Lipson tenure-track faculty to crea
- Page 324 and 325: Lipson and in more recent years of
- Page 326 and 327: Lipson toral-student cadres. One ha
- Page 328 and 329: Lipson ways. In the first instance,
- Page 330 and 331: Lipson that it would be less expens
- Page 332 and 333: Lipson time to time. My sense is th
- Page 335 and 336: Biographical Notes Diana L. Ashe is
- Page 337 and 338: Biographical Notes 1989 he has taug
The Write Bra<strong>in</strong><br />
it is affirmed by some clear signal com<strong>in</strong>g down the <strong>in</strong>stitutional structure. Ross<br />
Mayfield refers to this com<strong>in</strong>g together of the bottom <strong>and</strong> top as the creation of<br />
a “middlespace.”<br />
While faculty development <strong>and</strong> the challenges of adopt<strong>in</strong>g new technologies<br />
may seem tangential to the curricular goals of <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
these issues actually fit <strong>in</strong> quite well. Indeed, as Jon Udell’s articulation of screencast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
describes, one of the grow<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>in</strong> his <strong>in</strong>dustry is for writers who<br />
can not only perform the “technical writer” task of describ<strong>in</strong>g an application’s<br />
various functions but also can succeed at the more creative challenge of reach<strong>in</strong>g<br />
potential users <strong>and</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g them to envision how a new application might fit<br />
<strong>in</strong>to their social practices. This rhetorical goal, put more generally, is part of the<br />
skill set Daniel P<strong>in</strong>k identifies for workers <strong>in</strong> the post-knowledge economy: the<br />
ability to empathize with users <strong>and</strong> design powerful user experiences. The task<br />
of foster<strong>in</strong>g the adoption of emerg<strong>in</strong>g technologies with<strong>in</strong> an undergraduate<br />
program becomes one <strong>in</strong>stance of the rhetorical work graduates will later f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
themselves do<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
mov<strong>in</strong>g forward<br />
The Web 2.0 technologies I’ve been describ<strong>in</strong>g here are the current<br />
emerg<strong>in</strong>g technologies. Indeed blogs <strong>and</strong> wikis have been around for several<br />
years. EDUCAUSE <strong>and</strong> the New Media Consortium produce an annual “Horizon<br />
Report,” which identifies emerg<strong>in</strong>g technologies. In that report, they identify<br />
the technologies I have been discuss<strong>in</strong>g as those that are currently be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
implemented or will be implemented <strong>in</strong> higher education <strong>in</strong> the next year or so.<br />
Beyond that, they po<strong>in</strong>t to the grow<strong>in</strong>g functionality of mobile phones <strong>and</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence of educational gam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the next two to three years; <strong>and</strong> the implementation<br />
of what they term “augmented reality,” “enhanced visualization,” <strong>and</strong><br />
“context-aware environments <strong>and</strong> devices” <strong>in</strong> the next three to five years. Most<br />
of these latter technologies are already see<strong>in</strong>g use <strong>in</strong> the sciences, medic<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>and</strong><br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. The role they will play <strong>in</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g curricula is obviously<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>. This does not mean that current technologies will fade away, though<br />
it is likely they will change. It is not too difficult to imag<strong>in</strong>e how a podcast or<br />
wiki might evolve to work with a mobile phone or <strong>in</strong> a “context-aware” environment.<br />
And with a little imag<strong>in</strong>ation, one can see how these folksonomic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
structures might operate us<strong>in</strong>g a game-like <strong>in</strong>terface or via three-dimensional,<br />
virtual model<strong>in</strong>g. Regardless, <strong>in</strong>asmuch as these emerg<strong>in</strong>g technologies<br />
compose, design, communicate, <strong>and</strong> organize <strong>in</strong>formation for user experiences,<br />
they will have rhetorical elements that our discipl<strong>in</strong>e will be able to address. And<br />
271