Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
14 The Write Bra<strong>in</strong>: <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Post-<br />
Knowledge Economy<br />
Alex Reid<br />
The <strong>in</strong>clusion of computer technology <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g degrees is hardly<br />
new. Indeed it is the hallmark of technical writ<strong>in</strong>g degrees. While the history<br />
of technical writ<strong>in</strong>g follows the rise of our <strong>in</strong>dustrial economy, technical writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is a prototypical career of the post-<strong>in</strong>dustrial, knowledge economy. <strong>Technical</strong><br />
writers—like the eng<strong>in</strong>eers, computer programmers, lawyers, accountants,<br />
<strong>and</strong> other experts whose knowledge they translate—have played an important<br />
role <strong>in</strong> the professional world of the last thirty years. However, today, the jobs<br />
of the knowledge economy, like <strong>in</strong>dustrial jobs before them, are mov<strong>in</strong>g overseas.<br />
While these jobs will not disappear overnight, <strong>in</strong> design<strong>in</strong>g a professional<br />
writ<strong>in</strong>g curriculum, it is important to anticipate the chang<strong>in</strong>g requirements of<br />
our field as we move toward a “post-knowledge” economy. As I describe <strong>in</strong> this<br />
chapter, this future is one that will require not only solid technical skills but also<br />
strong creative <strong>and</strong> rhetorical abilities to empathize with, <strong>and</strong> design powerful<br />
experiences for, a variety of audiences/users. In this context, we have built our<br />
professional writ<strong>in</strong>g curriculum partly upon the traditions of technical writ<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
while also draw<strong>in</strong>g from creative writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> journalism <strong>and</strong> more generally<br />
from the discipl<strong>in</strong>e of rhetoric <strong>and</strong> composition. We have also looked beyond<br />
our discipl<strong>in</strong>e for the teach<strong>in</strong>g of media production, multimedia design, <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation management.<br />
In do<strong>in</strong>g so however, we f<strong>in</strong>d ourselves pressured from two ends. We<br />
foresee a marketplace seek<strong>in</strong>g a more sophisticated, creative, <strong>and</strong> technologically<br />
proficient writer, but we encounter <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g students with an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
need for <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> what we have traditionally viewed as fundamental<br />
skills <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g. In this situation, we cannot simply add new curriculum onto<br />
our exist<strong>in</strong>g professional writ<strong>in</strong>g curriculum. To do so would establish an exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
curriculum with escalat<strong>in</strong>g credit hours (someth<strong>in</strong>g undesirable for<br />
our students <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly unmanageable for a small faculty). Instead, we<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d ourselves with the task of build<strong>in</strong>g a curriculum that blends the emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
expectations of professional writ<strong>in</strong>g with more traditional models of technical<br />
communication <strong>and</strong> advanced writ<strong>in</strong>g genres. Rather than th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of creative<br />
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2010.2348.2.14<br />
255