Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Edminster and Mara generative of innovative, hybrid instructional methods and artifacts like our online graduate certificate program. Bhabha’s description of the cultural ‘beyond’ that humanity found itself seeking at the twentieth century is illuminating for us as well. We see that as education moves online, the culture of the academy finds itself in a space/time transition analogous to that which Bhabha characterizes: We find ourselves in the moment of transit where space and time cross to produce complex figures of difference and identity, past and present, inside and outside, inclusion and exclusion. For there is a sense of disorientation, a disturbance of direction, in the ‘beyond’: an exploratory, restless movement caught so well in the French rendition of the words au-dela—here and there, on all sides . . . hither and thither, back and forth (1). As members of the academy we find it useful to analyze the subject position of traditional, face-to-face education and its claim to “original” identity among other forms of learning. This analysis will help us “to think beyond narratives of originary and initial subjectivites and to focus on those moments or processes that are produced in the articulation of . . . differences” (1). We see our online graduate certificate program as an ‘articulation of difference’—a collaborative, interstitial space capable of generating an alternative identity for our program. This identity cannot and should not be prescribed by us, but will be shaped by that restless, exploratory, back and forth movement Bhabha describes—a movement emerging from the disorientation and disturbance of direction experienced within our program, the English Department, and the university as we seek our own ‘beyond’ in the world of online education. There are at least two interstices (Bhabha defines interstices as “the overlap and displacement of domains of difference”) that our certificate program problematizes (2). One is the interstice that emerges from the border drawn between the English Department and the Department of Continuing Education. The other is the interstice generated by the border drawn around the programs of Scientific and Technical Communication and the English Department. We see our online graduate certificate program as a cultural hybridity—an artifact that is emerging in the moment of historical transformation that is online education. We want to exploit the “productive ambivalence” of online education as “Other”—to reveal the boundaries of traditional education’s master narratives and to transgress these boundaries from the space of “otherness” that online education has been constructed as within the academic community. 200
Reinventing Audience through Distance conclusion At the same time we use the certificate to help us articulate a new identity for our program from an interstitial perspective, we also seek a new solidarity and community with other programs in the department, such as Rhetoric and Writing, from this interstitial perspective. On the one hand, we want to claim program agency from the in-between space of the overlapping domains of difference out of which our identity has been constructed by the colonial moves of English studies. On the other hand, we want to explore the imaginary of spatial distance—to live beyond the dual borderlands of traditional education/online education, and technical communication/English studies. Toward these ends, we have successfully negotiated our institutional bureaucracy and received approval from the Graduate College to accept applications for admission to the certificate program. The program is advertised on the university website at both the Graduate College pages (link) and the Continuing Education pages (link). As such, these two links effectively serve as doorways into an as-yet-unnegotiated program space. So as we wait for applicants to materialize and triangulate these conceptual spaces, we continue to reinvent our institution through the perspective of a distant audience. works cited Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1994. Duan, Ping and Weiping Gu. “The Development of Technical Communication in China’s Universities.” Technical Communication 52.4 (2005): 434-48. Inquiry, Engagement, and Achievement: The Bowling Green State University Academic Plan. 2005. 22 February, 2006. Kent, Thomas. Paralogic Rhetoric: A Theory of Communicative Interaction. Lewisburg, Bucknell University Press, 1993 Kynell, Theresa. “Technical Communication: Where Have We Been?” Technical Communication Quarterly 8.2 (1999): 143-151. Longo, Bernadette. Spurious Coin. New York: SUNY Press, 2000. Lovitt, Carl. “Rethinking the Role of Culture in International Professional Communication.” Exploring the Rhetoric of International Communication. Ed. Carl R. Lovitt. New York: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., 1999. Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996. 201
- Page 167 and 168: Composing and Revising appendix c m
- Page 169: minors, certificates, engineering
- Page 172 and 173: Nugent certificate programs are pot
- Page 174 and 175: Nugent and it simultaneously—not
- Page 176 and 177: Nugent For each of the sixty-two ce
- Page 178 and 179: Nugent nally, over a third of progr
- Page 180 and 181: Nugent Management Project Managemen
- Page 182 and 183: Nugent • 38% of respondents (10)
- Page 184 and 185: Nugent theory addresses this concer
- Page 186 and 187: Nugent invaluable theoretical model
- Page 188 and 189: Nugent Savage, Gerald J. “The Pro
- Page 190 and 191: Kungl and Hathaway edge, judgment,
- Page 192 and 193: Kungl and Hathaway ideas. That facu
- Page 194 and 195: Kungl and Hathaway minor. To insure
- Page 196 and 197: Kungl and Hathaway we found both we
- Page 198 and 199: Kungl and Hathaway amount of math a
- Page 200 and 201: Kungl and Hathaway We outlined four
- Page 202 and 203: Kungl and Hathaway classes. The uni
- Page 204 and 205: Kungl and Hathaway • starting fif
- Page 207 and 208: 10 Reinventing Audience through Dis
- Page 209 and 210: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 211 and 212: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 213 and 214: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 215 and 216: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 217: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 222 and 223: Parker accreditation board. And thi
- Page 224 and 225: Parker So, all in all, the effort t
- Page 226 and 227: Parker T- Test • Evaluating the W
- Page 228 and 229: Parker figure 2: the collaborative
- Page 230 and 231: Parker place. It nonetheless provid
- Page 232 and 233: Parker Canadian scholars focus on a
- Page 234 and 235: Parker Duin, A.H. “Computer-Suppo
- Page 236 and 237: Parker Trzyna, T. & Batschelet, M.W
- Page 238 and 239: Ballentine engineering schools and
- Page 240 and 241: Ballentine engineers outside of the
- Page 242 and 243: Ballentine However, as student grou
- Page 244 and 245: Ballentine want to know more about
- Page 246 and 247: Ballentine Client Letter The letter
- Page 248 and 249: Ballentine and implementation. Natu
- Page 250 and 251: Ballentine Most English departments
- Page 252 and 253: Ballentine Regardless of these indu
- Page 254 and 255: Ballentine unique attributes. Regar
- Page 256 and 257: Ballentine 25 Florman, Samel C. The
- Page 259: futures
- Page 262 and 263: Di Renzo Greater Expectations: A Ne
- Page 264 and 265: Di Renzo for that site, decisions w
- Page 266 and 267: Di Renzo ultimately is impossible (
Edm<strong>in</strong>ster <strong>and</strong> Mara<br />
generative of <strong>in</strong>novative, hybrid <strong>in</strong>structional methods <strong>and</strong> artifacts like our<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e graduate certificate program.<br />
Bhabha’s description of the cultural ‘beyond’ that humanity found itself<br />
seek<strong>in</strong>g at the twentieth century is illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g for us as well. We see that as<br />
education moves onl<strong>in</strong>e, the culture of the academy f<strong>in</strong>ds itself <strong>in</strong> a space/time<br />
transition analogous to that which Bhabha characterizes:<br />
We f<strong>in</strong>d ourselves <strong>in</strong> the moment of transit where space <strong>and</strong> time cross to<br />
produce complex figures of difference <strong>and</strong> identity, past <strong>and</strong> present, <strong>in</strong>side<br />
<strong>and</strong> outside, <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>and</strong> exclusion. For there is a sense of disorientation, a<br />
disturbance of direction, <strong>in</strong> the ‘beyond’: an exploratory, restless movement<br />
caught so well <strong>in</strong> the French rendition of the words au-dela—here <strong>and</strong> there,<br />
on all sides . . . hither <strong>and</strong> thither, back <strong>and</strong> forth (1).<br />
As members of the academy we f<strong>in</strong>d it useful to analyze the subject position of<br />
traditional, face-to-face education <strong>and</strong> its claim to “orig<strong>in</strong>al” identity among<br />
other forms of learn<strong>in</strong>g. This analysis will help us “to th<strong>in</strong>k beyond narratives of<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial subjectivites <strong>and</strong> to focus on those moments or processes<br />
that are produced <strong>in</strong> the articulation of . . . differences” (1). We see our onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
graduate certificate program as an ‘articulation of difference’—a collaborative,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terstitial space capable of generat<strong>in</strong>g an alternative identity for our program.<br />
This identity cannot <strong>and</strong> should not be prescribed by us, but will be shaped by<br />
that restless, exploratory, back <strong>and</strong> forth movement Bhabha describes—a movement<br />
emerg<strong>in</strong>g from the disorientation <strong>and</strong> disturbance of direction experienced<br />
with<strong>in</strong> our program, the English Department, <strong>and</strong> the university as we seek our<br />
own ‘beyond’ <strong>in</strong> the world of onl<strong>in</strong>e education.<br />
There are at least two <strong>in</strong>terstices (Bhabha def<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>terstices as “the overlap<br />
<strong>and</strong> displacement of doma<strong>in</strong>s of difference”) that our certificate program<br />
problematizes (2). One is the <strong>in</strong>terstice that emerges from the border drawn between<br />
the English Department <strong>and</strong> the Department of Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Education.<br />
The other is the <strong>in</strong>terstice generated by the border drawn around the programs<br />
of Scientific <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> Communication <strong>and</strong> the English Department. We<br />
see our onl<strong>in</strong>e graduate certificate program as a cultural hybridity—an artifact<br />
that is emerg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the moment of historical transformation that is onl<strong>in</strong>e education.<br />
We want to exploit the “productive ambivalence” of onl<strong>in</strong>e education as<br />
“Other”—to reveal the boundaries of traditional education’s master narratives<br />
<strong>and</strong> to transgress these boundaries from the space of “otherness” that onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
education has been constructed as with<strong>in</strong> the academic community.<br />
200