Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Shippensburg University’s <strong>Technical</strong> / <strong>Professional</strong> Communications M<strong>in</strong>or<br />
ment was one of the departments that spearheaded the proposal, we did not<br />
have the <strong>in</strong>tention or the desire for it to be particularly our m<strong>in</strong>or. There is<br />
question as to whether even a “regular” technical writ<strong>in</strong>g or communication program<br />
should be housed <strong>in</strong> the English Departments of universities, as MacNealy<br />
<strong>and</strong> Heaton describe <strong>in</strong> “Can this Marriage be Saved?” Their survey questions<br />
where the right home for such programs is, based on the difficulties that some<br />
technical communication faculty members have <strong>in</strong> English departments, where<br />
they get neither respect nor support from their colleagues. One of the solutions<br />
these authors propose is to make the program <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary, a choice “which<br />
would seem to suit a large group of respondents <strong>in</strong> our survey” (58). Thus, while<br />
a revolv<strong>in</strong>g directorship serves the practical function of lessen<strong>in</strong>g possible stra<strong>in</strong><br />
on departments, it also <strong>in</strong>sures the long-term <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary character <strong>and</strong><br />
ownership of the program.<br />
Our proposal for the <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>Technical</strong>/<strong>Professional</strong> Communications<br />
M<strong>in</strong>or passed university review <strong>in</strong> Fall 2001. However, it sat unresponded<br />
to for a year <strong>and</strong> a half <strong>in</strong> our State System’s Chancellor’s office. When<br />
it was f<strong>in</strong>ally readdressed, we took the opportunity to update the <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><br />
it <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> on our vision of its apparatus. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> the Spr<strong>in</strong>g of 2003, we<br />
were given approval to beg<strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>or.<br />
The next section, focus<strong>in</strong>g specifically on revisions to our orig<strong>in</strong>al proposal,<br />
describes the overall rationale for creat<strong>in</strong>g a totally new professional communications<br />
m<strong>in</strong>or. It discusses the strategies we used to support our claim for<br />
the need for this type of program, through analyz<strong>in</strong>g both other colleges’ programs<br />
<strong>and</strong> student need, <strong>and</strong> our plan for the program’s assessment.<br />
program rationale<br />
In our orig<strong>in</strong>al proposal from the Fall of 1999, we completed a survey of<br />
area colleges (with<strong>in</strong> a one hundred mile radius) to see what k<strong>in</strong>ds of courses or<br />
programs <strong>in</strong> technical communication they had. One of our concerns was that<br />
after two years, our rationale for the program’s importance <strong>and</strong> the area’s need<br />
for it was a little outdated. We set out to prove our m<strong>in</strong>or was now even more <strong>in</strong><br />
dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Show<strong>in</strong>g Need for the Program<br />
In updat<strong>in</strong>g our proposal, we exp<strong>and</strong>ed our hunt for technical communication<br />
programs to all schools <strong>in</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Baltimore area. We<br />
discovered that several area colleges were now offer<strong>in</strong>g either tracks with<strong>in</strong> a major<br />
or an actual degree <strong>in</strong> <strong>Technical</strong>, <strong>Professional</strong>, or Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Writ<strong>in</strong>g, a fact that<br />
177