Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Nugent Savage, Gerald J. “The Process and Prospects for Professionalizing Technical Communication.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 29.4 (1999): 355–381. Savage, Gerald J. “Tricksters, Fools, and Sophists: Technical Communication as Postmodern Rhetoric.” Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Volume II: Strategies for Professional Status. Ed. Teresa Kynell-Hunt, and Gerald J. Savage. Baywood’s Technical Communications Series. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 2003. 167–193. Scott, Blake J. “Sophistic Ethics in the Technical Communication Classroom: Teaching Nomos, Deliberation, and Action.” Technical Communication Quarterly 4.2 (1995): 187–199. Society for Technical Communication Academic Programs Database. 2004. Society for Technical Communication. August 2004 . Yee, Carole. “Can We Be Partners?: Industry/Corporate Advisory Boards for Academic Technical Communication Programs.” Publications Management: Essays for Professional Communicators. Ed. Jane O. Allen and Lynn H. Deming. Baywood’s Technical Communications Series. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 1994. Zimmerman, Donald E., and Marilee Long. “Exploring the Technical Communicator’s Roles: Implications for Program Design.” Technical Communication Quarterly 2.3 (1993): 301–317. 170
9 Shippensburg University’s Technical / Professional Communications Minor: A Multidisciplinary Approach Carla Kungl S. Dev Hathaway To meet increasing student interest in technical and professional opportunities for post-graduate career preparation, Shippensburg University, PA, has recently developed an interdisciplinary Technical/Professional Communications Minor, bringing together a variety of pertinent courses from across the college curriculum and organizing them into a minor that is substantive, coherent, and flexible. This article discusses the development and implementation of Shippensburg University’s new interdisciplinary minor. While the program’s final structure sprung primarily from necessity, its multidisciplinary status will allow our students to reap many unforeseen benefits. We feel this program could be a successful model for other smaller schools to follow, schools that have neither the student numbers nor the resources to begin their own majors or minors in technical communications. background: who we are Shippensburg University is a public university in the State System of Pennsylvania of about 6600 students. We attract an increasingly competitive student body, with SATs averaging about 1100. Most are from across Pennsylvania, and a number are from rural areas and are first-generation college students, who especially see college as an important and vital step in preparing for a professional career. At the same time, our university is committed to its traditional liberal arts curricula: we maintain a strong general education program, expose students to many fields of inquiry, and encourage close faculty-student relationships and community service. Thus, though the English Department felt pressures (from an array of sources which I’ll discuss) to provide a more “professional” education—to teach more overtly the workplace skills our students might need—our faculty believed whole-heartedly that our liberal education was best suited to instill the knowl- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2010.2348.2.09 171
- Page 137 and 138: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance a
- Page 139 and 140: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance in
- Page 141 and 142: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance co
- Page 143 and 144: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance We
- Page 145 and 146: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance ma
- Page 147 and 148: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance an
- Page 149 and 150: 7 Composing and Revising the Profes
- Page 151 and 152: Composing and Revising two years th
- Page 153 and 154: Composing and Revising I saw the pr
- Page 155 and 156: Composing and Revising we’ve work
- Page 157 and 158: Composing and Revising their lives
- Page 159 and 160: Composing and Revising the solely p
- Page 161 and 162: Composing and Revising his request.
- Page 163 and 164: Composing and Revising appendix a m
- Page 165 and 166: Composing and Revising appendix b m
- Page 167 and 168: Composing and Revising appendix c m
- Page 169: minors, certificates, engineering
- Page 172 and 173: Nugent certificate programs are pot
- Page 174 and 175: Nugent and it simultaneously—not
- Page 176 and 177: Nugent For each of the sixty-two ce
- Page 178 and 179: Nugent nally, over a third of progr
- Page 180 and 181: Nugent Management Project Managemen
- Page 182 and 183: Nugent • 38% of respondents (10)
- Page 184 and 185: Nugent theory addresses this concer
- Page 186 and 187: Nugent invaluable theoretical model
- Page 190 and 191: Kungl and Hathaway edge, judgment,
- Page 192 and 193: Kungl and Hathaway ideas. That facu
- Page 194 and 195: Kungl and Hathaway minor. To insure
- Page 196 and 197: Kungl and Hathaway we found both we
- Page 198 and 199: Kungl and Hathaway amount of math a
- Page 200 and 201: Kungl and Hathaway We outlined four
- Page 202 and 203: Kungl and Hathaway classes. The uni
- Page 204 and 205: Kungl and Hathaway • starting fif
- Page 207 and 208: 10 Reinventing Audience through Dis
- Page 209 and 210: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 211 and 212: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 213 and 214: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 215 and 216: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 217 and 218: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 219: Reinventing Audience through Distan
- Page 222 and 223: Parker accreditation board. And thi
- Page 224 and 225: Parker So, all in all, the effort t
- Page 226 and 227: Parker T- Test • Evaluating the W
- Page 228 and 229: Parker figure 2: the collaborative
- Page 230 and 231: Parker place. It nonetheless provid
- Page 232 and 233: Parker Canadian scholars focus on a
- Page 234 and 235: Parker Duin, A.H. “Computer-Suppo
- Page 236 and 237: Parker Trzyna, T. & Batschelet, M.W
9 Shippensburg University’s <strong>Technical</strong> / <strong>Professional</strong><br />
Communications M<strong>in</strong>or: A Multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
Approach<br />
Carla Kungl<br />
S. Dev Hathaway<br />
To meet <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g student <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> technical <strong>and</strong> professional opportunities<br />
for post-graduate career preparation, Shippensburg University, PA, has<br />
recently developed an <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>Technical</strong>/<strong>Professional</strong> Communications<br />
M<strong>in</strong>or, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together a variety of pert<strong>in</strong>ent courses from across the college<br />
curriculum <strong>and</strong> organiz<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong>to a m<strong>in</strong>or that is substantive, coherent, <strong>and</strong><br />
flexible. This article discusses the development <strong>and</strong> implementation of Shippensburg<br />
University’s new <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary m<strong>in</strong>or. While the program’s f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
structure sprung primarily from necessity, its multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary status will allow<br />
our students to reap many unforeseen benefits. We feel this program could be<br />
a successful model for other smaller schools to follow, schools that have neither<br />
the student numbers nor the resources to beg<strong>in</strong> their own majors or m<strong>in</strong>ors <strong>in</strong><br />
technical communications.<br />
background: who we are<br />
Shippensburg University is a public university <strong>in</strong> the State System of<br />
Pennsylvania of about 6600 students. We attract an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly competitive<br />
student body, with SATs averag<strong>in</strong>g about 1100. Most are from across Pennsylvania,<br />
<strong>and</strong> a number are from rural areas <strong>and</strong> are first-generation college students,<br />
who especially see college as an important <strong>and</strong> vital step <strong>in</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g for a professional<br />
career. At the same time, our university is committed to its traditional<br />
liberal arts curricula: we ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a strong general education program, expose<br />
students to many fields of <strong>in</strong>quiry, <strong>and</strong> encourage close faculty-student relationships<br />
<strong>and</strong> community service.<br />
Thus, though the English Department felt pressures (from an array of<br />
sources which I’ll discuss) to provide a more “professional” education—to teach<br />
more overtly the workplace skills our students might need—our faculty believed<br />
whole-heartedly that our liberal education was best suited to <strong>in</strong>still the knowl-<br />
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2010.2348.2.09<br />
171