Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
6 Curriculum, Genre and Resistance: Revising Identity in a Professional Writing Community David Franke When I was invited to direct our Professional Writing major, the first steps were clear: my PTW colleagues and I were to find students, promote the program, and develop a curriculum. 1 Much of this work was informal and occasional—conversations in the elevator with the dean, talk in the mailroom. My colleagues and I were surprised, however, at how much of our time and energy was devoted to writing, and writing that was not exactly scholarly. Our subject-matter expertise played a much smaller role than our rhetorical ability: we learned quickly how to make a complex point simple, what points not to raise, and how to anticipate the niggling unasked questions of our readers. Functional writing, in prescribed genres, was how work got done: getting the program proposal to the bureaucratic center of our system in Albany, NY was a labyrinth in its own right, but then came the course proposal revisions, emails, funding requests, webpages, syllabi, memos, minutes, class-size projections, assignments, and the like, each of which serving as an “important lever” that allowed us to “advance our own interests and shape our meanings in relation to complex social systems” (Charles Bazerman 79). 2 As Bazerman says elsewhere, these genres are not cold and mechanical, but “forms of life, ways of being” (“Life,” 19). In other words, in a complex literate system such as a professional writing program, our ways of being—our behavior, our identity, our style—are strongly shaped by the way we engage with key administrative genres. In the pages that follow, I want to tell the story of our program’s evolution as embodied and enacted in our administrative writings, and I focus on the curriculum because it is the center of this web of genres. Although the curricular text we wrote is neither profound nor even very long, being nothing but a completely humorless and efficient page full of prerequisites and other technical paraphernalia, it defines the nature of our program and the way subsequent and linked genres are written. Once the curriculum is approved and published in the college catalog, we become animate. As the center of this “web” of genres, the curriculum is often printed (or downloaded) to a page or two of the college catalog, and it serves as a semi-legal document that gives sequence, shape, unity, themes, and minimums to students, providing them with a loose road map for how they can complete a degree in un- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2010.2348.2.06 113
- Page 81 and 82: 4 Disciplinary Identities: Professi
- Page 83 and 84: Disciplinary Identities fessional w
- Page 85 and 86: Disciplinary Identities courses, th
- Page 87 and 88: Disciplinary Identities been genera
- Page 89 and 90: Disciplinary Identities sites for e
- Page 91 and 92: Disciplinary Identities ing others.
- Page 93 and 94: Disciplinary Identities responsibil
- Page 95 and 96: Disciplinary Identities well-known
- Page 97 and 98: Disciplinary Identities uncritical,
- Page 99 and 100: Disciplinary Identities departments
- Page 101 and 102: Disciplinary Identities has never,
- Page 103 and 104: Disciplinary Identities 2. Separate
- Page 105: evising
- Page 108 and 109: Ashe and Reilly question impressed
- Page 110 and 111: Ashe and Reilly humanities. In addi
- Page 112 and 113: Ashe and Reilly developing academic
- Page 114 and 115: Ashe and Reilly administrators may
- Page 116 and 117: Ashe and Reilly porate aspects of P
- Page 118 and 119: Ashe and Reilly requirements in the
- Page 120 and 121: Ashe and Reilly developing a system
- Page 122 and 123: Ashe and Reilly to reduce congestio
- Page 124 and 125: Ashe and Reilly diverse student pop
- Page 126 and 127: Ashe and Reilly most onlookers, is
- Page 128 and 129: Ashe and Reilly Andrews, Deborah C.
- Page 132 and 133: Franke der four years. Most curricu
- Page 134 and 135: Franke students who will, in order
- Page 136 and 137: Franke student writers Students gen
- Page 138 and 139: Franke solving. When I asked these
- Page 140 and 141: Franke and meaning are made. It was
- Page 142 and 143: Franke a key, as in music, in which
- Page 144 and 145: Franke area, the possibility of joi
- Page 146 and 147: Franke read our curriculum for what
- Page 148 and 149: Franke Apple Computer: iTunes Unive
- Page 150 and 151: Pitts only barometer by which to ju
- Page 152 and 153: Pitts in the Humanities should refl
- Page 154 and 155: Pitts cross-disciplinary thinking a
- Page 156 and 157: Pitts to prospective majors and the
- Page 158 and 159: Pitts the case in other departments
- Page 160 and 161: Pitts sider double-majoring in PW a
- Page 162 and 163: Pitts Writing and Rhetorical Skills
- Page 164 and 165: Pitts 4 4 4 4 1-4 4 4 4 / Engl 290
- Page 166 and 167: Pitts 4 1-4 4 4 4 4 / Engl 346 Prel
- Page 168 and 169: Pitts 4 4 4 4 / Engl 443 Nonfiction
- Page 171 and 172: 8 Certificate Programs in Technical
- Page 173 and 174: Certificate Programs inform the mod
- Page 175 and 176: Certificate Programs I found no wor
- Page 177 and 178: Certificate Programs schedule, seve
- Page 179 and 180: Certificate Programs technology. Fi
6 Curriculum, Genre <strong>and</strong> Resistance: <strong>Revis<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Identity<br />
<strong>in</strong> a <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g Community<br />
David Franke<br />
When I was <strong>in</strong>vited to direct our <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g major, the first<br />
steps were clear: my PTW colleagues <strong>and</strong> I were to f<strong>in</strong>d students, promote the<br />
program, <strong>and</strong> develop a curriculum. 1 Much of this work was <strong>in</strong>formal <strong>and</strong> occasional—conversations<br />
<strong>in</strong> the elevator with the dean, talk <strong>in</strong> the mailroom. My<br />
colleagues <strong>and</strong> I were surprised, however, at how much of our time <strong>and</strong> energy<br />
was devoted to writ<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g that was not exactly scholarly. Our subject-matter<br />
expertise played a much smaller role than our rhetorical ability: we<br />
learned quickly how to make a complex po<strong>in</strong>t simple, what po<strong>in</strong>ts not to raise,<br />
<strong>and</strong> how to anticipate the niggl<strong>in</strong>g unasked questions of our readers. Functional<br />
writ<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> prescribed genres, was how work got done: gett<strong>in</strong>g the program proposal<br />
to the bureaucratic center of our system <strong>in</strong> Albany, NY was a labyr<strong>in</strong>th<br />
<strong>in</strong> its own right, but then came the course proposal revisions, emails, fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />
requests, webpages, syllabi, memos, m<strong>in</strong>utes, class-size projections, assignments,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the like, each of which serv<strong>in</strong>g as an “important lever” that allowed us to<br />
“advance our own <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>and</strong> shape our mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> relation to complex social<br />
systems” (Charles Bazerman 79). 2 As Bazerman says elsewhere, these genres are<br />
not cold <strong>and</strong> mechanical, but “forms of life, ways of be<strong>in</strong>g” (“Life,” 19). In other<br />
words, <strong>in</strong> a complex literate system such as a professional writ<strong>in</strong>g program, our<br />
ways of be<strong>in</strong>g—our behavior, our identity, our style—are strongly shaped by<br />
the way we engage with key adm<strong>in</strong>istrative genres. In the pages that follow, I<br />
want to tell the story of our program’s evolution as embodied <strong>and</strong> enacted <strong>in</strong> our<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative writ<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> I focus on the curriculum because it is the center of<br />
this web of genres. Although the curricular text we wrote is neither profound nor<br />
even very long, be<strong>in</strong>g noth<strong>in</strong>g but a completely humorless <strong>and</strong> efficient page full<br />
of prerequisites <strong>and</strong> other technical paraphernalia, it def<strong>in</strong>es the nature of our<br />
program <strong>and</strong> the way subsequent <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ked genres are written. Once the curriculum<br />
is approved <strong>and</strong> published <strong>in</strong> the college catalog, we become animate.<br />
As the center of this “web” of genres, the curriculum is often pr<strong>in</strong>ted (or<br />
downloaded) to a page or two of the college catalog, <strong>and</strong> it serves as a semi-legal<br />
document that gives sequence, shape, unity, themes, <strong>and</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imums to students,<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g them with a loose road map for how they can complete a degree <strong>in</strong> un-<br />
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2010.2348.2.06<br />
113