Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a Design Discourse - Composing and Revising Programs in Professional and Technical Writing, 2010a
Henze, Sharer, and Tovey for future change” (13). Since we began working on this account of the turmoil that ensued when we attempted to alter the curricular structure of the department, we have witnessed the kind of “future change” that can eventually result from a moment—in this case the demise of our proposed RSPW concentration—that feels like failure. As we mentioned earlier, in response to the issues raised by our proposal, an ad hoc committee was formed to conduct a survey of faculty views on the nature of an English degree. The committee was further charged with developing a revised undergraduate core curriculum based upon these views. The work of the ad hoc committee has resulted in several significant changes to the department’s undergraduate degree, changes that were unanimously approved by departmental faculty. The two most significant changes, which went into effect in spring 2005, are as follows: 1. The core group of courses required of all majors in the department was revised to give some presence to classes dealing with rhetoric, professional writing, and English language study. At the same time, the number and specificity of core requirements was reduced, thus allowing students more opportunity to explore the variety of specialties within our diverse department. The new core is elaborated in the table below. Old Core (required of all majors in the department before Spring 2005) • ENGL 2000. Interpreting Literature • ENGL 3000. Lit in English to 1700 • ENGL 3010. Lit in English, 1700- 1880 • ENGL 3020. Lit in English, 1880-Present • One Shakespeare course (Tragedies, Comedies, or Histories) Revised Core (required of all majors in the department beginning Spring 2005) • One Historical Survey (selected from a variety of offerings in Literature pre-1700) • One Historical Survey (selected from a variety of offerings in Literature post-1700) • One Shakespeare course (Tragedies, Comedies, or Histories) • One Language Study Course (chosen from a variety of courses in Creative Writing, Linguistics, Rhetoric & Composition, and Technical & Professional Communication) 84
Disciplinary Identities 2. Separate, named concentrations within the BA in English were eliminated. Instead of a BA in English with options for Concentrations in Writing or Literature, the department now simply offers a BA in English for all students. As they pursue this degree, students are expected to work with their faculty advisors to create a curriculum of upper-division courses that will best meet their interests and advance their future plans. While the removal of concentrations did not give RSPW an official, named presence in the department (something we’d initially hoped our proposal would accomplish), the change provides opportunities for students to expand their studies in RSPW in ways that were not possible under the previous structure of concentrations. At the same time that the core was being revised, several new courses in rhetoric and professional writing were added to the department’s regular offerings, including two courses—Introduction to Rhetorical Studies and Introduction to Professional Writing— intended to introduce students to RSPW as an integral part of the English department. While we did not find success with our initial proposal, we are encouraged by the more visible presence we now have in the curriculum and by the attendant possibilities for collaboration among the various specialties within our large and diverse faculty. works cited Culler, Jonathan. “Imagining the Coherence of the English Major.” ADE Bulletin 133 (Winter 2003): 6-10. Cushman, Ellen. “Service Learning as the New English Studies.” Beyond English Inc: Curricular Reform in a Global Economy. Ed. David B. Downing, Claude Mark Hurlbert, and Paula Mathieu. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2002. 204-18. Downing, David B. “Beyond Disciplinary English: Integrating Reading and Writing by Reforming Academic Labor.” Beyond English Inc: Curricular Reform in a Global Economy. Ed. David B. Downing, Claude Mark Hurlbert, and Paula Mathieu. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2002. 23-38. Downing, David B., Claude Mark Hurlbert, and Paula Mathieu. “English Incorporated: An Introduction.” Beyond English Inc: Curricular Reform in a Global Economy. Ed. David B. Downing, Claude Mark Hurlbert, and Paula Mathieu. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2002. 1-21. Elbow, Peter. “OPINION: The Cultures of Literature and Composition: What Could Each Learn from the Other.” College English 64.3 (May 2002): 533-46. 85
- Page 52 and 53: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 54 and 55: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 56 and 57: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 58 and 59: Knievel, Belanger, Keeney, Couch, a
- Page 60 and 61: Griswold orientation meetings as ne
- Page 62 and 63: Griswold So at this point I had two
- Page 64 and 65: Griswold All the while I am hoping
- Page 66 and 67: Griswold anyone whose primary acade
- Page 68 and 69: Griswold pendix A). I dang well wan
- Page 70 and 71: Griswold Unfortunately, we were not
- Page 72 and 73: Griswold can be appended as evidenc
- Page 74 and 75: Griswold Oct.-Nov. 2003: Evaluation
- Page 76 and 77: Griswold such a program would confe
- Page 78 and 79: Griswold have been hired with exper
- Page 81 and 82: 4 Disciplinary Identities: Professi
- Page 83 and 84: Disciplinary Identities fessional w
- Page 85 and 86: Disciplinary Identities courses, th
- Page 87 and 88: Disciplinary Identities been genera
- Page 89 and 90: Disciplinary Identities sites for e
- Page 91 and 92: Disciplinary Identities ing others.
- Page 93 and 94: Disciplinary Identities responsibil
- Page 95 and 96: Disciplinary Identities well-known
- Page 97 and 98: Disciplinary Identities uncritical,
- Page 99 and 100: Disciplinary Identities departments
- Page 101: Disciplinary Identities has never,
- Page 105: evising
- Page 108 and 109: Ashe and Reilly question impressed
- Page 110 and 111: Ashe and Reilly humanities. In addi
- Page 112 and 113: Ashe and Reilly developing academic
- Page 114 and 115: Ashe and Reilly administrators may
- Page 116 and 117: Ashe and Reilly porate aspects of P
- Page 118 and 119: Ashe and Reilly requirements in the
- Page 120 and 121: Ashe and Reilly developing a system
- Page 122 and 123: Ashe and Reilly to reduce congestio
- Page 124 and 125: Ashe and Reilly diverse student pop
- Page 126 and 127: Ashe and Reilly most onlookers, is
- Page 128 and 129: Ashe and Reilly Andrews, Deborah C.
- Page 131 and 132: 6 Curriculum, Genre and Resistance:
- Page 133 and 134: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance si
- Page 135 and 136: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance bu
- Page 137 and 138: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance a
- Page 139 and 140: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance in
- Page 141 and 142: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance co
- Page 143 and 144: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance We
- Page 145 and 146: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance ma
- Page 147 and 148: Curriculum, Genre and Resistance an
- Page 149 and 150: 7 Composing and Revising the Profes
- Page 151 and 152: Composing and Revising two years th
Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary Identities<br />
2. Separate, named concentrations with<strong>in</strong> the BA <strong>in</strong> English were elim<strong>in</strong>ated.<br />
Instead of a BA <strong>in</strong> English with options for Concentrations <strong>in</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
or Literature, the department now simply offers a BA <strong>in</strong> English for all<br />
students. As they pursue this degree, students are expected to work with<br />
their faculty advisors to create a curriculum of upper-division courses that<br />
will best meet their <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>and</strong> advance their future plans. While the<br />
removal of concentrations did not give RSPW an official, named presence<br />
<strong>in</strong> the department (someth<strong>in</strong>g we’d <strong>in</strong>itially hoped our proposal would<br />
accomplish), the change provides opportunities for students to exp<strong>and</strong><br />
their studies <strong>in</strong> RSPW <strong>in</strong> ways that were not possible under the previous<br />
structure of concentrations.<br />
At the same time that the core was be<strong>in</strong>g revised, several new courses <strong>in</strong><br />
rhetoric <strong>and</strong> professional writ<strong>in</strong>g were added to the department’s regular offer<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g two courses—Introduction to Rhetorical Studies <strong>and</strong> Introduction<br />
to <strong>Professional</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g— <strong>in</strong>tended to <strong>in</strong>troduce students to RSPW as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegral part of the English department. While we did not f<strong>in</strong>d success with our<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial proposal, we are encouraged by the more visible presence we now have <strong>in</strong><br />
the curriculum <strong>and</strong> by the attendant possibilities for collaboration among the<br />
various specialties with<strong>in</strong> our large <strong>and</strong> diverse faculty.<br />
works cited<br />
Culler, Jonathan. “Imag<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Coherence of the English Major.” ADE Bullet<strong>in</strong><br />
133 (W<strong>in</strong>ter 2003): 6-10.<br />
Cushman, Ellen. “Service Learn<strong>in</strong>g as the New English Studies.” Beyond English<br />
Inc: Curricular Reform <strong>in</strong> a Global Economy. Ed. David B. Down<strong>in</strong>g, Claude<br />
Mark Hurlbert, <strong>and</strong> Paula Mathieu. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2002.<br />
204-18.<br />
Down<strong>in</strong>g, David B. “Beyond Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary English: Integrat<strong>in</strong>g Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
by Reform<strong>in</strong>g Academic Labor.” Beyond English Inc: Curricular Reform <strong>in</strong><br />
a Global Economy. Ed. David B. Down<strong>in</strong>g, Claude Mark Hurlbert, <strong>and</strong> Paula<br />
Mathieu. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2002. 23-38.<br />
Down<strong>in</strong>g, David B., Claude Mark Hurlbert, <strong>and</strong> Paula Mathieu. “English Incorporated:<br />
An Introduction.” Beyond English Inc: Curricular Reform <strong>in</strong> a Global<br />
Economy. Ed. David B. Down<strong>in</strong>g, Claude Mark Hurlbert, <strong>and</strong> Paula Mathieu.<br />
Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2002. 1-21.<br />
Elbow, Peter. “OPINION: The Cultures of Literature <strong>and</strong> Composition: What<br />
Could Each Learn from the Other.” College English 64.3 (May 2002): 533-46.<br />
85