06.09.2021 Views

A grammar of Pite Saami, 2014

A grammar of Pite Saami, 2014

A grammar of Pite Saami, 2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1 Overview <strong>of</strong> morphology<br />

4.1.2.1 Consonant gradation<br />

The term consonant gradation 2 refers to regular alternations <strong>of</strong> the consonant<br />

phonemes in the consonant center <strong>of</strong> the final foot <strong>of</strong> a word. 3<br />

All consonant phonemes in the consonant center are included in the present<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> such alternations. These alternations come in pairs <strong>of</strong> stem allomorphs<br />

that differ quantitatively and/or qualitatively. Alternations can be between<br />

a preaspirated and the corresponding non-aspirated consonant (ʰx‐x), a<br />

geminate consonant and the corresponding singleton consonant (xː‐x), a geminate+singleton<br />

and the corresponding singleton+singleton (xːy‐xy), two singletons<br />

and only the latter singleton (xy‐y), and three singletons and only the initial<br />

and final singleton (xyz‐xz). 4<br />

These patterns and the attested alternations are provided in Table 4.2 on the<br />

following page. The term strong grade (abbreviated ‘str’) is used to refer to the<br />

form with preaspiration, a geminate or more consonant segments than the corresponding<br />

form. Likewise, the term weak grade (abbreviated ‘wk’) refers to the<br />

form lacking a preaspirated or geminate consonant, or having fewer consonant<br />

segments, respectively. To facilitate reading Table 4.2, the attested alternations<br />

for each pattern are organized by alternations with a non-aspirated element first,<br />

followed by patterns with at least one preaspirated element. Furthermore, the<br />

individual lists <strong>of</strong> alternations are organized by mode <strong>of</strong> articulation and by the<br />

order set forth in the consonant phoneme inventory in Table 3.1 on page 37. Some<br />

examples illustrating this can be found below.<br />

The minimal pair in (2) shows a consonant gradation alternation /ʰp‐p/, which<br />

corresponds to the pattern ʰx‐x.<br />

(2) /dɔʰpe/ /dɔpe/<br />

dåhpe dåbe<br />

house\nom.sg house\gen.sg<br />

[pit100324]<br />

2 This term is quite common in <strong>Saami</strong> linguistics, e.g., in Feist (2010), although it is also known as<br />

‘grade alternation’, e.g., in Sammallahti (1998). As much <strong>of</strong> the literature on <strong>Saami</strong> linguistics<br />

is in languages other than English, it may be useful to provide some translations <strong>of</strong> the term<br />

‘consonant gradation’: German: Stufenwechsel, Swedish: stadieväxling, Finnish: astevaihtelu,<br />

Hungarian: fokváltakozás and Russian: чередование ступеней.<br />

3 Cf. §2.2.2 on prosodic positions, including the foot and the consonant center.<br />

4 There are certainly other ways to classify these alternations in the consonant center as well. For<br />

instance, one could disregard any consonant phonemes that are present in both alternations<br />

(then xː‐x and xːy‐xy would be the same type), or consider the xː‐x and ʰxː‐x patterns in Table 4.2<br />

to be the same type as simply a case <strong>of</strong> alternating consonant phonemes. However, the patterns<br />

in the present classification demonstrate the regularity <strong>of</strong> patterning between phonological<br />

features (such as geminate vs. singleton).<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!