Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a
Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a
Luxury products are not a bad or wasteful thing (goes this argument) because history shows that one generation’s decadent indulgence becomes the next generation’s bare necessity. Former luxury products that are now in daily use include buttons, window glass, rugs, door handles, pillows, mirrors, combs, and umbrellas, not to mention cars, electric lights, and indoor plumbing. The phenomenon of striving to afford “luxury” is the driving force for a rising standard of living. When we buy a luxury good, we increase the demand for it, which leads companies to produce more of it, ultimately leading to lower prices that make it affordable to the masses. At the same time that each new luxury creates new demand, it also creates the potential for a new industry with new jobs that enable people to afford the new luxuries. People become individually and collectively richer as they strive to buy new products and create new businesses to make these products. Advertising accelerates this cycle by both stimulating demand and helping suppliers communicate with customers. [23] Numerous organizations such as Adbusters and The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood work to counteract what they view as the debilitating effects of commercial messages in our culture. [24] Adbusters sponsors numerous initiatives, including Buy Nothing Day and TV Turnoff Week, intended to discourage rampant commercialism. These efforts, along with biting ads and commercials that lampoon advertising messages, are part of a strategy called culture jamming that aims to disrupt efforts by the corporate world to dominate our cultural landscape.” [25] Is Adbusters right? Does advertising encourage us to be shallow, or to value material rewards over spiritual ones? The jury is still out on that question, but there is little doubt that ads reinforce the things our society values. Images of happy (and popular) people who drive gas guzzlers and eat junk food surround us. KEY TAKEAWAY Because it’s so powerful, advertising can hurt as well as help us. A consumer would have to live in a deep hole not to be affected by the images of “shiny happy people” (to quote from the REM song of the same name) that constantly bombard us. To decide whether advertising causes us to feel insecure about our bodies, engage in self-destructive behaviors, or covet others’ possessions is to raise a chicken-and-egg question that elicits strong feelings on both sides (just ask your professor). Nonetheless, whether they create the problems or merely perpetuate them, advertising practitioners certainly need to remind Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 79
themselves (preferably every day) of the power they wield. Hopefully, if you go into the biz, you’ll remember that too. EXERCISES a. List and briefly discuss four common objections to advertising and its practice in our society. b. Briefly trace the history of how advertising has reflected and affected gender roles and racial and ethnic stereotypes in our culture since 1970. c. Evaluate the practice of behavioral targeting. Take a position on whether or not this practice invades privacy in a positive or negative way. Support your position. d. We can see materialism as a “drain on society” or a “promoter of prosperity.” Pick one of these views and support your choice with an effective argument. [1] Quoted in William Leiss, Stephen Kline, and Sut Jhally, Social Communication in Advertising: Persons, Products and Images of Well-Being (Scarborough, Ontario: Nelson Canada, 1990), 11. [3] Richard W. Pollay, “The Distorted Mirror: Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of Advertising,” Journal of Marketing 59 (1986): 18–36, and Morris B. Holbrook, “Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, What’s Unfair in the Reflections on Advertising?” Journal of Marketing 51 (1987): 95–103. [4] Eileen Fischer, “Interview with Denise Fedewa,” Advertising and Society Review 4, no. 4 (2003), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/advertising_and_society_review/toc/asr4.4.html. [5] Erin White, “Dove ‘Firms’ with Zaftig Models: Unilever Brand Launches European Ads Employing Non- Supermodel Bodies,” Wall Street Journal, April 21, 2004, B3. [6] Laura Petrecca, “More Ads Star Regular People,” USA Today Online, April 3, 2006,http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/2006-04-02-mcdonalds-usat_x.htm(accessed February 13, 2009). [7] Earl D. Honeycutt, Jr., “Gender Role Portrayals in Japanese Advertising: A Magazine Content Analysis,” Journal of Advertising, March 22, 1998,http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-391205_ITM (accessed February 10, 2009). [8] James Twitchell, Twenty Ads that Shook the World: The Century’s Most Groundbreaking Advertising and How It Changed Us All (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2001). Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 80
- Page 30 and 31: MySpace. We weren’t early enough
- Page 32 and 33: Specialty print media include bookl
- Page 34 and 35: Ad-Supported Content Ad agencies ar
- Page 36 and 37: [5] “Traditional Radio’s Digita
- Page 38 and 39: the promotional activities that int
- Page 40 and 41: increasingly thin layer of audience
- Page 42 and 43: Figure 2.8 A sales promotion is a t
- Page 44 and 45: 2.3 Advertising Industry Structure
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 2.10 Matrix Organization in
- Page 48 and 49: P&G reacted to this problem when it
- Page 50 and 51: Media buyers and media planners eva
- Page 52 and 53: Within a company, the jobs of the a
- Page 54 and 55: [1] Suzanne Vranica, “Ad Houses W
- Page 56 and 57: drumsticks and simulated drumhead p
- Page 58 and 59: Figure 3.1 Build a Foundation Chapt
- Page 60 and 61: 3.1 Economic Effects of Advertising
- Page 62 and 63: Broadcast radio and TV rely exclusi
- Page 64 and 65: 3.2 The Good: Advertising Enhances
- Page 66 and 67: washing with soap, that remain kill
- Page 68 and 69: share, so they tend to be more stri
- Page 70 and 71: now one of the primary attributes s
- Page 72 and 73: [8] Mister Snitch!, “Top Ten Reje
- Page 74 and 75: here is subjective—your image of
- Page 76 and 77: “If you let me play sports, I wil
- Page 78 and 79: Categories can be made quite specif
- Page 82 and 83: [9] Jean Grow and Joyce M. Wolburg,
- Page 84 and 85: 3.4 Advertising Regulation: Who Loo
- Page 86 and 87: Agencies), the ANA (Association of
- Page 88 and 89: [3] American Association of Adverti
- Page 90 and 91: about one-half the size of existing
- Page 92 and 93: Chapter 4 Consumers and the Communi
- Page 94 and 95: messages they see or hear, and when
- Page 96 and 97: 4.2 Is the Medium the Message? Comp
- Page 98 and 99: Figure 4.4 SS+K used actor George C
- Page 100 and 101: SS+K developed a comparative messag
- Page 102 and 103: Audio Clip “Ahem” http://app.wi
- Page 104 and 105: After studying this section, studen
- Page 106 and 107: SS+K Spotlight The memes and trends
- Page 108 and 109: 4.4 Decision Making LEARNING OBJECT
- Page 110 and 111: Motivation refers to the processes
- Page 112 and 113: 4.5 Internal Influences on Consumer
- Page 114 and 115: isn’t sure. And, regardless of hi
- Page 116 and 117: it’s not subliminal; the stimulus
- Page 118 and 119: Product line extensions. Marketers
- Page 120 and 121: 1. Sensory memory permits storage o
- Page 122 and 123: Of course, the nature of the ad its
- Page 124 and 125: c. Create an example involving a lo
- Page 126 and 127: [24] Raymond R. Burke and Thomas K.
- Page 128 and 129: products with others and to solicit
Luxury products are not a bad or wasteful th<strong>in</strong>g (goes this argument) because history shows that one<br />
generation’s decadent <strong>in</strong>dulgence becomes the next generation’s bare necessity. Former luxury products<br />
that are now <strong>in</strong> daily use <strong>in</strong>clude buttons, w<strong>in</strong>dow glass, rugs, door h<strong>and</strong>les, pillows, mirrors, combs, <strong>and</strong><br />
umbrellas, not to mention cars, electric lights, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>door plumb<strong>in</strong>g. The phenomenon of striv<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
afford “luxury” is the driv<strong>in</strong>g force for a ris<strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ard of liv<strong>in</strong>g. When we buy a luxury good, we <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
the dem<strong>and</strong> for it, which leads companies to produce more of it, ultimately lead<strong>in</strong>g to lower prices that<br />
make it affordable to the masses. At the same time that each new luxury creates new dem<strong>and</strong>, it also<br />
creates the potential for a new <strong>in</strong>dustry with new jobs that enable people to afford the new luxuries.<br />
People become <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>and</strong> collectively richer as they strive to buy new products <strong>and</strong> create new<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses to make these products. <strong>Advertis<strong>in</strong>g</strong> accelerates this cycle by both stimulat<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
help<strong>in</strong>g suppliers communicate with customers. [23]<br />
Numerous organizations such as Adbusters <strong>and</strong> The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood work to<br />
counteract what they view as the debilitat<strong>in</strong>g effects of commercial messages <strong>in</strong> our culture. [24] Adbusters<br />
sponsors numerous <strong>in</strong>itiatives, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Buy Noth<strong>in</strong>g Day <strong>and</strong> TV Turnoff Week, <strong>in</strong>tended to discourage<br />
rampant commercialism. These efforts, along with bit<strong>in</strong>g ads <strong>and</strong> commercials that lampoon advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
messages, are part of a strategy called culture jamm<strong>in</strong>g that aims to disrupt efforts by the corporate world<br />
to dom<strong>in</strong>ate our cultural l<strong>and</strong>scape.” [25]<br />
Is Adbusters right? Does advertis<strong>in</strong>g encourage us to be shallow, or to value material rewards over<br />
spiritual ones? The jury is still out on that question, but there is little doubt that ads re<strong>in</strong>force the th<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
our society values. Images of happy (<strong>and</strong> popular) people who drive gas guzzlers <strong>and</strong> eat junk food<br />
surround us.<br />
KEY TAKEAWAY<br />
Because it’s so powerful, advertis<strong>in</strong>g can hurt as well as help us. A consumer would have to live <strong>in</strong> a deep<br />
hole not to be affected by the images of “sh<strong>in</strong>y happy people” (to quote from the REM song of the same<br />
name) that constantly bombard us. To decide whether advertis<strong>in</strong>g causes us to feel <strong>in</strong>secure about our<br />
bodies, engage <strong>in</strong> self-destructive behaviors, or covet others’ possessions is to raise a chicken-<strong>and</strong>-egg<br />
question that elicits strong feel<strong>in</strong>gs on both sides (just ask your professor). Nonetheless, whether they<br />
create the problems or merely perpetuate them, advertis<strong>in</strong>g practitioners certa<strong>in</strong>ly need to rem<strong>in</strong>d<br />
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />
Saylor.org<br />
79