06.09.2021 Views

Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a

Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a

Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AD-VICE<br />

1. A company is try<strong>in</strong>g to decide whether it should use the percentage-of-sales method or the objective-<strong>and</strong>task<br />

method for budget<strong>in</strong>g its advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenses <strong>and</strong> costs. What factors should the company consider<br />

when mak<strong>in</strong>g this choice? Be specific.<br />

2. M&Ms has just <strong>in</strong>troduced a new dark chocolate M&M that it hopes will add to the company’s bottom<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e. The company has decided to use a stage-based spend<strong>in</strong>g approach as its advertis<strong>in</strong>g budget<strong>in</strong>g<br />

method. Critique this method as it might be applied to the M&M dark chocolate product launch. What<br />

critical factors do you th<strong>in</strong>k might be important for the company to consider if it uses the stage-based<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g approach?<br />

3. After review<strong>in</strong>g chapter materials <strong>in</strong> Figure 7.4 "Budget Snapshot of the Elements <strong>and</strong> Tim<strong>in</strong>g for the<br />

msnbc.com Campaign" evaluate the budget health of the msnbc.com campaign. What <strong>in</strong>formation did<br />

you consider? What comparisons did you make? Expla<strong>in</strong> your thought process <strong>and</strong> how you made your<br />

evaluation. Comment on <strong>in</strong>formation that you would like to have to make a better evaluation.<br />

4. Given what you have read so far, how can msnbc.com make better use of share of voice (SOV) to reach its<br />

goals <strong>and</strong> objectives? What roadblocks would you recommend (if any)? What is the connection (if any)<br />

between share of voice (SOV) <strong>and</strong> return on <strong>in</strong>vestment (ROI)? Comment.<br />

ETHICAL DILEMMA<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the chapter, “return on <strong>in</strong>vestment (ROI) makes advertis<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

accountable.” Advertisers spend vast sums to further their communication objectives. Studies have<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that advertis<strong>in</strong>g campaigns that set hard objectives (e.g., to improve profits) are more effective<br />

than campaigns that focus on <strong>in</strong>termediate or short-term goals (e.g., br<strong>and</strong> awareness or <strong>in</strong>creased daily<br />

sales of product). Strangely, however, only about 20 percent of companies use return on <strong>in</strong>vestment or<br />

contribution to profit as important <strong>in</strong>dicators of communication success. Why don’t more companies<br />

consider bottom l<strong>in</strong>e profits when evaluat<strong>in</strong>g success? The simple answer is that it is easier to measure an<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate metric than an ROI metric.<br />

Take a position that considers the ethics of accountability. Position One: Communication <strong>and</strong> delivery of<br />

emotional message objectives should not be tied directly to profits because of the difficulty of trac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!