Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a
Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a Launch! Advertising and Promotion in Real Time, 2009a
Clients use a variety of methods to determine their advertising budgets. One basic distinction is between top-down and bottom-up methods. Top-down approaches are easier; they basically use last year’s expenditures as a starting point. However, they also are more simplistic and may be self-defeating because they wind up allocating more money to promote products that are doing well at the expense of products that are doing poorly—when just the opposite adjustment may make more sense. Bottom-up approaches start by specifying the particular objectives a firm has for a brand and then estimating how much it will cost to meet those objectives. Budget-setting is more complicated than just tallying up what it costs to make and place advertising; the client also has to consider the resources an agency will need to conduct research, develop an advertising strategy, and measure how well the strategy worked so it can tweak the approach in the future if necessary. EXERCISES a. Compare and contrast top-down budgeting with bottom-up budgeting. b. Describe when advertisers should use the percentage of sales and industry averages methods for budgeting. c. Describe when advertisers should use the objective-and-task and stage-based spending methods for budgeting. d. Describe and explain the factors that contribute to proper budget allocation and timing. [1] Quoted in “Auto Ad Spending Down, Except Digital,” eMarketer, July 23, 2008,http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006426&src=article1_newsltr (accessed July 23, 2008); Rich Thomaselli, “GM Ending Tiger Woods Endorsement Deal,” Advertising Age, November 24, 2008, http://adage.com/article?article_id=132810 (accessed November 28, 2008); http://adage.com/article?article_id=46288& search_phrase=shona%20seifert. [2] Jack Neff, “P&G Rewrites its Definition of ‘Ad Spend,’” Advertising Age, September 3, 2007, 3. [3] Kate Maddox, “Ad Spending Up in ’05, ’06,” B to B, August 8, 2005, 17. [4] “Allianz Plans €225m Global Branding Blitz,” Marketing Week, May 3, 2007,http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-6503373/Allianz-plans-225m-global-branding.html (accessed February 1, 2009). Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 209
[5] Mya Frazier, “Geico’s $500M Outlay Pays Off,” Advertising Age, July 9, 2007, 8. [6] Jack Neff, “Package-Goods Players Just Can’t Quit Coupons,” Advertising Age, May 14, 2007, 8. [7] Jeremy Mullman, “Moët, Rivals Pour More Ad Bucks into Bubbly: Champagne Makers Try to Create Year-Round Demand,” Advertising Age, September 3, 2007, 4. [8] Jeremy Mullman, “Moët, Rivals Pour More Ad Bucks into Bubbly: Champagne Makers Try to Create Year-Round Demand,” Advertising Age, September 3, 2007, 4. [9] Jeremy Mullman, “Moët, Rivals Pour More Ad Bucks into Bubbly: Champagne Makers Try to Create Year-Round Demand,” Advertising Age, September 3, 2007, 4; “Danone Waters Plans to Increase Spend by 15%,” Marketing, July 25, 2007, 4. [10] Vanessa L. Facenda, “Procter Dishes out 3-Tiered Dawn Attack,” Brandweek, September 24, 2007, 4. [11] Quoted in “A Targeted Approach Creates a Powerhouse,” Chain Drug Review, June 4, 2007, 34. 7.2 Share of Voice (SOV) LEARNING OBJECTIVE After studying this section, students should be able to: 1. Describe share of voice (SOV) and its role in creating budget objectives. Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org 210
- Page 160 and 161: more natural and objective than int
- Page 162 and 163: Results showed that sportier models
- Page 164 and 165: 5.5 Using Research to Guide a Succe
- Page 166 and 167: they wanted to see recipes for ligh
- Page 168 and 169: [1] Quoted in Lisa McTigue Pierce,
- Page 170 and 171: a U.S. Army ad, see yourself walkin
- Page 172 and 173: audience profiling to become more t
- Page 174 and 175: “The key turning point of this wh
- Page 176 and 177: Life stage (e.g., empty-nest parent
- Page 178 and 179: feather flock together”). PRIZM (
- Page 180 and 181: fashionable. Bloomie’s research d
- Page 182 and 183: Actualizers, the top VALS2 group, a
- Page 184 and 185: Surveys of consumer behavior (for e
- Page 186 and 187: generic attribute and not a point o
- Page 188 and 189: 2. Demographics are measurable aspe
- Page 190 and 191: What Are the Properties of a Good T
- Page 192 and 193: conversation. The customer would ha
- Page 194 and 195: 6.3 Position Your Brand: Why Will T
- Page 196 and 197: The average Buick buyer is a man in
- Page 198 and 199: 6.4 Exercises TIE IT ALL TOGETHER N
- Page 200 and 201: muscle is being used to bring such
- Page 202 and 203: check any information on ethics pro
- Page 204 and 205: times like now. We see this situati
- Page 206 and 207: than 32 percent in just two years w
- Page 208 and 209: SS+K Spotlight Since msnbc.com’s
- Page 212 and 213: How Loud Are You? Share of voice (S
- Page 214 and 215: properties, and sci-fi sites over a
- Page 216 and 217: 3. List and discuss the keys to usi
- Page 218 and 219: Southern California, and it aims to
- Page 220 and 221: are positive or negative and whethe
- Page 222 and 223: the company spent on TV advertising
- Page 224 and 225: y category (agency fee, production,
- Page 226 and 227: You can list the pros and cons of t
- Page 228 and 229: AD-VICE 1. A company is trying to d
- Page 230 and 231: We are now eight months prior to th
- Page 232 and 233: After studying this section, studen
- Page 234 and 235: Just as people have personalities,
- Page 236 and 237: KEY TAKEAWAY The power of branding
- Page 238 and 239: well. It may also reveal indirect c
- Page 240 and 241: ealistic feel for its market positi
- Page 242 and 243: In contrast, opportunities and thre
- Page 244 and 245: 8.3 Define Where You Want to Go: Se
- Page 246 and 247: You’ll learn more about how these
- Page 248 and 249: adio, or read magazines. It may als
- Page 250 and 251: Figure 8.5 Anatomy of a Creative Br
- Page 252 and 253: Figure 8.7 The Communications Brief
- Page 254 and 255: KEY TAKEAWAY This section described
- Page 256 and 257: 2. Is there a Chick-fil-A in your n
- Page 258 and 259: Chapter 9 Choose Your Communication
Clients use a variety of methods to determ<strong>in</strong>e their advertis<strong>in</strong>g budgets. One basic dist<strong>in</strong>ction is between<br />
top-down <strong>and</strong> bottom-up methods. Top-down approaches are easier; they basically use last year’s<br />
expenditures as a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. However, they also are more simplistic <strong>and</strong> may be self-defeat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
because they w<strong>in</strong>d up allocat<strong>in</strong>g more money to promote products that are do<strong>in</strong>g well at the expense of<br />
products that are do<strong>in</strong>g poorly—when just the opposite adjustment may make more sense. Bottom-up<br />
approaches start by specify<strong>in</strong>g the particular objectives a firm has for a br<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> then estimat<strong>in</strong>g how<br />
much it will cost to meet those objectives. Budget-sett<strong>in</strong>g is more complicated than just tally<strong>in</strong>g up what it<br />
costs to make <strong>and</strong> place advertis<strong>in</strong>g; the client also has to consider the resources an agency will need to<br />
conduct research, develop an advertis<strong>in</strong>g strategy, <strong>and</strong> measure how well the strategy worked so it can<br />
tweak the approach <strong>in</strong> the future if necessary.<br />
EXERCISES<br />
a. Compare <strong>and</strong> contrast top-down budget<strong>in</strong>g with bottom-up budget<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
b. Describe when advertisers should use the percentage of sales <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry averages methods for<br />
budget<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
c. Describe when advertisers should use the objective-<strong>and</strong>-task <strong>and</strong> stage-based spend<strong>in</strong>g methods for<br />
budget<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
d. Describe <strong>and</strong> expla<strong>in</strong> the factors that contribute to proper budget allocation <strong>and</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
[1] Quoted <strong>in</strong> “Auto Ad Spend<strong>in</strong>g Down, Except Digital,” eMarketer, July 23,<br />
2008,http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006426&src=article1_newsltr (accessed July 23, 2008); Rich<br />
Thomaselli, “GM End<strong>in</strong>g Tiger Woods Endorsement Deal,” <strong>Advertis<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Age, November 24,<br />
2008, http://adage.com/article?article_id=132810 (accessed November 28,<br />
2008); http://adage.com/article?article_id=46288& search_phrase=shona%20seifert.<br />
[2] Jack Neff, “P&G Rewrites its Def<strong>in</strong>ition of ‘Ad Spend,’” <strong>Advertis<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Age, September 3, 2007, 3.<br />
[3] Kate Maddox, “Ad Spend<strong>in</strong>g Up <strong>in</strong> ’05, ’06,” B to B, August 8, 2005, 17.<br />
[4] “Allianz Plans €225m Global Br<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g Blitz,” Market<strong>in</strong>g Week, May 3,<br />
2007,http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-6503373/Allianz-plans-225m-global-br<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g.html (accessed<br />
February 1, 2009).<br />
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />
Saylor.org<br />
209