29.08.2021 Views

Judicial Vision August 2021

Judicial Vision private book for judicial officers

Judicial Vision private book for judicial officers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

August 2021 Judicial Vision Issue # 8

At a glance…

Sl

No

Court Parties Journal Provision of

law

Dictum

which is made after the filing of final report will not be

of any benefit to him. (Para 8)

In paragraph Nos.22 to 24 of the final order dated

02.09.2019 in Crl.M.C. No.4826/2019, this Court has

held that the court below has its duty and obligation to

examine the final report immediately after its filing and

to note the defects and to return the same to the

Investigating Officer for curing the defects and for resubmission,

especially in those cases where the

remanded accused is likely to put up a claim for default

bail plea and that such a statutory duty is cast on the

court going by the statutory provisions contained in the

aforementioned Rules 67 & 68 of the Criminal Rules of

Practice, Kerala, 1982, which has been dealt with in

paragraph No.15 of the order in Crl.M.C. 4826/2019.

This Court held therein that in a case where the final

report/charge sheet is filed either within the default

period or immediately thereafter, but before filing of the

statutory default bail plea by the accused, is defective

as on the date of filing of the said bail plea, then the

accused could put up the plea for statutory bail plea. But

in a case where the investigating agency has diligently

completed the investigation and has filed the final

report/charge sheet within the default period or

thereafter, but before the filing of the statutory bail plea

by the remanded accused, then the court is also having

a duty to alert the investigating agency to cure the

defects and still if the investigating agency has not

cured the subsisting defects as on the date of filing of

the statutory bail plea, then the right of the accused has

to be respected. But, at the same time, if the

investigating agency has been able to diligently cure

the defects and resubmit the final reports before the

abovesaid bail plea made by the accused, then

certainly the earlier accrued right, if any, will get

extinguished and the omission on the part of the court

to immediately notify the investigating agency in a case

like that to cure the defects, cannot be the substantial

basis to hold that the accused in such a case will still get

the indefeasible right to be released on default bail and

if such an approach is made, it would be rather too

hyper technical and without upholding and due regard

to the public interest.(Para 10)

Abbreviations

1. IPC- Indian Penal Code, 1860

2. CrPC-Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

3. CPC-Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

4. KBLR Act- Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1959

5. PoSCO Act - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,

2012

6. PC Act-Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

7. NI Act-Negotiable Instruments, 1881

8. MV Act- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

9. TP Act -Transfer of Property Act, 1882

10. HMA- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Glossary of legal and administrative terms

De facto - വതാപരം

De jure - നിയമപരം

Demobilisation - പിരിവിടൽ

Delusion - മിഥ, മം

Demarcation

Defaulter

Demeanour

- അതിർി നിർയം

- വീ വയാൾ

- ഭാവേചകൾ; െപമാ രീതി

Demurrage – കാലവിളംബ ചും; കാലതാമസ നപരിഹാരം

De novo trial - പുനർ വിചാരണ

Delimitation - അതിർി പുനർ നിർയം

Page Page | 14 | 14

Go to: In this Issue

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!