Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Annals of Oncology Conclusions: TH-302 demonstrates good tolerability when combined with bevacizumab. The MTD has not been reached and only one grade 3/4 toxicity was observed. Dose escalation is ongoing, with planned expansion at the MTD. Disclosure: J. Sun: The author is an employee of pharmaceutical industry with a financial interest in the drug which is the subject of this abstract. C. Hart: The author is an employee of pharmaceutical industry with a financial interest in the drug which is the subject of this abstract. C. Eng: The author is an employee of pharmaceutical industry with a financial interest in the drug which is the subject of this abstract. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. 437TiP A RANDOMISED PHASE II STUDY OF CARBOPLATIN AND BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (CABARET STUDY). COOPERATIVE TRIALS GROUP FOR NEURO-ONCOLOGY (COGNO) K. Field1 , M.A. Rosenthal1 , H. Wheeler2 , L. Cher3 ,E.Hovey4 , A.K. Nowak5 , C. Brown6 , A. Livingstone6 , K. Sawkins6 , R.J. Simes6 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, AUSTRALIA, 2 Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA, 3 Neuro-Oncology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA, 4 Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA, 5 Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA, 6 Clinical Trials, NH&MRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant glial tumor. There is no accepted standard management after disease progression. Much remains unknown about the optimal use of bevacizumab (bev), including the role of continuing beyond progression, and patterns of radiological progression during and after use. In addition, the new Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria have yet to be validated prospectively. Methods: This study is a multi-centre, stratified randomised phase II trial. Patients have recurrent GBM after radiotherapy and temozolomide, have had no other chemotherapy for GBM, and have ECOG performance status 0–2. At least three months have elapsed since radiotherapy. In Part 1, patients are randomised 1:1 to intravenous bev 10 mg/kg 2-weekly and carboplatin AUC5 4-weekly or bev monotherapy. On progression, eligible patients are randomised to continue or cease bev (Part 2). The primary objective is to determine the effect of bev plus carboplatin versus bev alone on progression-free survival according to modified RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints are response rates, cognitive function, quality of life, steroid dose, toxicity, and overall survival. CogState, a validated neurocognitive testing system, is being used prospectively for the first time in this population and compared with mini-mental state examination. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker analyses, comparison of modified RANO and modified MacDonald criteria, predictive value of early MRI after 2 doses of bev, steroid dosing, and location and type of radiological progression during and after therapy. Results: Enrolment commenced in Nov 2010, completing Part 1 accrual in Mar 2012 with 122 patients randomised from 17 Australian sites. Randomisation to Part 2 continues. Feasibility and safety data will be presented; efficacy outcome results are not expected until 2013. Conclusions: The study results will significantly improve knowledge regarding the use of bevacizumab in the setting of recurrent GBM, as well as providing for the first time a prospective analysis of CogState neurocognitive testing for patients with brain tumours. Disclosure: M.A. Rosenthal: Roche Advisory Board member. H. Wheeler: Roche Advisory Board member. E. Hovey: Roche Advisory Board member. A.K. Nowak: Roche Advisory Board member and has received research funding through Roche Australia. R.J. Simes: Roche Advisory Board Member. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September 2012 doi:10.1093/annonc/mds394 | ix151
abstracts developmental therapeutics 438O PHASE II ACTIVITY OF THE HSP90 INHIBITOR AUY922 IN PATIENTS WITH ALK-REARRANGED (ALK+) OR EGFR-MUTATED ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) E. Felip 1 , E. Carcereny 2 , F. Barlesi 3 , L. Gandhi 4 , L.V. Sequist 5 , S-W. Kim 6 , H.J. M. Groen 7 , B. Besse 8 , D-W. Kim 9 , E. Smit 10 , M. Akimov 11 , E. Avsar 12 , S. Bailey 13 , W. Ofosu-Appiah 14 , E.B. Garon 15 1 Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, SPAIN, 2 Medical Oncology Service, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, SPAIN, 3 Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department & Centre Investigation Clinique, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, FRANCE, 4 Oncology, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 6 Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, KOREA, 7 Pulmonary Diseases, University Hospital Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, NETHERLANDS, 8 Departement of Medicine, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, FRANCE, 9 Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, KOREA, 10 Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 11 Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, SWITZERLAND, 12 Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Biometrics and Data Management, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, SWITZERLAND, 14 Oncology, Novartis Oncology, Florham Park, NJ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Translational Oncology Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Background: AUY922 is a highly potent, non-geldanamycin, HSP90 inhibitor. HSP90 is a chaperone of client proteins relevant in NSCLC pathogenesis, including ALK and EGFR. Oncogenic fusion genes giving constitutive ALK activity (ALK+) occur in up to 6% of NSCLCs, and EGFR mutation (mut) occurs in 10–20% of cases. We report data from a Phase II study of AUY922 in patients (pts) with previously treated, advanced NSCLC, stratified by molecular status. Methods: Pts with advanced NSCLC who progressed following ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy, received AUY922 (70 mg/m 2 )asaonce-weekly,1-hrinfusion.Ptswere assigned to 1 of 4 strata: ALK + , EGFR-mut, KRAS-mut, or EGFR/KRAS/ALK wild-type. A Bayesian partially exchangeable multinomial model was used in the statistical analysis of the study. Primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate or stable disease at 18 wks. Secondary endpoints included OS, PFS, and safety/tolerability. Results: On 6 April 2012 cutoff, 121 pts had been treated (ALK+ [n = 22; both crizotinib (CRZ) treated and naïve], EGFR-mut [n = 35], KRAS-mut [n = 28], EGFR/ KRAS/ALK wild-type [n = 33], undetermined [n = 3]); pts were heavily pretreated (61% had received ≥3 prior regimens). Clinical activity of AUY922 was seen in pts with ALK+ and EGFR-mut NSCLC, with partial responses in 6/21 (29%) pts and 7/ 35 (20%) pts, respectively. 4/6 ALK+ responders were CRZ-naïve and 2/6 were pretreated. Estimated median PFS rates (FAS) were 42% and 34% at 18 wks in ALK+ and EGFR mut pts, respectively. In EGFR-mut pts who had progressed just after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, median PFS rate at 18 wks was 45% vs 21% in pts who had not received a TKI as their immediate pre-AUY922 therapy. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were eye disorders (77%), diarrhea (74%), and nausea (46%). Most AEs were grade (Gr) 1/2; Gr 3/4 AEs were rare (all 3 patients) were: fatigue (n = 4; 3 grade 1/2, 1 grade 3), nausea (n = 4; grade 1). No treatment-related serious AEs were observed. No DLTs were observed; the 120 mg dose level remains under evaluation. At 90 mg (n = 3), Day 29 geometric mean Cmax, Ctrough, AUC(0-24hr), and t1/2 were: 402 ng/ mL, 170 ng/mL, 6130 ng*hr/mL, 29 hr, respectively. At the time of analysis, 8 pts had ≥1 set of tumor response measurements starting ≥8 weeks after first dose. Partial responses were observed in 4 of 4 ALK+ pts (60 mg n = 1; 90 mg n = 3, including the crizotinib-naïve ACUP pt). Anti-tumor activity at 120 mg remains to be evaluated. In summary, AP26113 was well tolerated with preliminary anti-cancer activity in ALK+ pts naïve to or failing prior crizotinib. The phase 2 expansion will include 4 cohorts: ALK+ NSCLC that is 1) naïve or 2) resistant to prior ALK-targeted therapy; 3) EGFRm NSCLC that is resistant to EGFR-targeted therapy; 4) other cancers with abnormalities in ALK or other AP26113 targets. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01449461. Disclosure: G.J. Weiss: GJW has received funds and other support related to participation in this clinical trial from ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. through his employer, Scottsdale Healthcare. GJW has served on Speakers Bureaus for Genentech, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. N.I. Narasimhan: NIN is an employee of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D.J. Dorer: DJD is an employee of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. V.M. Rivera: VMR is an employee of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J. Zhang: JZ is an employee of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. T. Clackson: TC is an employee of ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. F. Haluska: FH is an employee of and owns stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. A.T. Shaw: ATS has received consulting fees/honorarium from ARIAD, Pfizer, Chugai, and Daiichi. ATS has received support in the form of grants paid to her employer by Novartis and AstraZeneca. D.R. Camidge: DRC has received consulting fees/honorarium from ARIAD and has served on advisory boards for Pfizer, Chugai, Novartis, and ARIAD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. © European Society for Medical Oncology 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
- Page 101 and 102: 261P BREAST CANCER SUBTYPES AND OUT
- Page 103 and 104: 90 mg/m2-cyclophophamide 600 mg/m2
- Page 105 and 106: to 9 weeks after dosing. Trastuzuma
- Page 107 and 108: Patients and methods: We reviewed d
- Page 109 and 110: sector patients. The aim of this st
- Page 111 and 112: Linear Logistic Model with Relaxed
- Page 113 and 114: Results: The median CTC fold change
- Page 115 and 116: 312: Table: Chemotherapy uptake wit
- Page 117 and 118: abstracts breast cancer, locally ad
- Page 119 and 120: Results: 8 trials (2092 pts) with 1
- Page 121 and 122: absolute difference of median value
- Page 123 and 124: Novartis, Genentech, and sanofi-ave
- Page 125 and 126: Results: Three RCTs with 1023 patie
- Page 127 and 128: collected from all patients for det
- Page 129 and 130: 355P FIRST REPORT OF LONG-TERM RESP
- Page 131 and 132: 361P A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PL
- Page 133 and 134: publications and aggregated in a me
- Page 135 and 136: Thus the primary aim to target BCSC
- Page 137 and 138: 383 WHY DO WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER
- Page 139 and 140: Results: We evaluated 76 pts with M
- Page 141 and 142: more than 6 cycles of capecitabine.
- Page 143 and 144: 406TiP PHASE II TRIAL OF PRIMARY SY
- Page 145 and 146: abstracts CNS tumors 410O CONDITION
- Page 147 and 148: Conclusions: Our data suggested tha
- Page 149 and 150: Conclusions: As in other cancer typ
- Page 151: 432 GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY AS A M
- Page 155 and 156: 1PR), but no responses were seen in
- Page 157 and 158: RO and Cd, as well as PD data for c
- Page 159 and 160: and vulvar Ca), and 11 SDs were obs
- Page 161 and 162: knowing HLA-A status double-blindly
- Page 163 and 164: Acquired-resistance to EGFR inhibit
- Page 165 and 166: 474P PHASE 1 STUDY OF THE SELECTIVE
- Page 167 and 168: TST is active in breast and gastric
- Page 169 and 170: Treatment-induced shedding of circu
- Page 171 and 172: Methods: Either co-cultures of peri
- Page 173 and 174: 501 PRECLINICAL DATA INVESTIGATING
- Page 175 and 176: 509TiP LUX-LUNG 8: A RANDOMIZED, OP
- Page 177 and 178: (P = 0.64). Synchronous BBC was sig
- Page 179 and 180: abstracts gastrointestinal tumors,
- Page 181 and 182: Disclosure: M. Lee: I am an employe
- Page 183 and 184: plus intravenous Bev(7.5mg/kg q 21d
- Page 185 and 186: anti-EGFR treatment. The present st
- Page 187 and 188: patients harboring a T/T genotype t
- Page 189 and 190: 551P ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY (AC) USE
- Page 191 and 192: experienced significantly more ≥
- Page 193 and 194: functioning scales. Exploratory ana
- Page 195 and 196: oxaliplatin (100 mg/m 2 )/raltitrex
- Page 197 and 198: 572P PANERB STUDY: WHICH CATEGORY O
- Page 199 and 200: Results: 92/114 patients were preop
- Page 201 and 202: 585P CHANGES IN THE INTESTINAL ENVI
Annals of Oncology<br />
Conclusions: TH-302 demonstrates good tolerability when combined with<br />
bevacizumab. The MTD has not been reached and only one grade 3/4 toxicity was<br />
observed. Dose escalation is ongoing, with planned expansion at <strong>the</strong> MTD.<br />
Disclosure: J. Sun: The author is an employee of pharmaceutical industry with a<br />
financial interest in <strong>the</strong> drug which is <strong>the</strong> subject of this abstract. C. Hart: The<br />
author is an employee of pharmaceutical industry with a financial interest in <strong>the</strong><br />
drug which is <strong>the</strong> subject of this abstract. C. Eng: The author is an employee of<br />
pharmaceutical industry with a financial interest in <strong>the</strong> drug which is <strong>the</strong> subject of<br />
this abstract. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
437TiP A RANDOMISED PHASE II STUDY OF CARBOPLATIN AND<br />
BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA<br />
MULTIFORME (CABARET STUDY). COOPERATIVE TRIALS<br />
GROUP FOR NEURO-ONCOLOGY (COGNO)<br />
K. Field1 , M.A. Rosenthal1 , H. Wheeler2 , L. Cher3 ,E.Hovey4 , A.K. Nowak5 ,<br />
C. Brown6 , A. Livingstone6 , K. Sawkins6 , R.J. Simes6 1<br />
Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC,<br />
AUSTRALIA, 2 Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW,<br />
AUSTRALIA, 3 Neuro-Oncology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA,<br />
4<br />
Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA,<br />
5<br />
Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA,<br />
6<br />
Clinical Trials, NH&MRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney,<br />
NSW, AUSTRALIA<br />
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is <strong>the</strong> most aggressive malignant glial tumor.<br />
There is no accepted standard management after disease progression. Much remains<br />
unknown about <strong>the</strong> optimal use of bevacizumab (bev), including <strong>the</strong> role of<br />
continuing beyond progression, and patterns of radiological progression during and<br />
after use. In addition, <strong>the</strong> new Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)<br />
criteria have yet to be validated prospectively.<br />
Methods: This study is a multi-centre, stratified randomised phase II trial. Patients<br />
have recurrent GBM after radio<strong>the</strong>rapy and temozolomide, have had no o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy for GBM, and have ECOG performance status 0–2. At least three<br />
months have elapsed since radio<strong>the</strong>rapy. In Part 1, patients are randomised 1:1 to<br />
intravenous bev 10 mg/kg 2-weekly and carboplatin AUC5 4-weekly or bev<br />
mono<strong>the</strong>rapy. On progression, eligible patients are randomised to continue or cease<br />
bev (Part 2). The primary objective is to determine <strong>the</strong> effect of bev plus carboplatin<br />
versus bev alone on progression-free survival according to modified RANO criteria.<br />
Secondary endpoints are response rates, cognitive function, quality of life, steroid<br />
dose, toxicity, and overall survival. CogState, a validated neurocognitive testing<br />
system, is being used prospectively for <strong>the</strong> first time in this population and compared<br />
with mini-mental state examination. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker<br />
analyses, comparison of modified RANO and modified MacDonald criteria,<br />
predictive value of early MRI after 2 doses of bev, steroid dosing, and location and<br />
type of radiological progression during and after <strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />
Results: Enrolment commenced in Nov 2010, completing Part 1 accrual in Mar <strong>2012</strong><br />
with 122 patients randomised from 17 Australian sites. Randomisation to Part 2<br />
continues. Feasibility and safety data will be presented; efficacy outcome results are<br />
not expected until 2013.<br />
Conclusions: The study results will significantly improve knowledge regarding <strong>the</strong><br />
use of bevacizumab in <strong>the</strong> setting of recurrent GBM, as well as providing for <strong>the</strong> first<br />
time a prospective analysis of CogState neurocognitive testing for patients with brain<br />
tumours.<br />
Disclosure: M.A. Rosenthal: Roche Advisory Board member. H. Wheeler: Roche<br />
Advisory Board member. E. Hovey: Roche Advisory Board member. A.K. Nowak:<br />
Roche Advisory Board member and has received research funding through Roche<br />
Australia. R.J. Simes: Roche Advisory Board Member. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors have<br />
declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds394 | ix151