26.07.2021 Views

Design Yearbook 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2017</strong><br />

School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape<br />

Newcastle University


Contents<br />

Welcome<br />

Charrette<br />

BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

Stage 1<br />

Stage 2<br />

Stage 3<br />

Fieldwork and Site Visits<br />

BA Architecture & Urban Planning (AUP)<br />

Stage 1<br />

Stage 2<br />

Stage 3<br />

Thinking-Through-Making Week<br />

MArch<br />

Stage 5<br />

Stage 6<br />

Fieldwork and Site Visits<br />

Research in Architecture<br />

BA Dissertation<br />

MArch Dissertation<br />

Linked Research<br />

Taught Masters Programmes<br />

PhD / PhD by Creative Practice<br />

Creative Practice Symposium<br />

Architecture Research Collaborative<br />

Scaling the Heights Exhibition<br />

Awards<br />

Contributors<br />

NUAS<br />

Sponsors<br />

3<br />

4<br />

7<br />

67<br />

84<br />

87<br />

158<br />

200<br />

201<br />

202<br />

203


Welcome<br />

Prue Chiles – Director of Architecture<br />

This book celebrates the achievements of students and staff whose hard work is a<br />

testament to the innovative culture and inclusive atmosphere of this School. It has<br />

been an exciting year which has been wonderful to both observe and be a part of.<br />

The creative and intellectual rigour of our approach was again formally recognised as<br />

excellent by the RIBA in the accreditation visit that took place this academic year.<br />

It has been a year of both change and continuity; change, with the addition of a<br />

number of teaching, academic and support staff, their arrival has already been warmly<br />

received and widely appreciated. Our School has always promoted a broad range of<br />

interdisciplinary practices and specialisms within the study of architecture and this<br />

increasing diversity has fostered a wide variety of design and research studios in both<br />

the Bachelor and Master’s degree programmes. For the first time, this has also included<br />

vertical studios which have encouraged collaboration between undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate students.<br />

Change has also come with the first major redevelopment of our School’s<br />

accommodation since 1966: the addition of an extension to the Building Science<br />

building which has doubled our workshop capacity, added new studios, review spaces<br />

and digital fabrication facilities. The latter include a new digital workshop space which<br />

has already been fully exploited by this year’s cohort through a wide range of models<br />

and representational studies. Moreover, investments in new technologies such as virtual<br />

reality equipment have allowed students to explore a wider range of media and further<br />

expand the limits of their architectural imaginations.<br />

Continuity has come in the form of continued success of the live build ‘linked research’<br />

programme, the latest iteration of which was highly commended in the rural initiatives<br />

category of the RIBA MacEwen Award. This programme has worked for a number<br />

of years in collaboration with local residents to design and build small structures in<br />

Northumberland aimed at sustaining rural communities. They have also provided<br />

an opportunity for students to experience the difficulties and delights of seeing a<br />

live architectural project from concept through to completion. This programme<br />

is an example of the close connections between our teaching and the work of the<br />

Architecture Research Collaborative (ARC), the School’s established research group.<br />

Collaborations between researchers and students fill the pages of this yearbook from<br />

the Newcastle After Dark studies, a study of the intricacies of night-time economies in<br />

Newcastle, through to Zanzibar Futures, a journal considering Zanzibar as a microcosm<br />

of geopolitical issues, along with continuing experimental architecture research into<br />

living architectural fabric.<br />

NUAS, the Newcastle University Architecture Society, has been recognised by the<br />

students’ union for the second year running as Best Departmental Society. Students<br />

have also established a student charter of Article 25, an NGO whose name is derived<br />

from the United Nations declaration of human rights, stating that everyone has the<br />

right to adequate and dignified shelter. Work like this continues the School’s tradition<br />

of offering programmes which engage students in a diverse range of social, political and<br />

cultural projects, instilling a strong sense of human values and societal responsibility.<br />

Our research-led teaching is intended to equip graduates not just with the skills they<br />

need to enter the profession but also with skills to help them to stay ahead of a changing<br />

professional landscape during a long career. The work presented in this book illustrates<br />

its diversity, originality, significance and rigour.<br />

3


Charrette<br />

Charrette Week is a whole School, one week, high energy, high productivity series of workshops culminating in a show on the Friday. Students<br />

from all years are mixed into Charrette studios for the week, to encourage cross-year learning and to break down social barriers within the<br />

School. Each Charrette ‘studio’ will typically involve 50 people with students from the upper years expected to exercise team and time<br />

management skills learnt in practice to ensure the projects are delivered on time and on budget! In keeping with the relatively new Charrette<br />

tradition Charrette leaders (typically alumni, architects, engineers and artists) were given three thematic words to respond to, this year’s being:<br />

Charrette 1: Haptic Shadows<br />

Holly Hendry<br />

Charrette 2: Junk Puppets<br />

Hannah Pierce<br />

Charrette 3: Instrumental<br />

Matt Charlton<br />

Tom Randle<br />

Charrette 4: Silence Of The Senses<br />

Hazel McGregor<br />

Charrette 5: Place in Progress<br />

Kate Percival<br />

Lowri Bond<br />

Sara Cooper<br />

Charrette 6: Incubation Station<br />

Matt Rowe<br />

Charrette 7: Touch Me! Let’s Change The School<br />

Amara Roca Inglesias<br />

Charrette 8: Navigating Indeterminacy<br />

Andrew Walker<br />

Charrette 9: Print Shift Repeat<br />

Ruth Sidley<br />

Thomas Henderson Schwartz<br />

Charrette 10: You Spin Me Right Round Baby Right Round<br />

Archie Bell<br />

Charrette 11: A Tale Of Two Cities<br />

Gareth Hudson<br />

Charrette 12: Tantrum City<br />

Yatwan Hui<br />

Charrette 13: Charrette Narratives<br />

Student Run<br />

Charrette 14: Arts Cafe For Chilli Studio<br />

Holly Hendry<br />

Charrette 15: Enchanted Architecture<br />

Sara Nabil Ahmed<br />

Charrette 16: Stu Brew<br />

Red Kellie<br />

Charrette 17: Curating the School<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

4


BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

Samuel Austin and Simon Hacker – Degree Programme Directors<br />

Newcastle’s RIBA Part I accredited BA programme fosters an inclusive, research-led approach<br />

to architecture. Alongside a thorough grounding in all the skills required to become an<br />

imaginative, culturally informed, socially aware and technically competent design professional,<br />

it offers opportunities to engage in developments at the forefront of current research,<br />

from computation and material science to architectural history and theory. Emphasising<br />

collaboration as well as independent critical enquiry, we encourage students to draw on diverse<br />

methods and fields of knowledge, to follow their own interests and to develop their own design<br />

approach.<br />

We believe that to produce good architecture requires more than rounded abilities and<br />

knowledge; it requires judgements about what we value in the buildings and cities we<br />

inhabit, what to prioritise in the spaces and structures we propose and what contribution<br />

architecture can make. The course doesn’t claim to offer simple – or correct – responses to<br />

these challenges. Our diverse community of researchers and practitioners, each with their<br />

own interests and expertise, introduce students to a range of issues, ideas, traditions and<br />

techniques in architectural design and scholarship. We help students develop fine grained<br />

skills in interpreting spaces and texts, critical thinking to understand the implications of design<br />

decisions, and spatial and material imagination to stretch the boundaries of what architecture<br />

can achieve. Rather than teach a single way of working, we give students the tools to discover<br />

what kind of architect they want to be.<br />

A lively design studio is central to this learning process and to the life of the School. <strong>Design</strong><br />

projects, taught by a mix of in-house tutors and practitioners from across the UK, account<br />

for half of all module credits. We promote design as thinking-through-making, an integrated<br />

process of researching and testing ideas in sketchbook, computer, workshop and on site,<br />

of responding to diverse issues and requirements all at once – spatial, material, functional,<br />

social, economic etc. This approach is reinforced by collaborative projects involving artists and<br />

engineers, and at the beginning of each year by week-long design charrettes where students<br />

from all stages of all design programmes work together to respond to diverse design challenges,<br />

through installations around the School and beyond. Lectures, seminars and assignments<br />

in other modules examine the theoretical, historical, cultural, practical and professional<br />

dimensions of architecture, and support students to embed these concerns in studio work.<br />

Stages 1 and 2 are structured to guide students through increasingly challenging scales,<br />

types and contexts of design projects, alongside a breadth of related constructional and<br />

environmental principles and varied themes in architectural history and theory. Briefs invite<br />

experimentation with different architectural ideas and representational skills, first through<br />

projects set in Newcastle, then incorporating study trips to regional towns and cities. As work<br />

increases in depth and complexity – from room to house, community to city, simple enclosure<br />

to multi-storey building – students have more opportunities to develop and focus their own<br />

interests. A dissertation – an in-depth original study into any architecturally related topic – sets<br />

the scene for a year-long Stage 3 final design project. With a choice of diverse thematic studios,<br />

each with its own expert contributors and international study trip, students acquire specialist<br />

skills and knowledge, allowing them to craft their own distinctive portfolio.<br />

7


Stage 1<br />

Some aspects of first year architectural education are reasonably constant and unchanging. The<br />

design module this year has continued to introduce students to the fascinating richness and diversity<br />

of existing architectural discourse and culture; to encourage them to pick up and try out the<br />

eternal tools and instruments of architecture, including scale, context, observation, human form,<br />

inhabitation, structure, manufacture and representation; as well as offering them opportunities to<br />

design and test-out solutions to a range of particular problems and needs.<br />

But this year has also seen some radical changes within Stage 1. All the studio projects were written<br />

and run for the first time, and various new connections have been fostered between the design<br />

and non-design modules, with an intention to build further on these in subsequent years. From a<br />

School context, perhaps the most obvious change has been the hand over from Martin Beattie as<br />

Stage 1 Coordinator this year – after many years of managing, teaching and nurturing first year,<br />

Martin has finally moved on to new pastures within the School and this is an opportunity on behalf<br />

of all staff, tutors and students to thank him for his input and dedication.<br />

Year Coordinator<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Simon Hacker<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin Gray<br />

James Longfield<br />

Laura Harty<br />

Simon Hacker<br />

Students<br />

Aaron Cheng<br />

Abigail Elisabeth Hawkins<br />

Afiqah Binti Sulaiman<br />

Akihisa Tomita<br />

Aleksabdria Bolyarova<br />

Alexandra Ellen Duxbury<br />

Alice Katherine Du Fresne<br />

Amna Ahmad I M Fakhro<br />

Ana Paula Godoy<br />

Anastasia Ciorici<br />

Anna Moncarzewska<br />

Anya Beth Donnelly<br />

Anna Volkova<br />

Assem Saparbekova<br />

Atthaphan Sespattanachai<br />

Chi Shen<br />

Chloe May Dalby<br />

Christopher David Anderson<br />

Christopher Liam Carty<br />

Cristina Alicia Gonzales Mitcalf<br />

Danielle Marie Quirke<br />

Demi-Jo Crawford<br />

Edward Benedict Yaoxiang Yan<br />

Elizaveta Streltsova<br />

Emily Jane Morrell<br />

Emily May Simpon<br />

Emily Rachael Pendleton Birch<br />

Emma Fernandez Ruiz<br />

Erin Noelle Dent<br />

Erya Zhu<br />

Esthefpany Mishell Carrillo Monge<br />

Ewan Mark Smith<br />

Faith Mary Hamilton<br />

Flora Rose Sallis-Chandler<br />

George William Cooper<br />

Grant Martin Donaldson<br />

Harry Charlesworth Groom<br />

Harry James Hurst<br />

Hassan Mehboob Sharif<br />

Ho Hang Ryan Fung<br />

Holly Kate Rich<br />

Huyen Anh Do<br />

Iram Kamal<br />

Irene Dumitrascu-Podogrocki<br />

Isabel Lois Fox<br />

Jacob Timothy Weetman Grantham<br />

James Edward David Hall<br />

James Michael Stokoe<br />

Jianing Lyu<br />

Jingyi Zhou<br />

Jody-Ann Goodfellow<br />

Joseph George Allen<br />

Josephine Anne May Coffey<br />

Junwen Luo<br />

Ka Ching Leung<br />

Kareemah Muhammad<br />

Karishma Dayalji<br />

Kate Asolo Woolley<br />

Katie Lara Cottle<br />

Kristin Olivia Read<br />

Leah Charlotte Harrison<br />

Leeza Anna Potanah<br />

Lucy Kay Atwood<br />

Luk Chong Leung<br />

Luke Tim Jonathan Shiner<br />

Lynsey Holt<br />

Madalein Carroll<br />

Maegan Rui Qi Lim<br />

Maharram Mammadzada<br />

Martina Dorothy Hansah<br />

Matthew Chi Ming Warrenberg<br />

Megan Frances Nightingale<br />

Michelle Sie Ee Lim<br />

Milo Carroll<br />

Miruna Ilas<br />

Mohini Devi Tahalooa<br />

Natalie Beata Piorecka<br />

Nathan Alan Cooke-Duffy<br />

Oliver Charles Harrington<br />

Pak Siu Au<br />

Peter Thomas Staniforth<br />

Philomena Chen<br />

Pok Ho Cheung<br />

Qian Yi Choi<br />

Rachel Emmeline Clark<br />

Rachel Sophie Keany<br />

Rebecca Sinead Crowley<br />

Rodrigo Miguel Pereira Domingos<br />

Rosa Sophia Kenny<br />

Ruth Niamh Angele Vidal-Hall<br />

Sabrina May Lauder<br />

Sally Emir Clapp<br />

Samuel Fraquelli<br />

Samuel Mackenzie Bell<br />

Sarah Alexandra Johnsone<br />

Sarah May Bradshaw<br />

Sean Ryan Bartlem<br />

Shaunee Lyn Tan<br />

Shivani Umed Patel<br />

Sienna Poppy Sprong<br />

Sofia Kovalenko<br />

Sofia Grace Turner<br />

Solomon Olufemi Adeyinka Ofoaiye<br />

Sophie Tilley<br />

Thomas James Grantham<br />

Thomas Robert Porritt<br />

Tobias Evan Himawan<br />

Tongyu Chen<br />

Victoria Louise Haslam<br />

Vito Benjamin Sugianto<br />

Wen Hua Huang<br />

Will Peter Tankard<br />

William Harry Taylor<br />

Xin Guo<br />

Xingyu Zhou<br />

Xueqing Zhang<br />

Yeekwan Lam<br />

Yi May Emily Chan<br />

Yingyeung Mo<br />

Zhana Hristova Kokeva<br />

Zhong Zheng<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

8 Text by Simon Hacker Opposite - Tobias Himawan


Process Page 1 of 3<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Come On In<br />

Laura Harty<br />

This project asks students to remake and refashion the interiors of particular canonical houses and small buildings of the 20th and 21st<br />

centuries in order to identify what it is about them that makes them individual. It asks them to engage with various architectural tools and to<br />

absorb and claim the new-found spaces for themselves.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Process Page 1 of 3<br />

Process Page 1 of 3<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

proach Process page 1 of 3<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

10<br />

Top - Erya Zhu Middle - Erya Zhu Bottom - Ho Hang Ryan Fung


Final Page 1 of 3<br />

<br />

Final Pag<br />

Final Page 1 of 3Final Page 2 of 3<br />

<br />

Final Pag<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Come On In<br />

Come on In<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Top left to Bottom right - Erya Zhu(5), Ho Hang Ryan Fung<br />

11


esign.<br />

design<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Intervention!<br />

James Longfield<br />

This project invites students to design a small inhabited intervention within a particular surveyed site. Using measured survey drawings,<br />

photographic studies and observational drawings in order to inform ideas for a new small scale ‘micro architecture’, students design an<br />

intervention that houses a particular function and occupies territory between the scale of furniture and architecture.<br />

Linked with AUP Stage 1 (see pg.68)<br />

this is<br />

-<br />

12<br />

Top - Katie Cottle<br />

Bottom - Ho Hang Ryan Fung


ORIGINAL WORK PAGE (1 of 1)<br />

PRESENTATION PAGE<br />

30<br />

27<br />

PRESENTATION PAGE<br />

“what’s inside? i can only silhouettes”<br />

process s 51<br />

“that guy accross the room is talented”<br />

process 53<br />

39<br />

41<br />

Top left to Bottom right - Zhong Zheng, Megan Nightingale, Tobias Himawan(2), Matthew Warenburg (2), Peter Staniforth (2) 13


The Chair and the Figure<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin Gray<br />

In this project, students examine and draw a particular chair, relating it to the proportions of the human body. The project combines<br />

observational drawing of a static design element, with the study of human proportion in movement, looking in particular at the module of<br />

the human form and how it serves as a basis for architectural design.<br />

Linked with AUP Stage 1 (see pg.68)<br />

14 Top left to Bottom right - Anna Volkova, Karishma Dayalji, Qian Yi Choi, Cameron Reid (AUP), Anya Donnelly, Group: Kate Asolo Woolley, Maegan Rui<br />

Qi Lim, Michelle Sie Ee Lim, Anastasia Ciorici, Maisie Jenkins (AUP), Julian Baxter (AUP), Karolina Smok (AUP), Group: Isabel Lois Fox, Jacob Timothy<br />

Weetman Grantham, Jianing Lyu; Leeza Potanah


Top left to Bottom right - Group: Abigail Elisabeth Hawkins, Christopher David Anderson, Luk Chong Leung; Group (AUP): Kirin Gallop, Fabian Kamran,<br />

Natalie Si Wing Lau, Thomas McFall; Alexandra Duxbury, Martina Hansah, Tobias Evan Himawan, Ruth Vidal-Hall, Group (AUP): Ellis Salthouse, Nur<br />

Salymbekov, Ella Sophia Spencer, Thanuyini Suseetharan; Xin Guo, Shivani Patel<br />

15


Market Placed<br />

Simon Hacker<br />

In this final project of the year, students design a small market and enterprise building for the University Campus. The project commences<br />

with the design of individual stalls, booths and small workshops that explore various architectural languages. Working within a group students<br />

then design a collective aggregation or cluster of these small structures on a specific site – a market place. Finally, they individually design a<br />

larger in-door hall in conjunction with a structure and skin that provides shelter for the wider market complex.<br />

<br />

Technical drawings and picture<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

16<br />

Top - Pok Ho Cheung Middle - Megan Nightingale Bottom, left to right - Qian Yi Choi, Natalia Piorecka(2)


PRESENTATION PAGE 1 OF 14<br />

FINAL STORE MODEL<br />

<br />

<br />

student forum site. It<br />

is going to be selling<br />

frozent younghurt<br />

which people can buy<br />

it and walking around<br />

the market like holding<br />

ice cream or they<br />

can sit on the top<br />

<br />

younghurt.<br />

9<br />

BRUTALISM x FREI OTTO | An investigation of the site revealed a assortment of different architectural elements across the site. Claremont<br />

tower is brutalistic, the glass and steel staircase at the old library building reflects the open frame language, and the trees behave like<br />

<br />

Frei Otto’s tensile structures.<br />

From left to right:<br />

Fig 22a: Investigation to minimize roof’s elevational<br />

profile<br />

Fig 22b: Reinterpreation of architectural elements<br />

on Site B<br />

Fig 22c: Development of roof’s structural strategy<br />

16<br />

<br />

Technical drawings and picture<br />

<br />

<br />

PROCESS PAGE 3 OF 10<br />

22<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

18<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

PRESENTATION PAGE<br />

<br />

For the materiality,<br />

glass and timber as<br />

Steel and glass will b<br />

porting material for<br />

<br />

the clusters. The ma<br />

ported by the black<br />

those black wire is se<br />

tension cable to resis<br />

roof. I also added tw<br />

<br />

outdoor spaces for t<br />

ORIGINAL WORK PAGE 2 OF 6<br />

Top left to Bottom right - Qian Yi Choi, Edward Benedict Yaoxiang Yan, Anastasia Ciorici, Atthaphan Sespattanachai, Pok Ho Cheung, Ho Hang Ryan Fung,<br />

Qian Yi Choi, Katie Lara Cottle, Atthaphan Sespattanachai, Matthew Chi Ming Warrenberg<br />

25<br />

17


Stage 2<br />

Economy forms the basis of our architectural investigations and design explorations in Stage 2 this<br />

year. How architecture is produced by, and productive of, the economies within which we live has<br />

been explored through analysis of urban environments and the imagination of their futures; the design<br />

of collective housing and communal spaces; projects crossing the boundaries between art, architecture<br />

and engineering; and the design of spatial experience.<br />

With projects set in Edinburgh’s historic port, Leith and the Northumberland border town of<br />

Berwick-upon-Tweed, and in the fictional realms of film, projects have moved between the scale of the<br />

dwelling to the scale of space; from the digital to the material and practices of making: always asking<br />

the question of architectures’ role and relation to the economies it is embedded in.<br />

A year of transition, Stage 2 seeks to encourage a growing sense of criticality towards design decisions,<br />

a developing autonomy of thought and action, and an understanding of architectures’ position in<br />

times of social, cultural and economic flux.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

Andy Campbell<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Christos Kakalis<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Project Tutors<br />

Amara Roca Inglesias<br />

Amy Linford<br />

Carolina Ramirez Figuroa<br />

Christos Kakalis<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Dan Kerr<br />

Gillian Peskett<br />

James Longfield<br />

James Perry<br />

Jennie Webb<br />

Jess Davidson<br />

Luke Rigg<br />

Nita Kidd<br />

Stella Migdali<br />

Fine Art Tutors<br />

Adam Goodwin<br />

Archie Bell<br />

Gareth Hudson<br />

Harriet Sutcliffe<br />

Peter Sharpe<br />

Julia Heslop<br />

Rosie Morris<br />

Students<br />

Aaron Swaffer<br />

Abigail May Smart<br />

Alesia Berahavaya<br />

Alysia Lara Arnold<br />

Arran James Noble<br />

Bahram Yaradanguliyev<br />

Benedict Douglas Wigmore<br />

Boris Larico Villagomez<br />

Brandon Athol Few<br />

Callum James Luke<br />

Callum Robert Campbell<br />

Charlie William Donaldson<br />

Cheng Wan Mak<br />

Chi Lam Cheng<br />

Ching Nam Yue<br />

Ching Wah Hong<br />

Chou Ee Ng<br />

Chun Yin Ng<br />

Ciara Catherine McClelland<br />

Cooper Taylor<br />

Danielle Helena Berg<br />

Darcy Eleanor Arnold-Jones<br />

David Michael Gray<br />

David Richard Osorno<br />

Dianne Kwene Aku Odede<br />

Dora Mary Frances Farrelly<br />

Eleanor Waugh<br />

Elliot James Crowe<br />

Elliot Matthew Dolphin<br />

Eloise Aliza Coleman<br />

Emily Catherine Child<br />

Emily Reta Spencer<br />

Emma Elizabeth Kemp<br />

Emma Imogen Moxon<br />

Ethan John Archer<br />

Euan Emilio Alpin McGregor<br />

Eve Kindon<br />

Finlay William Lohoar Self<br />

Freya Jane Emerson<br />

Gemma Louise Duma<br />

Grace Charlotte Ward<br />

Hannah Emily McAvoy<br />

Harry Cameron Tindale<br />

Harry Robert Henderson<br />

Hazel Ruth Cozens<br />

Helenna Abigail Taylor<br />

Henry James Cahill<br />

Ho Sze Jose Cheng<br />

Huiyu Zhou<br />

Ibadullah Shigiwol<br />

Ioana Buzoianu<br />

Irvano Irvian<br />

Jack Oscar Sweet<br />

Jake Thomas Williams-Deoraj<br />

James Edward Bacon<br />

James Gillis<br />

Jamie Schwarz<br />

Jay Antony Hallsworth<br />

Jemima Alice Smith<br />

Jerome Sripetchvandee<br />

Jhon Sebastian Valencia Cortes<br />

Jia Lun Chang<br />

Jiewen Tan<br />

Joanne Lois May Cain<br />

Joel Pacini<br />

Jonathan Pilosof<br />

Jordan Paige Ince<br />

Jose Diogo Lajes Machado<br />

Marques Figueira<br />

Joseph Henry Noah Elbourn<br />

Joshua Willem Jago Knight<br />

Jun Tao Gerald Ser<br />

Junyi Chen<br />

Ka Chun Rico Chow<br />

Ka Hei Chan<br />

Kai Lok Cheng<br />

Katie Ann Elizabeth Campbell<br />

Katy Rose Barnes<br />

Kieran Harrison<br />

King Chi Leung<br />

Kiran Kaur Basi<br />

Konstantins Briskins<br />

Kotryna Navickaite<br />

Levente Mate Borenich<br />

Liam Kieran Rogers<br />

Liam Michael Marcel Davi<br />

Lilian Winifred Davies<br />

Luc James Askew-Vajra<br />

Malgorzata Nicoll Szarnecka<br />

Man Cheong Gabriel Leung<br />

Matilda Louise Durkin<br />

Matilda Marie Barratt<br />

Matthew Edward Harrison<br />

Matthew Oliver Ward<br />

Meina Zhang<br />

Mengxian He<br />

Monica Said<br />

Myeongjin Suh<br />

Nadia Beatriss Young<br />

Nancy Marshall Marrs<br />

Natasha Diyamanthi Trayner<br />

Nicholas Juan Tatang<br />

Nikshith Nagaraja Reddy<br />

Nitichot Setachanadana<br />

Nophill Mohmmd Damaniya<br />

Olga Barkova<br />

Pablo Larrea Wheldon<br />

Phoebe Elizabeth A Shepherd<br />

Polina Morova<br />

Quian Wang<br />

Qian Zhao<br />

Rachael Jeanette Burleigh<br />

Rachen Marie Cummings<br />

Rachel Spencer<br />

Rebecca Charlotte Glancey<br />

Rebecca Jean Maw<br />

Reece Jay Oliver<br />

Rowena Saffron Covarr<br />

Robert Walker Ashworth<br />

Rufus Giles Wilkinson<br />

Samuel George Brooke<br />

Samuel James Hawkins<br />

Seo Ruong Kang<br />

Seyoung Han<br />

Shihao Quan<br />

Simour Elise Button<br />

Siriwardhanalage De Saram<br />

Sophie Ogilvie-Graham<br />

Steven Gary Lennox<br />

Susanna Emily Jane Smith<br />

Tanya Naresh Haldipur<br />

Tashanraj Selvanayagam<br />

Tian Hong Kevin Wong<br />

Tian Yee Lim<br />

Toghrul Mammadov<br />

Weihao Wang<br />

Wing Yung Janet Tam<br />

Xi Lin<br />

Xuanzhi Huang<br />

Yi-En Ling<br />

Yuan Xu<br />

Yuan Xue<br />

Yuehua Wang<br />

Yuze Tian<br />

Zehua Wei<br />

Zhidong Liu<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

18 Text by Christos Kakalis Opposite - Arran Noble


Top left - Name Name Project Title Top right - Nameless Nameless Project Title Bottom - Name Name Project Title<br />

19


At Home in the City<br />

Amara Roca Inglesias & Dan Kerr; Jennie Webb & Luke Rigg; Gillian Peskett & Christos Kakalis; Amy Linford & Stella Migdali; Nita<br />

Kidd & James Perry; Carolina Ramirez Figuroa & James Longfield; Jess Davidson & Claire Harper<br />

How housing is produced, where it is built and who it is for are essential questions, not only for architectural practitioners, but for society at<br />

large. Semester one’s main project, set in Leith, Edinburgh, explored the changing conditions of housing and collective living within a set of<br />

specific economic and social constraints.<br />

20 Top - Henry Cahill Bottom - Samuel Brooke


Top - Brandon Few Middle, left to right - Toghrul Mammadov, Hazel Cozens, Jose Lajes Machando Marques Figueira Bottom - Brandon Few<br />

21


Engineering Experience<br />

Amara Roca Inglesias & Dan Kerr; Jennie Webb & Luke Rigg; Gillian Peskett & Christos Kakalis; Amy Linford & Stella Migdali; Nita<br />

Kidd & James Perry; Carolina Ramirez Figuroa & James Longfield; Jess Davidson & Claire Harper<br />

Through a collaborative project involving students, staff and practitioners from architecture, fine art and engineering, filmic environments<br />

were reimagined as a set of physical artworks to be moved into, through, over, under – experienced through human motion and the camera,<br />

and re-filmed to re-tell a specific experience from each film.<br />

22<br />

Top and Middle - Charlie William Donaldson<br />

Bottom, left to right - Irvano Irvian, Alesia Berahavaya


Left - Alesia Berahavaya<br />

Right, top to bottom - Ethan John Archer, Irvano Irvian<br />

23


Exploring Experience<br />

Amara Roca Inglesias & Dan Kerr; Jennie Webb & Luke Rigg; Gillian Peskett & Christos Kakalis; Amy Linford & Stella Migdali; Nita<br />

Kidd & James Perry; Carolina Ramirez Figuroa & James Longfield; Jess Davidson & Claire Harper<br />

Can we think of architecture through an experiential understanding of materiality? Producing, treating and working with materials suggest<br />

practices and processes that can inform design to unpack diverse architectural events taking place in different levels: from drawing to<br />

construction and inhabitation. The project, set in Berwick-upon-Tweed, explores the ways materiality is embodied in architecture seeking, to<br />

unravel its complex and dynamic character.<br />

24 Top - Benedict Wigmore Middle, left to right - Levente Borenich, Bahram Yaradanguliyev, Gemma Duma Bottom - Liam Davi


Top - Katie Campbell Middle - MatthewWard Bottom - CharlieDonaldson<br />

25


Stage 3<br />

Following RIBA Bronze Medal success last year, this year’s Stage 3 were given the choice of nine yearlong<br />

studios covering a wide range of themes and issues. Three of the studios were also taught vertically,<br />

split between the graduating Stages 3 and 6, providing a platform for peer learning and increased crosspollination<br />

between the BA and MArch.<br />

Studios covered subjects ranging from the re-use of the Bank of England site, through unconscious<br />

rituals and contemporary monastic practice to a revisit of Cedric Price’s ‘Potteries Think Belt’. Field<br />

trips ranged from a stay in Barcelona, an Italian ‘Grand Tour’, visits to Ronchamp and La Tourette and<br />

a road trip to Nottingham, Leicester and Walsall. The studios followed the pattern established last year<br />

of a six week primer, followed by ‘Staging’ (including a field trip), Realization and Refinement stages.<br />

The ‘Primer’ exercise is designed to develop and define the studio’s unique thematic framework. Students<br />

then developed their own projects, from a complex range of issues into a structured and synthetic<br />

whole. New innovations this year included ‘Theory into Practice’ and ‘Architectural Technology’<br />

symposium days, an increased focus on technical integration through focused technical reviews and<br />

expanded academic portfolios.<br />

Year Coordinator<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Cara Lund<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

Amy Linford<br />

Andy Campbell<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Cara Lund<br />

Carolina Figueroa<br />

Christos Kakalis<br />

Colin Ross<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

David McKenna<br />

Hugh Miller<br />

Ivan Marquez<br />

Josep Maria Garcia Fuentes<br />

James Londfield<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Martyn Dade Robertson<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Michael Simpson<br />

Students<br />

Agatha Mary MacEwan Savage<br />

Aishath Mohaned Rasheed<br />

Alena Pavlenko<br />

Alexander Willaim<br />

Alexander William Mackay<br />

Alexander James McCulloch<br />

Alice Elizabeth Reeves<br />

Alice Elizabeth Simpkins-Wood<br />

Amber Natasha Farrow<br />

Ameeta Praful Ladwa<br />

Andreas Lukita Haliman<br />

Angus James Campbell Brown<br />

Anna Vershinina<br />

April Glasby<br />

Arthur Anuma Bayele<br />

Assem Nurymbayeva<br />

Benjamin James Taylor<br />

Boram Kwon<br />

Charlotte Goodfellow<br />

Charlotte Laura Victoria Lorgues<br />

Chao Shen<br />

Chi-Yao Lin<br />

Ciaran Horscraft<br />

Claudia Kim Bannatyne<br />

Daniel Barrett<br />

Daniel Francis Hill<br />

David Stuart Jones<br />

Douglas Gardner<br />

Ekren Sungur<br />

Elizabeth Rose Ridland<br />

Eliza Hague<br />

Elle-May Simmonds<br />

Emily Yasmin Georgina O’Hara<br />

Emma Kate Burles<br />

Esme Hallam<br />

Farrah Noelle Colilles<br />

Gabrielle Faith Beaumont<br />

George Windsor Oliver<br />

Grace de Rome<br />

Groffrey Nicholls<br />

Hao Zhuang<br />

Harrison Jack Avery<br />

Hector Adam Laird<br />

Henry William Orlando Valori<br />

Hoi Yuet Chau<br />

Ho Yin Chung<br />

Huey Ee Yong<br />

Isabel Mills Lyle<br />

Jack David Ranby<br />

Jacob Alexander Smith<br />

James Alexander Kennedy<br />

Jennifer Louise Betts<br />

Ji Chuen Ng<br />

John Kenneth Knight<br />

John Joesph O’Brien<br />

Jonathon McDonald<br />

Joseph William Firth Smith<br />

Juan Felipe Lopez Arbelaez<br />

Ka Chun Tsang<br />

Kate Francis Byrne<br />

Kate Hannah Longmore<br />

Kate Helena Stephenson<br />

Katherina Weiwei Bruh<br />

Katherine Isabel Rhodes<br />

Katherine Marguerite Mitchell<br />

Laura Jane Cushine<br />

Lawrance Loc Man Wong<br />

Liam Costain<br />

Lilly Francis Street<br />

Lilly Rebekah Travers<br />

Lucy Emily Heal<br />

Marina Ryzhkova<br />

Marisa Rachel Bamberg<br />

Mark Andrew Laverty<br />

Mattew Davies Smith<br />

Matthew Donald Lovat Hearn<br />

Matthew Layford<br />

Matthew Patrick Rooney<br />

Melitni Athanasiou<br />

Men Hin Choi<br />

Muhammad Ahmed Asfand<br />

Natalie Mok Suet Yin<br />

Nial Simran Parkash<br />

Nicholas William Gilchrist Honey<br />

Nita Harieth Semgalawe<br />

Nurul ‘Aqilah Binti Ali<br />

Octorino Tjandra<br />

Oliver James Crossley<br />

Pannawat Sermsuk<br />

Paul Mathew Johnson<br />

Philippa Grace McLeod-Brown<br />

Pitaruthai Longyan<br />

Prajwal Limbu<br />

Pui Wing Clarins Chan<br />

Quynh Dang Le Tu<br />

Rebecca Rowland<br />

Regen James Gregg<br />

Rhiannon Jade Graham<br />

Robert John Thackeray<br />

Robert Thurtell<br />

Richard Harry Mayhew<br />

Rufaro Natalie Matanda<br />

Ryan Daniel Bemrose<br />

Ryoga Adityo Dipowikoro<br />

Sam McDonough<br />

Samuel Richard<br />

Sam Welbourne<br />

Sean Martyn Hoisington<br />

Shuyi Chen<br />

Sirawat Thepcharoen<br />

Thasnia Haque<br />

Timothy Seymour Lucas<br />

Trung Hieu Tran<br />

Tung Son Cao<br />

Tristan Patrick Chammey Searight<br />

Vincent Zeno MacDonald<br />

Wai Yip Tsang<br />

William Mansell<br />

Wing Kei So<br />

Xueyang Bai<br />

Yanjie Song<br />

Yee Yuen Ku<br />

Yi Shu<br />

Zhuoran Li<br />

Ziyun Wang<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

26<br />

Text by Matthew Margetts<br />

Opposite - George Oliver


Studio 1 - Acting Town<br />

Daniel Mallo & Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Based in the Georgian market town of Richmond (North Yorkshire), the Acting Town studio focused on the creation of spaces for performativity<br />

bringing to the fore interaction, events and processes. The studio placed a strong emphasis on urban and material research with a view to<br />

interweave experimental spaces for performing arts within the urban fabric. The year started exploring the themes of variation, seriality and<br />

repetition within the dense amalgamation of Richmond town centre; it culminated with the design of a Laboratory for Performing Arts<br />

unfolding the approach of building as a ‘village’, a series of sequentially interconnected rooms, outdoor plazas and alleys.<br />

28<br />

Left - Nick Honey<br />

Right, top to bottom - Liam Costain, Nick Honey, Ekrem Sungar


Left, top to bottom - Aui Longyan, Mark Laverty, Nita Semgalawe Right, top to bottom - Liam Costain(2), George Oliver 29


30 Top left to Bottom right - April Glasby, Gloria Chen, Quynh Dang Le Tu, Pan Sermsuk


Top left to Bottom right - James Kennedy, Pui Wing Chan, Anna Vershinina, Grace de Rome(2), Shuyi Chen 31


Studio 2 - Enclosed Order<br />

Ivan Marquez Munoz & Christos Kakalis<br />

The Enclosed Order studio proposed an investigation of monastic architecture, divided into two main stages:<br />

In the first stage, students were asked to define the individual character and the community that will inhabit the suggested complex,<br />

being required to imagine, formally explore and design the unit/monastic cell that this character is going to inhabit, emphasising on its<br />

atmosphere,and intangible qualities.<br />

In the second stage,students were asked to design a monastic/retreat complex based upon the line of enquiry developed in the first stage,<br />

refining their own briefs and narratives.<br />

32<br />

Andreas Hliman


Top left to Bottom right - Ciaran Horscraft, Andreas Hliman, Matthew Hearn, Sean Hosington, Marisa Bamberg, Ryoga Dipowikoro, Laura Cushnie 33


34<br />

Top, left to right - Melitini Athanasiou, Ka Chun Tsang Middle - Yi Shu Bottom - Chi-Yao Lin


Top - Timothy Lucas Middle, left to right - Wing Kei So, Nurul Ali Bottom - Laura Cushnie 35


Studio 3 - Experimental Architecture<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson & Carolina Figueroa<br />

This year the Experimental Architecture studio anticipated the implications of a new generation of ‘Living Technologies’ on the design of the<br />

built environment. The studio made use of the University’s world-class research in biology and biotechnology to anticipate a new building<br />

technology. We introduced students to the idea of experiment and experimental practices in architecture – combining scientific experiments<br />

with creative and open-ended design processes. The studio was sited in Dunston Staiths where the students were asked to “fill the gap” in a<br />

fire damaged portion of this industrial timber structure on the River Tyne. The students developed propositions based on a range of lab and<br />

studio combined facilities.<br />

36 Exhibition - Group work


Top - Kate Stephenson Middle - Kate Stephenson Bottom - Trung Hieu Tran 37


38 Top - Amber Farrow Middle - Pippa Mcleod-Brown Bottom - Vincent MacDonald


Left, top to bottom - Alexander McCulloch, Amber Forrow Right, top to bottom - Emma Burles, Kate Byrne, Hector Laird, Robert Thackery, Matthew Layford 39


Studio 4 - Getting Away From It All<br />

Colin Ross & Michael Simpson<br />

The studio is led by Colin Ross and Michael Simpson. Both practicing architects, they have a shared interest in cross disciplinary design which<br />

encourages students to develop an expanded creative practice beyond building focussed architectural outcomes.<br />

Studio ambitions were to a) explore design across scales and disciplines with ‘building’ as a centre of a layered design response, b) discover coast<br />

and community through a process of immersive, collaborative study with peers, c) create a tourist destination to boost local economy - a tool<br />

for regeneration with local, regional or national focus.<br />

40<br />

Top - Jon McDonald Middle, left to right - Joseph Smith, Claudia Bannatyne, Arthur Bayel Bottom - Jon McDonald


perspective section with airflow<br />

PERSPECTIVE SECTION 1:100 WITH AIRFLOW<br />

1:100<br />

Top - Esme Hallam Middle - Alice Simpkins Bottom - Will Mansell 41


42<br />

Top - Matthew Rooney Middle, left to right - Elizabeth Ridland, Agatha Savage, Katherine Mitchell Bottom - Katherine Mitchell


Left - Matthew Rooney Right, top to bottom - Matthew Rooney, Richard Mayhew, Gabrielle Beaumont(3) 43


Studio 5 - Material Poetics<br />

James Longfield & Amy Linford<br />

Material qualities are central to the production of architecture, both technically, in terms of the pragmatics of construction, and through the<br />

social meanings, rituals and memories they embody. Our studio encouraged students to engage with material as the ‘stuff’ of architecture,<br />

real, rather than rendered, the thickness, thinness, density, weight of building elements, and the effect these qualities have on the sensory<br />

experience of occupation.<br />

Through the studio each student has explored a specific material through hands-on investigations, and through a year-long engagement with<br />

Scarborough as a site of reflection and production. Students’ projects have addressed materiality as a way of thinking about building design<br />

and detailing as a thoughtful and critical process of material assembly which emerges out of the pragmatics and poetics of material contexts,<br />

cultures and politics.<br />

44<br />

Left - Ho Yin Chung<br />

Right, top to bottom - Lilly Street, Aishath Rasheed, Lilly Street


Top left to Bottom right - Angus Brown, Katherine Rodes, Ryan Bemrose, Ji Chuen Ng, Natalie Mok, Rhiannon Graham, Thasnia Haque 45


46 Top to Bottom - Lilly Travers(2), Aishath Rasheed, Natalie Matanda


Top - Ameeta Ladwa Middle - Natalie Matanda Bottom - Alive Reeves 47


Studio 6 - The Very Hungry Caterpillar<br />

Andy Campbell<br />

The Very Hungry Caterpillar studio focuses on helping something grow, evolve and flourish. Students were asked to support the seed of an<br />

idea to creatively re-use a vacant, under-used building in Glasgow. An architecture of preservation will allow this ordinary building to be<br />

inhabited by a creative, artistic community in the short-medium term while an architectural strategy for the longer term will help protect this<br />

community through an envisioned gentrification of the surrounding area.<br />

48 Top - Daniel Hill Bottom - Ziyun Wang


1:200 Exploded Axonometric<br />

Seeking a New Corporate Architecture<br />

Katie Longmore<br />

Main Entrance Elevation<br />

Left, top to bottom - Juan Lopez Arbelaez, Katie Longmore<br />

Right, top to bottom - Wai Yip Tsang, Ziyun Wang(2)<br />

49


50 Top left - Rebecca Rowland Top right - Wai Yip Tsang Middle - Rebecca Rowland Bottom - Sirawat Thepcharoen


Left, top to bottom - Juan Lopez Arbelaez, Katie Longmore, Daniel Hill<br />

Right, top to bottom - Regen James Gregg, Daniel Hill<br />

51


Studio 7 - Potteries Thinkbelt<br />

Matthew Margetts & Cara Lund<br />

Continuing an interest in Infrastructure as background processes and systems this year we have revisited Cedric Price’s ‘Potteries Think Belt’<br />

- 50 years after its conception. We used the Potteries Think Belt plan as a ‘treasure map’ to navigate the delights of contemporary Stoke-on-<br />

Trent.<br />

The studio was one of three ‘vertical’ studios pioneered this year, taught jointly between Stages 3 and 6, and began with the group exercise of<br />

building a ‘Stoke-o-Matic’ dynamic mapping model. The model was used to explore systematic relationships between transport, education,<br />

environment and identity with enjoyably unpredictable results.<br />

Stage 3 students were then asked to develop their own hybrid briefs based on components of the Potteries Thinkbelt’s original brief –<br />

incubators, knowledge stores, accommodation units and interchange stations. Sites were selected along infrastructural routes past, present<br />

and future.<br />

Linked with Stage 6 (see pg.144)<br />

52 Symposium - Group work


Top, left to right - Chao Shen, Hao Zhuang Middle, left to right - Sam Wellbourne, Chao Shen Bottom - Chao Shen<br />

53


54 Top and Middle - Boram Kwon Bottom - Hao Zhuang


Left, top to bottom - Ben Taylor(3), Hao Zhuang<br />

Right - Elle Simmonds(2), Sam Wellbourne<br />

55


Studio 8 - Building Upon Building<br />

Josep-Maria García-Fuentes & Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

This studio explored preservation as architecture, as it understands they are both placed within a cultural continuum and are the outcome of<br />

a complex cultural, social and political struggle. This idea was explored through the design of a major addition to/or the transformation of<br />

an existing heritage building. This required an understanding of the existing building in all of the ways its architecture and materials express<br />

the values it sought to represent and serve at the time, and in the ways that those meanings might or might not be extended, enriched or<br />

transformed and reshaped by the new addition.<br />

Linked with Stage 6 (see pg.148)<br />

56 Lawrence Wong


Top - Yanjie Song<br />

Bottom - Octorino Tjandra<br />

57


58 Xueyang Bai


Sketch and Final Sections, 1:200<br />

at A1<br />

Top - Henry Valori Middle - Octorino Tjandra Bottom - Jack Ranby<br />

59


Studio 9 – Rituals and the Unconscious<br />

Kati Blom, David McKenna & Hugh Miller<br />

In Rituals (and the unconscious) students designed a small tea ceremony room in a site in Tynemouth. After developing spatial themes and<br />

landscape strategies from this intervention, they continued to design a craft or an architecture school using the same site. A Japanese joinery<br />

workshop helped with concept development.<br />

Linked with Stage 6 (see pg.152)<br />

60 Top - Matthew Smith Bottom, left to right - Hue Yong, Matthew Smith, Daniel Barrett


Top left - Daniel Barrett Top right - Eliza Hague Bottom - Hue Yong<br />

61


62 Top - Eliza Hague Middle and Bottom - Daniel Barrett


Left, top to bottom - Yuen Ku(2), Paul Johnson<br />

Right, top to bottom - Harrison Avery, Eliza Hague<br />

63


Stage 3 - Fieldwork & Site Visits<br />

BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

As part of Stage 3 the varied studios undertake a range of field trips in the first semester, travelling to a diverse locations around Europe.<br />

Studio 1: Acting Town<br />

Madrid<br />

Studio 2: Enclosed Order<br />

Basel<br />

La Tourette<br />

Lyon<br />

Ronchamp<br />

Vitra Foundation - London - Barcelona<br />

Studio 3: Experimental Architecture<br />

Barcelona<br />

London<br />

Studio 4: Getting Away From It All<br />

Edinburgh<br />

Studio 5: Material Poetics<br />

Barcelona<br />

Studio 6: The Very Hungry Caterpillar<br />

Glasgow<br />

Studio 7: Potteries Thinkbelt<br />

Birmingham<br />

Leicester<br />

Nottingham<br />

Walsall<br />

Studio 8: Building on Building<br />

London<br />

Rome<br />

Verona<br />

Venice<br />

Studio 9: Rituals and Unconscious<br />

Finland<br />

64


Barcelona Centre<br />

KATI DON’T WALK IN FRONT OF THE CAMERA


BA Architecture & Urban Planning (AUP)<br />

Andrew Law & Armelle Tardiveau – Degree Programme Directors<br />

The BA (Hons) Architecture and Urban Planning (AUP) is an evolving three-year<br />

programme that seeks to unite academic themes and approaches from the architecture<br />

and urban planning programmes across the School. The AUP degree carries its own<br />

intellectual and pedagogical themes that cannot be found on other programmes<br />

elsewhere in the School. There are four conceptual strands, which includes one major<br />

theme, ‘alternative practice’, and three minor themes: visual culture, urban design and<br />

spatial practice as well as social enterprise.<br />

The alternative practice strand responds to a critique of twentieth century architecture<br />

and planning as overly technocratic and individualised. Returning to these critiques,<br />

alternative practice bring to the fore social, cultural, political and environmental<br />

concerns in the design and construction of the built environment. Our course has<br />

drawn inspiration from a range of thinkers and practitioners concerned with the built<br />

environment (including philosophers, political activists, sociologists, geographers,<br />

architects and planners) that have sought to engage and include communities in design<br />

and building (sometimes self-build, sometimes co-production).<br />

The design work from Stages 1, 2 and 3 of the programme selectively showcases much of<br />

the intellectual and practical academic content of the degree while helping the students<br />

to develop visual and spatial skills; we aim to engage students in developing their own<br />

agenda and interests making clear the connections between social, environmental and<br />

design issues and the built environment as the driving spirit of their endeavors.<br />

67


AUP Stage 1<br />

The AUP programme is radically interdisciplinary and offers an integrated approach to both<br />

Architecture and Urban Planning. The first semester focuses on skill building with formative<br />

design projects allowing students to develop drawing abilities in free hand and orthographic<br />

representation, as well as engage them in materialising spatial ideas three dimensionally through<br />

modelling and sketching.<br />

Students begin the year with the study of an urban scene in Siena painted by Lorenzetti in 1339;<br />

they interrogate the socio-spatial relationships and model to scale their interpretation of the<br />

urban fabric. This first exercise is intended to set the tone of the programme and engage students<br />

in unpacking traditional questions in urban studies at all scales (city, building, people). This is<br />

supported in greater depth with non-design modules such as ‘Alternative Practice Histories’<br />

and ‘Social Worlds’ allowing students to develop critical thinking of the power of the standard<br />

profession while broadening the spectrum of the myriad of other actors of the built environment.<br />

The design projects together with the ‘Introduction to Architectural History’ and ‘Architectural<br />

Technology’ are shared with Stage 1 BA Architecture ensuring that AUP students are familiar with<br />

existing architectural practice, discourse and culture. As such the artists and design contributors<br />

from Architecture provide an invaluable input and grounding into the first year programme.<br />

Linked with BA Stage 1 (see pg.12-15)<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

David McKenna<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin Grey<br />

James Longfield<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Sean Douglas<br />

Stage 1<br />

Abell Ene<br />

Aimee Akinola<br />

Amabelle Aranas<br />

Andrew Fong<br />

Andrew Webb<br />

Anqi Li<br />

Cameron Reid<br />

Chloe Cummings<br />

Chunyang Song<br />

Daniel Carr<br />

Dongjae Lee<br />

Dwayne De Vera<br />

Ella Spencer<br />

Ellis Salthouse<br />

Emma Van Der Welle<br />

Fabian Kamran<br />

Farah Binti Ashraf<br />

Haziqah Hafiz Howe<br />

Henry Oswald<br />

Julian Baxter<br />

Juliette Smith<br />

Karim Shaltout<br />

Karolina Smok<br />

Kelly Morris<br />

Kirin Gallop<br />

Luis Henriques Menezes Pataca<br />

Maisie Jenkins<br />

Matthew Li<br />

Mohammad Hassan<br />

Natalie Lau<br />

Nik Binti Azman<br />

Nur Salymbekov<br />

Oliver Timms<br />

Oyinkansola Omotola<br />

Ryan Hancock<br />

Salar Butt<br />

Samantha Chong<br />

Sara Fulton<br />

Sebestyen Laszlo Tali<br />

Shuli Wu<br />

Sophie Wakenshaw<br />

Stephen Teale<br />

Thanuyini Suseetharan<br />

Thomas McFall<br />

Thomas Sheridan<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

68<br />

Text by Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Opposite - Sophie Wakenshaw


Reading Into/Drawing From<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

The project focuses on The Allegory of Good and Bad Government, an urban scene set in the city of Siena, Italy, painted by Ambrogio<br />

Lorenzetti between 1338-39. By observing, sketching and drawing the ensembles of buildings that can be read into Lorenzetti’s painting,<br />

students delve into a three-dimensional interpretation of the traditional urban fabric depicted. Working in groups, the outcome is the<br />

articulation of a plan and a model of the scene.<br />

70<br />

Group Work: Sophie Wakenshaw; Ryan Hancock; Luis Pataca, Shuli Wu; Juliette Smith; Karolina Smok; Oliver Timms, Amabelle Aranas; Julian Baxter; Dwayne<br />

De Vera; Sara Fulton, Karolina Smok, Oyinkansola Omotola, Haziqah Hafiz Howe, Daniel Carr; Sebestyen Laszlo Tali; Emma Van Der Welle


Measure<br />

David McKenna<br />

There are 14 boat houses belonging to various colleges, schools and amateur rowing clubs located along the Wear in Durham. The earliest dates<br />

from the early 1800s and coincide with the founding of the University. Measure required the design of a 15th boat house and cafe that would<br />

form a gateway from the city centre to the University playing fields with particular consideration of sunlight and floodwater.<br />

Top, left to right - Natalie Lau, Sophie Wakenshaw, Haziqah Hafiz Howe Middle - Ella Spencer Bottom - Kirin Gallop<br />

71


72 Top left to Bottom right - Haziqah Hafiz Howe, Natalie Lau, Shuli Wu(2), Karolina Smok, Chloe Cummings, Luis Henriques Menezes Pataca, Kirin Gallop


Top left to Bottom right - Ella Spencer, Anabelle Arana, Natalie Lau, Chloe Cummings, Andrew Webb<br />

73


AUP Stage 2<br />

Delving into greater depth in the alternative practice ethos, students develop further critical thinking<br />

by being exposed to theories pertaining to architecture and planning in the widest possible range of<br />

cultures and social groups. Positionality in both theory and design becomes a leading aspect of the<br />

AUP Stage 2. In addition, students are provided the opportunity to choose from a variety of options<br />

so that they can carve their own career path and further develop skills and imagination in design<br />

projects but also specialisms in planning, social enterprise, poverty and informal housing as well as<br />

sociology and the politics of urban space. The optional field trip to the Netherlands is a highlight<br />

of the second semester where students are exposed to alternative practice projects and governance<br />

methods as well as sustainable approaches to the built environment.<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

Stage 2<br />

Abbey Forster<br />

Adil Zeynalov<br />

Ahmet Hayta<br />

Ben Johnson<br />

Beyza Celebi<br />

Bunkechukwu Obiagwu<br />

Dominica Bates<br />

Emily Whyman<br />

Flynn Linklater-Johnson<br />

Georgia Miles<br />

Hannah Hiscock<br />

Jeffrey Korworrakul<br />

Jieyang Zhou<br />

Jing Su<br />

Joshua Beattie<br />

Junqiang Chen<br />

Ka Hei Wong<br />

Michael Rosciszewski Dodgson<br />

Minsub Lee<br />

Racheal Osinuga<br />

Richard Gilliatt<br />

Ryan Thomas<br />

Sahir Thapar<br />

Sanghyeok Lee<br />

Shaoyun Wang<br />

Sonali Venkateswaran<br />

Sutong Yu<br />

Theodore VostBond<br />

Ting En Wu<br />

Van Abner Tabigue Consul<br />

Winnie Wong<br />

Zeynab Bozorg<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

74<br />

Text by Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Opposite - Group work


Theory and Form<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

The module considered the development of architectural expression in response to the economic challenges and social optimism that<br />

characterises the North East region.<br />

Students considered a Theory + Form approach in the submission of an essay and design project pursuing a strategy for the re-use/conversion/<br />

extension/adaptation of an existing post war building on Tyneside.<br />

The Salvation Army Men’s Hostel, by Ryder and Yates, a key building from the post war period in the region, was identified for study and<br />

analysis by allowing students to assess the design through a series of lectures, visits, seminars, design analysis tutorials and exercises.<br />

76<br />

Top - Salvation Army Men’s Hostel, by Ryder and Yates 1974<br />

Bottom - Group work: Junqiang Chen, Minsub Lee, Ka Hei Wong, Ting En Wu


Group Work: Jing Su, Shaoyun Wang, Sutong Yu, Jieyang Zhou, Ahmet Halil Hayta, Sanghyeok Lee, Reacheal Felicia Modupeayo Osinuga, Winnie Wing Yee<br />

Wong, Zeynab Bozorg, Van Abner Tabigue, Consul, Sahir Thaper, Ryan Patrick Thomas, Fatma Beyza Celebi, Bunkechukwu Chiagoziem Obiagwu, Sonali<br />

Venkateswaran, Dominica Ruby Bates, Joshua Edward Beattie, Theodore Christian Robert VostBond, Emily Whyman<br />

77


AUP Stage 3<br />

The major component of Stage 3 is the dissertation. In order to cater for the variety of strengths and<br />

abilities of the cohort, students may choose to write a Social Science dissertation or Creative Practice<br />

dissertation using design as a form of enquiry. The design modules offered, including housing for<br />

vulnerable populations and co-production of space, ensure an incremental experience of working<br />

in/for/with communities. Furthermore, the Erasmus exchange to Amsterdam and Stockholm in<br />

semester one reinforces the diversity of approaches around alternative practice. The year culminates<br />

with a series of talks by a variety of practitioners and activists of the built environment with a view<br />

to inspire students for their next academic or professional steps – these include Amy Lindford<br />

of MUF Architects,Kate Percival and Sara Cooper of 22 Sheds, Dr Emma Coffield curator of<br />

Newcastle City Futures, Michael Crilly of Studio Urban Area, Ryan Conlon a student from the<br />

MA Urban <strong>Design</strong> student (AUP 15/16 graduate), Sally Watson Architectural Curator and Dhruv<br />

Sookhoo, architect, planner and developer.<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Tim Townshend<br />

Stage 3<br />

Alex Robson<br />

Ali Alshirawi<br />

Andrew Blandford-Newson<br />

Anthony Choy<br />

Chia-Yuan Chang<br />

Christopher Hau<br />

Eleanor Chapman<br />

George Jeavons-Fellows<br />

Hannah Knott<br />

Henry Morgan<br />

Jieyu Xiong<br />

Jonas Grytnes<br />

Luke Leung<br />

Nadine Landes<br />

Natalie Sung<br />

Phuong Anh Pham<br />

Runyu Zhang<br />

Sheryl Lee<br />

Simona Penkauskaite<br />

Thomas Gibbons<br />

Yeqian Gao<br />

Yilan Zhang<br />

Yuxiang Wang<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

78<br />

Text be Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Opposite - Group work


Housing For Vulnerable Populations<br />

Tim Townshend<br />

During the 2020s a point will be reached where 25% of the UK’s population is 65 or over. However people are not simply living longer,<br />

but living more active lives into older age. There is a huge challenge to meet the needs and aspirations of these active ‘third agers’. Working<br />

with Armstrong House an independent charity providing ‘independent living with support‘, in the village of Bamburgh, Northumberland<br />

explored the complexities of providing a safe, stimulating and desirable home for older people in the existing setting of a listed building.<br />

80 Top - Luke Leung Middle - Jonas Grytne Bottom - Anthony Choy and Yuxiang Xang


S E N S O R Y G A R D E N S M E L L T O U C H S O U N D S I G H T<br />

S E N S O R Y G A R D E N S M E L L T O U C H S O U N D S I G H T<br />

HONEYSUCKLE<br />

HONEYSUCKLE<br />

HONEYSUCKLE<br />

LAMB’S EARS<br />

LAMB’S EARS<br />

LAMB’S EARS<br />

LAVENDER<br />

LAVENDER<br />

LAVENDER<br />

SUCCULENT<br />

SUCCULENT<br />

SUCCULENT<br />

ASHLAR<br />

ASHLAR<br />

ASHLAR<br />

GLASS<br />

GLASS<br />

GLASS<br />

TIMBER BEAM<br />

TIMBER BEAM<br />

TIMBER BEAM<br />

PEBBLE DASH<br />

PEBBLE DASH<br />

PEBBLE DASH<br />

STONE PATH<br />

STONE PATH<br />

STONE PATH<br />

FOUNTAIN GRASS<br />

FOUNTAIN GRASS<br />

FOUNTAIN GRASS<br />

CURRY PLANT<br />

CURRY PLANT<br />

CURRY PLANT<br />

SECTION 11 : : 200<br />

COURTYARD LOUNGE<br />

SECTION 1 : 200<br />

Top - Sheryl Lee Middle - Yequian Gao Bottom - Simona Penkauskaite<br />

81


Co-Production of Space: Probing the Future<br />

Daniel Mallo & Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Set in the West End of Newcastle upon Tyne, this project aimed to promote/expand on the initiatives of Edible Elswick. Students designed<br />

and built a prototype that would enhance the practices of planting, growing and cooking initiatives in an ethnically diverse neighbourhood.<br />

This informed the design of a master plan for Mill Lane using urban agriculture as the leading drive for an inclusive urban space that engages<br />

social groups from diverse age, social and religious backgrounds.<br />

82<br />

Group Work: Shelley Xiong, Runyu Zhang, Yilan Zhang, Andy Chang, Natalie Sung, Simona Penkauskaite, Yu / Jason Wang, Ali Alshirawi, Hannah Knott,<br />

Nadine Landes, Ellie Chapman, Andrew Blandford-Newson, Jonas Grytnes, Yeqian Gao, Sheryl Lee, Luke Leung


Group Work: Alex Robson, Chris Hau, Tom Gibbons, Henry Morgan, Jonas Grytnes, Yeqian Gao, Sheryl Lee, Luke Leung<br />

83


Thinking-Through-Making Week<br />

Thinking-Through-Making Week continues our theme of collaborations with artists, engineers, architects, musicians, thinkers and makers.<br />

The week is for final year BA and MArch students in the second semester of the year. With a focus on material and making, this week-long<br />

series of lectures and workshops asks students to approach architecture through the process of making and drawing at large-scale, bringing<br />

material back to the core of architecture’s exploration.<br />

Brick and Clay<br />

Matt Rowe<br />

Building Wth Round Poles: Joints and Meshes<br />

Amara Roca Iglesias<br />

Creative Concrete<br />

Leigh Cameron<br />

Film and Photography<br />

Matt Lawes<br />

Golden Journey<br />

with Matt Rowe<br />

Organic Casting<br />

Amy Linford<br />

Stone Carving<br />

with Russ Coleman<br />

84<br />

https://thinkingthroughmaking.org/workshops/


MArch<br />

Zeynep Kezer – Degree Programme Director<br />

‘What can architecture do? Where might architectural thinking take us?’<br />

These are essential questions that drive Newcastle’s two-year MArch Programme. We<br />

offer a research-led approach to education, alternately challenging and encouraging<br />

students to stretch their architectural and critical imaginations, to think harder and<br />

more deeply about what architecture is and what it could be. As a result, the output<br />

every year is diverse, threaded by an interest in architecture as a collective, cultural<br />

endeavour. The projects interrogate architectural production in all its aspects, from<br />

material processes, to modes of design, representation and construction, to the ways<br />

that architecture shapes - and is shaped by - the society and culture in which it is<br />

situated.<br />

As an RIBA accredited Part II programme - the second of three steps towards<br />

qualification as a UK Architect - MArch is geared to develop advanced skills in<br />

analysis, representation, design, and technical resolution through projects of<br />

considerable scale and complexity. But it is also rooted in the belief that architectural<br />

training must go beyond professional competence. The MArch draws on the diverse<br />

expertise of Architectural Research Collaborative, our School’s multidisciplinary<br />

research collaborative, to push explorative ways of working and thinking<br />

architecturally. Students are given incentives to undertake original investigations<br />

into issues and techniques at the forefront of contemporary developments in<br />

architecture and beyond - from synthetic biology to the space of the psyche - while<br />

at the same time grounding their work in a specific material, social, cultural and<br />

intellectual context. Cross-studio reviews, exhibitions (in and out of our premises)<br />

and symposia support a lively exchange of ideas and challenge students to position<br />

their work in relation to trends in architectural production and discourse.<br />

Teaching in MArch cuts across common distinctions between design, technology,<br />

history and theory, promoting an integrated approach that treats all aspects of<br />

architecture as opportunities for critical creative enquiry. Studio modules play a<br />

central role, incorporating lectures, seminars, consultancies and workshops spanning<br />

the curriculum, as well as cross-year events such as ‘Charrettes’ and ‘Thinking-<br />

Through-Making’ Week. Projects are undertaken in small design-research studios,<br />

each exploring particular issues or themes that resonate with the research interests<br />

of tutors. Briefs invite an open process of investigation between staff and students,<br />

fostering the development of an independent approach and distinctive critical<br />

stance, all grounded in rigorous research. In Stage 5, two semester-long projects set<br />

in a major European city (currently based in Rotterdam) interrogate the complexities<br />

of architecture’s relation to context, from urban to detail-scale, allowing students to<br />

test new approaches, methods, and ideas. With most of the prescribed curriculum<br />

covered during Stage 5, Stage 6 is freed up to focus on a specific interest or question,<br />

pursued in depth through a year-long thesis project.<br />

With a rich range of opportunities for specialisation, the MArch programme at<br />

Newcastle allows students to develop their own fields of expertise and to showcase<br />

these in a distinctive portfolio. Alongside the design studio, students can choose to<br />

pursue independent research through a dissertation, to join a linked research design<br />

project in which they collaborate on a live research project led by a member of<br />

staff, or to take a tailored set of modules from one of our other specialist Masters<br />

programmes - such as Sustainable Buildings and Environments, Town Planning,<br />

or Urban <strong>Design</strong> - with the potential of accumulating credits towards a second<br />

postgraduate degree. Bridging between the two years of MArch, these activities<br />

spark ideas and develop skills that often feed into thesis projects. The School<br />

also has a series of exchange agreements with leading schools of architecture in<br />

Europe and around the world, including KTH Stockholm, National University of<br />

Singapore, and the University of Sydney. MArch students can study abroad for one<br />

or two semesters of Stage 5, and the programme benefits from the diverse skills and<br />

experiences of students who join our projects.<br />

87


Stage 5<br />

Stage 5 is a year for in-depth experimentation: for exploring architecture in all its cultural, social,<br />

political, material and historical contexts, for testing new approaches to design, representation and<br />

technology. Briefs emphasize critical thinking and require students to engage with current debates<br />

in architecture and society at large. The year’s work focuses on a particular international city – this<br />

year Rotterdam – beginning with an intensive week long study visit, including architectural tours,<br />

excursions, talks, group urban analysis and social events. Students undertake a critical reimagining<br />

of the city through two semester long projects which challenge them to work at two radically<br />

different scales – first urban, then detail. Framing design as a rigorous, as well as speculative process,<br />

they foster design-research skills and interests in preparation for Stage 6.<br />

In semester one, ‘Plan Rotterdam’ asked students to engage with the urban fabric of the city, its<br />

historical layers, cultural currents and social differences. The project was taught as five distinct<br />

studios that each took on a different urban area and issue. Common themes include the interplay<br />

of buildings, infrastructure, land and water in a city below sea level, architecture’s role in the<br />

production of images, experiences and lifestyles, and the politics of regeneration in a place<br />

renowned for visionary architectural and urban ideas. The project is paired with the ‘Tools for<br />

Thinking about Architecture’ module, which introduces a range of critical approaches through<br />

lectures, workshops and seminars.<br />

Semester two’s ‘Rematerializing Rotterdam’ switched focus to material and technical imagination,<br />

taking detail, construction and atmosphere as opportunities for creative and critical exploration.<br />

The brief asked students to interrogate a [g]host architecture – built or unbuilt, in Rotterdam<br />

or elsewhere – and to reimagine it in the contemporary city. A detail and environment lecture<br />

series, supported by expert consultancies, encouraged students to pursue a technical specialism that<br />

embodies the intentions of the project.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

James Craig<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Bethan Kay<br />

Ivan Marquez Munoz<br />

James Craig<br />

Laura Harty<br />

Ken MacLeod<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

Students<br />

Abigail Murphy<br />

Adam Hill<br />

Adel Kamashki<br />

Alexander Blanchard<br />

Alice Ravenhill<br />

Alina Tamciuc<br />

Babatunde Ibrahim<br />

Clare Bond<br />

Cynthia Wong<br />

Daniel Sprawson<br />

Demetris Socratus<br />

Emma Gibson<br />

Emma Kingman<br />

Elizabeth Holroyd<br />

Henry Brook<br />

James Anderson<br />

James Hunt<br />

Jessica Goodwin<br />

Jessica Mulvey<br />

Karl Mok<br />

Laura McClorey<br />

Lorna Clements<br />

Luana Kwok<br />

Matthew Turnbull<br />

Oliver Wolf<br />

Preena Mistry<br />

Robert Douglas<br />

Robert Wills<br />

Sophie Baldwin<br />

Theodora Kyrtata<br />

Thomas Sharlot<br />

Thomas Cowman<br />

Erasmus Students<br />

Cyrillus Carpreau<br />

Elin Stensils<br />

Mirjam Konrad<br />

Contributors<br />

See pg.201<br />

88<br />

Text by James Craig<br />

Opposite - Sophie Baldwin


Dreamland<br />

James Craig<br />

In this studio, we interrogated Rotterdam’s ‘metropolitan’ attributes as a means to creating our own urban laboratory; a theme-park dedicated<br />

to metropolitan simulation.<br />

The site for this studio is the area in and around the Rijnhaven-Maashaven basins. This site has been marked as the first in a series of postindustrial<br />

harbour basins to be transformed in the next 20 years under the Stadshavens development plan.<br />

90<br />

Cynthia Wong


Top - Sophie Baldwin Middle, left to right - Preena Mistry, Becca Lewis Bottom, left to right - Mirjam Konrad, Jessica Goodwin<br />

91


The Early Days Of A Better Nation<br />

Stephen Parnell & Ken MacLeod<br />

The aim of this project was to envision a Rotterdam of 2086. This was achieved through working with Science Fiction novelist Ken MacLeod<br />

to first establish a post-human scenario with each student then designing a fragment of that scenario with their own brief, set in 2086, on a<br />

site in Heijplaat.<br />

92<br />

Matthew Turnbull


Top - Elin Stensils Bottom, left - James Anderson Bottom, right - Alice Ravenhill, Adan Hill<br />

93


This Could Be Rotterdam (Or Anywhere)<br />

Bethan Kay<br />

The magnificence of central Rotterdam’s architectural ambitions cloaks the fact that much of the city sprawls out in relative banality to the<br />

encircling infrastructures. It is these ‘non-places’, bearing no defining characteristics of history or identity, which this studio set out to explore<br />

through in-depth analysis and a critique of the ‘Image of the City’. Focusing on the dullness of Rotterdam’s Brainpark, a highly-planned but<br />

declining backwater (where 36% of the office space stands empty), students were challenged to question what could reactivate the site and<br />

put it back on the approved map.<br />

94<br />

Top - Robert Douglas<br />

Bottom - Lorna Clements


Top - Emma Kingman(2), Abigail Murphy Middle - Robert Douglas Bottom, left to right - Karl Mok, Clare Bond<br />

95


In Media Res<br />

Laura Harty<br />

This studio was interested in prising apart the clear binary of public and private within the urban realm, and seeked to extrapolate and<br />

interrogate the tensions and possibilities that lie between.<br />

The studio title ‘In Medias Res’, Latin for ‘in the middle of things’ suggests that sites exist within a nexus of multiple defining criteria. One of<br />

the students’ tasks was to distil these criteria into a typology of urban places which scale between public and private.<br />

96<br />

Robert Wills


Top and Middle - Luana Kwok<br />

Bottom, left to right - Thomas Sharlot, Adel Kameshki<br />

97


Lost Spaces<br />

Ivan Marquez Munoz<br />

The Lost Spaces studio proposed a design-based reflection about the value of lost spaces, in the process of decay in their lifecycle. The task was<br />

to create an intervention that provided living accommodation and associated common facilities for a particular protagonist in need of care,<br />

implementing a strategy of socially integrated and architecturally sustainable neighbourhood.<br />

98<br />

Left - Demetris Socratus<br />

Right, top to bottom - Abigail Murphy, Emma Gibson, Clare Bond


Top - Demetris Socratus Middle - Emma Gibson Bottom - Clare Bond<br />

99


Hybrid Objects<br />

James Craig<br />

Hybrid Objects asked students to create an architectural response to the complex space that exists between viewers and objects. This space, a<br />

foggy territory where myriad meanings can be made, is the zone where projected meanings collide to create a space of betweenness. The result<br />

is a hybrid object; constituted from entangled meanings that exist between observers and objects. Through the selection and unpacking of<br />

an object from the permanent collection of the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, each student developed their own art depository in the<br />

Museumpark area of Rotterdam.<br />

100<br />

Alice Ravenhill


Elin’s exploded axo here<br />

Section<br />

BB<br />

Section<br />

AA<br />

Section<br />

AA<br />

Section<br />

BB<br />

Painting Storage<br />

Basement Plan - 1:200<br />

Top - Elizabeth Holroyd Middle, left to right - Elizabeth Holroyd, Elin Stensils,Theodora Kyrtata Bottom - Thomas Cowman<br />

101


Tell-Tale Tectonics<br />

Bethan Kay<br />

Situated between Rotterdam’s spectacular Wilhelminapier and the declining port, the rapidly gentrifying peninsula of Katendrecht formed the<br />

site for this semester’s enquiry. Expanding on the themes explored in Marco Frascari’s ‘Tell-The-Tale Detail’, the studio embraced the value of<br />

details as the union of representation and function, and as generator of a scheme. Delving into the area’s rich history - from industry to jazz,<br />

immigration to art, tattooing to prostitution and everything in-between - each student adopted a ghost from the district’s past to act as the<br />

catalyst for a wide range of tectonic explorations rooted in the narrative of place – tectonics that tell-a-tale.<br />

102<br />

Preena Mistry


Top - Mirjam Konrad Middle - Cynthia Wong Bottom - Preena Mistry<br />

103


Spectres of Utopia and Modernism<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Students excavated indwelling ‘ghosts of modernism’ in surviving Rotterdam examples of heroic modernist architecture from the 1920s and<br />

1930s, and in orthodox post-war modernist buildings constructed between 1945-1960. In quarrying for ghosts of modernism, students also<br />

chased spectres of Utopia, harbouring the potential for tragedy and the promise of better ways of being at the same time.<br />

The modernity students resuscitated is one of near infinite possibilities, bound up with re-enchanting the world; not the spent modernity of<br />

technocratic excess. The Utopia pursued was as a method for shaping desires for better ways of being – not the catastrophic totalising Utopia<br />

of convention.<br />

104<br />

Top - Alex Blanchard<br />

Bottom, left to right - Adam Hill, Jessica Goodwin


Top - Adel Kamashki Middle - Sophie Baldwin Bottom - Robert Douglas<br />

105


Stage 5 & 6 Fieldwork & Site Visits<br />

MArch<br />

As part of Stage 5 and 6 varied field trips were taken across the year. Stage 5 visited Rotterdam as a group which gave the opportunity for<br />

students to experience the city and embark on site visits. Stage 6 visited places from Stoke-On-Trent to Zanzibar, as well as students taking<br />

individual trips related to their thesis projects.<br />

MArch Stage 5<br />

Rotterdam<br />

MArch Stage 6<br />

Studio 1: Caravanserai - Zanzibar<br />

Zanzibar<br />

Studio 2: Experimental Architecture<br />

Venice<br />

Studio 3: Intoxicated Space<br />

Berlin<br />

Studio 7: Potteries Thinkbelt<br />

Stoke-on-Trent<br />

Studio 8: Building Upon Building<br />

Rome<br />

Verona<br />

Venice<br />

Studio 9: Rituals and the Unconscious<br />

Finland<br />

106


Stage 6<br />

In Stage 6 students undertake a year-long thesis project with a self-generated brief, within a<br />

theoretical framework established by their chosen studio. This year an unprecedented nine studios<br />

were on offer, including three studios running in a vertical orientation with Stage 3 in which<br />

students responded to variants of the same thematic concerns.<br />

All nine studios offer a comparable level of complexity, but they cover a broad range of issues<br />

and geographies leading to a diverse variety of outcomes. They showcase the interactions between<br />

studio leaders’ research expertise and the evolving interests and competences of Stage 6 students.<br />

To achieve this, students’ individual thesis projects are developed within each studio’s thematic,<br />

balancing their individual learning objectives with the studio’s area of interest. Students build upon<br />

experience gained from previous years’ representational techniques and experimentation, as well as<br />

the technical and critical knowledge they gain in Stage 5.<br />

In the MArch, studios range from ‘The Architectural Biography’, in which students respond to the<br />

oeuvre of a chosen architect with their own projects, through to ‘Caravanserai Zanzibar’, continuing<br />

Professor Prue Chiles’ work with students on the island. The Matter Studio develops APL’s tradition<br />

of working with the properties of materials, which this year has been greatly enhanced by the<br />

opening of brand new and extensive workshop facilities. Similarly, the Experimental Architecture<br />

Studio builds on Professor Rachel Armstrong’s research into biological drivers for architecture.<br />

Each of the studios has a strong and burgeoning identity within the School, and this year’s excellent<br />

student work reflects the diverse and broad range of research-led teaching at the School.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Cara Lund<br />

Claire Harper<br />

David McKenna<br />

Edward Wainwright<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Hugh Miller<br />

James Craig<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Paul Rigby<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Samuel Austin<br />

Students<br />

Adam Hampton-Matthews<br />

Alexandra Carausu<br />

Alexander Baldwin-Cole<br />

Angie Hei Man lau<br />

Carl Reid<br />

Cleo Kyriacou<br />

Daniel Duffield<br />

David Boyd<br />

Deryan Teh<br />

Gavin Wu<br />

Gregory Edward Murrell<br />

James Street<br />

Jessica Wilkie<br />

Joseph Dent<br />

Joseph Wilson<br />

Justin Moorton<br />

Kathleen Jenkins<br />

Katie Fisher<br />

Kayleigh Anne Creighton<br />

Kim Alicia Gault<br />

Laurence Ashley<br />

Malcolm Greer Pritchard<br />

Mariya Lapteva<br />

Martin Parsons<br />

Matthew Wilcox<br />

Matthew Sharman-Hayles<br />

Matthew Westgate<br />

Michael Southern<br />

Nedelina Atanasova<br />

Nicola Blincow<br />

Nikolas Ward<br />

Noor Jan-Mohamed<br />

Raphael Selby<br />

Rebecca Wise<br />

Richard John Spilsbury<br />

Robert Evans<br />

Rosie O’Halloran<br />

Ruochen Zhang<br />

Samuel Halliday<br />

Sophie Cobley<br />

Stavri Rousounidou<br />

Su Ann Lim<br />

Thomas Saxton<br />

Ulwin Beetham<br />

Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />

Wallace Ho<br />

Contributors<br />

see pg.201<br />

108 Text by Matthew Ozga-Lawn Opposite - David Boyd The Draughtsman’s Quietus


Studio 1 – Caravanserai - Zanzibar<br />

Prue Chiles & Claire Harper<br />

This studio builds upon the body of work and progressive thinking of previous years in an ongoing research project, which seeks to understand<br />

and conceptualise new paradigms for architecture and spatial planning in Zanzibar: a semi-autonomous archipelago on the East-African<br />

‘Swahili Coast’. The projects all address tightly interwoven economic and socio-political issues but from different angles, and although the<br />

chosen sites are spread around Unguja: Zanzibar’s largest and most populated island, just as much attention and conversation has gone into<br />

the wider issues and connections. Collaboration began with a 2060 scenario-based mapping exercise, which through certain assumptions,<br />

precedents, strategies, and the mediation of carefully measured contingencies, proposed a sustainable spatial schematic for Unguja in just<br />

over 40 years time. In December 2016, the team travelled to Zanzibar to validate research to-date, and armed with individual mappings<br />

of key subjects to be explored, they began to enrich their lines of enquiry. The countless interactions, observations and discussions; from<br />

liaising with the Local Planning Department to designing and constructing a new public toilet block with a local NGO; were all invaluable<br />

to understanding some of Zanzibar’s most pertinent development issues, so that they could be addressed through responsive and responsible<br />

architectural proposals.<br />

110<br />

Angie Hei Man Lau Empowering Rural Zanzibar


Deryan Teh Mkokotoni a Town for Fish<br />

111


10.<br />

9.<br />

8.<br />

7.<br />

6.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

3.<br />

2.<br />

1.<br />

112<br />

Justin Moorton Zanzibar Academy of Culinary Arts


Kayleigh Creighton Shwahili Community Co-operative<br />

113


114 Malcolm Pritchard Caravanserai


Nicola Blincow From Home to Island<br />

115


Studio 2 – Experimental Architecture<br />

Rachel Armstrong & Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Experimental Architecture prepares students for changing architectural ideas and emerging new technologies, relevant to a globally connected,<br />

highly complex and constantly evolving world. By establishing a starting point from which established design tropes may be challenged, such<br />

as the use of inert building materials, new opportunities, like the use of ‘living’ fabrics and technologies, may be explored by developing<br />

prototypes that relate to an original building proposal. Students attending the course will therefore develop a set of architectural design<br />

tools, graphical notations, and experimental studio practices that can not only be applied during their final year but also throughout their<br />

professional development.<br />

116<br />

Top and Middle - Staithes Group Field Trip<br />

Bottom - Su Ann Lim


Su Ann Lim The Ephemeral Halophytic Saltscape<br />

117


118 Kim Gault Waste Palaces


Matthew Sharman-Hayles The Bio-Analogue City<br />

119


120 Michael Southern Gaudy Architecture


Fabric sculptures in the Lagoon Garden<br />

Nedelina Atanasova Lagoon Fabrics<br />

121<br />

LAGOON FABRICS<br />

35


122 Thomas Saxton The Sensory Cenobium


Wallace Ho Academy of Decay<br />

123


Studio 3 – Intoxicated Space<br />

Edward Wainwright, Kieran Connolly & Samuel Austin<br />

‘… the rapture of the Dionysian state with its annihilation of the ordinary bounds and limits of existence contains, while it lasts, a lethargic<br />

element in which all personal experience of the past became immersed. This chasm of oblivion separates the worlds of everyday reality and<br />

the Dionysian reality.’<br />

- Friedrich Nietzsche, The Dionysian Worldview, pg.88<br />

Dionysius takes us to spaces outside our daily lives, breaks the chains of the known world and permits an insight into alternate experiences<br />

of being. These spaces are both mental and physical, created by a state of intoxication. This state can itself be induced by many stimuli – the<br />

effect of rhythm, touch, excess, desire, art, belief…<br />

These stimuli do not operate on the human in a vacuum. They take place always in, and through, space: the pub, club, bedroom, brothel,<br />

stadium, gallery, church. Ritual, sensory intensities and deprivations are key to their effect – experiences are played out over time, through<br />

space, on and with the body.<br />

Intoxicated Space situates itself as a studio focusing on design practice. Here, intoxication is understood as being produced through spatial,<br />

material and aesthetic intensities across a range of themes: desire, immersion, repetition, contact, touch, the body and crowds. The studio<br />

has sought not to define a product as its core output, but to explore the development of methods of architectural design. We have sought to<br />

critically interrogate each other’s pre-conceived design methods and practices coming into the final year of the MArch, with the aim to define,<br />

borrowing from Jane Rendell, modes of a critical spatial practice.<br />

124<br />

Cleo Kyriacou EROS desire


INTOXICATED SPACE<br />

INTOXICATED SPACE<br />

127<br />

129<br />

INTOXICATED INTOXICATED SPACE SPACE<br />

129<br />

127<br />

Daniel Duffield BECOMING<br />

125


fig 50 Stage 5 Material<br />

Explorations. Earth brick<br />

productions.<br />

fig 51 Stage 5 Material<br />

Explorations. Earth brick<br />

productions.<br />

fig 33 (top) Sarah.<br />

A first iteration for<br />

developing a technique<br />

of representing a<br />

41problematised body.<br />

fig 34 (bottom) Reappropriation<br />

of a Hannah<br />

Höch collage<br />

fig 35 Reappropriation of<br />

a Hannah Höch collage<br />

fig 36 Reappropriation of<br />

a Hannah Höch collage<br />

28 29<br />

Following on from looking at the<br />

work of Monica Bonvicini especially,<br />

I conducted a series of models and<br />

drawings, that studied the objects<br />

of disabled embodiments and there<br />

meanings. These provocations<br />

collided those elements in order to<br />

demonstrate tensions and propose<br />

new potentials. For example, the<br />

reconcieving of the safety cord<br />

handle in an accessible toilet as a<br />

black tassel!<br />

fig 60 Stage 6<br />

Provocation piece.<br />

fig 61 Stage 6<br />

Provocation piece.<br />

46 47<br />

126 Gregory Murrell Aesthetic Intoxication


Laurence Ashley Intoxication Intensities Trust in Capital<br />

127


128 Noor Jan-Mohamed A Dissolution of Boundaries


Stavri Rousounidou Durational Extentions of the Russian State Hermitage<br />

129


Studio 4 – Matter<br />

Graham Farmer & Paul Rigby<br />

The studio celebrates ‘Matter’ and encourages design processes that are founded on a dialogic and emergent understanding of materiality.<br />

The studio challenges the notion of buildings as static assemblies of neutral products and instead seeks concrete material practices in which<br />

technology is always both contextual and performative.<br />

Students start by selecting their own matter to ‘collaborate’ with and as a group have explored new understandings of conventional construction<br />

materials like timber and ceramics, along with experimental new materialities interrogating growth, form-making and formlessness. Themes of<br />

making, manufacture, entropy, flux, transformation and environmental renewal are all prominent in the student work.<br />

130<br />

Alexander Baldwin-Cole Bakethin Weir Facility


Adam Hampton-Matthews Restless Landscapes<br />

131


132 Martin Parsons Weaving Architecture


Vili Welroos Origin<br />

133


Studio 5 – The Architectural Biography<br />

James Craig & Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

This studio develops from the representation and exploration of the life and experiences of prominent individuals, as found in our previous<br />

studio ‘Landscapes of Human Endeavour.’ This time we refocus attention onto the figure of the architect. Students selected a range of<br />

architects and produced projects which mediated between their own imagined constructions, and a biographical reading of the architect<br />

they are engaged with. This year the lives and projects of Aldo Rossi, Peter Eisenman, Paulo Soleri, Raimund Abraham, Joseph Gandy and<br />

Alexander Brodsky were reimagined by students in the studio.<br />

134<br />

Gavin Wu The Scrimshaw Missiles


P1_5B<br />

& P1_5C<br />

P1_13Di-iii<br />

P1_13Fi-iii<br />

P1_5Fi<br />

P1_13Eii<br />

P1_13Eiii<br />

P1_13Ei<br />

P1_5A[L]<br />

P1_5Fiii<br />

P1_5Eiv<br />

P1_5A[R]<br />

P1_4A<br />

P1_5Ev<br />

P1_13Div-v<br />

P1_13Fiv-v<br />

P1_8Aiv<br />

P1_12D<br />

P1_12E<br />

P1_4C<br />

P3_4A<br />

P3_1C<br />

P1_5B<br />

P1_5D<br />

P1_11Aiii<br />

P1_5Ci-vii<br />

P1_1A[R]<br />

P2_1Aii<br />

Position: South Facing; Above Ground.<br />

Access:<br />

Public Landscape. Private self<br />

contained towers.<br />

Position: North Facing; Below Ground.<br />

Access:<br />

Private routes. Vault Access &<br />

maintenance.<br />

Position: East Facing; Top of Structure.<br />

Samuel Halliday Vaults of Origin<br />

Access: Semi Public/Private<br />

Landscape on roof.<br />

135


136 Mariya Lapteva The Venice


House - 1:50<br />

School - 1:500<br />

Checkpoint - 1:250<br />

Nautical Club - 1:250<br />

Stadium - 1:200<br />

Hotel - 1:100<br />

Nikolas Ward Houses of Tension<br />

137


RECYCLING HARBOR<br />

SLUDGE TREATMENT FACTORY<br />

CENTRAL PAVILION<br />

COMMUNITY CENTRE<br />

ALTERNATIVE URBANIZATION<br />

1:250<br />

PRODUCTION CENTRE<br />

FIRING CENTRE<br />

SLUDGE RECYCLING SYSTEM<br />

LIVING UNITS PRUDUCTION SYSTEM<br />

138 Ruochen Zhang Urban Laboratory: River of Waste


Joseph Dent Peter Eisenman, Midtown Manhattan and House 2<br />

139


Studio 6 – The Rhythmanalysis of Concrete Utopias<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

The End of the City?<br />

Students in this studio were challenged to develop proposals for concrete utopias in the city. If the 20th century can be understood as a long<br />

period of unmaking cities that continues, despite their apparent resurgence, the aim of this studio is the production of projects for the reurbanization<br />

of city centres, in particular those that might be considered successful examples of regeneration but in achieving this sucsess have<br />

become so sanitised that the city is no longer ‘city-like.’<br />

The projects produced in this studio have examined the possibilities revealed by using ‘Utopia as Method’ in the design process.<br />

140<br />

Alexandra Carausu A Digital Cemetery in a Transhumanist Future


2<br />

1<br />

3<br />

Alexandra Carausu A Digital Cemetery in a Transhumanist Future<br />

141


142 David Boyd The Draughtsman’s Quietus


Matthew Wilcox The City That Built Itself<br />

143


Studio 7 – Potteries Thinkbelt<br />

Matthew Margetts & Cara Lund<br />

Continuing an interest in infrastructure as background processes and systems this year we have revisited Cedric Price’s ‘Potteries Think Belt’<br />

– 50 years after its conception. We used the ‘Potteries Think Belt’ plan as a ‘treasure map’ to navigate the delights of contemporary Stokeon-Trent.<br />

The studio was one of three ‘vertical’ studios pioneered this year – taught jointly between Stages 3 and 6, and began with the group exercise<br />

of building a ‘Stoke-o-Matic’ dynamic mapping model. The model was used to explore systematic relationships between transport, education,<br />

environment and identity with enjoyably unpredictable results.<br />

Stage 6 students were given much more latitude and typically chose to focus on more societal infrastructures such as education, retail and<br />

third sector networks.<br />

Linked with Stage 3 (see pg.52)<br />

144<br />

Jessica Wilkie The Learning Precinct


Joseph Wilson Touching Ground<br />

145


146 Robert Evans Stow-ke


Robert Evans Stow-ke<br />

147


Studio 8 – Building Upon Building<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes & Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

This studio understands preservation as architecture, as it explores architecture, heritage, authenticity and preservation tied to ever-changing<br />

political and cultural processes, which inescapably mean that their constant changes cannot be avoided or stopped. Grounding on this<br />

approach the studio discusses the contemporary concern with heritage and the ever–expanding preservation movement. Ultimately the<br />

studio questions what it means to preserve and whether it is really possible to preserve. The projects in the studio explore new approaches to<br />

experimental preservation to better suit this profound and changing essence of heritage and respond appropriately to its current contemporary<br />

challenges.<br />

Linked with Stage 3 (see pg.56)<br />

148<br />

Carl Reid British Museum and a Critique on Preservation of Artefacts


Raphael Selby Park of the People<br />

149


150 Matthew Westgate The 21st Century Pedestrian Reformation of Venice


Red Doors<br />

Katie Fisher Gresham Red Door Workshop<br />

Asylum Documents<br />

151


Studio 9 – Rituals and the Unconscious<br />

Kati Blom, David McKenna & Hugh Miller<br />

Rituals and the Unconscious is a vertical studio. The theoretical background, in both Stage 3 and Stage 6 studio, is similar, but structure and<br />

focus were different. Both groups took part in the trip to Finland. During the first part of the year, Stage 6 had theoretical seminars about<br />

phenomenology, perception psychology and psychoanalytical literature, on top of normal tutorials. The overall aim was to choose a ritual<br />

important to each student. The thesis question evolved from the premise to revitalise this ritual. During the primer phase, various approaches<br />

were developed concentrating on projection, processes of daily or creative rituals, or the ritual of death. Students then chose individual<br />

methods to test the limits of the revitalising of a ritual through design, in variety of places: New York financial centre, RIBA headquarters in<br />

London, Lindisfarne Island, London’s Islington and Newcastle.<br />

Linked with Stage 3 (see pg.60)<br />

152<br />

Primer Group Work Freud Room


Kathleen Jenkins The Moonshot Factory at Portland Place<br />

153


154 James Street Translation


Rosie O’Halloran Islington Projection House<br />

155


156 Rebecca Wise Meditative Architecture


Ulwin Beetham La Danse Macabre<br />

157


Research in Architecture<br />

Multidisciplinary research in architecture is flourishing, and we are particularly pleased this year<br />

that our successes in winning major project funding, developing collaborations between colleagues<br />

and building a strong postgraduate research community which are also benefitting students in<br />

the BA and MArch through innovative research-led teaching. 2016-17 saw the launch of Prof<br />

Rachel Armstrong’s Horizon 2020-funded £3.2 million LIAR (Living Architecture) project<br />

and Dr Martyn Dade-Robertson’s Thinking Soils has just won ESPRC funding, enabling us to<br />

recruit a talented group of Research Associates and strengthen our unique focus on Experimental<br />

Architecture. The School is establishing itself as a UK leader in architectural design research; we<br />

had our first creative practice PhD completions from Dr James Longfield and Dr Luis Herna; fine<br />

artist Dr Polly Gould joined our Architecture Research Collaborative (ARC) as postdoctoral fellow<br />

in <strong>Design</strong>-led Research, and together with Prof Prue Chiles organised the inaugural Architecture:<br />

Creative Practice Symposium (25-26 th April <strong>2017</strong>) where this year’s visiting professor Julieanna<br />

Preston (Massey, NZ) joined contributors from across the UK to mentor junior colleagues and<br />

present her participatory project Murmur about the Town Wall.<br />

ARC staged a number of public events which took research into the spaces it is about; Scaling the<br />

Heights, an ARC-organised collaboration held in the abandoned space of the Tyne Bridge’s North<br />

Tower (18-25 th Nov 2016) as part of the AHRC Being Human Festival of the Humanities, featured<br />

the urban explorer Lucinda Grange and had over 400 visitors including local MP Chi Onwurah.<br />

Dr Emma Cheatle recorded birth stories in Maternity Tales in the RVI and Laing (17-18 th Nov<br />

2016) and MArch students presented their Newcastle After Dark research in local night-club Tiger<br />

Tiger (12 th Feb <strong>2017</strong>). They were one of eleven linked research groups which ran this year – an<br />

offer which is unique in the UK as far as we know where MArch students can elect to work in small<br />

groups on a research project led by one or two staff – on projects as diverse as studying international<br />

brutalism to building pavilions at Kielder Water. This year we also introduced a new research-led<br />

module in the BA – with 15 dissertation electives offered by staff across the disciplines, further<br />

enabling all students to benefit from the rich research culture in the School.<br />

Ecologies,<br />

Insfrastructures<br />

and Sustainable<br />

Environments<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Samuel Austin<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Simone Ferracina<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

John Kamara<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Experimental<br />

Architecture<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

James A Craig<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Simone Ferracine<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Futures and<br />

Imaginaries<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

James A Craig<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

Ian Thompson<br />

History, Cultures and<br />

Landscape<br />

Samuel Austin<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Stephen Prnell<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Edward Wainwright<br />

Industries of<br />

Archicture<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

John Kamara<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Processes and Practices<br />

of Architecture<br />

Prue Chile<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Edward Wainwright<br />

Mountains and<br />

Megastructures<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

James A Craig<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Visiting Professors,<br />

PhD examiners and<br />

contributors<br />

Amy Butt<br />

Anna Holder<br />

Becky Shore<br />

Catrin Huber<br />

Chris Muller<br />

Chris Speed<br />

David Greenwood<br />

Ian Wiblin<br />

Jane Rendell<br />

Julia Heslop<br />

Juileanna Preston<br />

Katja Grillner<br />

Lucinda Grange<br />

M. Sohail<br />

Neil Barker<br />

Nikoletta Karasthani<br />

Penny McCarthy<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

Simon Taylor<br />

Steve Sharples<br />

Ye Huang<br />

PhD students<br />

Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

Ali Salih<br />

Ashley Mason<br />

Carolina Ramirez Figueroa<br />

Charles Makun<br />

Cheng Wang<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

Djuang Sodikin<br />

Hazel Cowie<br />

Ivan Marquez Munoz<br />

James Craig<br />

James Longfield<br />

Javier Rodriguez Corral<br />

Javier Urquizo Calderon<br />

Khalid Setaih<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Luis Hernandez Hernandez<br />

Macarena Beltan Rodriguez<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Nergis Kalli<br />

Ohoud Kamal<br />

Oluwatoyin Akin<br />

Pierangelo Scravaglieri<br />

Ray Verrall<br />

Ruth Lang<br />

Sadanu Sukkasame<br />

Sam Clark<br />

Sana Al-Naimi<br />

Sarah Cahyadini<br />

Sinead Hennessy<br />

Tijana Stevanovic<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

Xi Chen<br />

Xi Ye<br />

Yasser Megahed<br />

Yomna Elghazi<br />

158 Text by Katie Lloyd Thomas Opposite - Scaling the Heights


BA Dissertations<br />

Vernacular Architecture of Nomads: Transmission of principles and knowledge from<br />

traditional Kazakh architecture to the architecture of 21st century<br />

Assem Nurymbayeva<br />

This dissertation set out to investigate and discuss Vernacular Nomadic Architecture and how<br />

its fundamental efficient engineering basics and other aspects have been applied and used in the<br />

contemporary construction field. Study on the historical background and structural principles<br />

of nomadic dwellings is important in order to get a better understanding of traditional Kazakh<br />

Architecture, to test and analyse the ancient structures and research the subject of cultural<br />

influence. In this dissertation the Case Study on the aspect of implementing the features of<br />

nomads’ dwellings in the time of 21st Century is reviewed and studied. Moreover, purpose of<br />

this research is to assess the extent to which information gathered from the Literature Review<br />

unravelled nomadic constructions - Yurts. Their examination and inspection with the aim<br />

of obtaining holistic critique will be implemented by collecting primary data of thermal<br />

performance and feedback from the occupants. The notion of combining technological<br />

innovations of today and extremely valuable traditional experience and knowledge accumulated<br />

by the human race for many centuries is the focus of this dissertation.<br />

Rebuilding Identity: Acknowledging the traumas of architectural destruction<br />

Daniel Barrett<br />

My dissertation aims to investigate the troubling state of identity within refugee camps,<br />

following the biggest migration crisis since World War II. I began by defining the routes to<br />

a positive sense of identity under the two classifications of accomplishment. This provided<br />

an architectural and spatial framework from which to view identity in refugee camps, which<br />

naturally led to an uncovering of the tensions at the heart of humanitarian design that constrict<br />

identity growth: Permanence – Temporary, Independence – Control.<br />

Considering the spatial clues for these categories, an analysis of the formal and informal<br />

refugee settlements seemed to reveal that the further towards the permanent and independent<br />

side of the spectrum, the more identity is able to flourish.<br />

The dissection of the Za’atari camp was important as it showed the development of identity<br />

over a wide time frame in a highly controlled environment (a refugee camp ‘sandbox’). The<br />

steady swing from temporary to permanent, and from control to independence, over the<br />

course of five years unveiled a gradual rebirth of Syrian Identity. I tell this story through the<br />

accomplishments of the refugees in Za’atari.<br />

Classifying Concrete: A study of existing irregularities in concrete’s characteristics and<br />

how this could affect its position in the current classification system of material properties<br />

Quynh Dang Le Tu<br />

This dissertation originated from my interest in finding out what could be regarded as ‘irregular’<br />

in architecture. This is not the kind of striking unusualness that calls for attention like the<br />

extravagant cladding of Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim Museum or Zaha Hadid’s extreme curved<br />

style in Heydar Aliyev Centre. I wanted to study something which exceeded the ‘normal’ in a<br />

subtle way but which also has a significant impact on the work of architecture.<br />

At the outset, concrete came to my research as fabric formwork, something contrasting to<br />

the density of the common concrete. What interested me was its plasticity, but moreover the<br />

appreciation of the material itself more than just about the constructional aspect. Concrete<br />

cannot be defined by one category and I wanted to find ways to express its ability ‘to be both’<br />

of concrete. While determining concrete’s indeterminacy I have also realised that I might as<br />

well have created a new class for its properties. Because of being ‘in-between’, concrete has<br />

moments of irregularity and does not fit into the conventional property system. This led me to<br />

question whether it was the classification that could not cope with the properties of concrete<br />

and caused irregularities in it. And if that is the case, could there be another framework that<br />

accepts concrete’s properties as another standard category?<br />

160


At The Threshold: Investigating the work of Sou Fujimoto in relation to ideas of the ‘inbetween’<br />

in Dutch structuralism and in the Japanese notion of ‘Ma’<br />

Pannawat Sermsuk<br />

Every day we unconsciously cross a number of threshold spaces. Transitional spaces are key<br />

moments in architecture yet these spaces are much neglected. Aldo Van Eyck, a key figure<br />

in Dutch Structuralism, believed that threshold spaces promise a potential to create a<br />

continuous sense of place. Influenced by Einstein’s theory of relativity where space and time<br />

are interrelated, Van Eyck began to form the concept of the ‘in-between’.<br />

In parallel to Dutch structuralism, the idea of in-between has long embedded in Japanese<br />

architecture known as ‘Ma’. It is also an architectural inherent being reinterpreted into a<br />

contemporary context by architects like Sou Fujimoto. Also inspired by Einstein’s theory<br />

of relativity, the concept of homogenised continuity of interiority and exteriority becomes<br />

prominent in Fujimoto’s work. His architecture involves spaces which connect together in<br />

‘loose order’ – of which he called ‘weak architecture’.<br />

Acknowledging those differences, and without suggesting any direct influence of one architect<br />

on another, this dissertation sets out to explore certain parallels between Van Eyck’s notion of<br />

the in-between and the work of Sou Fujimoto. It will trace an approach to an in-between realm<br />

that will help in breaking down boundaries between public and private, inside and outside,<br />

and create a continuous sense of place where a person can feel ‘belong’ wherever they are.<br />

The International Flying Circus: Architects and branding within an evolving media<br />

landscape<br />

Katherine Marguerite Michell<br />

Architecture has always been understood as more than purely shelter. Primarily a tool for<br />

communication, architecture is read as a symbol of broader social order; carrying inherent<br />

economic and cultural significance. Conversely, architecture can also be the spatial<br />

manifestation of the individual ego and culturally-distinguished celebrity.<br />

This role of celebrity architect has powerful ramifications in the field of political strategy;<br />

ramifications that are explored through this writing which examines the media’s role in<br />

sponsorship of the architectural ego.<br />

As starchitects are increasingly fetishised as cultural icon and mainstream ‘celebrity’, the aura<br />

of architectural mystique that once preserved this high-cultural status is now being dispelled<br />

by selfies and socks.<br />

By examining different value systems that propagate architectural eminence, this writing<br />

explores how the platforms of social media are altering these established values. Whether<br />

aura is diminished, or starchitects are increasingly fetishised as celebrity, these changes will<br />

inevitably play out in the future global landscape. The International Flying Circus adopts a<br />

speculative look ahead at the political implications of a shift in architectural status.<br />

Architectural Soundscapes: The communication of the sonic experience within art<br />

galleries<br />

Jack Ranby<br />

The dominance of the visual appraisal of architecture means that the significance of auditory<br />

spatial awareness is generally overlooked. Whilst greatly influencing the way we navigate and<br />

perceive space and promoting a feeling of social cohesion, the ignorance towards the role of<br />

sound in architecture comes primarily from our perception of space and time.<br />

In this dissertation, the overall role of sound in architecture will be discussed, along with the<br />

development or ‘deterioration’ of the urban soundscape and its causes. This will ultimately<br />

lead to an investigation of the means of representing and communicating aural information in<br />

order to reinforce the use of sound for a rational design methodology.<br />

161


BA Dissertations<br />

The Carpets of Venice: Was venetian façade ornamentation influenced by the carpet trade<br />

1300-1600?<br />

Angus Brown<br />

Art historians have drawn a link between Islamic carpets and Italian painting. This dissertation<br />

will attempt to establish a further link between oriental rugs and the ornamentation of<br />

Venetian architecture (1300-1600). This will be achieved by examining the relationship<br />

between Venice and the East centred around the carpet trade, followed by an exploration of its<br />

influence on Italian paintings, before attempting to discover whether such a link can be drawn<br />

to Venetian architecture.<br />

The first chapter will discuss the early depictions of Anatolian carpets in Venice. To help<br />

inform the discussion we will look at some of the common motifs and patterns displayed on<br />

oriental carpets. Inventories will also help us to establish the extent of the carpet trade. The<br />

second chapter will establish why vernacular architecture was receptive to Islamic influence<br />

with analysis of the tripartite plan and Gottfired Semper’s Stoff-Wechsel theory. The third<br />

chapter will address whether carpets have become part of the city’s permanent display,<br />

discerning whether there is a connection between the mihrab niche found on Moslem prayer<br />

mats and Venetian fenestration. To complete the discussion, we will analyse the surviving<br />

façade paintings of the city and discern whether these too were influenced by the patterns<br />

found on carpets.<br />

Terrestrial Ecopoiesis: The choreography of life within an encapsulated world<br />

Robert Thackeray<br />

Whether it’s to travel into the depths of space, or to sit out the apocalypse here on earth, closed<br />

system ecologies strive to provide a space that can sustain human life. By mixing together<br />

disciplines such as biology, ecology, anthropology, and a whole load of other ‘ologies’ to go<br />

with them, the closed systems created in the past present a very experimental architectural<br />

typology.<br />

Delving into these ideas, and how their ecologies will be inhabited by people, this essay<br />

tries to emulate their experimental approach. Combining scientific analysis with descriptive<br />

postulations and fiction, or using poetry, religion and myth to accentuate experimentations,<br />

the essay strives to cross disciplines, and therefore styles, to give a rounded understanding of<br />

such a multifaceted typology.<br />

HygroSpores: A report into early experiments on the design and fabrication of bacteria<br />

spore based actuators<br />

Pippa McLeod-Brown<br />

Energy reduction policies imposed by the government have led to technological innovations<br />

to lower energy consumption in architectural design and building practices. Building systems<br />

“reduce energy use by means of technologically enabled climate-responsiveness”. Actuators are<br />

primary examples of this; they are used to regulate internal building environments by reducing<br />

nuances such as solar heat gain. Bioclimatic design has been the focus for attaining lower energy<br />

consumption figures, however the use of active building systems is still sporadically required<br />

when external environmental conditions do not favour the passive systems implemented.<br />

In recent years there has been a growing interest in developing organic material to replace<br />

traditional mechanical systems. Natural systems perpetually respond to the environment using<br />

genetically ingrained survival mechanisms. This has inspired a new generation of responsive<br />

materials in architecture that are capable of reacting intelligently to their environment. The<br />

properties of materials such as wood have been researched to understand how the natural<br />

systems function so we can programme them to work for human benefit.<br />

This dissertation will describe a series of experiments that explore a new type of hygromorphic<br />

material which uses a mutated strain of Bacillus Subtilis spores that can be applied to a thin,<br />

passive, polymer substrate and programmed into an actuating system.<br />

162


AUP Creative Practice / Social Sciences Dissertations<br />

Window: mediation between two spaces: The inhabitants and the street watchers?<br />

Yeqian Gao<br />

I chose the window and the transparency behaviology around the window as the key words<br />

of my dissertation. The main inspiration was from a study trip to the Netherlands which took<br />

place in April 2016. During the trip, we did several neighbourhood site visits. One thing<br />

that impressed me was the design of the windows. I could not help but look in the rooms<br />

behind every window. Even though sometimes nobody was at home just looking at the stylish<br />

interiors greatly enhanced my experience. It got more interesting when there were people<br />

inside, then you get to see all sorts of activities take place and even eye contact when they<br />

realized pedestrians like me, were looking through the window. Also, when a whole group of<br />

students with a guide walking around your neighbourhood, the residents will get curious and<br />

attempt to look out from the window.<br />

Soon, a question of what other contribution these windows by the street have to their<br />

neighbourhood and street experience in residential area? Rather than just playing a role of<br />

natural surveillance, which was from the eyes on the street theory from Jane Jacob, from my<br />

own observation and experience, the window contributes to the liveliness of the street and<br />

neighbourhood and therefore improve the walking experience among the neighbourhoods.<br />

Along with the research, the literature reading started based on the keywords: urban scale,<br />

lively street and neighbourhoods, private and public urban space, walk, window… However,<br />

most of the literature covers the topic of urban design only assume the public space as urban<br />

area and more specifically majority were about boosting economic in commercial area. Walking<br />

experience researches, that I covered, had more attention to neighbourhoods, nonetheless,<br />

they often relate to healthy urban. All enhanced the purpose of this research. Therefore, at this<br />

stage, I ste my research question into two aspects, windowology and within neighborhoods.<br />

Five site visits have done in Newcastle Upon Tyne, throughout different typology of the<br />

neighborhoods in Newcastle, linkages and clues are coming up slowly, and in this draft, I<br />

would like to share my findings basing on three of the Newcastle window experience.<br />

The Impact of Street Art Graffiti in the Process of Regeneration<br />

Lok Hang Luke Leung<br />

The importance of art that surrounds us in our society – among our built environment there<br />

is undiscovered uniqueness, for each passage and alleyways there is something mysterious. Of<br />

which, street and graffiti artists operate in these scenes, captivity transforming urban waste<br />

into a city canvas. These artists are the urban regenerators, reflecting their work on the social<br />

political aspect of the media. Furthermore, to contact these invisible figures among our society,<br />

I used the platform of Instagram to attract artist’s attention, as well as keeping a recording of<br />

this subcultural movement. Overall, the study revealed that city acceptance toward street and<br />

graffiti are the main contributors in elevating the creative industries within a city, however, it<br />

is the individuals that underline the city success.<br />

What are the impaction of Graffiti in the process of regeneration? How has Culture shifted?<br />

Making Street Art and Graffiti as part of our culture? Does Street Art and Graffiti have benefits<br />

to the wider norms of society?<br />

An Investigation into Subterranean Residential Developments within the Royal Borough<br />

of Kensington and Chelsea<br />

Andrew Blandford-Newson<br />

This dissertation explores the incentives behind the new popular method of undertaking<br />

subterranean residential developments within Kensington and Chelsea and how their impacts<br />

have labelled such constructions as an issue for concern over recent years, leading to respective<br />

local planning legislation changes. Through a qualitative research process, material from<br />

professionals, local residents and submitted Planning Applications are analysed to better<br />

understand such impacts and the adequacy of such newly established policies within the<br />

planning system itself. The results show an insight into the important role that the planning<br />

system plays in ensuring planning for the future in the best interest of serving the public.<br />

163


MArch Dissertations<br />

The 10,000 word MArch dissertation offers students the opportunity to undertake a sustained enquiry into a topic of particular interest to<br />

them and to develop their own modes of writing and presentation. Where appropriate the timing of the dissertation allows for topics explored<br />

to inform their final thesis design project. The research has a growing profile in the School, with two public presentations taking place in<br />

October and February, and the dissertation is now a feature of the Degree Shows in Newcastle and London.<br />

Scales of Aggregation: Material variation in architecture<br />

Justin Moorton<br />

Standardisation has historically been promoted as a means of driving down manufacturing<br />

costs and hence improving the accessibility of products through economies of scale. Yet<br />

the materials which make our built environments are all starting to look the same, and this<br />

flavourless homogeneity may be taking an emotional toll on the people forced to live in and<br />

around them. A growing body of cognitive science research is revealing how oppressively dull<br />

environs can create stress and raise blood pressure as a direct result of boredom, and how<br />

variety can improve our quality of life. This paper looks at reasons why visual variation in<br />

architectural materiality is a property worth examining and retaining. To do so, scale and<br />

texture were employed as metrological frameworks for approaching the design of heterogeneous<br />

surfaces. This concern is especially valid considering the huge technological advances in digital<br />

fabrication of late. Multi-material printing is already possible and in the not-so-distant future<br />

it is anticipated that we will be able to embed and weave multiple materials into complex<br />

micro-structures specified with micron-scale precision. However, it is shown that there are<br />

other ways of orchestrating heterogeneity, mostly involving relinquishing some for of agency<br />

or control. The deterministic specification of variation is a much more complicated endeavour<br />

and an interdisciplinary method of approach is outlined.<br />

Although this dissertation quite clearly had the secondary agenda of highlighting some of the<br />

pitfalls of material standardisation, it has ended on a positive note. Whether by cultivating<br />

the need for craft and community participation in contemporary construction, or enabling<br />

material variety to become ‘free’ and accessible to all, a contingency which can be made<br />

possible through the wider availability of 3D printing, the refocusing of design energies to<br />

include the smallest scales of material design has the potential for real political and social<br />

traction in today’s world of every-increasing giganticism. And we do live in very exciting times:<br />

where the material concoctions we produce may soon be as varied as our imaginations will<br />

allow.<br />

164


Theatrical Reconstructions: Case studies on authenticity within the politics of heritage<br />

construction<br />

Vili Welroos<br />

Originating from ideas conceived in the 19th century, precise reconstructions are a 20th<br />

century phenomenon caused by the urge to preserve our legacy within a narrative of heritage<br />

construction. It has come to be used and abused by those in control of a dynamic Bourdieuian<br />

field of ‘heritage production’. In the 21st century, this phenomenon is rapidly accelerating<br />

via innovative methods of recording and the possibility for seemingly authentic replication<br />

through new technologies. The project typology, perhaps, highlights an evolving perception<br />

of heritage; one that is built on what existed, or preserved as a physical manifestation of the<br />

past after its destruction. Analysis of perceptions of historic authenticity is performed by<br />

juxtaposing three different case studies – St. Mark’s Campanile, the Berlin City Palace and the<br />

Triumphal Arch of Palmyra. The reason for using these examples is due to their underlying<br />

differences in terms of reconstruction and a comparative analysis based on a theoretical<br />

understanding of the preservation debate is performed. This research proposes that architects<br />

take a critical attitude towards the built (and rebuilt) environment which forms a part of a<br />

complex socio-political struggle taking place before us right now and in the future. Recording<br />

and archiving information renders it usable within reconstructions whilst keeping memories<br />

hidden forever makes their recording obsolete. The dilemma is that it always contains a level of<br />

political contestation. Destruction may be inevitable, but retaining a record allows humanity<br />

to celebrate the physical manifestation of memories in the present, making it indispensable as a<br />

tool for solace. Nevertheless, the debate carries on evolving towards a new type of transformed<br />

neo-physical preservation. What can the differing attitudes taken towards authenticity and<br />

precision tell us about the political struggle they are part of, and what can architects learn<br />

from it today?<br />

Social Housing, The Discography: A soundtrack to Britain’s modernist estates<br />

Adam Hampton-Matthews<br />

The phrases council estate and tower block have become two of the most stigmatised terms<br />

in the English language. Simply thinking about them brings about a plethora of negative<br />

connotations that we subconsciously associate with them. So much so that many of Britain’s<br />

estates are now brandished with the same caustic typologies of ‘dead-ends, vandalism, violence,<br />

and the absence of escape routes’. This ‘fear’ of crime and social malaise within estates is deeply<br />

rooted in British history and politics.<br />

Britain’s modernist estates have long been a social backdrop to which a variety of popular<br />

culture platforms are situated featuring heavily in motion pictures, yet what is less well<br />

documented is the way Britain’s estates have been portrayed in music. Often overlooked in<br />

writings of architectural representation, music could prove a particularly intriguing subject<br />

due to the close and personal relationship artists have with their lyrics; providing a deeper<br />

insight into what these estates meant to the people who lived in them, and how they were<br />

perceived both within a local context as well as across Britain.<br />

The dissertation begins with a study of prolific dystopian-novelist J.G. Ballard, focusing<br />

specifically on his influences within the emerging genre of New Wave music during the 1970s,<br />

reflecting on how artists began to comment on Ballard’s dystopian vision and the realities of<br />

British housing. The subsequent chapters include a comprehensive study of the modernist<br />

housing that developed in Coventry and Sheffield. Over the years, these utopian cities have<br />

proved to be a powerful tool for creativity for some of Britain’s most influential artists in the<br />

music industry. Taking a journey through the music ‘scenes’, this study aims to gain a better<br />

understanding of the relationship between the perceptions of Britain’s modernist estates and<br />

the genres that emerged.<br />

165


Linked Research<br />

Among the most exciting and ambitious modules we offer as a School, the Linked Research module<br />

is unique to the Newcastle curriculum and spans the two Stages in the MArch enabling year-long<br />

collaborative research projects between staff and students. Linked Research encourages approaches<br />

that extend beyond the conventional studio design project or ‘lone researcher’ dissertation model<br />

allowing space for multiple and speculative forms of research. Projects are often open-ended and<br />

collaborative and, because they are long term and involve groups working together, they can enable<br />

participatory projects and large-scale production with a wide range or partners inside and outside<br />

the University. This year an unprecedented eight linked research projects were completed, ranging<br />

from explorations of Newcastle’s unique nightlife to the study of abandoned and empty swimming<br />

pools. Linked Research is an increasingly popular option for students in our MArch, offering<br />

students first-hand access to the ongoing research of staff at APL, and allowing novel ways of<br />

collaborative learning that break new ground in how we educate at the School.<br />

Architecture by Default<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

James Street<br />

Noor Jan-Mohamed<br />

Beyond Representation<br />

James Craig<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

David Boyd<br />

Joseph Dent<br />

Nikolas Ward<br />

Ruochen Zhang<br />

Empty Pool<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Rona Lee<br />

Martin Parsons<br />

Stavri Rousounidou<br />

Theodora Kyrtata<br />

International Brutalisms<br />

Steve Parnell<br />

Testing Ground<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Alexander Baldwin- Cole<br />

Kathleen Jenkins<br />

Katie Fisher<br />

Laurence Ashley<br />

Matthew Westgate<br />

Robert Evans<br />

Samuel Halliday<br />

Sophie Cobley<br />

Ulwin Beetham<br />

Zanzibar Futures<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Alexandra Carausu<br />

Malcolm Pritchard<br />

Matthew Wilcox<br />

Nicola Blincow<br />

Joseph Wilson<br />

Raphael Selby<br />

Learning Space<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Cara Lund<br />

Carl Reid<br />

Gavin Wu<br />

Jessica Wilkie<br />

Kayleigh Creigton<br />

Thomas Cowman<br />

Newcastle After Dark<br />

Edward Wainwright<br />

Samuel Austin<br />

Matthew Sharman Hayles<br />

Rosie O’Halloran<br />

Thomas Saxton<br />

166 Text by Matthew Ozga-Lawn Opposite - Raphael Selby International Brutalisms


Architecture by Default<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Situated in the buildings and spaces which form the generic environments of contemporary architecture, Architecture by Default is a critical<br />

investigation into spatial production predicated on values of efficiency, economy, management and organisation. Through the reading of<br />

industry wide material specification documents employed by corporate facility management services, a catalogue of construction systems –<br />

from the suspended ceiling tile to plastic trunking – are identified and their repetition across a variety of rooms, spaces and building types is<br />

documented and analysed.<br />

These are the spaces procured by spreadsheet, by a committee of people not usually too interested in what a space looks like but how it<br />

performs. Examples are cited where the vision for a building or a space are dictated by the specification of the systems which form it; how they<br />

meet certain regulations, are packaged with particular warranties and fit into tightly controlled budgets. Conclusively the project addresses<br />

how these dominant products and systems affect the design of space and the wider impact this has on how modern buildings are constructed.<br />

It speculates on the wide range of default processes embedded in architectural production, from the use of standardised construction systems<br />

to the specification’s which dictate their implementation.<br />

(150)<br />

(24)<br />

(1)<br />

(1)<br />

(1)<br />

(150)<br />

(12)<br />

(1)<br />

(29m)<br />

(1)<br />

168


Beyond Representation<br />

James Craig & Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Beyond Representation is a project based around an earlier project by STASUS titled Everest Death Zone. This project consisted of four<br />

drawings and a short text concerning the bodies of endeavourers who tried and failed to ascend Mount Everest. STASUS invited students<br />

to extend one of the drawings, based on the most famous endeavourer, George Mallory, into a physical installation at the ‘Mountains &<br />

Megastructures’ symposium (March 2016 at APL). The installation included performative and atmospheric experimentation and students<br />

worked with STASUS on designing, fabricating and installing the work.<br />

The installation was then extended and developed as part of ARC’s Scaling the Heights event in the North Tower of the Tyne Bridge (see<br />

pg.198) Students were tasked with installing the work, along with the work of other collaborators, as part of a battery-powered temporary<br />

exhibition in the tower.<br />

Finally, students were tasked with translating the installation into a virtual, embodied drawing through VR technology. Using the School’s new<br />

VR room, students exhibited work that mediated between a virtual representation of Everest’s landscape, the North Tower, the installation,<br />

and a physical apparatus within the room itself. This complex and multi-layered set-up bridged formerly distinct representational frameworks<br />

and allowed us to move and interact with architectural drawing in new and unexpected ways.<br />

169


Empty Pool<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas & Rona Lee<br />

Acknowledging the various ways of defining emptiness, the study of The Empty Pool revolves around the state that follows the removal of<br />

water. This decision is derived from the intrinsic link between the pool’s main modus usandi – swimming and paddling. The specificity of the<br />

pool’s form prevents programmatic alteration, a constraint that offers ample space for imagination and discussion. The peculiarity at the sight<br />

of the pool’s exposed form, segregated from its intention, is an exceptionally intriguing theme, open for interpretation. Site visits, theoretical<br />

readings and film screenings were used as resources for the development of the project.<br />

The outcome of the group research was an inventory of empty pools, compiled in a book for the purposes of an exhibition. A volumetric study<br />

through a series of physical models was conducted for a selection of pools. The pool shapes in 1:500 scale were sunk into plaster rectangles,<br />

the dimension of which was derived from the standard swimming pool tile.<br />

Within the project students formulated individual research topics. Martin explored the purpose and patterns of oceanic lidos, a pool typology<br />

which is currently reviving throughout the British Isles. Stavri investigated the physical animation of the female body in the element of water<br />

through researching psychoanalysis, feminine theories and the swimming pool’s cinematic history. Theodora defined a typology under the<br />

name ‘exotic pool’ and used the exposed volumes of Tropicana Pool in Rotterdam as a lens to deconstruct and decipher the illusion of a tropical<br />

landscape fantasy.<br />

170


International Brutalisms<br />

Steve Parnell<br />

The group research looked at International Brutalisms – focusing on the ethical aspect of the movement as opposed to Reyner Banham’s<br />

aesthetic. Brutalism (whether called by the same name or not) appeared in many countries in the post war period. There is currently a debate<br />

on the future of these buildings as due to their age, they demand refurbishment, restoration, or demolition.<br />

The group focused on researching the context of Brutalism internationally by each student choosing a country to study and catalogue its key<br />

brutalist buildings. The purpose of this was understand the Brutalism in its native context and assess whether the findings could contribute<br />

to the British debate.<br />

The first semester of the project looked at the historical background of Brutalism, to understand style of architecture and how to identify it.<br />

This included literary and periodical research to identify key buildings and later, travelling to the chosen country to document the buildings,<br />

as well as interviews with local academics and architects, during the summer vacation. The final semester consisted of completing a written<br />

dissertation which also included the documentation of the buildings.<br />

The Architectural Journal of US Brutalism<br />

Joe Wilson<br />

My dissertation, led with the question “what characteristics constitute to defining Brutalist architecture in<br />

the United States of America, and do they focus on architectural aesthetics, as opposed to having an ethical<br />

stance promoted by British Brutalism?” This question was posed because North America did not suffer the<br />

same physical devastation as that of the UK and other European countries during the Second World War.<br />

I found that US ‘Brutalist’ architects’ ideologies did not carry the social missions as British Brutalist<br />

architects. From my conversations with U.S. architects, I discovered that it was the heavy, monumental,<br />

and sculptural aesthetic qualities of Le Corbusier’s work that captured U.S. architects’ imaginations. Le<br />

Corbusier presented concrete as a building material that offered sculptural plasticity. This freedom offered<br />

US architects an escape from the rectilinear style of sharp modernism, instead providing endless variability<br />

in form allowing inhabitants to engage with the architecture more intimately.<br />

I sought to confirm whether U.S. Brutalism is exclusively associated with concrete, and identified that<br />

the expressive use of concrete in the USA often resulted in three recurring features: monumentality,<br />

sculpturalism, experientialism.<br />

I explored Brutalism’s reception in the USA, with regards to the architecture itself and the terminology.<br />

I found that US architects believed that the word ‘Brutalism’ held negative connotations and that they<br />

referred to their work as ‘concrete modernism’ or ‘expressionism’. I concluded that the term Brutalism<br />

within American architecture is a superimposition by journalists for assemblage of aesthetically similar<br />

buildings that were constructed in concrete during the late modernist period.<br />

Brazilian Brutalism: An analysis of Brutalism in the context of Brazil<br />

Raphael Selby<br />

The dissertation aims to discover the essence of Brazilian Brutalism through an analysis of essential<br />

characteristics of the buildings researched. The term Brutalism has been used to refer to a widespread<br />

selection of modern architecture from the 1950s to the 1980s. The study argues that Brutalism in Brazil,<br />

although similar in aesthetics to other Brutalisms around the world, is native to the country.<br />

A recent ‘aestheticisation’ of Brutalism has seen the popularity of these buildings grow on social media.<br />

However, there is little knowledge outside Brazil regarding the context of these buildings, their purpose in<br />

the urban fabric and how they are inhabited and experienced. Field work in Brazil, which included visiting<br />

the buildings and interviewing key academics and architects, was crucial in providing the data required for<br />

the analysis of the buildings and their architectural qualities.<br />

The understanding of ethic as ‘essence’ - derived from the word “ethos” - rather than implying a notion<br />

of morality, is concerned with the intrinsic nature and essential quality of a material or space. It is such<br />

meaning, that determines the character of the building, resulting in more than just an aesthetic experience.<br />

By observing, documenting, photographing and drawing the buildings first-hand an analysis of three<br />

‘essential characteristics’, namely the ground plane, monumentality and natural light - argues for the essence<br />

of Brazilian Brutalism.<br />

By studying Brutalism in Brazil, the need for further research became clear. There is a large number of<br />

buildings requiring to be documented. The age and condition of the buildings, require academics and<br />

architects to identify their architectural importance, allowing for their appreciation, understanding and<br />

subsequent preservation.<br />

171


Learning Space<br />

Matthew Margetts & Cara Lund<br />

Building on our previous linked research collaboration with Sunderland University’s Psychology Department, ‘Slides, Deckchairs and<br />

Watercoolers’, we continue our exploration into the psychology behind places, spaces and furniture designed for interaction. This year the<br />

focus was on increasing our understanding design which encourages people to physically engage with and modify a space/piece of adaptable<br />

furniture.<br />

Much modern workplace and education furniture is designed to be flexible. But it is only flexible if people engage with it and change it. Our<br />

practice experience in British Council for Offices’ award winning workplace design suggests this rarely happens in reality or as intended. Thus<br />

the central line of enquiry was to gain a better understanding of the psychological parameters, and having spatialized these, test an intervention<br />

in the architecture school, before refining and testing in a real-life workplace.<br />

Our students were challenged to work across disciplines, with real end users, to develop dynamic mapping tools and to undertake their own<br />

reflective ‘live build’.<br />

172


Newcastle After Dark<br />

Edward Wainwright & Samuel Austin<br />

Newcastle has become nationally and internationally famous for its nightlife. From ‘stag and hen do’s’ to the ‘trebles bar’ phenomena, the<br />

city has evolved spatially, economically and legislatively to accommodate a playground of desire, consumption and intoxication. Heavily<br />

dependent on the night time economy, Newcastle is continually developing spaces for the after-dark. The areas of the Bigg Market and the<br />

‘Diamond Strip’ of Collingwood street have been explored through film and photography, documenting the activities and experiences that<br />

contribute to the night-time streetscape.<br />

Newcastle After Dark explores the city at night; a dense fabric of interior spaces catering for excitement and excess, that spill out onto<br />

the streets and urban spaces in between. Nocturnal environments of the city - the bar, pub, nightclub - are well understood through their<br />

economic and social geography, but there have been few comprehensive, architecturally-led surveys of spaces of intoxication, despite their<br />

significant influence on the identity of post-industrial cities across the UK.<br />

This staff and student research project takes an architectural approach to to explore the spaces of the night – looking at their forms, materials,<br />

aesthetics and experiences – in the context of the city. Research into the city’s night-time economies, and their evolution, history, and role<br />

within Newcastle’s culture, informs an examination of how intoxication is enacted in, and through, the city’s space, and how space in turn is<br />

transformed through night time desires.<br />

173


Testing Ground<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

The Testing Ground Programme provides the opportunity for students to collaborate with a range of related disciplines, external organisations<br />

and building users through the vehicle of ‘live’ projects.<br />

This year the students worked on two main projects. The first involved a collaboration with The Middlesbrough Institute of Modern<br />

Art (MIMA) where the students designed and constructed the furniture infrastructure for the exhibition ‘If All Relations Were to Reach<br />

Equilibrium..…’ This project involving display, and public programmes explored the subject of migration on Teesside and elsewhere, bringing<br />

together artefacts and artworks made by asylum seekers as well as established artists.<br />

The second project engaged the students in the design and construction of a Heritage Lottery funded Wildlife Hide at the Bakethin Conservation<br />

Area, Kielder. The students navigated complex statutory and client requirements including making the structure fully accessible<br />

and only specifying materials from sustainable sources. The students worked closely with the Northumbrian Wildlife Trust and the resulting<br />

timber-framed structure contains two ‘pods’ on split levels, one for bird watching and one for forest viewing. The Hide is clad in charred larch,<br />

has a moss roof and includes innovative sash windows that slide into the wall to give unobstructed views<br />

174


Zanzibar Futures<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

This project seeks to explore the geo-politics of Zanzibar: a small island archipelago just off the East-African ‘Swahili coast’. Zanzibar has the<br />

ambition of being the most sustainable island in Africa, despite currently facing pressing development issues of rapid population growth and<br />

scarcity of resources. With a population of just under one million, Unguja, Zanzibar’s principal island, is truly a microcosm of the most critical<br />

nternational development challenges.<br />

The culmination of this linked research project was a journal, Zanzibar Futures, which represents a year-long documentation of the cultural,<br />

social and development issues on Unguja, resulting in a combination of research inquiry, design thinking and live building. The team’s journey<br />

began with fieldwork in February 2016, which formed an invaluable foundation for the subsequent research. Working together with the<br />

Ministry of Urban and Rural Planning in Zanzibar and the NGO Sustainable East Africa, they were briefed and informed on current practice<br />

and approaches toward local development planning.<br />

Featured in the journal are four key essays, which although individually authored are a result of closely related and interrelated research topics.<br />

Therefore, like much of the included work, these represent a collective endeavour and support the other ethnographic, historical and design<br />

studies. The essays also highlight different academic and architectural modes of production and methods used in their research. Alexandra’s<br />

essay on the typologies of Architecture in Zanzibar is an architectural polemic focusing on how the buildings in Zanzibar relate to each other<br />

spatially, materially and stylistically with regards to their varying cultural influences. Malcolm’s essay, overtly political, elaborates on studies<br />

of Zanzibar’s education systems, whilst simultaneously acting as commentary on the architectural design principals and construction patterns<br />

surrounding local education. Matt’s essay discusses one of the conundrums of contemporary exchange and commercial culture, by questioning<br />

the degree to which markets can be formalised, whilst finding ways to quantify in ways meaningful to architecture the variety of exchange and<br />

activity patterns of a marketplace. Finally Nicola’s essay on the cultural value of trees, highlights through both sytematic and poetic means<br />

the enormous political, social and economic value of trees in Zanzibar. From their fundamental importance throughout colonial and local<br />

histories, to the current economy and identity of the region, trees carry particular social importance and make a huge contribution to urban<br />

public space.<br />

Finally the team worked on developing a website to document the collective academic work which has been carried out in Zanzibar over<br />

the last four years by students from both the Universities of Sheffield and Newcastle. The website aims to bring together the design projects,<br />

studies and papers so that they can be shared with partners in Zanzibar, whilst also being accessible to other disciplines and anyone else<br />

interested in learning about the geopolitical, socio-economic and architectural complexities of this fascinating region.<br />

175


MA in Urban <strong>Design</strong><br />

Georgia Giannopoulou, Tim Townshend, Ali Madanipour<br />

Contributors: John Devlin, Roger Meier, Martin Bonner, Aidan Oswell, Richard Smith, William Ault, Dhruv Sookhoo, Colin Haylock, Michael<br />

Crilly, Tony Wyatt, Sarah Miller, Geoff Whitten, Prue Chiles, Steve Graham, Cristina Pallini, Smajo Beso<br />

The MA in Urban <strong>Design</strong> is a well-established interdisciplinary programme at Newcastle University that draws on expertise from the<br />

disciplines represented in the School, namely Architecture, Planning and Landscape. The programme brings to the foreground a strong<br />

agenda of social and ecological engagement together with a relational approach to the built environment and public life. Three distinct design<br />

projects punctuate the year and are supported by theory courses and critical debate around the practice of Urban <strong>Design</strong>. The projects engage<br />

with varying localities and the challenges and themes emerging from the place as well as themes for regeneration and societal challenges. The<br />

two major projects are parts of a year-long project on a complex site in the city centre of Newcastle and deal with issues of post-industrial<br />

urban renewal; the first part of the project Skills in Urban Regeneration engages with contemporary concepts of Digital/Smart Cities, as well as<br />

sustainability in the context of a mixed use masterplan for this key site in the city. Housing Alternatives, forming the latter part of this project,<br />

examines new models of neighbourhood design in the context of the housing crisis and housing needs. The project explores concepts of<br />

affordability, sustainable living and community led-models as well as new and contemporary models for living addressing issues of resilience,<br />

changing patterns of working, and an ageing population centred on the increasingly popular in the UK cohousing model.<br />

The European field trip to Milan (Italy) aims to introduce alternative approaches to Urban <strong>Design</strong> using concepts of landscape, health<br />

and GreenBlue infrastructure. The project is based on a derelict site planned for a railway station on the Milan-Mortara line, including<br />

an unfinished railway structure by Aldo Rossi. Students are tasked with producing proposals for developing a salutogenic landscape using<br />

theoretical explorations on the theme as well as taking into consideration the city’s history in relation to its water systems and fitting into the<br />

context. The year concludes with the Urban <strong>Design</strong> Thesis, a major research-led design project, on topics selected by the individual students<br />

around their interests. The course features a robust engagement with urban design process including issues of financial viability and delivery<br />

across the design projects. Students in the course have many opportunities for visiting places within the UK and in Europe in the context of<br />

the projects.<br />

176<br />

Top left to Bottom right - Group: Xuan Zhou, Peijun Yao, Group: Adem Altunkaya, Jackson Leong, Group: Ryan Conlon, Diva Jain, Group: Laurence Bonner,<br />

Adem Altunkaya, Ryan Conlon, Group: Adem Altunkaya, Jackson Leong


Top - Group: Diva Jain, Ryan Conlon, Adem Altunkaya, Laurence Bonner Upper Middle - Group: Laurence Bonner, Ryan Conlon, Adem Altunkaya, Diva Jain<br />

Lower Middle - Group: Diva Jain, Ryan Conlon<br />

Bottom - Group: Diva Jain, Ryan Conlon<br />

177


MA in Architecture, Planning and Landscape (<strong>Design</strong>)<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Contributors: Astrid Lund, Nathaniel Coleman,Tony Watson<br />

The Master of Architecture, Planning and Landscape-<strong>Design</strong> (MAAPL-D) course encourages students to develop a deeper understanding<br />

of varieties of identity in cities. Students conduct detailed studies of particular urban communities, concentrating on determining strategies<br />

of appropriate development for specific urban sites. In each of the three semesters of the course, developing projects presuppose devising<br />

community based urban design frameworks for selected sites that broadly consider the surrounding context. In each semester, holistic design<br />

frameworks articulating the potential character and quality of the environment initiated by the proposed project support reasonably complex<br />

building designs.<br />

Semester one is divided proportionally between group explorations of the city and individual project work, augmented by developing research<br />

into the history, theory and design of cultural buildings in an urban context. The second semester project explores ideas of meaning and<br />

identity in the urban environment and the role that public space and buildings play in articulating notions of citizenship and community.<br />

Students produce three architectural/urban design schemes of increasing scale and complexity for a specific urban location. Architecture as a<br />

civic element is emphasised, including concentration on the relation between exterior and interior spaces.<br />

The problematic of public space within an increasingly privatised built environment; the degree to which theory can be verified by the design;<br />

and the support of both by close readings of set theoretical texts that consider architecture and the city from a range of perspectives are<br />

central to the course; as is a developing understanding of architecture within the expanded field of an urban context in relation to notions of<br />

identity, community, and culture more generally. No matter their scale, projects are construed as complex public buildings with key interior<br />

and exterior public spaces specific to their location and purpose. Thesis projects developed during the third semester provide students with<br />

opportunities for elaborating on many of the themes introduced earlier in the course. The thesis is a major design project framed by individual<br />

students that they largely produce independently.<br />

The MAAPL-D course challenges students’ preconceived notions of architecture, planning, urban design and the city, as well as their ingrained<br />

habits of architectural conceptualization and representation. In the course, individual buildings are considered as component parts of cities,<br />

rather than as isolated objects within it. As such, tendencies to over-emphasise buildings as spectacular image, interesting form, or virtuosic<br />

technological novelty are counter-balanced by the urban, social, and tectonic qualities of projects. Within the expanded field of the city, urban<br />

buildings are emphasised as socio-cultural elements rather than primarily as abstract objects of aesthetic (or visual) appreciation.<br />

178 Top -Mohamed Elghoneimy Bottom - Jemma El Chidiac


Top left to Bottom right - Jemma El Chidiac, Hala Almalkawi(2), Jiayin Zhong, Xinjue Wang, Xiaoli Tian(2)<br />

179


MSc in Experimental Architecture<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson, Rachel Armstrong<br />

Contributors: Carolina Ramirez Figueroa, Andrew Ballantyne, Simone Ferracina, Aurelie Guyet, Luis Hernan, Rolf Hughes<br />

The MSc in Experimental Architecture is a new and exciting programme based on a visionary architectural practice that deals with global 21st<br />

century challenges that prepares students for a rapidly evolving professional environment. Our approach is grounded in an experimental designled<br />

methodology to working with new types of materials, methods and technologies that create the context for further social, political, economic<br />

and cultural reflection that, which are expressed through an architectural design project which is simultaneously provocative and visionary, but<br />

also grounded and rigorous.<br />

The course is design based and centred around two Studios: Living Technologies and Synthetic Ecologies (run in semesters 1 and 2 respectively).<br />

The studios are supported by lectures and workshops in drawing, modelling computation, fabrication and design methods. Students are expected<br />

to emerge from the programme with world-class design portfolios that also embody an informed position on the role of the 21st century architect.<br />

Students are encouraged to challenge accepted modes and practices in architecture using a variety of approaches that include design-led<br />

and scientific experiment. Such an approach seeks to address forward-focussed engagement with architectural agendas while also providing<br />

opportunities for young architects to develop the intellectual and practical skills by which they may develop strategies for dealing with a rapidly<br />

evolving professional environment that is being shaped by global challenges, such as rapidly rising populations, and emerging technologies.<br />

180 Synthetic Ecologies


Living Technologies<br />

181


MSc in Sustainable Buildings and Environments (SBE)<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

Contributors: Alan J Murphy, Barry Rankin, Halla Huws, Hassan Hemida, Ivan Marquez Munoz, Liam Haggarty, Richard Allenby, Paul Yeomans<br />

MSc students in SBE use building and urban performance simulation tools and a deeper understanding of building physics to underpin their<br />

architectural design approaches. This academic year we were joined by students from the MArch and MAAPL-D route. The students worked on<br />

three live projects with their estates departments and Newcastle City Council. They engaged with a number of well-established professionals in<br />

the field.<br />

The Engineering Excellence Quarters in Newcastle University Campus studies: we were asked by the University to start looking at massing ideas for<br />

the project to maximize capturing the sustainability aspects of the site. Students looked into the environmental impacts (such as wind speed and<br />

shadowing studies) on pedestrians and how different massing ideas could lead to a unified campus where pedestrian movement is facilitated and<br />

the natural environment is moderated.<br />

The Freeman Hospital in Newcastle: working closely with the Estate Department to improve the 1960’s building. The occupants complain from<br />

drafts in winter and overheating and less effective natural ventilation in the wards year round. The project addressed possibilities of aesthetic<br />

improvements, and insertions of social interaction spaces while moderating the indoors climate using building performance simulations. Students<br />

also expanded their explorations to look at climate change scenarios and environmental architectural concepts can prevent the need for cooling.<br />

Fisherman’s Lodge in Jesmond Dene: the students presented design proposals for the public consultation that was managed by English Heritage<br />

and Newcastle City Council. Fisherman’s Lodge has been derelict for over ten years and ideas for its revival and extensions into various possible<br />

functions were introduced to the council to help them build ideas of potential usage. Building and urban performance simulation were used to<br />

maximize the sustainability potential of the projects and underpin design decisions in such a dark and historic valley.<br />

182 Top -Wuxia Zhang Bottom - Lwigina Ramirez Castillo


1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

6 9<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Top, left to right -Wuxia Zhang, Eliana Peralta Aquino Middle - Lwigina Ramirez Castillo Bottom - Eliana Peralta Aquino<br />

183


Locations<br />

Activities<br />

Byker Community Gardens<br />

Residents Ouseburn Farm YMCA Byker Storehouse Horticulturalist<br />

Byker Community Trust<br />

Education Productive Growing Horticultural Training<br />

Community Orchard Tending Public Spaces Community Meals Cooking Lessons<br />

Engaging with the two<br />

Growing fruit and<br />

Training and teaching<br />

The south facing terraces<br />

Residents employed to<br />

Shared meals between<br />

Utilising fruit and veg grown<br />

primary schools to educate<br />

vegetables in the Byker<br />

new horticultural skills to<br />

of Avondale Rise lend<br />

plant and maintain the<br />

residents developing<br />

around the redevelopment<br />

children on growing<br />

Gardens and around the<br />

residents to help people<br />

themselves to a small<br />

public spaces around<br />

relationships and providing<br />

to teach residents about<br />

plants and care for the<br />

estate. Food grown can be<br />

improve their gardens or<br />

community orchard,<br />

Byker, including planters,<br />

the opportunity for new<br />

healthy eating and cooking.<br />

environment.<br />

used for shared meals.<br />

pursue employment.<br />

growing a range of fruit.<br />

beds and hedges.<br />

social connections.<br />

St Lawrence’s<br />

Primary School<br />

PLANT NURSERY<br />

HORTICULTURAL<br />

TRAINING<br />

EDUCATION<br />

Ouseburn<br />

Farm<br />

PRODUCTIVE<br />

GROWING<br />

YMCA Byker<br />

Byker Aspire<br />

COMMUNITY<br />

ORCHARD<br />

Horticulturalist<br />

Residents<br />

Storehouse<br />

COOKING<br />

LESSONS<br />

Byker Community<br />

Trust<br />

TENDING PUBLIC<br />

SPACES<br />

COMMUNITY<br />

MEALS<br />

BCT Rapid<br />

Response Team<br />

Residents<br />

Recent PhD by Creative Practice Completion<br />

Making Byker: The Situated Amateur Practices of a Citizen Architect<br />

James Longfield<br />

Positioned on the margins of the architectural profession as an informal and amateur practice, my thesis explored connections between<br />

‘expert’ practice and the city as a fluid socio-spatial construct of (re)production and consumption, freed from professional preoccupations with<br />

buildings as formal, static and aesthetic objects.<br />

In 1969, Anglo-Swedish architect Ralph Erskine was commissioned to masterplan and design the Byker redevelopment project in Newcastle<br />

upon Tyne. With colleagues, he established an office on site, and a number of the architects moved to the area to deliver the project. As a result<br />

of this direct engagement with the area, a situated mode of practice emerged in the overlap between their professional personas as practitioners<br />

and their social concerns as residents.<br />

Having moved into a house in Byker in 2011, my work onsite through the PhD drew on the approach of Erskine’s team as a touchstone,<br />

inspiring a mode of relational practice that draws on situated and everyday ways of knowing to inform acts of adaption, (mis)use and<br />

intervention, and that investigated the unique condition of the hobby rooms which Erskine’s team included in the design of the redevelopment.<br />

The investigation of the thesis developed a creative practice methodology to inform and trace a series of tactical and reflective operations that<br />

emerged out of my engagement with the social ecologies and political structures of Byker, as both a resident and an active citizen. Through<br />

the overlapping of my professional and personal identities I pursued a series of architectural projects and practices that sought to traverse<br />

the boundary between the professionally distinct configurations of architect and user to question new possible relations between these two<br />

identities and associated perceptions of the built environment. Through ongoing reflection on these operations, the thesis established four<br />

distinct themes: situated practice, everyday practice, amateur practice and citizen practice, that situate contemporary theoretical positions on<br />

architecture in the context of Byker. A situated drawing, inscribed onto my dining table at home, provides a site to explore each theme and<br />

their intersections.<br />

The work on site explored the historical and contemporary background of the underused and vacant hobby rooms in Byker as spaces of<br />

collectivity and leisure interest. Limited by the inaccessibility of many of these spaces, my investigations explored the spaces of hobby practice<br />

more broadly across the redevelopment in collaboration with Byker residents, identifying hobby space as that which is temporally inhabited<br />

framed by key equipment formed through the ‘everyday design’ of these users. The development of this altered understanding of the nature<br />

and use of hobby space informed the design and construction of a series of pieces of ‘hobby furniture’ for different hobbyists around the Byker<br />

area that explored the possibility for hobby space as deployed across a range of spaces. Reflection on the use of these elements paid closer<br />

attention to the forms of social infrastructure that supports and underpins the use and viability of collective hobby spaces, culminating in<br />

the proposal of a set of ‘hobby agencies’ that speculated on the social relationships that might enable spatial alterations across public spaces<br />

in the area.<br />

The situated actions through which the hobby rooms were addressed also confront the illegitimacy of amateur practice, revealing the creative<br />

and empowering potential of the informal social engagement of the practitioner with the conditions of use and appropriation, alongside other<br />

citizens, embedding practice within a local network of individuals, agencies, local organisations and political bodies.<br />

By deploying professional tools and methods within the context of citizenship, the thesis contributes toward ongoing discussions concerning<br />

the role of participatory practice in architecture, exploring these questions from the perspective of the practitioner’s involvement in the rituals<br />

and rhythms of everyday life. In doing so, it frames an approach to architectural practice that is spatially situated, yet temporally boundless,<br />

a cyclical operation that weaves together spatial, social, and political activity, making a claim for a new mode of situated, amateur, citizen<br />

practice.<br />

Main Supervisor: Adam Sharr, Second Supervisor: Katie Lloyd Thomas, Internal Examiner: Prue Chiles, , External Examiner: Katja Grillner - KTH<br />

School of Architecture - Stockholm, Sweden<br />

BYKER COMMUNITY GARDENS<br />

BYKER COMMUNITY GARDENS<br />

MAKING BYKER<br />

Hobby Agencies: Byker Community Gardens<br />

Hobby Agencies: Byker Community Gardens<br />

184


PhD and PhD by Creative Practice Students<br />

PRACTICEOPOLIS: Journeys in the architectural profession<br />

Yasser Megahed<br />

The contemporary architectural profession displays an on-going struggle for<br />

economic and cultural capital between heterogeneous cultures of practice,<br />

which together comprise what can be described as a state of dynamic<br />

equilibrium. The contemporary profession is dominated by a technical-rational<br />

culture of practice. The term refers to commercially-driven practices that are<br />

often associated with the production of buildings by or for multinational<br />

corporations and tend to echo their values. This research interrogates the<br />

imperatives of this domination on the values of the architectural profession.<br />

It builds upon two strategies: firstly, mapping the alternative cultures of the<br />

present architectural profession; and secondly, identifying the dangers of the<br />

increasing closeness in values between the profession and other actors in the<br />

building industry. The research argues that these increasingly shared values<br />

threaten the unique worth of the architectural profession and the dynamic<br />

equilibrium which characterises it. By inventing Practiceopolis: an imaginary<br />

city of architectural practice, the research aims to investigate the nature of the<br />

profession and the particular values it contributes to the built environment.<br />

Practiceopolis is a city built on diagrammatic relations between different<br />

cultures of practice covering a wide spectrum of the contemporary profession.<br />

The city became envisaged through a sequence of five iterative narratives<br />

whose specific narrations set the foundation for the next. An initial diagram<br />

becomes a map, which becomes the plan for a speculative city. These narratives<br />

are accountable for mapping the contemporary profession by building<br />

the complex metaphor of Practiceopolis. They explore the inhabitation of<br />

Practiceopolis by narrating stories about the competition between prominent<br />

cultures of practice in the city’s imaginary political scene represented through<br />

a graphic novel. The research ends with propositions regarding the particular<br />

values of the architectural profession, and highlights the necessity to explore<br />

how these values could be defined, communicated, and marketed.<br />

Life, Superceiling: A cultural history of the suspended ceiling<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Suspended ceilings are a ubiquitous element of contemporary architecture.<br />

From the generic spaces of the shopping mall, corporate office and hospital<br />

wing; to intimate spaces of domestic inhabitation, the suspended ceiling<br />

prevails. Their pervasive presence can be attributed to their simplicity, ease of<br />

construction and inherent repetitious quality. Organised on a regular grid of<br />

600mm x 600mm, the suspended ceiling neatly resolves the problem of how<br />

to conceal the plethora of technical and environmental services desired in the<br />

design of modern buildings. The proliferation of suspended ceiling systems<br />

globally testifies their status as the default ceiling solution for contractors,<br />

designers and clients alike.<br />

The ubiquity of suspended ceilings across our contemporary built<br />

environments, implies that there widespread application is not only enabled by<br />

technical efficiency but by active cultural, political and economic forces. The<br />

research examines and develops an account of the history of technical, social,<br />

cultural and economic factors which have contributed to the global production<br />

and consumption of suspended ceiling systems. Borrowing techniques and<br />

methods deployed by radical Italian design collective Superstudio; multiple<br />

readings of the suspended ceiling are developed, drawing out wider questions<br />

related to prevalent cultural attitudes toward standardisation, industrialisation,<br />

organisation and management. These attitudes are read through the suspended<br />

ceiling, contributing toward a critique of contemporary spatial production<br />

and its relationship to architectural practice.<br />

185


Towards a Synthetic Morphogenesis for Architecture<br />

Paola Carolina Ramirez Figueroa<br />

www.syntheticmorphologies.com<br />

Synthetic Morphologies is a design exploration project that emerges from a<br />

growing design discourse on the possibilities afforded by Synthetic Biology.<br />

The 21st century is poised to be the era of biology, very much like the 20th has<br />

been the age of digital information. The notion comes from recent advances<br />

from Synthetic Biology in manipulating and creating new living organisms<br />

that exhibit unprecedented traits in nature. <strong>Design</strong>, as many other fields, has<br />

felt the influence of such a paradigmatic shift. In architecture, for instance, a<br />

growing body of speculative work imagines a future material reality enacted by<br />

hybrids of machine and living organisms, whereby building are grown rather<br />

than constructed.<br />

Yet, Synthetic Morphologies poses the possibility that, in fact, Synthetic<br />

Biology presents design with a more profound challenge – one that stirs the<br />

restating of the discipline of design itself. To think, for instance, of buildings<br />

which are grown out of pre-programmed living organisms is, in effect, to<br />

continue the classic paradigm of design wherein the designer is an almighty<br />

giver of form. I propose an alternative approach – an organicist-inspired<br />

material practice for synthetic biology.<br />

I believe the intersection of design and synthetic biology invites us to think<br />

of design as a negotiation between different actors, some of which include the<br />

chemical environment, mechanical conditions, designers and living organisms<br />

themselves. Throughout my doctoral research I’ve engaged in different<br />

projects which characterise and trace the evolution of the speculative discourse<br />

initiated by synthetic biology, and which eventually leads to the notion of<br />

a biologically-oriented material practice: a technique to engage with the<br />

processes of designing through and with living organisms.<br />

Space Thickening and the Digital Ethereal: Production of architecture in<br />

the digital age<br />

Jose-Luis Hernandez-Hernandez<br />

www.digitalethereal.com<br />

Digital Ethereal came about as a design discourse on digital technologies, and<br />

the invisible infrastructure underpinning it. I believe our interaction with<br />

this landscape of electromagnetic signals, described by Antony Dunne as<br />

Hertzian Space, can be characterised in the same terms as that with ghosts and<br />

spectra. They both are paradoxical entities, whose untypical substance allows<br />

them to be an invisible presence. In the same way, they undergo a process of<br />

gradual substantiation to become temporarily available to perception. Finally,<br />

they both haunt us: ghosts, as Derrida would have it, with the secrets of past<br />

generations; Hertzian Space, with the frustration of interference and slowness.<br />

But it is these same traits of Hertzian Space that affords the potential for a<br />

spatially rich interaction with information systems, one that more closely<br />

resembles the interaction with real architecture. The challenge however lies<br />

in how to design with systems that are fundamentally invisible. They can<br />

be ‘translated’ – changing their modality into one which is tangible. This<br />

modality change is however always laced with cultural charges, which changes<br />

the nature of Hertzian Space.<br />

In order to take advantage of Hertzian Space, I advocate for a creative<br />

practice aimed at creating new objects, indexed to Hertzian Space, but<br />

which also captures the cultural and social complexity imbued in the use of<br />

such technologies. I call this new series of objects the digital ethereal. The<br />

design work created throughout this project blends together disciplines and<br />

techniques such as performance, photography, design, programming and<br />

electronics.<br />

186


Shared Identity: Buildings, Memories, and Meanings<br />

Stephen Grinsell<br />

News stories about either the decision to save or demolish many buildings of<br />

the 1960s and early 1970s regularly use the noun monstrosity, usually prefaced<br />

by the word concrete. However, not all concrete buildings create animosity.<br />

The recently demolished Birmingham Central Library, whilst derided by<br />

Prince Charles as looking like ‘a place where books are incinerated, not kept’<br />

(Birmingham Mail, 2014) is also commonly and affectionately called the<br />

‘Ziggurat’, a reference to the stepped terraces of ancient temples. David Parker<br />

and Paul Long in their article ‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives<br />

of Urban Decline and Regeneration’ write ‘For all their faults, the buildings of<br />

the 1960s and 1970s currently being destroyed supplied Birmingham with an<br />

identity’ (Parker and Long, 2004 p.18). Buildings are given their identity and<br />

meaning, or more accurately, given a multiplicity of meanings, by those who<br />

gaze upon them and allow the building to impact upon them. This impact,<br />

or the experience as a result of that gaze, stirs emotions and evokes memories,<br />

memories that heighten a sense of identity. This identity then becomes a shared<br />

identity as people share their memories, and what the building means to them.<br />

Parker, D., & Long, P. (2004). ‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives<br />

of Urban Decline and Regeneration’. Visual Culture in Britain, 5(1), 37-58.<br />

The Impacts of Owners’ Participation on ‘Sense of Place’,<br />

the Case of Tehran, Iran<br />

Goran Erfani<br />

A key aspect for urban designers and managers concerns how urban<br />

transformation arising from regeneration of inner-city areas is associated<br />

with ‘sense of place’. Although much academic work tracks individual sense<br />

of place, little interrogates the community aspect and its link with urban<br />

renewal. This study investigated how the urban renewal schemes in Tehran,<br />

Iran have attempted to adopt the owners’ participation into their planning<br />

and implementation. It concentrated especially on diverse ways that different<br />

stakeholders perceived the methods of these schemes and the significance for<br />

community sense of place.<br />

The study examined the urban renewal projects conducted by the municipality<br />

of Tehran which concerns these areas as deprived neighbourhoods with various<br />

physical, social and environmental problems. Two cases were studied, namely<br />

the Oudlajan bazar and the Takhti neighbourhood, which both are located<br />

in the inner city (district 12). Despite similarities, they are distinctive cases.<br />

Oudlajan, which has outstanding heritage value to the city, is a commercial<br />

public space. The Takhti project was about the residential private space. In<br />

addition, each case had diverse socio-cultural and physical transformation.<br />

The selecting of the distinctive cases shaped a better picture of urban<br />

transformation in Tehran.<br />

The techniques applied seek to represent different types of participants, by<br />

means of local observation and semi-structured interviews with a range of<br />

stakeholders in these schemes. Additionally, to elicit what constitutes the<br />

interrelationships between people and place, Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI)<br />

was carried out. The photos captured by the residents were discussed with<br />

them to reveal the potential impact of urban renewal projects on place-based<br />

community attachment, identity and satisfaction in the eyes of individuals.<br />

Concurrently, planners, managers and developers were interviewed. To signify<br />

the intersubjectivity, the results and evidence from the previous phases were<br />

separately discussed with other participant and non-participant residents in<br />

the renewal schemes. Furthermore, the study considered the potential and<br />

limitations for sense of place associated with the urban regeneration schemes.<br />

187


On Repetition: Photograhpy in/as Architectural Criticism - Working<br />

through the Archives of Mies van der Rohe and Lilly Reich’s German<br />

Pavilion and the North American Concrete Grain Elevators<br />

Catalina Mejia-Moreno<br />

www.travesiafoundation.org<br />

‘Many of us, maybe all of us, look at some images repeatedly, but it seems that we do<br />

not write about that repetition, or think it, once written, worth reading by others’.<br />

T.J.Clark. The Sight of Death. An experiment in Art Writing. (New Haven and<br />

London: Yale University Press, 2006) pp. 9.<br />

In the photo-archives of two of the most recognised British architectural<br />

historians of the late twentieth century - Robin Evans and Reyner Banham -<br />

two iconic buildings come across repeatedly, almost compulsively. In Evans’, the<br />

Barcelona Pavilion (1929- reconstructed 1986) and in Banham’s, the Buffalo<br />

Grain Elevators (late nineteenth Century). While these slide sets can be<br />

understood as the result of the empiricist English tradition and the relevance<br />

of direct experience for the buildings’ histories and criticisms, they are also<br />

evidence of a wider phenomenon in architectural history: the drive to re-visit,<br />

the compulsion to re-photograph and the instinct to repeat. In this context,<br />

my PhD project questions photography as the inherent means of repetition<br />

in architectural history, while arguing that the photograph as material object<br />

and object of representation also performs as the criticism itself. By studying<br />

two important moments in time for the photographic dissemination of the<br />

two aforementioned buildings, and by understanding the material history of<br />

photographs as commodities and objects of transaction, I critically examine<br />

the relationship between architectural history, architectural criticism, and<br />

photographic and ideological techniques of (re)production.<br />

Looking Towards Retirement: Alternative <strong>Design</strong> Approaches to Third-<br />

Ager Housing<br />

Sam Clark<br />

UK society was first categorised ‘aged’ during the 1970s, and is currently<br />

heading towards ‘super-aged’ status, whereby 20 per cent of the population<br />

will be aged sixty-five and over by the year 2025. Indeed scientific evidence<br />

indicates linear increases in life expectancy since 1840, such that UK<br />

population ‘pyramids’ are now looking more like ‘columns’, with fewer<br />

younger people at the base and increasing numbers and proportions of older<br />

people at the top. There are 10,000 centenarians living in the UK today, with<br />

demographers anticipating a five-fold increase by 2030. Half of all babies born<br />

this year can expect to live one hundred years.<br />

Housing plays a significant role in sustaining a good quality of life, and there<br />

is growing opinion that moving to specialist or more age-appropriate housing<br />

has a positive impact on the wellbeing of older people, as well as potential<br />

benefits to the property market as a whole. Recent design research includes a<br />

competition commissioned by McCarthy & Stone to ‘re-imagine ageing’, and<br />

an RIBA report illustrating future scenarios in which ‘Active Third-Agers’ have<br />

made a huge impact on UK towns and cities. Both initiatives were predicated<br />

on the idea that today’s older population (colloquially known as the ‘babyboomers’)<br />

have alternative and more demanding lifestyle expectations that are<br />

likely to drive a step-change in housing choice for older people.<br />

Sam is working in collaboration with national house builder, Churchill<br />

Retirement Living, to further explore the needs and aspirations of those<br />

entering retirement. In this instance a PhD by Creative Practice is being used<br />

as a vehicle for applied design research that will contribute to contemporary<br />

visions for retirement living.<br />

188


Cities, People, Nature: An Exploration<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

mynaturehood.tumblr.com<br />

With more than half of the world’s population now living in cities, it is the<br />

nature within the city that has the potential to enhance people’s lives on a daily<br />

basis. The city-people-nature trinomial raises a number of questions that form<br />

the basis of this research. My first installation coincided with the ‘Landscape,<br />

Wilderness and the Wild’ conference and explored two initial questions:<br />

Is there a boundary between the natural and cultural in the city?<br />

The relation between nature and culture is complex. The classical notion of<br />

nature is the world devoid of human interaction or activity; and urbanization,<br />

the antithesis of nature. At the other end of the spectrum there is the notion<br />

of nature as a social constructed phenomenon, and the idea that nature as the<br />

untouched doesn’t exist anymore, as human activity has affected the whole<br />

world. What is evident is that cities depend on nature to survive and vice versa,<br />

and it is therefore difficult to see where one ends and the other starts.<br />

Could the expectation of nature in the city be challenged and what could we<br />

tolerate within the urban?<br />

Within the city we tend to arrest the progression of nature in order to maintain<br />

landscapes and spaces looking a certain way, and avoid the chaos or fear that<br />

might result from a ‘wild’ nature. ‘Wilderness’ is found on abandoned sites,<br />

on former industrial sites, in the cracks of the pavements, in the joints of<br />

the walls, reclaimed by nature whilst waiting to be developed or cleared out.<br />

Is looking the reason why we arrest nature, and how is nature experienced<br />

through the other senses?<br />

Revealing <strong>Design</strong>: A Dialogic Approach<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/staff/profile/matthew.ozga-lawn<br />

My research project attempts to reveal hidden or overlooked agencies within<br />

the studio space and the representational modes therein, which is normally<br />

conceived of as a neutral zone through which designs are simply ‘transmitted’.<br />

In my study, the studio is conflated with a rifle range. The studio, in adopting<br />

the characteristics and agencies of the military space, opens architectural<br />

representation onto codes and phenomena normally considered to be outside<br />

its remit. These phenomena are drawn into the project through historical and<br />

theoretical links established by the rifle range space.<br />

My research blurs the agencies of the military and studio spaces, revealing<br />

coded agencies that we as designers often take for granted in how we relate and<br />

engage with representational artefacts in the studio.<br />

189


Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Construction – Case of Tower<br />

Buildings in Libya<br />

Salem Tarhuni<br />

The Conservation of Twentieth Century Architecture in China<br />

Yun Dai<br />

Comprehensive Intelligence in Sustainable Courtyard House<br />

Architecture<br />

Rand Agha<br />

A Spatial Carbon Analysis Model for Retrofitting the Guayaquil’s<br />

Residential Sector – GURCC as a Case Study<br />

Javier Urquizo<br />

Crisis of Traditional Identity in Built Environment of the Saudi Cities. A<br />

Case Study: The Old City of Tabuk<br />

Mabrouk Alsheliby<br />

Natural Ventilation: An Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Indoor<br />

Air Quality in Hospitals of Semi-Arid Climates<br />

Mohamed Mahgoub Elnabawi<br />

Learning from Vernacular Natural Ventilated Residential Houses<br />

in Mediterranean Climate Zone of Lebanon; and Developing its<br />

Application Methods in <strong>Design</strong>ing Contemporary Housing in Beirut<br />

Najla Mansour<br />

The Contemporary Role and Transformation of Civic Public<br />

Architecture: The Case of Tripoli’s Central Municipal Building, Libya<br />

Abdelatif El-Allous<br />

A Coincidental Plot, For Architecture<br />

Ashley Mason<br />

Natural Ventilation: An Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Indoor<br />

Air Quality in Hospitals of Semi-Arid Climates<br />

Mohammed Mohammed<br />

Architecture for All in the megacity: Spatially Integrated Settlements in<br />

Istanbul Dominated by Desirable Affordable Housing that Values More<br />

than the Total Cost of Construction and Land Values<br />

Ulviye Nergis Kalli<br />

Impact of Community Participation on Peri-Urban Development Projects<br />

in Akure, Nigeria<br />

Oluwatoyin Akim<br />

Usage of Thermally Comfortable Outdoor Space through the Lens of<br />

Adaptive Microclimate<br />

Khalid Setaih<br />

Becoming Planners and Architects: the Formation of Perspectives on<br />

Residential <strong>Design</strong> Quality<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

After the Blueprint: Questions around the Unfinished in New Belgrade<br />

Tijana Stevanović<br />

Modelling the Effects of Household Practices on Heating Energy<br />

Consumption in Social Housing. A Case Study in Newcastle upon Tyne<br />

Macarena Beltan Rodriguez<br />

190


Architecture: Creative Practice Symposium<br />

The School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape at Newcastle University<br />

25-26 th April <strong>2017</strong><br />

Architecture: Creative Practice Symposium led by Professor Prue Chiles<br />

was conceived as an in-house event with the addition of notable external<br />

contributors, and the aim was to create a dynamic and informal forum in<br />

which to present, debate and create our sense of the breadth of creative<br />

practice within the School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, and in<br />

architecture more widely. This small scale and intimate symposium consisted<br />

of workshops, round tables, exhibitions, and discussions creating fruitful<br />

exchanges in a positive and generous atmosphere.<br />

We were delighted to have as opening keynote Professor Jane Rendell from<br />

the Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL. Rendell shared insights into how<br />

architectural design, creative practice, and material experimentation can be<br />

more fully presented as research, followed by an introduction to her work and<br />

the field of terms - critical spatial practice and site-writing - for which she is<br />

renowned.<br />

The evening continued with presentations by: Prof Prue Chiles – Social Ends<br />

And Means; Catrin Huber - Creative Practice; Prof Adam Sharr - Architectural<br />

<strong>Design</strong>; Prof Rachel Armstrong - Experimental Architecture; Prof Graham<br />

Farmer - Live Build Projects; Ian Wiblin and Dr Chris Müller – Photography;<br />

and a round table discussion led by Prof Katie Lloyd-Thomas. Dinner was then<br />

served in the newly opened Building Sciences Lab. The next day began with<br />

the workshop presentations by Elizabeth Baldwin Gray, Kati Blom, Andrew<br />

Campbell, James A Craig, Claire Harper, Dr Christos Kakalis, Daniel Mallo,<br />

Mags Margetts, Matt Ozga-Lawn, and Dr Ed Wainwright, each followed by<br />

crit-style feedback.<br />

After lunch landscape architect and artist Catherine Dee, and artists Penny<br />

McCarthy, Dr Becky Shaw, (SHU), Dr Polly Gould (APL) framed their<br />

projects, so to explore whether Fine Art offers a model of an emergent academic<br />

system that is useful in Architecture. Reports on visits to other practice research<br />

discussions elsewhere were presented by Dr Anna Holder - Researching<br />

Making/Making Research, Aarhus; Dr Martyn Dade-Robertson - Research<br />

through <strong>Design</strong> Conference, Edinburgh; James A Craig and Prof Katie Lloyd-<br />

Thomas - PhD By <strong>Design</strong> Conference, Sheffield; Nikoletta Karastani - RIBA<br />

North East: Dr Emma Cheatle on her practice and Newcastle University<br />

Humanities Research Institute (NUHRI); and Julia Heslop on Protohome.<br />

The coffee breaks were illustrated by landscape architect Dr Ian Thompson’s<br />

photographic work and Dr Peter Kellett’s recent exhibition on everyday objects<br />

in Addis Ababa. Our visiting Professor, Prof Julieanna Preston, Professor of<br />

Spatial Practice at the College of Creative Arts, Massey University, Wellington,<br />

New Zealand, gave the closing keynote; a performative presentation with<br />

voice, image and narrative, that brought the event to a moving close. We then<br />

enjoyed a guided walk with Dr Ed Wainwright past the architectural sites of<br />

note in Newcastle on the way to the sixteenth century building, Alderman<br />

Fenwick’s House, Pilgrim Street where Ian Wiblin presented his exhibition<br />

of black and white photographic prints and video work, with closing drinks.<br />

Image:<br />

Polly Gould<br />

Alpine Architecture: Piz Roseg, <strong>2017</strong><br />

Watercolour on paper<br />

34.5 x 54 cm<br />

New York, VOLTA<strong>2017</strong><br />

Improbable architectures for mountain tops after the work of Bruno Taut<br />

(1880-1938)<br />

At points over the two days it was argued that different definitions of<br />

research might be needed in order to accommodate both the distinctive<br />

multidisciplinary nature of architecture, and its knowledge production<br />

through practice. The Symposium provided the opportunity to recognize the<br />

wide range of practice that is occurring at APL and to open questions for<br />

future inquiry.<br />

Text by Polly Gould<br />

191


ARC – Architecture Research Collaborative<br />

Architecture is often considered a mongrel discipline, and architectural research is often perceived as borrowing from many other fields from<br />

art history to civil engineering. We set up ARC with the aim of countering this view – promoting architecture as a discipline in its own right.<br />

We wanted to challenge a model of research which dissects architecture into its technical, social and humanistic components so we proposed<br />

a group composed of themes which would change over time whilst maintaining their collective identity.<br />

This year we have continued with the themes we set in 2015: Namely Ecologies, Infrastructures and Sustainable Environments, Experimental<br />

Architecture, Futures and Imaginaries, History Cultures and Landscape, Industries of Architecture and Processes and Practices of Architecture.<br />

In addition, we have a special and emergent theme Mountains and Megastructures which has framed some of our collaborative activity this<br />

year.<br />

Our AHRC-funded event ‘Scaling the Heights’, part of the Being Human Festival of the Humanities, was held in the in the North Tower of<br />

the Tyne Bridge on the 18–25 th November. The event attracted over 400 visitors to an exhibition which included the installation Everest Death<br />

Zone, presentations by a group lead by STASUS (James A. Craig and Matthew Ozga-Lawn) and presentations from speakers across the School<br />

and beyond. A follow-up publication is being planned.<br />

Our commitment to interdisciplinary research has an international presence through the Cambridge University Press Journal arq –<br />

Architectural Research Quarterly – whose managing editor, Professor Adam Sharr, and the majority of the editorial team are based in ARC . A<br />

special issue this year on Biotechnologies for the Built Environment was edited by Martyn Dade Robertson and Rachel Armstrong.<br />

As our numbers continue to expand with Polly Gould starting as the ARC Research Fellow at the end of last year and new colleagues joining<br />

us we have also turned our attention to how we present our creative practice and design lead research. Traditional research is often measured<br />

in terms of the quality traditional publications. However, in Architecture we seek to practice research through a much greater range of media<br />

and outputs. To this end we held a Creative Practice Symposium on the 25-26 th April to bring together practitioner researchers and research<br />

practitioners to discuss the role creative practice has in their own work. This is the beginning of a new initiative for the School as we develop<br />

emerging areas of research which have been overlooked for too long.<br />

Iraq and the Enduring Legacy of Gertrude Bell<br />

Sana Al-Naimi<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

In my PhD research I investigate the dramatic changes in the built environment over<br />

the last century in Iraq. I explore the enduring spatial implications of Gertrude Bell’s<br />

vision, which not only shaped post-WWI British Mandate Iraq, but also continued to<br />

inform the actions of consecutive governments. Bell introduced socio-spatial changes<br />

aided by the designs of Scottish architect J.M. Wilson. Both skilfully employed their<br />

shared passion and expertise in Islamic and Mesopotamian archaeology in “sugarcoating”<br />

colonialism. I aim to understand how novel architectural typologies and new<br />

space hierarchies contributed to the current cultural and political instability in Iraq.<br />

Acknowledgments:<br />

This research is funded by the Northern Bridge Doctoral Training Partnership. Artwork<br />

by the author based on images from Gertrude Bell Archive, Newcastle University, PERS_<br />

B004B.<br />

Intoxicated Space<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

From the nocturnal realm of the bar, club & pub, to the divine realm of the church,<br />

mosque or temple, intoxication – seen as phenomena that moves one outside of the<br />

realm of everyday experience – is enacted in and through space. Understanding the<br />

production of the spaces of intoxication, and how intoxication can be produced through<br />

space forms the basis of this collaboration research project and design studio. Working<br />

with installation artists, architects and researchers, Intoxicated Space seeks to explore<br />

the experience, politics and production of intoxication through practice based research<br />

methods.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Gareth Hudson (School of Fine Art, Newcastle University)<br />

Students:<br />

Delia Heitmann (RWTH Aachen), Rosie O’Halloran, Tom Saxton, Matt Sharman-<br />

Hayles (APL, Newcastle University)<br />

192


Witch Bottles<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Ecologies, Infrastructure, Sustainable Development<br />

Layering of material according to a chemical and symbolic programmes that speak<br />

to the elements of air, fire and water were located within the grounds of the Robert<br />

Rauschenberg Foundation property as a charm that discusses the values at risk through<br />

sea level rise. They symbolize our hopes, fears and dreams about climate change in a<br />

manner that draws from local traditions – the production of charmed bottles – and<br />

ancient knowledge practices, like channeling. These bottles are now part of the<br />

foundation’s land art collection and were also “virtually” gifted to the BBC Museum of<br />

Curiosity, Series 9 at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07lj6yh<br />

Acknowledgments:<br />

Robert Rauschenberg Foundation Fellowship Residency<br />

Rising Waters 2 confab, April/May 2016<br />

Pre-Columbian Tropical Urbanism<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

This AHRC funded project is evaluating the long term urban traditions exemplified by<br />

the diversity of pre-Columbian tropical cities of Mesoamerica, to inform sustainable<br />

urban futures. A series of interdisciplinary workshops will build on historically integrated<br />

research on tropical urbanism and environmental design to formulate a collaborative<br />

research project to test underlying principles. In addition to academic partners in<br />

several countries, the project will engage with wider audiences through a design ideas<br />

competition and public exhibition to create awareness of the archaeological relevance of<br />

the past for future urban living.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Benjamin Vis (PI) University of Kent, University of Leiden, University of Gothenburg,<br />

RIBA South East, Sainsbury Centre for the Visual Arts<br />

The Alternative Public<br />

Xi Chen<br />

Processes and Practices of Architecture<br />

The research will investigate the nature and creation public space in the city in Wenzhou,<br />

a coastal city in the southeast of China. The research interrogates the theoretical<br />

analysis and the experimental artistic practice that attempting to test the possibilities<br />

of alternative approach towards the production of public space. It will re-examine the<br />

effects and understanding of the modern introduction of public space in contemporary<br />

Chinese society. By referring to the ‘right to the city’, the research aims to explore whose<br />

power accounts in the development of public space through the cultural, social, spatial<br />

and political lens.<br />

Website:<br />

www.unbuilt.net<br />

Constructing Informality<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

Since 1985 I have been carrying out longitudinal ethnographic research into the growth<br />

and development of informal settlements in the city of Santa Marta, Colombia. The<br />

30 year cumulative data set documents the housing trajectories of communities and<br />

households through changing economic and social circumstances and helps explain how<br />

built form and social formations are mutually and dynamically constituted through<br />

time. Living within a local family in a settlement for extended periods on multiple<br />

occasions makes it possible to explore the interrelationships between processes of housing<br />

construction, furnishing and habitation, and issues of identity (re)construction and the<br />

role of the dwelling in people’s lives.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Benjamin Vis (PI) University of Kent, University of Leiden, University of Gothenburg,<br />

RIBA South East, Sainsbury Centre for the Visual Arts<br />

193


The Modernism of Birth<br />

Emma Cheatle<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

This research examines the impact of buildings and interiors on the history of English<br />

maternity. From the 1750s, concurrent with the rise of the novel, the incidental spaces of<br />

home birth were succeeded by lying-in hospitals run by newly established man-midwives.<br />

Across the nineteenth-century, birth was further medicalised and institutionalised in<br />

these purpose made spaces. Analysing particular buildings and novels, this research traces<br />

the developing relationship between the places in which birth took place, the women<br />

and men involved, and the development of instruments and practices. The related Being<br />

Human Festival project, Maternity Tales, spring from the above research.<br />

Key References:<br />

Emma Cheatle, Part-architecture: the Maison de Verre, Duchamp, Domesticity and<br />

Desire in 1930s Paris (Routledge, 2016)<br />

Emma Cheatle, ‘Recording the absent in the Maison de Verre’, in IDEA Journal (2012)<br />

Standardised Assessment of Building Adaptability<br />

John M. Kamara<br />

Industries of Architecture<br />

The aim of this project is to refine and test a theoretical model for rating the adaptability<br />

of buildings as a first step towards a methodology for the standardised assessment of<br />

building adaptability. The theoretical model is based on indicators of the adaptability<br />

of different elements of a building in relation to six adaptability features: adjustability,<br />

versatility, refit-ability, convertibility, scalability, and movability. Empirical evidence<br />

through case studies and analytical techniques will be used to model building change<br />

and test and refine the theoretical model.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Dr Oliver Heidrich (school of Civil Engineering, Newcastle University), Dr Vladimir<br />

Ladinski (Principle Architect, Gateshead Council), Professor Mario Dejaco, Professor<br />

Fulvio Re Cecconi and Dr Sebastiano Maltese (Politecnico do Milano, Italy)<br />

Phenomenological Affordance Analysis<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Processes and Practices of Architecture<br />

My thesis laid foundations for an analysis of unique architectural experiences which have<br />

heterogeneous elements. The corresponding building offers a set of negative or positive<br />

affordances which may become noted in an experience. To analyse environmental<br />

relations via perception psychology (Gibson) proved to be useful particularly in<br />

evaluating glass buildings and the memorable experiences triggered by them. This<br />

analysis reveals continuities and discontinuities of surfaces of material substances, as well<br />

as the analysis of affordances within. Both exterior and interior can be looked as concave<br />

or convex surfaces.<br />

The Architect as Shopper<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Industries of Architecture<br />

This project investigates the emergence of the architect as ‘shopper’ and handmaiden of<br />

the building products industry in the interwar period – a transformation much debated<br />

at the time, but now largely forgotten, and an unquestioned aspect of contemporary<br />

architectural practice. It explores the role of women who, on the one hand were just<br />

entering the architectural profession, selling building products or working in the<br />

electrical industry, and on the other, were actively targeted as key consumers of building<br />

products. The research is in conjunction with the Building Centre (London) and a<br />

Canadian Centre for Architecture (Montreal) research fellowship to prepare the book<br />

proposal.<br />

Link:<br />

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KSc5m9mWQs<br />

194


Revisiting the Modernist Dream<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Processes and Practices of Architecture<br />

This project explores the newly renovated Park Hill in Sheffield, an iconic modernist<br />

megastructure. We worked with the new residents living there, stakeholders and people<br />

with memories of the old Park Hill, to build up a picture of domesticity, everyday living<br />

and how the residents interact with the building, the concrete and the space. From indepth<br />

interviews and interactive workshops with models and drawings the subsequent<br />

exhibition, we found that the new residents came from a surprisingly wide demographic<br />

and had diverse and inspiring thought and attitudes about their new lives at Park Hill<br />

and how they are making it home.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Museums Sheffield, Kate Pahl and others at the University of Sheffield. Part of the<br />

‘Imagine’ project sponsored by the AHRC/ESRC 2012-<strong>2017</strong><br />

Solar Futures<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Ecologies, Infrastructures and Sustainable Environments<br />

An experimental, transdisciplinary and collaborative project to develop independent<br />

energy visions and neighbourhood strategies for the future of Stockbridge, South<br />

Yorkshire. Working closely and co-productively with a group of local residents for three<br />

years the project and energy systems modelling to describe the current possibilities,<br />

research ideas and local values of the transition. We explore the role of strategic national<br />

policy and the potential for holistic design in planning energy transitions. We develop<br />

a more visionary set of speculative “what if” projects/scenarios for discussion that could<br />

be relevant for all places like Stocksbridge. The nature of transdisiplinarity and coproduction<br />

in the project were key findings.<br />

Collaborators: In partnership with Durham and Sheffield Universities. An EPSRC<br />

funded project 2012-2016<br />

Art, Economy and Space<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

Artist’s practices are intimately linked to space – its availability is intricately tied to the<br />

emergence of scenes of artistic activity. The spaces available for use by artists are directly<br />

affected by changing economies. The ebb and flow of capital being reflected in often<br />

surprising ways through environments that become available for studios and workshops.<br />

The effect these spaces have on modes of artistic production and the relations between<br />

artists forms the basis of an emerging research project, with collaborators between<br />

architecture, business and fine art at Newcastle University, and the arts organisation The<br />

NewBridge Project, in Newcastle upon Type.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

David Butler (School of Arts & Culture, Newcastle University) Charlie Gregory (The<br />

NewBrigde Project, Newcastle) Paul Richeter (Newcastle University Business School)<br />

Moon Writing<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Experimental Architecture<br />

Moonlight in the bay around the iconic Fish House at the Robert Rauschenberg<br />

Foundation in Captiva produces graphical traces on the surface of the water that suggest<br />

a correspondence between the sun and the earth, which is orchestrated by the tides.<br />

This Moon Writing invokes the production of symbols from a generative surface, which<br />

raises deeper questions about the kinds of languages that the natural world produces<br />

spontaneously and even understands – be they between cosmic bodies, or bacteria – and<br />

how do we begin to design with them?<br />

Acknowledgments:<br />

Robert Rauschenberg Foundation<br />

195


Rapid Urban Change<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Ecologies, Infrastructures and Sustainable Environments<br />

Ethiopia is experiencing rapid economic growth, development and modernisation,<br />

including large scale programme to improve the living conditions of the poor and to<br />

modernise the capital, Addis Ababa. Well-established communities are being moved<br />

from centrally located traditional courtyard housing to multi-storey blocks on the urban<br />

periphery. This collaborative research is documenting the lived experience of urban<br />

transformation and social change through case studies of low-income households. The<br />

aim is to give a voice to those with the least control and power and to gain insights into<br />

how communities cope with change, their levels of resilience and how they adapt to<br />

radically different social, spatial and economic circumstances.<br />

Key Outputs:<br />

Kellett, P. and Eyob, Y. (2016) ‘From Courtyards to Condominiums: the experience of<br />

re-housing in Addis Ababa’ paper presented at IAPS 24 International Conference \The<br />

human at home, work and leisure: Sustainable use and development of space in everyday<br />

life’, Lund University, Sweden, June.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Ethiopian Institute of Architecture and Building Construction (EiABC) at Addis Ababa<br />

University, Newcastle University Institute for Social Renewal<br />

Visual Arts and International Development<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

History, Cultures and Landscape<br />

This exhibition-based project draws on the techniques from contemporary art to<br />

question conventional narratives and world views and thereby contribute to the public<br />

understanding of the international development. Lively assemblages of everyday objects<br />

supported by photographic projections presented stories of celebration, innovation and<br />

creativity alongside development dilemmas and challenges. The exhibitions draw on<br />

material from Ethiopia.<br />

Key Outputs:<br />

Kellett, P. (2015) ‘Made in Ethiopia: Material Culture of Everyday Life’ solo exhibition,<br />

Long Gallery, Department of Fine Art, Newcastle University, April 2015.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

Addis Ababa University, Voluntary Service Overseas (VSO), Newcastle University<br />

Institute for Creative Arts Practice (NiCAP)<br />

Computational Colloids<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Experimental Architecture<br />

Imagine a soil, saturated with billions of engineered bacteria cells. As a force is applied<br />

to the ground, bacteria living in the soil would detect an increase in pressure. The<br />

bacteria respond by synthesising a new biological material to blind soil grains together<br />

and increase soil resistance. The resulting structure would consist of a material where<br />

sand grains are only cemented where the forces through the material require. Our<br />

EPSRC funded project will build a proof of concept to show how we might design<br />

a manufacturing process where the material itself acts as manufacturer and designer,<br />

modelling and responding to its environment. The implications of such a project could<br />

be profound. Such a technology would push well beyond the current state of the art<br />

and challenge a new generation of engineering designers to think at multiple scales<br />

from molecular to the built environment and to anticipate civil engineering with living<br />

organisms.<br />

Project Team:<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape), Helen<br />

Mitrani (School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences), Anil Wipat (IOS, School of<br />

Computing science), Meng Zhang (Faculty of Life and Health Sciences – Northumbria<br />

University), Aurelie Guyet (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape), Javier<br />

Rodriguez Corral (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape)<br />

196


Construction Site for Ideas<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

History Cultures Landscape<br />

A research programme investigation on the role of architectural media in the construction<br />

and dissemination of architectural ideas and discourse from their beginnings in the<br />

nineteenth century to the present day. It aims to understand the role of the magazine in<br />

the construction of architectural history and its influence on architectural culture and<br />

practice by charting the content and form of architectural periodicals across time, with<br />

particular focus on the contributors and their relationship to the changing nature of<br />

architecture as a profession, practice, and culture.<br />

Key References:<br />

Parnell, S. ‘Architecture Magazines: Playgrounds and Battlegrounds.’ In Common<br />

Ground: A Critical Reader, ed. K. Long and S. Rose, 305-8. Venezia: Marsilio, 2012.<br />

‘Architecture Magazines: Playgrounds and Battlegrounds’, 13th International<br />

Architecture Exhibition, Biennale di Venezia, 29 August – 25 November 2012.<br />

Parnell, S. ‘AR’s and AD’s Post-War Editorial Policies: The Making of Modern Architecture in<br />

Britain.’ The Journal of Architecture 17, no.5 (October 2012).<br />

Parnell, S. ‘The Collision of Scarcity and Expendability in architectural Culture of the 60s/70s.’<br />

Architectural <strong>Design</strong>, August 2012.<br />

Bacteria Spore Actuators<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson, Carolina Ramirez-Figueroa & Luis Hernan<br />

Experimental Architecture<br />

Very recent research has shown that bacteria spores combined with an elastomer like<br />

material can be used to create very powerful hydromorphic material. Hydromorphic<br />

materials can respond to changes in humidity by changing shape. There are a number of<br />

hydromorphic materials and most work by combining two layers – which have separate<br />

rates of expansion in the presence of moisture. As one layer expands it forces the other<br />

layer to change its shape causing the material to bend. In architecture there has been<br />

experimentation with timber based hydromorphic materials but, as yet, the bacteria<br />

based hydromorphic materials have not been considered by architectural designers.<br />

We have begun to experiment with the basic material and configurations of Bacilla Spore<br />

actuators and, through a Stage 3 (3rd Year Undergraduate) studio begun to work with<br />

mechanisms that may translate the power of the hydromorphic material to mechanisms<br />

which may form parts of a dynamic building skin.<br />

Output:<br />

Bacteria Hygromorphs: experiments into the integration of soft technologies into<br />

building skin – ACADIA 2016<br />

Out of our Control<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Processes and Practices of Architecture<br />

An ongoing longitudinal auto-ethnographic research project to re-visit, re-evaluate and<br />

encourage the clients’ and builder’s responses to the homes they have lived in and built.<br />

This project turns from the eyes of the architect to the hands of the maker and to the<br />

senses of the dweller to interrogate ideas about the social and built everyday domestic<br />

space, its representation, the final outcome and beyond. Can bricks and mortar be a<br />

reflection of ourselves and transformational to the life of the occupants? Our architectural<br />

field of operation is an expanded site of multiple and layered accumulations of physical<br />

domestic locations, where the relationships, bodies and texts compound into what we<br />

define as Home. Contingencies of site are far more acute for us and placed us at the heart<br />

of a set of relationships and processes that became an expanded field for us beyond the<br />

conventional notion of site.<br />

Collaborators:<br />

The Architectural Practice CE+CA and many other interested parties<br />

197


Scaling the Heights: Mountains and Vertical Megastructures<br />

Tyne Bridge North Tower<br />

18-25 th November 2016<br />

Scaling the Heights: Mountains and Vertical Megastructures was an exhibition and programme of public talks on the physicality and ascent<br />

of tall structures and artificial mountains, presented by the Architecture Research Collaborative (ARC) and temporarily installed in the Tyne<br />

Bridge’s North Tower, providing a rare opportunity to explore one of Newcastle’s iconic buildings. This event was included as part of Being<br />

Human, the UK’s only national festival of the humanities, that took place in over forty-five towns and cities across the UK between 17-25 th<br />

November 2016 and followed that year’s theme ‘Hopes and Fears’.<br />

Contemporary economic and social conditions are driving cities and their inhabitants ever higher into cloud-grazing skyscrapers and highrises.<br />

We invited our audience to experience the long history and mesmerising appeal of all things high and mighty through an exhibition of<br />

mountains and megastructures. The North Tower was unlit, unoccupied, unheated and without electrical supply, and the event was set up as<br />

an entirely battery-powered show. The site was accessible from street level by a flight of stairs that led into the open tower cavity, criss-crossed<br />

by steel supports, home to pigeons, prone to leaking in the rain, and echoing with the rhythm of the bridge traffic overhead.<br />

Each visitor was equipped with a torch in order to navigate the exhibits: the dramatic installation ‘Everest Death Zone’ suspended in the vast,<br />

vertical space by architects STASUS; photographic works by the vertical urban explorer and photographer Lucinda Grange; Amy Butt’s Sci-fi<br />

reading corner; a participatory sound installation derived from recordings from all the Tyne bridges by James Davoll and David de la Haye; a<br />

curatorial cabinet of curiosity by Dr Christos Kakalis.<br />

A programme of events and talks from the exhibitors animated the site over the week: architect Neil Barker’s talk Building the Tyne Bridge;<br />

a walking tour with Rutter Carroll of the Tyne Gorge North Newcastle and Castle Hill and Tyne Gorge South Gateshead and St Mary’s;<br />

Professor Steve Graham and Amy Butt discussing science fiction and the vertical city; Dr Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes’ talk The Mountainous<br />

search for a Modern Architecture; Dr Martin Beattie’s talk Travels on the Edge of Empire: John Stapylton Grey Pemberton’s expedition to Darjeeling<br />

and the ‘snowy ranges’; and a chilly film screening of ‘The Epic of Everest’ Captain John Noel, 1924: restored 2013.<br />

ARCs success with opening an iconic but rarely accessible Newcastle building as a site for Scaling the Heights was met with great enthusiasm<br />

by the public, and has created ambition for further forays into temporary site-specific exhibits in the city, so as to profile the architectural<br />

research into the built environment that is coming out of ARC and APL.<br />

SCALING THE<br />

HEIGHTS<br />

MOUNTAINS AND VERTICAL MEGASTRUCTURES<br />

architecture<br />

research<br />

collaborative<br />

NOVEMBER 18-25<br />

TYNE BRIDGE NORTH TOWER<br />

#SCALINGTHEHEIGHTS<br />

#BEINGHUMAN16<br />

Book online at:<br />

www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/events/being-human/scaling-heights<br />

198<br />

Text by Polly Gould


199


Awards<br />

Newcastle University APL Awards<br />

BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

H B Saint (William Bell) Memorial Scholarship for best major project designs:<br />

Mark Laverty<br />

Thomas Faulkner Prize:<br />

Angus Brown<br />

MArch Architecture<br />

H B Saint (William Bell) Memorial Scholarship for best major project designs:<br />

Daniel Duffield<br />

William Glover:<br />

Justin Moorton<br />

Ed Bennett Prize:<br />

Greg Murrell<br />

RIBA Awards<br />

BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

RIBA Bronze Medal nominations:<br />

Daniel Barratt<br />

Mark Laverty<br />

RIBA Hadrian Award nominations:<br />

Kat Bruh<br />

Matthew Rooney<br />

Melitini Athanasiou<br />

Tristan Searight<br />

MArch Architecture<br />

RIBA Silver Medal nominations:<br />

Daniel Duffield<br />

Mariya Lapteva<br />

RIBA Hadrian Award nominations:<br />

David Boyd<br />

Mariya Lapteva<br />

Matthew Sharman-Hayles<br />

Vili Welroos<br />

3DReid Award<br />

Nomination:<br />

Daniel Duffield<br />

www.3dreid.com<br />

200<br />

Top - Mark Laverty Middle - Daniel Duffield Bottom - Mariya Lapteva


Contributors<br />

Each year, the School draws on a vast and extraordinary array of talented architects, artists, critics and other practitioners who substantially<br />

contribute to our students’ learning, and to the culture and status of the School more generally. On this page we’ve gathered all (we hope!) of<br />

these vital individuals who come week-after-week to teach in our School. Our thanks go to each and every one of them, and we hope they will<br />

keep returning, as without their critical input the School would be a very different place.<br />

Stage 1<br />

Alanah Honey<br />

Cath Keay,<br />

Chloe Gill<br />

Damien Wooten<br />

David Davies<br />

Di Leitch<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin Gray<br />

James Longfield<br />

James Morton<br />

Keri Townsend<br />

Laura Harty<br />

Mal Lorimer<br />

Maral Tulip<br />

Mike Veitch<br />

Nathalie Baxter<br />

Robert Johnson<br />

Sean Douglas<br />

Steve Tomlinson<br />

Tara Stewart<br />

Tony Watson<br />

Stage 2<br />

Albane Dullivier<br />

Andy Campbell<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin Gray<br />

Enrico Forestieri<br />

Jamie Anderson<br />

John Lowry<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Kieran Gaffney<br />

Luis Hernan<br />

Maria Mitsoula<br />

Nikoletta Karastathi<br />

Patrick Devlin<br />

Sam Clarke<br />

Simone Ferracina<br />

Vlasios Sokos<br />

Stage 3<br />

Adam Storey<br />

Alan Fraser - Structural Engineer<br />

Albane Duvillier - www.aaschool.ac.uk<br />

Alex Gordon - www.jesticowhiles.com<br />

Aurelie Guyet<br />

Bex Gill<br />

Chris French - www.simpsonandbrown.co.uk<br />

Craig McIntyre<br />

Dan Kerr - www.mawsonkerr.co.uk<br />

David Bailey - www.dlgarchitects.com<br />

Declan McCafferty - www.grimshaw.global<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin-Gray<br />

Fraser Halliday - www.harrisonstevens.co.uk<br />

Hazel York - www.hawkinsbrown.com<br />

Hugh Miller - www.hughmillerfurniture.co.uk<br />

Iris Van Dorst - www.faulknerbrowns.co.uk<br />

Jack Green - www.biomorphis.com<br />

James Nelmes - www.bennettsassociates.com<br />

James Perry www.harperperry.co.uk<br />

Javier Rodriguez Corral<br />

John McAulay - www.cundall.com<br />

Josh Duffy - www.arup.com<br />

Luis Hernan<br />

Julie-Anne Delaney<br />

Lee Haldane<br />

Liam Proudlock - (Proudlock Associates)<br />

Luciano Cardellicchio - Kent University<br />

Luis Hernan<br />

Marc Horn - www.studiohorn.com<br />

Mark Johnson - www.brentwoodgroup.co.uk<br />

Mark Sinclair - Structural Engineer<br />

Mike Harrison<br />

Neil Wallace<br />

Nicholas Peters - www.grimshaw.global<br />

Nita Kidd - www.mawsonkerr.co.uk<br />

Paul Bussey - (AHMM)<br />

Rachel Currie - gt3architects.com<br />

Ray Verrall<br />

Rob Morrison - Taktal<br />

Ross Blekinsop - www.studiohorn.com<br />

Rowan Moore - www.theguardian.com<br />

Sean Douglas<br />

Sean Griffiths<br />

Selena Anders - Notre Dame University<br />

Scott Emmett - www.arup.com<br />

Stephen Ibbotson - www.iarch.co.uk<br />

Stephen Richardson - www.sw.co.uk<br />

Stuart Hallett - www.arup.com<br />

Tim Bailey - www.xsitearchitecture.co.uk<br />

Tim Mosedale - www.mosedalegillatt.wordpress.com<br />

Tracey Proudlock - (Proudlock Associates)<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

Valerio Morabito - Penn <strong>Design</strong><br />

Yasser Megahed<br />

AUP<br />

Ali Madanipour<br />

Andrew Donaldson<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

Diego Garcia Mejuto<br />

Di Leitch<br />

Emma Gibson<br />

Georgia Giannopoulou<br />

Helen Robinson<br />

Irene Curulli<br />

Irene Mosley<br />

James Longfield<br />

Jane Midgley<br />

Joanna Wylie<br />

Joe Dent<br />

Jules Brown<br />

Julia Heslop<br />

Ken Hutchinson<br />

Loes Veldpaus<br />

Martin Bonner<br />

Matt Wilcox<br />

Mike Veitch<br />

Montse Ferres<br />

Neil Powel<br />

Paola Gazzola<br />

Preena Mistry<br />

Raphael Selby<br />

Robert Douglas<br />

Roger Maier<br />

Ronnie Graham<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

Sana Al-Naimi<br />

Sara Stead<br />

Sophie Ellis<br />

Tara Stewart<br />

Tim Bailey<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

Xi Chen<br />

Stage 5<br />

Ali Manadipour<br />

Amy Butt<br />

Anna Czigler<br />

Ben Bridgens<br />

Chantelle Stewart<br />

Dik Jarman<br />

Evan Green<br />

Jack Green<br />

James Longfield<br />

James Nelmes<br />

Jenny Conroy<br />

John Ng<br />

Jonnie McGill<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Leon Walsh<br />

Lisa Moffit<br />

Luis Hernan<br />

Manja van de Worp<br />

Megan Charnley<br />

Paul Thomas<br />

Remo Pedreschi<br />

Roger Burrows<br />

Ruth Hudson-Silver<br />

Sam Vardy<br />

Sarah Jane Stewart<br />

Simone Ferracina<br />

Tahl Kaminer<br />

Toby Blackman<br />

Stage 6<br />

Alistair Robinson<br />

Andrew Carr<br />

Andrew English<br />

Gary Caldwell<br />

Howard Evans<br />

Rolf Hughes<br />

Maurice Mitchell<br />

Neil Armstrong<br />

Nick Heyward<br />

Patrick Devlin<br />

Pete Brittain<br />

Peter Hoare<br />

Simone Ferracina<br />

Photography<br />

Brandon Few<br />

Ko-Le Chen<br />

Lucinda Grange<br />

201


NUAS<br />

Newcastle University Architecture Society is the student-run representation body within the School. Representing just under 600 students, we<br />

work to provide opportunities that enhance our member’s education through programmes ranging from skills workshops, industry panel talks<br />

to one on one support. For many students in APL the society forms the heart of the School, bringing together students from across different<br />

stages with staff and practitioners in a casual environment. Every year we work to host a variety of events aimed to break up academic teaching<br />

including international trips, socials, and our annual Summer Ball and Charity Ball, which raised over £1000 in aid of Crisis in December.<br />

NUAS continues to go from strength to strength after winning the <strong>2017</strong> ‘IBM Award for Outstanding Contribution to the Student<br />

Community’ highlighting our work to boost cross stage engagement around the School and campaigning to improve students’ safety and<br />

welfare. We are also celebrating winning ‘Best Departmental Society’ for the second year running for our work providing an enjoyable<br />

atmosphere outside of lectures to meet, discuss and challenge the built environment sector.<br />

The Society wishes to thank all the staff of APL for their endless help and enthusiasm as well as RIBA, NAWIC and our industry partners for<br />

their support. Our thanks also goes to our members, for without whom we simply would not of had the outstanding year we have.<br />

President: Jonathan Pilosof, Secretary: Joanne Cain, Treasurer: Jhon Sebastian Valencia Cortes, Events Director: Ellie Waugh, Social Secretary: Helena Taylor, Raising and Giving<br />

Officer: Rowena Covarr, Formals Officer: Farrah Noelle Colilles, Exhibition & Shows Coordinator: Regen James Gregg, Lectures & Talks Coordinator: Jose Figueira, Marketing and<br />

Communication: Bahram Yaradanguliyev, Kofibar Representative: Matilda Barrett, Sports & Activities Coordinator(s): Toghrul Mammadov, Brandon Few<br />

202


Sponsors<br />

This year our thanks go to several special practices who have been kind enough to sponsor our end-of-year degree shows and publications.<br />

The Newcastle-based practice FaulknerBrowns is our principle sponsor and plays a big role in the life of the School, particularly through the<br />

teaching of Paul Rigby, one of the practice’s partners. Hawkins\Brown and Farrells have also provided generous sponsorship and our thanks<br />

as a School goes to each of these practices, which are all active in the Newcastle area and beyond.<br />

203


faulknerbrowns.co.uk


We are proud to support<br />

the School of Architecture,<br />

Planning and Landscape at<br />

Newcastle University<br />

hawkinsbrown.com \ @hawkins_brown


208


Newcastle University School of<br />

Architecture, Planning and Landscape<br />

<strong>Yearbook</strong> ‘17<br />

Editorial Team<br />

Elizabeth Holroyd<br />

Theodora Kyrtata<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Special Thanks<br />

Alison Pattison<br />

James Craig<br />

& Linked Research Group<br />

“Curating APL” 2014-15<br />

Title Partners<br />

FaulknerBrowns<br />

Printing & Binding<br />

Statex Colour Print<br />

www.statex.co.uk<br />

Typography<br />

Adobe Garamond Pro<br />

Paper<br />

GF Smith<br />

Colourplan, Mandarin, 350gsm<br />

First published in July <strong>2017</strong> by:<br />

The School of Architecture<br />

Planning and Landscape,<br />

Newcastle University<br />

Newcastle Upon Tyne.<br />

NE1 7RU<br />

United Kingdom<br />

w: www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/<br />

t: +44 (0) 191 222 5831<br />

e: apl@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

ISBN 978-0-7017-0256-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!