14.07.2021 Views

how to play chess endgames book

In this companion volume to Fundamental Chess Endings, Müller and Pajeken focus on the practical side of playing endgames. They cover all aspects of strategic endgames, with particular emphasis on thinking methods, and ways to create difficulties for opponents over the board. Using hundreds of outstanding examples from modern practice, the authors explain not only how to conduct 'classical' endgame tasks, such as exploiting an extra pawn or more active pieces, but also how to handle the extremely unbalanced endings that often arise from the dynamic openings favoured nowadays. All varieties of endgames are covered, and there are more than 200 exercises for the reader, together with full solutions.

In this companion volume to Fundamental Chess Endings, Müller and Pajeken focus on the practical side of playing endgames. They cover all aspects of strategic endgames, with particular emphasis on thinking methods, and ways to create difficulties for opponents over the board.

Using hundreds of outstanding examples from modern practice, the authors explain not only how to conduct 'classical' endgame tasks, such as exploiting an extra pawn or more active pieces, but also how to handle the extremely unbalanced endings that often arise from the dynamic openings favoured nowadays. All varieties of endgames are covered, and there are more than 200 exercises for the reader, together with full solutions.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BISHOP-PAIR

IN THE ENDGAME

163

B

E9.12 /**

How did the game finish?

G) Two Bishops against

Rook and Minor Piece

In the endgame it is sometimes not clear which

of these combinations of pieces is the stronger.

It generally depends on the other material or on

positional factors.

This is better than:

a) Naturally 4 !!al? is wrong and serves

here only as an illustration of the power of the

bishops: 4...tbc:4 5 Ac! .ic5 6 a4 i.d4 7 !ia2

Ae3 8 ~al Axel 9 ~xcl lba5 -+.

b) 4 ~xd6? Axd6 5 .tel g5 6 fxg5 fxg5 7

.ixg5 (7 Wf2 .ixf3 8 Wxf3 Af4 -+) 7 ... i.a3 8

Wf2 c I~ 9 Axel Axe I should be theoretically

lost, but not within the limits of the 50-move

rule. Of course, I (KM) am not claiming that I

would have won it.

c) 4 ~fl?! lbb5 (4 .. .ll:ic4? 5 Acl Axel 6

~cl lbd2 7 1:Ixc2! is not Black's intention) 5

Wg3 (5 Ac!? Axel 6 ~xcl lbc3 -+) 5 ... Ad3

(5...lbc3 6 lbd4 Ab2 7 Acl! Axel 8 ~xcl

lbxa2 9 1:Ixc2 =) 6 ~el lbc3 7 lbd4 i.b2 8

lbxc2 (8 Wf3 lbxa2 9 lbb3 +) 8 ... .ixc2 9 Ad4

Aa4 =.

4 •.. Ab4 (D)

If 4 ... lbc4? 5 i.c I Axel 6 ~xcl lbd2 then,

as in the variation with 4 ~fl, comes 7 &c2!.

After 7 ... lbxf3 8 ~c7+ Wg6 9 Wf2 only White

has winning chances, since his rook is very

powerful on the open board. This stands in

marked contrast to the note to White's 7th move.

after which the white rook is completely dominated,

even though there is only one additional

minor piece left on the board. This is in accordance

with the general rule of thumb, that the

side playing against the rook should not exchange

pieces. Generally. the more open and

empty the board. the stronger the rook.

I.Hausner - K.Mi.iller

Hamburg 1990

Black's dangerous passed pawn enables him

to play for a win without any risk.

l Axa7?!

This is very risky. After I Wf2!? White

should not be worse; for example, 1.. .hxg4 2

hxg4 c3 3 .ixc3 .ic2 4 We2 =.

1...hxg4 2 hxg4 c3 3 .ie3 c2 4 !let!

5~e2

Or:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!