Inside History: Protest. Revolt & Reform

For our next issue we take a closer look at the theme of Protest from the events of Peterloo to the fall of the Berlin. Inside we cover a whole range of historical protests and the individuals who led the charge for change. This issues includes: John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry, The Suffragettes, Billie Holiday and the role music has played in protests, The Civil Rights Movement, Protest and Sport, We are the People: The Fall of the Berlin Wall, Bloody Sunday at Trafalgar Square, and much much more. For our next issue we take a closer look at the theme of Protest from the events of Peterloo to the fall of the Berlin. Inside we cover a whole range of historical protests and the individuals who led the charge for change. This issues includes:

John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry, The Suffragettes, Billie Holiday and the role music has played in protests, The Civil Rights Movement, Protest and Sport, We are the People: The Fall of the Berlin Wall, Bloody Sunday at Trafalgar Square, and much much more.

10.06.2021 Views

For Brown, the continued talk of the abolitionist movementwas getting the cause nowhere. What was needed in hisview, was action. Blood would needed to be shed in orderto free the enslaved. In many respects, Brown would beproven correct as only a couple of years after his actions atHarpers Ferry, the United States of America would turnagainst each other leading to a bloody Civil War where theconcept of Slavery was high on the agenda.Not everyone agreed with John Brown’s plan to start aninsurrection against slave owners in 1859. FrederickDouglass, the former slave turned abolitionist, might havenot have agreed with Brown’s methods but he certainlyadmired his passion. Yet, he feared for his friend’s braveplan to raid the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in order toarm a slave rebellion against their oppressors. In Douglasseyes, Brown and his small band of rebels were "going into aperfect steel trap" warning Brown that he "would never getout alive". Douglass, like many others declined the invitationto join the raid at Harpers Ferry.Harpers Ferry as a target made perfect sense to JohnBrown. Inside the federal arsenal were 100,000 rifles andmuskets. Within the six countries of Harpers Ferry therewere approximately 18,000 slaves. If they joined him, itwould be enough to form an army. Twenty-one men wouldjoin Brown for the raid on Harpers Ferry. Five of those menwere freed and fugitive slaves. The plan was simple. Toattack Harpers Ferry, secure the arsenal, hope others jointhe insurrection and then flee into the blue ridgemountains of Virginia using guerrilla tactics to attackplantations and in doing so, grow his army before taking onRichmond.Despite his success the previous year, failure would onceagain haunt Brown. Upon entering Harpers Ferry, a trainwas approaching. The rebels stopped the train but within afew hours, Brown let the train go. At the next town, theconductor contacted Washington saying that “One Man andTwo hundred men are attacking Harpers Ferry!” PresidentBuchanan immediately ordered Robert E Lee to take care ofthe situation and crush the insurrection. Despite the standoff, Brown would be captured in the engine house alongwith five others. Twelve of his men would die at HarpersFerry whilst four escaped.John Brown would face three charges during his trial.Treason, Murder and inciting slave insurrection. All werepunishable by death. His trial would begin on the 27thOctober 1859 and would last only three and half days. Itwould take the jury only 45 minutes to find him guilty of allcharges. His execution date was set as December 2, 1859.For the other men who were captured the charge oftreason was dropped but they would still be found guilty ofthe other charges. Shields Green, John Copeland Jr, JohnEdwin Cook and Edwin Coppock would all face thehangman’s noose. Green sent word to Brown that he wasglad to have fought with him, and awaited his deathwillingly.General Robert E. LeeDuring his time in prison awaiting execution, the coverageof John Brown’s raid intensified. From jail, he wroteapproximately 100 letters to newspaper editors around thecountry as well as his family. In doing so, he aimed toestablish his own case and begin the process of writing hisown history. Opinions about John Brown and the actions ofhis rebels began to take hold on the national conscience. Tothose who supported anti-slavery he was seen as a Martyryet to others who opposed his actions, he was a traitor. Inpolarising the opinions of the country, Brown hadunwittingly succeeded in bringing the question aboutslavery to the limelight.Following his execution, white abolitionist's who hadsupported Brown with money and support in order tobankroll the raid had fled north to Canada. FrederickDouglass would join them given his close connections toBrown. A Federal Marshall arrived at Douglass’s home oneday after he fled. It was a narrow escape.In the aftermath of the raid on Harpers Ferry and Brown’sexecution many have fought for his reputation. Americanphilosopher, Ralph Waldo Emerson would call Brown: “Therarest of heroes, a pure idealist with no by-ends.”Even today, John Brown and his actions at Harper Ferryleads historians, educators and even the general public toask questions. Was he a revolutional hero? Was he aterrorist? Were his actions so morally just that it justifiedthe ends? Was he a fanatical madman who put his ownvanity and glory ahead of what was actually achievable? Intruth, John Brown is all of those things. A complicatedfailure that ultimately succeeded through the actions thatwere his preferred method of negotiations. That being,violence, war and brother fighting brother in what wouldbecome the American Civil War. It was only through thatbloodshed that slavery would finally end. A bloodshed thatbegan at Harpers Ferry.14 INSIDE HISTORY

For Brown, the continued talk of the abolitionist movement

was getting the cause nowhere. What was needed in his

view, was action. Blood would needed to be shed in order

to free the enslaved. In many respects, Brown would be

proven correct as only a couple of years after his actions at

Harpers Ferry, the United States of America would turn

against each other leading to a bloody Civil War where the

concept of Slavery was high on the agenda.

Not everyone agreed with John Brown’s plan to start an

insurrection against slave owners in 1859. Frederick

Douglass, the former slave turned abolitionist, might have

not have agreed with Brown’s methods but he certainly

admired his passion. Yet, he feared for his friend’s brave

plan to raid the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in order to

arm a slave rebellion against their oppressors. In Douglass

eyes, Brown and his small band of rebels were "going into a

perfect steel trap" warning Brown that he "would never get

out alive". Douglass, like many others declined the invitation

to join the raid at Harpers Ferry.

Harpers Ferry as a target made perfect sense to John

Brown. Inside the federal arsenal were 100,000 rifles and

muskets. Within the six countries of Harpers Ferry there

were approximately 18,000 slaves. If they joined him, it

would be enough to form an army. Twenty-one men would

join Brown for the raid on Harpers Ferry. Five of those men

were freed and fugitive slaves. The plan was simple. To

attack Harpers Ferry, secure the arsenal, hope others join

the insurrection and then flee into the blue ridge

mountains of Virginia using guerrilla tactics to attack

plantations and in doing so, grow his army before taking on

Richmond.

Despite his success the previous year, failure would once

again haunt Brown. Upon entering Harpers Ferry, a train

was approaching. The rebels stopped the train but within a

few hours, Brown let the train go. At the next town, the

conductor contacted Washington saying that “One Man and

Two hundred men are attacking Harpers Ferry!” President

Buchanan immediately ordered Robert E Lee to take care of

the situation and crush the insurrection. Despite the stand

off, Brown would be captured in the engine house along

with five others. Twelve of his men would die at Harpers

Ferry whilst four escaped.

John Brown would face three charges during his trial.

Treason, Murder and inciting slave insurrection. All were

punishable by death. His trial would begin on the 27th

October 1859 and would last only three and half days. It

would take the jury only 45 minutes to find him guilty of all

charges. His execution date was set as December 2, 1859.

For the other men who were captured the charge of

treason was dropped but they would still be found guilty of

the other charges. Shields Green, John Copeland Jr, John

Edwin Cook and Edwin Coppock would all face the

hangman’s noose. Green sent word to Brown that he was

glad to have fought with him, and awaited his death

willingly.

General Robert E. Lee

During his time in prison awaiting execution, the coverage

of John Brown’s raid intensified. From jail, he wrote

approximately 100 letters to newspaper editors around the

country as well as his family. In doing so, he aimed to

establish his own case and begin the process of writing his

own history. Opinions about John Brown and the actions of

his rebels began to take hold on the national conscience. To

those who supported anti-slavery he was seen as a Martyr

yet to others who opposed his actions, he was a traitor. In

polarising the opinions of the country, Brown had

unwittingly succeeded in bringing the question about

slavery to the limelight.

Following his execution, white abolitionist's who had

supported Brown with money and support in order to

bankroll the raid had fled north to Canada. Frederick

Douglass would join them given his close connections to

Brown. A Federal Marshall arrived at Douglass’s home one

day after he fled. It was a narrow escape.

In the aftermath of the raid on Harpers Ferry and Brown’s

execution many have fought for his reputation. American

philosopher, Ralph Waldo Emerson would call Brown: “The

rarest of heroes, a pure idealist with no by-ends.”

Even today, John Brown and his actions at Harper Ferry

leads historians, educators and even the general public to

ask questions. Was he a revolutional hero? Was he a

terrorist? Were his actions so morally just that it justified

the ends? Was he a fanatical madman who put his own

vanity and glory ahead of what was actually achievable? In

truth, John Brown is all of those things. A complicated

failure that ultimately succeeded through the actions that

were his preferred method of negotiations. That being,

violence, war and brother fighting brother in what would

become the American Civil War. It was only through that

bloodshed that slavery would finally end. A bloodshed that

began at Harpers Ferry.

14 INSIDE HISTORY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!