Ovi Magazine Issue #24: Nationalism - Published: 2013-01-31
In this thematic issue of the Ovi magazine we are not giving answers about “nationalism.” We simply express opinions. We also start a dialogue with only aim to understand better. In this thematic issue of the Ovi magazine we are not giving answers about “nationalism.” We simply express opinions. We also start a dialogue with only aim to understand better.
Articleand so on. The vanguard of this revolution will be thesame people who were involved in the Arab Spring,the uprisings in Burma and Iran, and the Occupymovement in the United States, the youth of Europe.The European Union must find the right balancebetween debate and consensus on an overall vision.That vision must permeate into all aspects of society.Without this vision Europe cannot progress and mayactually decline. The people of Europe need a newidentity that carries both meaning and a sense ofexcitement about the future.And what must be borrowed by the EuropeanUnion, once discarded in an attempt to create a pan-Euro culture is the “hotch potch” of cultural diversitythat exists within the member states. Uniformity doesnot bring strength, diversity brings strength which hasbeen unrecognized. Diversity is what makes Europeand the Commission has over the years tried to createa Europe of the lowest common denominator (LCD).Europe has actually been stripped of its very strength.The answer is not in the pan-Euro approach butengaging the diversity within the Union, somethingmany, if not the majority feel in their hearts. A Eurocultureshould take in both national and pan-Eurotraits and slowly evolve into a single Euro-identity.Just like the Euro-debt crisis, the Euro-cultural crisisis the result of legislators believing that regulationis not the solution to everything. New approachesoutside legislative frameworks are required here.There is great risk that the metaphor of blue maybecome a sea that lacks the ability to have foresightand vision. The EU Council is fast becoming atransactional rather than transformational identityas it started out to be. The bureaucrats have replacedthe dreamers and philosophers setting into motionprocesses that inhibit rather than rather thanencourages growth in diversity and richness.60Blue is also symbolic of authority and the EU mustbe aware of the need to develop an environment wherethe Commission is not seen as top down regulator buttruly concerned with what it’s citizenry thinks andfeels about issues. The citizens of the EU must beencouraged to develop a sense of ownership in thewhole process once again.
Sometimes I finda place to sleepArticlesBut I never dream61
- Page 10 and 11: Nationalism and Universalism in Ita
- Page 12 and 13: Nationalism and Universalism in Ita
- Page 14 and 15: ThemeChristos MouzevirisNationalism
- Page 16 and 17: Nationalism SemanticsAt home too, m
- Page 18 and 19: ThemeProf. Lawrence NanneryThe Inco
- Page 20 and 21: The Incoherences of NationalismLet
- Page 22 and 23: The Incoherences of NationalismIt i
- Page 24 and 25: The Incoherences of NationalismSoon
- Page 26 and 27: ThemeMirella IontaWhen Spiritual Ch
- Page 28 and 29: When Spiritual Chaos Begets Politic
- Page 30 and 31: When Spiritual Chaos Begets Politic
- Page 32 and 33: ThemeGiorgos KontogiannisNationalis
- Page 34 and 35: Nationalism and patriotismThe pione
- Page 36 and 37: Press for nationalismNationalism co
- Page 38 and 39: Press for nationalismHichem Karoui:
- Page 40 and 41: Press for nationalismGrowing Global
- Page 42 and 43: ArticleProf. Anis H. BajrektarevicF
- Page 44 and 45: ArticleWhy and how?!Young generatio
- Page 46 and 47: 46Nationalism & Patriotic Posters
- Page 48 and 49: Quotes“There is no flag large eno
- Page 50 and 51: How can I playhide & seekwhen21 chi
- Page 52 and 53: ArticleDavid SparenbergTurn your Gu
- Page 54 and 55: ArticleTony ZuvelaBerserk Alert!54
- Page 56 and 57: ArticleLily JadeOne Child Per Famil
- Page 58 and 59: ArticleProf. Murray HunterEurope: S
- Page 62 and 63: ArticleRene WadlowAlbert Schweitzer
- Page 64 and 65: NewsIndianapolis Museum of ArtLarge
- Page 66 and 67: NewsAgung Rai Museum of ArtIda Bagu
- Page 68: Check Ovi EBook-shelvesfor our late
Article
and so on. The vanguard of this revolution will be the
same people who were involved in the Arab Spring,
the uprisings in Burma and Iran, and the Occupy
movement in the United States, the youth of Europe.
The European Union must find the right balance
between debate and consensus on an overall vision.
That vision must permeate into all aspects of society.
Without this vision Europe cannot progress and may
actually decline. The people of Europe need a new
identity that carries both meaning and a sense of
excitement about the future.
And what must be borrowed by the European
Union, once discarded in an attempt to create a pan-
Euro culture is the “hotch potch” of cultural diversity
that exists within the member states. Uniformity does
not bring strength, diversity brings strength which has
been unrecognized. Diversity is what makes Europe
and the Commission has over the years tried to create
a Europe of the lowest common denominator (LCD).
Europe has actually been stripped of its very strength.
The answer is not in the pan-Euro approach but
engaging the diversity within the Union, something
many, if not the majority feel in their hearts. A Euroculture
should take in both national and pan-Euro
traits and slowly evolve into a single Euro-identity.
Just like the Euro-debt crisis, the Euro-cultural crisis
is the result of legislators believing that regulation
is not the solution to everything. New approaches
outside legislative frameworks are required here.
There is great risk that the metaphor of blue may
become a sea that lacks the ability to have foresight
and vision. The EU Council is fast becoming a
transactional rather than transformational identity
as it started out to be. The bureaucrats have replaced
the dreamers and philosophers setting into motion
processes that inhibit rather than rather than
encourages growth in diversity and richness.
60
Blue is also symbolic of authority and the EU must
be aware of the need to develop an environment where
the Commission is not seen as top down regulator but
truly concerned with what it’s citizenry thinks and
feels about issues. The citizens of the EU must be
encouraged to develop a sense of ownership in the
whole process once again.