Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University

Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University

23.12.2012 Views

• Nearly seventy years later, in the summer of 2004, I reconnected with Virginia Woolf when one of my assistants discovered three letters Woolf had written me in 1935 and 1936. Th rilled with the discovery, my editor, Philip Turner, announced: “Stop everything you’re doing. Remember, you wrote the fi rst doctoral thesis on Virginia Woolf’s work. I’m going to publish it in its entirety, including these three newly discovered letters and also her diary entries about you.” Th e book, entitled Virginia Woolf: Th e Will to Create as a Woman, appeared in 2005. It had been my fi rst book, and now it was my eighteenth. My two children and I agreed with my friend, the novelist Cynthia Ozick: “Th ese letters do not belong to you and your children. Th ey belong to the world.” On 12 December 2005, we donated them to the Berg Collection in the New York Public Library. Woolf scholars can now fi nd them in the Collection among the 28 volumes of her diaries and more than 100 of her letters. • In 2006, the annual Virginia Woolf Conference held in Birmingham opened my eyes to the global scope of Virginia Woof’s infl uence. When I wrote my thesis in 1932, there was no such person as a “Virginia Woolf scholar.” At the conference, however, I was accepted by a group of brilliant and enthusiastic Woolfi ans from all over the world. Some had even come from Australia, China, and Japan. Th ere I learned from some of the older scholars that my study was the only one available to them during the rediscovery of Virginia Woolf by American and British feminists in the 1960s. Th e conference reawakened my understanding of how much I owed to Virginia Woolf. She helped me fi nd the courage to write as a woman, and to use words and images as my tools to fi ght injustice. Th roughout the rest of my life, the words she spoke to me at 52 Tavistock Square were written across my heart: We had such hope for the world. I wish I could tell her that, despite everything, I still have hope. viii

Introduction by Anna Burrells, Steve Ellis, Deborah Parsons, and Kathryn Simpson Boundaries signal limits and extent. Th ey contain and confi ne, but they also abut and adjoin. Boundaries demarcate and divide one thing from another, yet as borders they are also the site of the betwixt and between, where opposites meet, and as frontiers they point to the unknown beyond, promising exploration and discovery. Boundaries can be closed or open, and focussed inwards or outwards. Virginia Woolf was fi xated by thresholds—historical, social, spatial, ontological, epistemological, and artistic—and in her writing constantly positioned herself at the site of the “in-between,” as Tara Surry notes in her essay in this volume. “Now is life very solid, or very shifting?” she asked in her diary in January 1929, “I am haunted by the two contradictions” (D3 218). For the 16 th Annual International Conference on Virginia Woolf we invited speakers to explore the idea of Woolfi an boundaries—to consider not only Woolf’s own transgressions and trespasses, but also to explore Woolf’s work from perspectives “beyond the boundary” of her own positions and attitudes, and indeed beyond a metropolitan-centred view. Th e response to this invitation was impressive, as speakers crossed geographical boundaries and moved beyond established interpretative parameters in rich and fertile ways, refusing the constraints of period, generic, and methodological boundaries—as Woolf herself was persistently concerned to do—and pushing the limits and extent of our own disciplinary taxonomies. Because of the constraints of space we can only represent a fraction of the high quality papers submitted for this volume, but we hope that those included will stir new thoughts and open further perspectives and debate beyond the very literal boundaries of this Woolfi an text. One of the most fascinating perspectives on Woolf’s writing and life was off ered by Ruth Gruber, who wrote the fi rst PhD thesis on Woolf in 1931/2, and shared with the conference her experience of working on her thesis and of meeting Virginia and Leonard Woolf; of crossing the threshold of their home, and, in completing her thesis, crossing another threshold and opening the door to Woolf scholarship. It was an immense privilege to hear Ruth Gruber’s incredible story, some of which is included in her Foreword to this collection, a fl avour of the hour-long talk that both fascinated and entertained the new and established Woolf scholars of today. Suzanne Bellamy’s essay continues this work of what she calls “textual archeology” in her discussion of the fi rst Australian MA thesis on Woolf, written by Nuri Mass in 1941/2. At the beginning of an exciting project to edit this thesis, Bellamy off ers insights into another important threshold moment in Woolf scholarship, and to the prescience of this early critic, who with none of the biographical material which has proved so valuable to subsequent criticism recognised the challenges of exploring Woolf as a female and modernist writer. Deploring absolutism, Woolf’s instinct was drawn to the transitional aspect of boundaries, and to their fl uctuation, their permeability, and their transgression, but at the same time she was immensely sympathetic to the human desire for defi nition and solidity, and despite constantly seeking to move beyond the confi nes of the ego, intensely aware of its fragility. “I am whirled down caverns, and fl ap like paper against endless corridors,” thinks ix

Introduction<br />

by Anna Burrells, Steve Ellis, Deborah Parsons, and Kathryn Simpson<br />

<strong>Boundaries</strong> signal limits and extent. Th ey contain and confi ne, but they also abut and<br />

adjoin. <strong>Boundaries</strong> demarcate and divide one thing from another, yet as borders<br />

they are also the site of the betwixt and between, where opposites meet, and as frontiers<br />

they point to the unknown beyond, promising exploration and discovery. <strong>Boundaries</strong><br />

can be closed or open, and focussed inwards or outwards. Virginia Woolf was fi xated by<br />

thresholds—historical, social, spatial, ontological, epistemological, and artistic—and in her<br />

writing constantly positioned herself at the site of the “in-between,” as Tara Surry notes in<br />

her essay in this volume. “Now is life very solid, or very shifting?” she asked in her diary<br />

in January 1929, “I am haunted by the two contradictions” (D3 218). For the 16 th Annual<br />

International Conference on Virginia Woolf we invited speakers to explore the idea of Woolfi<br />

an boundaries—to consider not only Woolf’s own transgressions and trespasses, but also<br />

to explore Woolf’s work from perspectives “beyond the boundary” of her own positions and<br />

attitudes, and indeed beyond a metropolitan-centred view. Th e response to this invitation<br />

was impressive, as speakers crossed geographical boundaries and moved beyond established<br />

interpretative parameters in rich and fertile ways, refusing the constraints of period, generic,<br />

and methodological boundaries—as Woolf herself was persistently concerned to do—and<br />

pushing the limits and extent of our own disciplinary taxonomies. Because of the constraints<br />

of space we can only represent a fraction of the high quality papers submitted for this volume,<br />

but we hope that those included will stir new thoughts and open further perspectives<br />

and debate beyond the very literal boundaries of this Woolfi an text.<br />

One of the most fascinating perspectives on Woolf’s writing and life was off ered by<br />

Ruth Gruber, who wrote the fi rst PhD thesis on Woolf in 1931/2, and shared with the<br />

conference her experience of working on her thesis and of meeting Virginia and Leonard<br />

Woolf; of crossing the threshold of their home, and, in completing her thesis, crossing<br />

another threshold and opening the door to Woolf scholarship. It was an immense privilege<br />

to hear Ruth Gruber’s incredible story, some of which is included in her Foreword to this<br />

collection, a fl avour of the hour-long talk that both fascinated and entertained the new<br />

and established Woolf scholars of today. Suzanne Bellamy’s essay continues this work of<br />

what she calls “textual archeology” in her discussion of the fi rst Australian MA thesis on<br />

Woolf, written by Nuri Mass in 1941/2. At the beginning of an exciting project to edit<br />

this thesis, Bellamy off ers insights into another important threshold moment in Woolf<br />

scholarship, and to the prescience of this early critic, who with none of the biographical<br />

material which has proved so valuable to subsequent criticism recognised the challenges<br />

of exploring Woolf as a female and modernist writer.<br />

Deploring absolutism, Woolf’s instinct was drawn to the transitional aspect of boundaries,<br />

and to their fl uctuation, their permeability, and their transgression, but at the same<br />

time she was immensely sympathetic to the human desire for defi nition and solidity, and<br />

despite constantly seeking to move beyond the confi nes of the ego, intensely aware of its<br />

fragility. “I am whirled down caverns, and fl ap like paper against endless corridors,” thinks<br />

ix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!