23.12.2012 Views

Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University

Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University

Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES<br />

In Woolf’s novel, Brown, like the historical Edward Carpenter, takes the role of a mystical<br />

evolutionary socialist guide, although his theories are more tentative and inconclusive<br />

than Carpenter’s, refl ecting Woolf’s own post-war pessimism. In Civilisation: Its Cause and<br />

Cure, Carpenter had diagnosed and suggested a cure for the diseased state of late-Victorian<br />

society; similarly, it is to the “medical” and “priestly” Brown that the victims of Victorianism<br />

in Th e Years turn for help in curing their crippled lives (234). Brown’s diagnosis that contemporary<br />

lives are “screwed up into one hard little, tight little—knot” echoes the second<br />

stage of the three-stage evolutionary socialist scheme put forward by Carpenter (238). In<br />

this second stage, modern Man abandons the communal harmony of primitive society for<br />

the narrow egotism of competitive materialism and his life is described as “strangled tied<br />

and bound” (sic) (Democracy 27). In addition, Brown’s prescription that “the soul…wishes<br />

to expand…to form new combinations” (238) closely echoes Carpenter’s prediction that (in<br />

the third evolutionary stage) the human soul will expand in ever-widening circles and the<br />

creative mind “continually mak[e] new combinations” (Art 106).<br />

Most signifi cantly, behind Brown’s anti-Fascism—and perhaps even behind Th ree<br />

Guineas itself—can be discerned the anti-statist political philosophy that was Carpenter’s<br />

response not to fascism but to Victorian homophobia. Brown’s question—“If we do<br />

not know ourselves, how then can we make religions, laws that…‘fi t’?” (227)—implies<br />

Antigone’s intuitive “unwritten” law, defi ned by Woolf in Th ree Guineas as “the private<br />

laws that should regulate certain instincts, passions, mental and physical desires” (203),<br />

but both are further linked to Carpenter’s goal of a non-governmental society in which<br />

the heart’s internal authority takes precedence over external law. 5 In addition, Carpenter’s<br />

prediction that Man will evolve beyond hero-worship—or the worship of “idols”—is refl<br />

ected in Brown’s refusal to accept the role of Teacher or Master and in Rose’s confi rming<br />

laughter, that seems to chime “no idols, no idols, no idols” (Art 152; TY 341).<br />

Finally, Brown himself functions as an exemplar of Carpenter’s third and fi nal evolutionary<br />

stage in which the soul expands to such a degree that it becomes one with the<br />

Universal even while retaining its own individuality. Within this cosmic consciousness, Carpenter<br />

argues, there is self-reliance but “no more self-consciousness” and in Woolf’s novel,<br />

Brown’s complete lack of self-consciousness is repeatedly emphasized (Civilisation 70). A<br />

capacity to see life from a cosmic perspective is also suggested by Brown’s otherwise rather<br />

shockingly detached description of the air-raid in the 1917 episode as “only children letting<br />

off fi reworks in the back garden” (236). Furthermore, the mysterious operation of Brown’s<br />

“spontaneous subterranean benevolence” (337) on the other characters in the novel would<br />

seem to illustrate the non-coercive, ripple-like process whereby, according to Carpenter,<br />

“a new sentiment of life” “passes by some indirect infl uence from one to another” (Ideal 72,<br />

emphasis added). Th us Eleanor’s contact with Brown “seemed to have released something in<br />

her; she felt not only a new space of time, but new powers, something unknown within her,”<br />

and under Brown’s presiding infl uence at the fi nal party scene, this “new sentiment of life”<br />

spreads mystically to the younger generation of North and Peggy (239).<br />

Two striking pieces of imagery from Th e Years—that of the fl owering bud and that<br />

of the winged insect emerging from its chrysalis—confi rm the centrality of Carpenter’s<br />

inter-textual presence within the novel, given his frequent use of very similar imagery to<br />

illustrate his theory of psychological and social evolution or “exfoliation.” According to<br />

this theory, both personal and social transformation are driven by internal desire; new

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!