Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University
Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University Woolfian Boundaries - Clemson University
112 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES winters’ nights, a drumming from sturdy trees and thorned briars which made the whole room green in summer…. What power could now prevent the fertility, the insensibility of nature? (141-42) Mrs. McNab and her crew at least scythe the grass. Th e anonymous, cosmic questioner’s idea of “insensibility” maintains the rational edge on the random operations of nature. Th e Waves, particularly in its intervals, off ers more observation than control of what goes on in the garden; indeed the material of the intervals is continuous with the matter of the soliloquies delivered by the characters. Birds are no longer invaders, but comprehensive observers. We fi nd them in the third interlude, as they sing in the trees or move in fl ight, when “they swerved, all in one fl ight, when the black cat moved among the bushes, when the cook threw cinders on the ash heap and startled them” (TW 73). Slightly later they are “intensely conscious of one thing…perhaps…a snail shell, rising in the grass like a grey cathedral…or perhaps they saw the splendour of the fl owers making a light of fl owing purple over the beds,” and still later “they looked deeper beneath the fl owers, down the dark avenues into the unlit world where the leaf rots and the fl ower has fallen. Th en one of them, beautifully darting, accurately alighting, spiked the soft, monstrous body of the defenceless worm” (74). Here Woolf experiments with thinking as a bird, and creates one of many holistic views accessible in her work, one in which the human order is only part of the great cycle of life and death. A very obvious second example is the consciousness of Mrs. Dalloway, feeling continuous with other entities, linking across people, places and time, as she contemplates the trees of St. James’s Park “who lifted her on their branches as she had seen the trees lift the mist, but it spread out ever so far, her life, herself” (MD 9). Woolf’s girlhood capacity for satire, including both self-satire and satire of patriarchal power in relation to nature and hunting, fi nds numerous early expressions. A favorite of mine is in her 1899 “Warboys” diary, which takes us on a memorable moth-hunt in Huntingdonshire, subjecting her elder brother Th oby to the heaviest parody. Scientifi c methods and the British game tradition are implicated in this satire of “the most scientifi c way of catching moths” (PA 144). Th e leader of the expedition is identifi ed only as J. T. S., echoing the penchant for initials in British academic publishing, including scientifi c annals. Th oby is cast as a meticulously costumed great white hunter. Th ere is plenty of mockery in reserve for his bumbling accomplices, down to the dog, and including herself: Man, the hunter, starts forth in the following procession. Firstly of course the leader of the expedition, the renowned J. T. S. He wears a large felt hat, & muffl ed round him is a huge brown plaid, which makes his fi gure striding in the dark most picturesque & brigand like. In his hand he carries a glass jar—of which more anon. 2ndly appears a female form in evening dress, a shawl over her shoulders, & carrying a large stickless net. 3rdly the lantern bearer (none other than the present writer) who lights the paths fi tfully with a Bicycle lamp of brilliant but uncertain powers of illumination…4thly Ad. L. S. a supernumerary amateur of no calling who takes little interest in the proceedings & is profi cient in the art of obscuring the lamp at critical moments; 5thly Gurth the dog member, whose services are unrequired & unrewarded; being the fi rst to investigate the sugar & having been convicted of attempts to catch moths for no entomological purpose whatever. (PA 144-45)
Woolf, Ecofeminism, and Breaking Boundaries 113 Th ese aspiring entomologists manage to jar a huge, rare red underwing. Young Virginia knows its name because it was her duty to look up such identities for her siblings. Woolf adds an element of emotion to the outcome: “the whole procession felt some unprofessional regret when, with a last gleam of scarlet eye & scarlet wing, the grand old moth vanished” (145). Th ere are numerous later critiques of hunting in Woolf. Among the most notable is her indictment of the methods men used to garner egret plumes in her essay, “Th e Plumage Bill,” where she also criticizes environmentalists who place blame on women for demanding such accoutrements. Woolf satirizes England’s trophy hunters, as in this case via a bored Lady Orlando: Th e Archduke would bethink him how he had shot an elk in Sweden, and Orlando would ask, was it a very big elk, and the Archduke would say that it was not as big as the reindeer which he had shot in Norway; and Orlando would ask, had he ever shot a tiger, and the Archduke would say he had shot an albatross, and Orlando would say (half hiding her yawn) was an albatross as big as an elephant, and the Archduke would say—something very sensible, no doubt, but Orlando heard it not, for she was looking at her writing table, out of the window, at the door. (O 181) Woolf off ers more unusual qualms about fi shing. One occurrence comes in the “Plumage Bill” essay, where she wonders why only the purchase of bird plumes by women shopping on Oxford Street is subject to critical scrutiny by environmentalists. Aiming at the male consumer, she muses, “Such an outburst about a fi shing-rod would be deemed sentimental in the extreme. Yet I suppose that salmon have their feelings” (E3 243, emphasis added). Grotesque fi shing practices are instanced in To the Lighthouse, as McAlister’s boy carves bait from a live fi sh, and when a young Bart Oliver appalls his little sister with baiting a hook. Several women, including Lady Bradshaw in Mrs. Dalloway and Isa Oliver in Between the Acts once fi shed, until fi shlike they went under, or were tangled by their husbands’ lines. A mystical, irrational expression of connection to the world of sea creatures may be apprehended in the sighting of the “fi n in the waste of waters” by Virginia Stephen off Cornwall in 1905, an image she passes on to Bernard in Th e Waves (e.g., 189). In her late essay, “Th e Death of the Moth,” Woolf takes up a typical position between indoors and out, near a window. She is writing, but she is also attentive to a day-fl ying moth, and she enters into its reality via hers. Th e initial signifi cance of this creature—a humble, less beautiful form of moth than the class of night-fl yers—is that it shared “the same energy which inspired the rooks, the ploughmen, the horses, and even, it seemed, the lean bare-backed downs” on a mild mid-September morning (DM 4). Her construct suggests the Gaia concept of the globe as a united, living thing. Th e essay grows somber as Woolf pities the self-imposed limits of the moth, banging around on a single pane of glass, when the wide expanse of the downs lies outside. Slowly she recognizes that this obscure creature is struggling with death, and it wins her respect by righting itself, achieving what Woolf constructs as a sense of composure. While nature’s force of death cannot be
- Page 76 and 77: 62 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES to a possibl
- Page 78 and 79: 64 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Caroline Ste
- Page 80 and 81: 66 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES of “expert
- Page 82 and 83: 68 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES of merging a
- Page 84 and 85: 70 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES But the triu
- Page 86 and 87: REAL BODIES AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF C
- Page 88 and 89: 74 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES of culture a
- Page 90 and 91: 76 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES a certain eg
- Page 92 and 93: 78 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES advantages o
- Page 94 and 95: WOOLF, ROOKS, AND RURAL ENGLAND by
- Page 96 and 97: 82 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES G. K. Yeates
- Page 98 and 99: 84 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES At another t
- Page 100 and 101: WOOLF AND THE OTHERS AT THE ZOO by
- Page 102 and 103: 88 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES his gaze a s
- Page 104 and 105: 90 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES bankruptcy o
- Page 106 and 107: 92 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES refuses to s
- Page 108 and 109: 94 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES of pesticide
- Page 110 and 111: 96 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Taxonomy in
- Page 112 and 113: 98 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Th e name of
- Page 114 and 115: “CE CHIEN EST À MOI”: VIRGINIA
- Page 116 and 117: 102 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES a statement
- Page 118 and 119: 104 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES pery: “An
- Page 120 and 121: 106 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Woolf’s c
- Page 122 and 123: VIRGINIA WOOLF, ECOFEMINISM, AND BR
- Page 124 and 125: 110 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES with a ‘c
- Page 128 and 129: 114 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES dominated,
- Page 130 and 131: WOOLF’S TRANSFORMATION OF PROVIDE
- Page 132 and 133: 118 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES appropriati
- Page 134 and 135: 120 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES in her visi
- Page 136 and 137: 122 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES word that d
- Page 138 and 139: 124 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES and Lewis
- Page 140 and 141: 126 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Works Cited
- Page 142 and 143: 128 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES black bars
- Page 144 and 145: 130 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES leap from t
- Page 146 and 147: 132 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES of Harriet
- Page 148 and 149: 134 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Mrs. Grundy
- Page 150 and 151: 136 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES Alternative
- Page 152 and 153: PERFORMING THE SELF: WOOLF AS ACTRE
- Page 154 and 155: 140 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES In the proc
- Page 156 and 157: 142 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES would be on
- Page 158 and 159: “WHOSE FACE WAS IT?”: NICOLE KI
- Page 160 and 161: 146 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES for a full
- Page 162 and 163: 148 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES skin, and s
- Page 164 and 165: “MEMORY HOLES” OR “HETEROTOPI
- Page 166 and 167: 152 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES fi rstly th
- Page 168 and 169: 154 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES shaped by a
- Page 170 and 171: 156 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES such as cha
- Page 172 and 173: 158 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES directions,
- Page 174 and 175: 160 WOOLFIAN BOUNDARIES language, t
Woolf, Ecofeminism, and Breaking <strong>Boundaries</strong><br />
113<br />
Th ese aspiring entomologists manage to jar a huge, rare red underwing. Young Virginia<br />
knows its name because it was her duty to look up such identities for her siblings. Woolf<br />
adds an element of emotion to the outcome: “the whole procession felt some unprofessional<br />
regret when, with a last gleam of scarlet eye & scarlet wing, the grand old moth<br />
vanished” (145).<br />
Th ere are numerous later critiques of hunting in Woolf. Among the most notable<br />
is her indictment of the methods men used to garner egret plumes in her essay, “Th e<br />
Plumage Bill,” where she also criticizes environmentalists who place blame on women for<br />
demanding such accoutrements. Woolf satirizes England’s trophy hunters, as in this case<br />
via a bored Lady Orlando:<br />
Th e Archduke would bethink him how he had shot an elk in Sweden, and Orlando<br />
would ask, was it a very big elk, and the Archduke would say that it was<br />
not as big as the reindeer which he had shot in Norway; and Orlando would<br />
ask, had he ever shot a tiger, and the Archduke would say he had shot an albatross,<br />
and Orlando would say (half hiding her yawn) was an albatross as big as<br />
an elephant, and the Archduke would say—something very sensible, no doubt,<br />
but Orlando heard it not, for she was looking at her writing table, out of the<br />
window, at the door. (O 181)<br />
Woolf off ers more unusual qualms about fi shing. One occurrence comes in the “Plumage<br />
Bill” essay, where she wonders why only the purchase of bird plumes by women shopping<br />
on Oxford Street is subject to critical scrutiny by environmentalists. Aiming at the male<br />
consumer, she muses, “Such an outburst about a fi shing-rod would be deemed sentimental<br />
in the extreme. Yet I suppose that salmon have their feelings” (E3 243, emphasis added).<br />
Grotesque fi shing practices are instanced in To the Lighthouse, as McAlister’s boy carves<br />
bait from a live fi sh, and when a young Bart Oliver appalls his little sister with baiting<br />
a hook. Several women, including Lady Bradshaw in Mrs. Dalloway and Isa Oliver in<br />
Between the Acts once fi shed, until fi shlike they went under, or were tangled by their husbands’<br />
lines. A mystical, irrational expression of connection to the world of sea creatures<br />
may be apprehended in the sighting of the “fi n in the waste of waters” by Virginia Stephen<br />
off Cornwall in 1905, an image she passes on to Bernard in Th e Waves (e.g., 189).<br />
In her late essay, “Th e Death of the Moth,” Woolf takes up a typical position between<br />
indoors and out, near a window. She is writing, but she is also attentive to a day-fl ying<br />
moth, and she enters into its reality via hers. Th e initial signifi cance of this creature—a<br />
humble, less beautiful form of moth than the class of night-fl yers—is that it shared “the<br />
same energy which inspired the rooks, the ploughmen, the horses, and even, it seemed,<br />
the lean bare-backed downs” on a mild mid-September morning (DM 4). Her construct<br />
suggests the Gaia concept of the globe as a united, living thing. Th e essay grows somber<br />
as Woolf pities the self-imposed limits of the moth, banging around on a single pane of<br />
glass, when the wide expanse of the downs lies outside. Slowly she recognizes that this obscure<br />
creature is struggling with death, and it wins her respect by righting itself, achieving<br />
what Woolf constructs as a sense of composure. While nature’s force of death cannot be