Susanna Wesley

This is the story of Susanna Wesley, 1669-1742 Mother of Charles and John Wesley, who were founders of the Methodist Church. Susanna and her husband, Samuel, had nineteen children, ten of whom survived to adulthood. Her son Charles became a well-known hymn writer and her son John became the found of Methodism. Susanna was brought up in a Puritan home as the youngest of twenty-five children. As a teenager, she became a member of the Church of England. She became the wife of a chronically debt-ridden parish rector in an English village. She said, "I have had a large experience of what the world calls adverse fortune." Nonetheless, Susanna managed to pass down to her children Christian principles that stayed with them. This is the story of Susanna Wesley, 1669-1742 Mother of Charles and John Wesley, who were founders of the Methodist Church. Susanna and her husband, Samuel, had nineteen children, ten of whom survived to adulthood. Her son Charles became a well-known hymn writer and her son John became the found of Methodism.

Susanna was brought up in a Puritan home as the youngest of twenty-five children. As a teenager, she became a member of the Church of England. She became the wife of a chronically debt-ridden parish rector in an English village. She said, "I have had a large experience of what the world calls adverse fortune." Nonetheless, Susanna managed to pass down to her children Christian principles that stayed with them.

carrythelight
from carrythelight More from this publisher
17.04.2021 Views

6 SUSANNA WESLEY. possibly being turned out of it, to the great regret and sorrow of his parishioners, who had learned to love and trust him. The inhabitants of the parish of St. John the Evangelist, Friday Street, Cheapside, unanimously chose him as their minister in 1652 ; and though he speaks of it as the smallest in London, it is evident that he remained there six or seven years. He must have married Miss White on his first settlement in the metropolis. That he would gladly have gone elsewhere is rendered probable by his declaration that Cromwell twice refused to present him to a living worth four hundred pounds a year, though he was the nominee of the patron. In July 1657 the Protector, however, gave Aunesley the Lord's Day evening lecture at St. Paul's, which brought him one hundred and twenty pounds a year; and twelve months after, through the favour of Richard Cromwell, he was made vicar of St. Giles', Cripplegate, against the wish of some of the inhabitants, who at the Restoration petitioned Charles II. for his removal. That monarch, however, confirmed him in his living possibly because he did not wish to make too rapid or sweeping changes. Dr. Amiesley had been a prominent man among the Puritan divines, whether he approved of the execution of the "martyred King'' or no, for he had been one of the commissioners appointed by the Act of Parliament for the approbation and admission of ministers of the Gospel after the Presbyterian manner. No doubt he would have liked to have retained his living and won the favour of the King, for his ancestral instincts were likely to make him Royalist rather than Roundhead. But when it came to a question of conscience he was firm to his principles, and in 1662, when the

Act of to it, BIRTH AND ANCESTRY. 7 Uniformity was passed, he refused to subscribe and, like Howe and Baxter, and two thousand of the best and most prominent clergy of the time, was ejected on St. Bartholomew's Day. The Earl of Anglesey strove hard to persuade his kinsman to conform, and promised him preferment ; but it was impossible to move him, and he frequently preached in private, though ten years elapsed before the Declaration of Indulgence made it safe for him to get the Meeting House in Little St. Helen's licensed, where he officiated to a large and affectionate congregation death. He was a remarkably handsome man, tall and dignified, and of a very robust constitution, and several of his children resembled him in personal beauty. till his Comparison of his portraits with those of living types, show that his aquiline nose, short upper lip, wavy brown hair, and peculiarly strong and durable sight, have been largely transmitted to his descendants. Few of them, however, have been tall, although the majority have been strong and hardy. He was devotedly fond of his wife, and their family increased annually and even oftener. There were two boys, Samuel who died in India, and Benjamin who was executor to his father's will, but most of the children were girls. Judith was a very handsome and strong-minded woman, whose portrait was painted by Sir Peter Lely ; Anne was a wit as well as a beauty, and married a rich man ; Elizabeth, who married Duntoii, the eccentric bookseller, was very pretty, sweet-natured, and perhaps as near perfection as any mortal can be. There was also a Sarah and three others, of whom all we know is that they grew up to womanhood and married. Susanna was slim and very pretty, and retained her good looks and symmetry

6 SUSANNA WESLEY.<br />

possibly being turned out of it, to the great regret<br />

and sorrow of his parishioners,<br />

who had learned to<br />

love and trust him.<br />

The inhabitants of the parish of St. John the Evangelist,<br />

Friday Street, Cheapside, unanimously chose<br />

him as their minister in 1652 ;<br />

and though he speaks of<br />

it as the smallest in London, it is evident that he<br />

remained there six or seven years. He must have<br />

married Miss White on his first settlement in the<br />

metropolis. That he would gladly have gone elsewhere<br />

is rendered probable by his declaration that<br />

Cromwell twice refused to present him to a living<br />

worth four hundred pounds a year, though he was the<br />

nominee of the patron. In July 1657 the Protector,<br />

however, gave Aunesley the Lord's Day evening lecture<br />

at St. Paul's, which brought him one hundred and<br />

twenty pounds a year; and twelve months after,<br />

through the favour of Richard Cromwell, he was made<br />

vicar of St. Giles', Cripplegate, against the wish of some<br />

of the inhabitants, who at the Restoration petitioned<br />

Charles II. for his removal. That monarch, however,<br />

confirmed him in his living possibly because he did<br />

not wish to make too rapid or sweeping changes.<br />

Dr. Amiesley had been a prominent man among the<br />

Puritan divines, whether he approved of the execution<br />

of the "martyred King'' or no, for he had been one<br />

of the commissioners appointed by the Act of Parliament<br />

for the approbation and admission of ministers of<br />

the Gospel after the Presbyterian manner. No doubt<br />

he would have liked to have retained his living and<br />

won the favour of the King, for his ancestral instincts<br />

were likely to make him Royalist rather than Roundhead.<br />

But when it came to a question of conscience<br />

he was firm to his principles, and in 1662, when the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!