Safety Considerations Guide for Trident v2 Systems - TUV ...
Safety Considerations Guide for Trident v2 Systems - TUV ...
Safety Considerations Guide for Trident v2 Systems - TUV ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hazard and Risk Analysis<br />
Hazard and Risk Analysis 5<br />
In the United States, OSHA Process <strong>Safety</strong> Management (PSM) and EPA Risk Management<br />
Program (RMP) regulations dictate that a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) be used to identify<br />
potential hazards in the operation of a chemical process and to determine the protective<br />
measures necessary to protect workers, the community, and the environment. The scope of a<br />
PHA may range from a very simple screening analysis to a complex hazard and operability<br />
study (HAZOP).<br />
A HAZOP is a systematic, methodical examination of a process design that uses a multidisciplinary<br />
team to identify hazards or operability problems that could result in an accident. A<br />
HAZOP provides a prioritized basis <strong>for</strong> the implementation of risk mitigation strategies, such<br />
as SISs or ESDs.<br />
If a PHA determines that the mechanical integrity of a process and the process control are<br />
insufficient to mitigate the potential hazard, an SIS is required. An SIS consists of the<br />
instrumentation or controls that are installed <strong>for</strong> the purpose of mitigating a hazard or bringing<br />
a process to a safe state in the event of a process disruption.<br />
A compliant program incorporates “good engineering practice.” This means that the program<br />
follows the codes and standards published by such organizations as the American Society of<br />
Mechanical Engineers, American Petroleum Institute, American National Standards Institute,<br />
National Fire Protection Association, American Society <strong>for</strong> Testing and Materials, and National<br />
Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. Other countries have similar requirements.<br />
<strong>Safety</strong> Integrity Levels<br />
This figure shows the relationship of DIN V 19250 classes and SILs (safety integrity levels).<br />
R<br />
I<br />
S<br />
K<br />
R<br />
E<br />
D<br />
U<br />
C<br />
T<br />
I<br />
O<br />
N<br />
99.999<br />
99.99<br />
99.90<br />
99.00<br />
90.00<br />
Percent<br />
Availability<br />
0.00001<br />
0.0001<br />
0.001<br />
0.01<br />
0.1<br />
PFD avg<br />
Risk Measures<br />
>10,000<br />
10,000–<br />
1,000<br />
1,000–<br />
100<br />
100–<br />
10<br />
RRF<br />
Figure 2 Standards and Risk Measures<br />
SIL 3<br />
SIL 4<br />
SIL 3<br />
SIL 2 SIL 2<br />
SIL 1<br />
ANSI/ISA<br />
S84.01<br />
SIL 1<br />
IEC<br />
61508<br />
Risk Standards<br />
<strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Trident</strong> <strong>v2</strong> <strong>Systems</strong>