23.12.2012 Views

Safety Considerations Guide for Trident v2 Systems - TUV ...

Safety Considerations Guide for Trident v2 Systems - TUV ...

Safety Considerations Guide for Trident v2 Systems - TUV ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hazard and Risk Analysis<br />

Hazard and Risk Analysis 5<br />

In the United States, OSHA Process <strong>Safety</strong> Management (PSM) and EPA Risk Management<br />

Program (RMP) regulations dictate that a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) be used to identify<br />

potential hazards in the operation of a chemical process and to determine the protective<br />

measures necessary to protect workers, the community, and the environment. The scope of a<br />

PHA may range from a very simple screening analysis to a complex hazard and operability<br />

study (HAZOP).<br />

A HAZOP is a systematic, methodical examination of a process design that uses a multidisciplinary<br />

team to identify hazards or operability problems that could result in an accident. A<br />

HAZOP provides a prioritized basis <strong>for</strong> the implementation of risk mitigation strategies, such<br />

as SISs or ESDs.<br />

If a PHA determines that the mechanical integrity of a process and the process control are<br />

insufficient to mitigate the potential hazard, an SIS is required. An SIS consists of the<br />

instrumentation or controls that are installed <strong>for</strong> the purpose of mitigating a hazard or bringing<br />

a process to a safe state in the event of a process disruption.<br />

A compliant program incorporates “good engineering practice.” This means that the program<br />

follows the codes and standards published by such organizations as the American Society of<br />

Mechanical Engineers, American Petroleum Institute, American National Standards Institute,<br />

National Fire Protection Association, American Society <strong>for</strong> Testing and Materials, and National<br />

Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. Other countries have similar requirements.<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Integrity Levels<br />

This figure shows the relationship of DIN V 19250 classes and SILs (safety integrity levels).<br />

R<br />

I<br />

S<br />

K<br />

R<br />

E<br />

D<br />

U<br />

C<br />

T<br />

I<br />

O<br />

N<br />

99.999<br />

99.99<br />

99.90<br />

99.00<br />

90.00<br />

Percent<br />

Availability<br />

0.00001<br />

0.0001<br />

0.001<br />

0.01<br />

0.1<br />

PFD avg<br />

Risk Measures<br />

>10,000<br />

10,000–<br />

1,000<br />

1,000–<br />

100<br />

100–<br />

10<br />

RRF<br />

Figure 2 Standards and Risk Measures<br />

SIL 3<br />

SIL 4<br />

SIL 3<br />

SIL 2 SIL 2<br />

SIL 1<br />

ANSI/ISA<br />

S84.01<br />

SIL 1<br />

IEC<br />

61508<br />

Risk Standards<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Trident</strong> <strong>v2</strong> <strong>Systems</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!