Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- 68 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administration offices, and the Complex maintenance compound. Many of these facilities are not currently Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant; upgrading is needed and in some cases, is underway. Appendix E displays the fiscal year (FY) 2004 Maintenance Management System (MMS) database list of backlogged maintenance entries for the Complex. Compatibility Determinations Federal law and Service policy provide the direction and planning framework to protect the Refuge System from incompatible or harmful human activities, and to ensure that Americans can enjoy Refuge System lands and waters. The Administration Act, as amended by the Refuge Winterberries frozen in winter: Photo by Marijke Improvement Act, is the key legislation regarding management of public uses and compatibility. The compatibility requirements of the Refuge Improvement Act were adopted in the Service’s Final Compatibility Regulations and Final Compatibility Policy published October 18, 2000 (Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 202, pp 62458- 62496). This Compatibility Rule changed or modified Service Regulations contained in Chapter 50, Parts 25, 26 and 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (USFWS 2000c). To view the policy and regulations online, go to http://policy.fws.gov/library/00fr62483.pdf. The Act and Regulations require that an affirmative finding be made of an activity’s “compatibility” before such activity or use is allowed on a national wildlife refuge. A compatible use is one, “...that will not materially interfere with or detract from the fulfillment of the mission of the Refuge System or the purposes of the refuge” (Refuge Improvement Act). Not all uses that are determined compatible must be allowed. The refuge has the discretion to allow or disallow any use based on other considerations such as public safety, policy and available funding. However, all uses that are allowed must be determined compatible. Except for consideration of consistency with State laws and regulations as provided for in subsection (m) of the Act, no other determinations or findings are required to be made by the refuge official under this Act or the Refuge Recreation Act for wildlife-dependent recreation to occur (Refuge Improvement Act). We completed compatibility determinations (CDs) for the six priority public uses, activities that facilitate participation in the priority public uses, and research for Assabet River NWR under existing Service regulations and policy, the Act and the recent revisions of our Compatibility Regulations (Appendix G). Each (with some restrictions) was found to be compatible with both the mission of the Refuge System and the purposes for which the refuges were established. We are issuing these CDs, for these activities, as part of this CCP. Assabet River NWR
Chapter 5: Refuge Administration We have also determined several modes of travel to be compatible. These are: walking or hiking, snowshoeing, canoeing, non-motorized boating, and cross-country skiing. All of these means of locomotion are subject to the stipulations outlined in the CDs for these activities as part of this CCP. In addition, we have evaluated several other methods of locomotion (specifically, use of motor-vehicles in general, all-terrain vehicles, dirt bikes, gasoline-powered motor boats, snowmobiles, dogsleds, bicycles, and horses). Each of these has been determined to be inconsistent with the purpose for which the refuges were established. Draft CDs were distributed (in the draft CCP/EA) for a 45 day public review in mid 2003. These CDs have since been approved, and will allow wildlife dependent recreation on the refuge. Subsequent to releasing the draft CCP/EA, we also distributed CDs for scientific research for a public review period. All comments were considered and utilized in the revision. These new CDs are now final and included in Appendix G. Additional CDs will be developed when appropriate new uses are proposed. CDs will be re-evaluated by the Refuge Manager when conditions under which the use is permitted change significantly; Osprey nest: Photo by Marijke Holtrop when there is significant new information on effects of the use; or at least every 10 years for non-priority public uses. Priority public use CDs will be re-evaluated under the conditions noted above, or at least every 15 years with revision of the CCP. Additional detail on the compatibility determination process is in Parts 25, 26, and 29 of Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, effective November 17, 2000. Monitoring and Evaluation This Final CCP covers a 15-year period. Periodic review of the CCP is required to ensure that established goals and objectives are being met, and that the plan is being implemented as scheduled. To assist this review process, a monitoring and evaluation program will be implemented, focusing on issues involving public use activities, and wildlife habitat and population management. Monitoring of public use programs will involve the continued collection and compilation of visitation figures and activity levels. In addition, research and monitoring programs will be established to assess the impacts of public use activities on wildlife and wildlife habitat, assess conflicts between types of refuge uses, and to identify compatible levels of public use activities. We will reduce these public use activities if we determine that incompatible levels are occurring. Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 69 -
- Page 28 and 29: - 18 - Forested Wetland: Photo By E
- Page 30 and 31: - 20 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 32 and 33: - 22 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 34 and 35: - 24 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 36 and 37: - 26 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 38 and 39: - 28 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 40 and 41: - 30 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 42 and 43: Canada Geese: Photo by Paul Buckley
- Page 44 and 45: - 34 - Beaver activity at Assabet R
- Page 46 and 47: - 36 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 48 and 49: - 38 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 50 and 51: - 40 - Wild Mushroom: Photo by Mari
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 3: Refuge and Resource Desc
- Page 54 and 55: - 44 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 56 and 57: Mallard with ducklings: Photo by Jo
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 4: Management Direction Str
- Page 60 and 61: - 50 - One of the buildings that ha
- Page 62 and 63: Trail: Photo by Stanley Klein - 52
- Page 64 and 65: - 54 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 66 and 67: - 56 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 68 and 69: - 58 - Wood Frog Eggs: Photo by Mar
- Page 70 and 71: - 60 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 72 and 73: - 62 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 74 and 75: - 64 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 76 and 77: - 66 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 80 and 81: - 70 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 82 and 83: - 72 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 84 and 85: - 74 - Literature Cited Lockwood, R
- Page 86 and 87: - 76 - Literature Cited University
- Page 88 and 89: - 78 - Literature Cited (This page
- Page 90 and 91: - 80 - Glossary protection on servi
- Page 92 and 93: - 82 - Glossary Geographic Informat
- Page 94 and 95: - 84 - Glossary responsible for the
- Page 96 and 97: - 86 - Glossary “candidate specie
- Page 98 and 99: - 88 - Glossary (This page intentio
- Page 100 and 101: - 90 - List of Preparers John Eaton
- Page 102 and 103: - 92 - Appendices (This page intent
- Page 104 and 105: - 94 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws se
- Page 106 and 107: - 96 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws Na
- Page 108 and 109: - 98 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws No
- Page 110 and 111: - 100 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws T
- Page 112 and 113: CAT Content Analysis Team November
- Page 114 and 115: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 116 and 117: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 118 and 119: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 120 and 121: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 122 and 123: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 124 and 125: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 126 and 127: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- 68 -<br />
Chapter 5: Refuge Administration<br />
offices, <strong>and</strong> the Complex maintenance compound. Many of these facilities<br />
are not currently Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant;<br />
upgrading is needed <strong>and</strong> in some cases, is underway. Appendix E displays<br />
the fiscal year (FY) 2004 Maintenance Management System (MMS)<br />
database list of backlogged maintenance entries<br />
for the Complex.<br />
Compatibility Determinations<br />
Federal law <strong>and</strong> <strong>Service</strong> policy provide the<br />
direction <strong>and</strong> planning framework to protect the<br />
Refuge System from incompatible or harmful<br />
human activities, <strong>and</strong> to ensure that Americans<br />
can enjoy Refuge System l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> waters. The<br />
Administration Act, as amended by the Refuge<br />
Winterberries frozen in winter: Photo by Marijke<br />
Improvement Act, is the key legislation regarding<br />
management of public uses <strong>and</strong> compatibility. The compatibility<br />
requirements of the Refuge Improvement Act were adopted in the<br />
<strong>Service</strong>’s <strong>Final</strong> Compatibility Regulations <strong>and</strong> <strong>Final</strong> Compatibility Policy<br />
published October 18, 2000 (Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 202, pp 62458-<br />
62496). This Compatibility Rule changed or modified <strong>Service</strong> Regulations<br />
contained in Chapter 50, Parts 25, 26 <strong>and</strong> 29 of the Code of Federal<br />
Regulations (USFWS 2000c). To view the policy <strong>and</strong> regulations online, go<br />
to http://policy.fws.gov/library/00fr62483.pdf.<br />
The Act <strong>and</strong> Regulations require that an affirmative finding be made of an<br />
activity’s “compatibility” before such activity or use is allowed on a national<br />
wildlife refuge. A compatible use is one, “...that will not materially interfere<br />
with or detract from the fulfillment of the mission of the Refuge System or<br />
the purposes of the refuge” (Refuge Improvement Act). Not all uses that<br />
are determined compatible must be allowed. The refuge has the discretion<br />
to allow or disallow any use based on other considerations such as public<br />
safety, policy <strong>and</strong> available funding. However, all uses that are allowed<br />
must be determined compatible. Except for consideration of consistency<br />
with State laws <strong>and</strong> regulations as provided for in subsection (m) of the Act,<br />
no other determinations or findings are required to be made by the refuge<br />
official under this Act or the Refuge Recreation Act for wildlife-dependent<br />
recreation to occur (Refuge Improvement Act).<br />
We completed compatibility determinations (CDs) for the six priority<br />
public uses, activities that facilitate participation in the priority public uses,<br />
<strong>and</strong> research for <strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong> under existing <strong>Service</strong> regulations<br />
<strong>and</strong> policy, the Act <strong>and</strong> the recent revisions of our Compatibility<br />
Regulations (Appendix G). Each (with some restrictions) was found to be<br />
compatible with both the mission of the Refuge System <strong>and</strong> the purposes<br />
for which the refuges were established. We are issuing these CDs, for these<br />
activities, as part of this <strong>CCP</strong>.<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>