Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Chapter 4: Management Direction Strategy 9: Within 10 years, survey small mammals using small live box traps, snap traps, and pitfall traps. We will arrange traps in a grid throughout the refuge and trapping will be done during the spring, summer, or fall. If any threatened or endangered species are found, we may initiate mark/recapture studies to develop a population estimate. Objective 2: Manage aquatic and upland habitat to maintain habitat and species diversity. We will determine resources of concern, including focus species or speciesgroups and their habitat needs. Focus species and habitats are most likely to be selected based on a combination of factors such as: endangerment (federal and state-listed species); priority, national and regional Service plans (such as the NAWMP, the PIF, etc); Service policies/regulations such as those related to HMPs and maintenance of ecological integrity; the purpose for which the refuge was established (its value for the conservation of migratory bird species); current/historical species and habitat presence; and recommendations from MassWildlife or other partners. Strategy 1: Continue with the status quo of our old field, grassland, upland and wetland habitat management, until our management plans are completed. Some areas that are currently being mowed may eventually be allowed to revert to forest or may be managed as early successional habitat. Until final decisions are made about each parcel, based on the HMP, current management techniques will be allowed to continue. Strategy 2: Within 3 years, develop a long-range HMP. We will include information for all habitats and species on the refuge, with a focus on resources of regional and national concern (based on regional and Service plans). We will provide quantitative and measurable objectives and strategies for habitat management to enhance resources of concern. Strategy 3: Within 5 years, complete a HWIMP. We will include an on-going monitoring component designed to measure progress toward those objectives outlined in the HMP, and to allow mid- Wetland habitat: Photo by John Grabill course corrections or alterations as they may be needed. We will develop any additional step-down plans that may be required, depending on specific habitat management techniques or practices that may be recommended in the plans including chemical, mechanical or fire. We will develop protocol in this plan to be statistically sound and peer reviewed. - 48 - Strategy 4: Continue to seek opportunities to develop cooperative management agreements with neighboring conservation organizations and individuals. We will work with our conservation partners and, where our Assabet River NWR
Japanese Knotweed: Photo by Marijke Holtrop Chapter 4: Management Direction mission, goals, and objectives are compatible, will work together to implement habitat management and biodiversity strategies. Objective 3: Limit the spread of invasive and overabundant species and minimize habitat degradation. Strategy 1: Document presence, acreage, and location of invasive and overabundant species in conjunction with vegetation surveys and development of a cover type map. We will take baseline measurements of key condition indices such as density, height, and percent cover. Strategy 2: Develop an Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPMP), which will provide a full range of potential and alternative mechanical, biological and chemical control strategies. We will include a monitoring program as a part of the plan, which will consist of plot sampling, estimates of cover, and responses of wildlife and other plants. We will use the IPMP in concert with habitat monitoring to assess progress and the effectiveness of different techniques, and identify additional problem species. We will research alternative methods of controlling certain species as appropriate, based on monitoring results. Control strategies will be species specific and may employ biological vectors, mechanical methods (hand pulling), fire, or herbicides. We will use the least intrusive, but most effective control practice. As previously discussed, use of herbicides would require action specific step down plans, and in some situations proposed control methodologies may also require wetland permitting review and approval. Strategy 3: We will also participate in appropriate, experimental invasive species control research programs. These programs must be reviewed and approved by Service regional or national biological staff and the Department of the Interior’s wildlife research arm, the Biological Resources Division, now located within the U.S. Geologic Survey, before any research is initiated. Strategy 4: Control invasive and overabundant animal species using the most effective means available. There are currently identified problems related to overabundant or invasive animal species on the refuge. Beaver have occasionally caused localized flooding of refuge trails and maintenance roads and are raising water levels, which is affecting a well on the refuge. Control of such situations includes manually clearing culverts, installing grates on culverts and water-control structures, and installing beaver deceivers in dams or on culverts. Devices range from a simple PVC pipe inserted into dams to reduce water levels, to fencing constructed in a semicircle around a culvert with drain pipes inserted through the fence. If more serious threats to habitat, refuge facilities, adjacent property or Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 49 -
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introd
- Page 9: Table D-2: Birds of Assabet River N
- Page 12 and 13: - 2 - Chapter 1: Introduction and B
- Page 14 and 15: “To administer a national network
- Page 16 and 17: - 6 - Chapter 1: Introduction and B
- Page 18 and 19: - 8 - Chapter 1: Introduction and B
- Page 20 and 21: - 10 - Chapter 1: Introduction and
- Page 22 and 23: Blue Iris: Photo by Marijke Holtrop
- Page 24 and 25: - 14 - Trailmarker: Photo by Karla
- Page 26 and 27: - 16 - Chapter 2: The Comprehensive
- Page 28 and 29: - 18 - Forested Wetland: Photo By E
- Page 30 and 31: - 20 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 32 and 33: - 22 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 34 and 35: - 24 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 36 and 37: - 26 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 38 and 39: - 28 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 40 and 41: - 30 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 42 and 43: Canada Geese: Photo by Paul Buckley
- Page 44 and 45: - 34 - Beaver activity at Assabet R
- Page 46 and 47: - 36 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 48 and 49: - 38 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 50 and 51: - 40 - Wild Mushroom: Photo by Mari
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 3: Refuge and Resource Desc
- Page 54 and 55: - 44 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
- Page 56 and 57: Mallard with ducklings: Photo by Jo
- Page 60 and 61: - 50 - One of the buildings that ha
- Page 62 and 63: Trail: Photo by Stanley Klein - 52
- Page 64 and 65: - 54 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 66 and 67: - 56 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 68 and 69: - 58 - Wood Frog Eggs: Photo by Mar
- Page 70 and 71: - 60 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 72 and 73: - 62 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 74 and 75: - 64 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
- Page 76 and 77: - 66 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 78 and 79: - 68 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 80 and 81: - 70 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 82 and 83: - 72 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
- Page 84 and 85: - 74 - Literature Cited Lockwood, R
- Page 86 and 87: - 76 - Literature Cited University
- Page 88 and 89: - 78 - Literature Cited (This page
- Page 90 and 91: - 80 - Glossary protection on servi
- Page 92 and 93: - 82 - Glossary Geographic Informat
- Page 94 and 95: - 84 - Glossary responsible for the
- Page 96 and 97: - 86 - Glossary “candidate specie
- Page 98 and 99: - 88 - Glossary (This page intentio
- Page 100 and 101: - 90 - List of Preparers John Eaton
- Page 102 and 103: - 92 - Appendices (This page intent
- Page 104 and 105: - 94 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws se
- Page 106 and 107: - 96 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws Na
Chapter 4: Management Direction<br />
Strategy 9: Within 10 years, survey small mammals using small live box<br />
traps, snap traps, <strong>and</strong> pitfall traps. We will arrange traps in a grid<br />
throughout the refuge <strong>and</strong> trapping will be done during the spring,<br />
summer, or fall. If any threatened or endangered species are found, we<br />
may initiate mark/recapture studies to develop a population estimate.<br />
Objective 2: Manage aquatic <strong>and</strong> upl<strong>and</strong> habitat to maintain habitat<br />
<strong>and</strong> species diversity.<br />
We will determine resources of concern, including focus species or speciesgroups<br />
<strong>and</strong> their habitat needs. Focus species <strong>and</strong> habitats are most likely<br />
to be selected based on a combination of factors such as: endangerment<br />
(federal <strong>and</strong> state-listed species); priority, national <strong>and</strong> regional <strong>Service</strong><br />
plans (such as the NAWMP, the PIF, etc); <strong>Service</strong> policies/regulations such<br />
as those related to HMPs <strong>and</strong> maintenance of ecological integrity; the<br />
purpose for which the refuge was established (its value for the conservation<br />
of migratory bird species); current/historical species <strong>and</strong> habitat presence;<br />
<strong>and</strong> recommendations from Mass<strong>Wildlife</strong> or other partners.<br />
Strategy 1: Continue with the status quo of our old field, grassl<strong>and</strong>,<br />
upl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong> habitat management, until our management<br />
plans are completed. Some areas that are currently being mowed<br />
may eventually be allowed to revert to forest or may be managed as<br />
early successional habitat. Until final decisions are made about<br />
each parcel, based on the HMP, current management techniques<br />
will be allowed to continue.<br />
Strategy 2: Within 3 years, develop a long-range HMP. We will<br />
include information for all habitats <strong>and</strong> species on the refuge, with a<br />
focus on resources of regional <strong>and</strong> national concern (based on<br />
regional <strong>and</strong> <strong>Service</strong> plans). We will provide quantitative <strong>and</strong><br />
measurable objectives <strong>and</strong> strategies for habitat management to<br />
enhance resources of concern.<br />
Strategy 3: Within 5 years, complete a HWIMP. We will include an<br />
on-going monitoring component designed to measure progress<br />
toward those objectives outlined in the HMP, <strong>and</strong> to allow mid-<br />
Wetl<strong>and</strong> habitat: Photo by John Grabill course corrections or alterations as they may be needed. We will<br />
develop any additional step-down plans that may be required,<br />
depending on specific habitat management techniques or practices that<br />
may be recommended in the plans including chemical, mechanical or fire.<br />
We will develop protocol in this plan to be statistically sound <strong>and</strong> peer<br />
reviewed.<br />
- 48 -<br />
Strategy 4: Continue to seek opportunities to develop cooperative<br />
management agreements with neighboring conservation organizations <strong>and</strong><br />
individuals. We will work with our conservation partners <strong>and</strong>, where our<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>