Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3: Refuge <strong>and</strong> Resource Descriptions<br />
a central Massachusetts location; <strong>and</strong><br />
morphology, pH, alkalinity, trophic status, <strong>and</strong> watershed<br />
characteristics similar to Puffer Pond.<br />
Surface water <strong>and</strong> sediment sample pairs were collected at six locations in<br />
each pond. <strong>Fish</strong> samples were collected at four locations in each pond, using<br />
gill nets, angling, <strong>and</strong> electroshocking. Chain pickerel were sampled as<br />
predators, yellow perch as foragers, <strong>and</strong> bullheads as bottom feeders.<br />
During actual sampling, four bullheads were the only bottom feeders<br />
collected in Ministers Pond. In the predator <strong>and</strong> bottom feeding levels,<br />
fillet concentrations were used to calculate human health risks, <strong>and</strong> whole<br />
fish concentrations were used to determine ecological risks. In the forager<br />
level, only whole fish samples were analyzed.<br />
In water samples from Puffer Pond, arsenic, cadmium, <strong>and</strong> lead were<br />
detected at concentrations above the screening values. Concentrations of<br />
those metals were below the screening values in all of the background pond<br />
surface water samples. However, the maximum lead concentration in the<br />
Puffer Pond samples was only slightly higher than the maximum<br />
concentration detected in the background pond.<br />
In sediment samples, arsenic concentrations exceeded the screening value<br />
in all Puffer Pond samples, whereas only one of the background samples<br />
exceeded the arsenic screening value. Concentrations of cadmium, lead,<br />
silver, <strong>and</strong> the pesticides DDD <strong>and</strong> DDE exceeded the<br />
respective screening values at approximately the same<br />
frequencies in samples from both ponds.<br />
Mercury was not detected in surface water or sediment<br />
from either pond at concentrations above the laboratory<br />
method detection limits (0.2 ug/l <strong>and</strong> 0.1 ug/g, respectively).<br />
Although mercury was not detected in surface water or<br />
sediment, it was detected in 14 of 24 fish from Puffer Pond<br />
<strong>and</strong> in 17 of 19 fish from Ministers Pond. Mercury exceeded<br />
the USFDA action level (1.0 mg/kg) in only one fish (a<br />
Beaver activity: Photo by Marijke Holtrop<br />
yellow perch from Puffer Pond), at a concentration of 1.12<br />
mg/kg. Concentrations of mercury, arsenic, chromium, <strong>and</strong> lead in Puffer<br />
Pond fish samples “were not statistically different from local background<br />
conditions” (E&E 1994).<br />
E&E concluded that potential human health risks associated with eating<br />
fish from Puffer Pond are negligible <strong>and</strong> that potential ecological <strong>and</strong><br />
human health risks are no greater than those posed by Ministers Pond or<br />
other similar ponds in the area. Despite low environmental concentrations,<br />
mercury is bioavailable to aquatic organisms. The fish are a primary food<br />
source for piscivorous wildlife <strong>and</strong> “may result in allowing the contaminants<br />
to magnify in the food chain as they are generally consumed whole” (E&E<br />
1994).<br />
Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 25 -