23.12.2012 Views

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3: Refuge <strong>and</strong> Resource Descriptions<br />

a central Massachusetts location; <strong>and</strong><br />

morphology, pH, alkalinity, trophic status, <strong>and</strong> watershed<br />

characteristics similar to Puffer Pond.<br />

Surface water <strong>and</strong> sediment sample pairs were collected at six locations in<br />

each pond. <strong>Fish</strong> samples were collected at four locations in each pond, using<br />

gill nets, angling, <strong>and</strong> electroshocking. Chain pickerel were sampled as<br />

predators, yellow perch as foragers, <strong>and</strong> bullheads as bottom feeders.<br />

During actual sampling, four bullheads were the only bottom feeders<br />

collected in Ministers Pond. In the predator <strong>and</strong> bottom feeding levels,<br />

fillet concentrations were used to calculate human health risks, <strong>and</strong> whole<br />

fish concentrations were used to determine ecological risks. In the forager<br />

level, only whole fish samples were analyzed.<br />

In water samples from Puffer Pond, arsenic, cadmium, <strong>and</strong> lead were<br />

detected at concentrations above the screening values. Concentrations of<br />

those metals were below the screening values in all of the background pond<br />

surface water samples. However, the maximum lead concentration in the<br />

Puffer Pond samples was only slightly higher than the maximum<br />

concentration detected in the background pond.<br />

In sediment samples, arsenic concentrations exceeded the screening value<br />

in all Puffer Pond samples, whereas only one of the background samples<br />

exceeded the arsenic screening value. Concentrations of cadmium, lead,<br />

silver, <strong>and</strong> the pesticides DDD <strong>and</strong> DDE exceeded the<br />

respective screening values at approximately the same<br />

frequencies in samples from both ponds.<br />

Mercury was not detected in surface water or sediment<br />

from either pond at concentrations above the laboratory<br />

method detection limits (0.2 ug/l <strong>and</strong> 0.1 ug/g, respectively).<br />

Although mercury was not detected in surface water or<br />

sediment, it was detected in 14 of 24 fish from Puffer Pond<br />

<strong>and</strong> in 17 of 19 fish from Ministers Pond. Mercury exceeded<br />

the USFDA action level (1.0 mg/kg) in only one fish (a<br />

Beaver activity: Photo by Marijke Holtrop<br />

yellow perch from Puffer Pond), at a concentration of 1.12<br />

mg/kg. Concentrations of mercury, arsenic, chromium, <strong>and</strong> lead in Puffer<br />

Pond fish samples “were not statistically different from local background<br />

conditions” (E&E 1994).<br />

E&E concluded that potential human health risks associated with eating<br />

fish from Puffer Pond are negligible <strong>and</strong> that potential ecological <strong>and</strong><br />

human health risks are no greater than those posed by Ministers Pond or<br />

other similar ponds in the area. Despite low environmental concentrations,<br />

mercury is bioavailable to aquatic organisms. The fish are a primary food<br />

source for piscivorous wildlife <strong>and</strong> “may result in allowing the contaminants<br />

to magnify in the food chain as they are generally consumed whole” (E&E<br />

1994).<br />

Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 25 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!