23.12.2012 Views

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix G: <strong>Final</strong> Compatibility Determinations<br />

Justification: The National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-<br />

57) identifies six legitimate <strong>and</strong> appropriate uses of wildlife refuges: wildlife observation<br />

<strong>and</strong> wildlife photography, environmental education, interpretation, hunting, <strong>and</strong> fishing.<br />

These priority public uses are dependent upon healthy wildlife populations. Where these<br />

uses are determined to be compatible, they are to receive enhanced consideration over<br />

other uses in planning <strong>and</strong> management.<br />

The majority of visitors to the refuge are there to view the wildlife <strong>and</strong> upl<strong>and</strong>, wetl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

<strong>and</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong> habitat areas. Some visit to develop an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of natural or cultural<br />

history. This visitation is in accordance with a wildlife-oriented activity <strong>and</strong> is an<br />

acceptable secondary use. There will be some visitor impacts from this activity, such as<br />

trampling vegetation (Kuss <strong>and</strong> Hall, 1991) <strong>and</strong> disturbance to wildlife near trails (Klein,<br />

1993 <strong>and</strong> Burger, 1981), but the knowledge, appreciation <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

management gained by visitors will provide support for the <strong>Service</strong>. The long-term<br />

benefits gained through wildlife observation <strong>and</strong> photography activities outweigh the<br />

impacts listed above.<br />

These activities will not materially interfere with or detract from the mission of the<br />

National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge System or the purposes for which the refuge was established.<br />

Literature Cited:<br />

Burger, J. 1981. The Effect of Human Activity on Birds at a Coastal Bay. Biol. Conserv.<br />

21:231-241.<br />

Klein, M.L. 1993. Waterbird Behavioral Response to Human Disturbances. Wildl. Soc.<br />

Bull. 21:31-39.<br />

Kuss, F.R. <strong>and</strong> C.N. Hall. 1991. Ground Flora Trampling Studies: Five Years After<br />

Closure. Environ. Manage. 15(5):715-727.<br />

Signature - Refuge Manager: /s/ Elizabeth A. Herl<strong>and</strong> 12/21/2004<br />

(Signature <strong>and</strong> Date)<br />

Concurrence - Regional Chief: /s/ Anthony D. Léger 12/27/2004<br />

(Signature <strong>and</strong> Date)<br />

M<strong>and</strong>atory 15-year Reevaluation Date: December 27, 2019<br />

Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 235 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!