Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Appendix F: Staffing Charts Anticipated Impacts on Refuge Purpose: The impacts associated with this activity are trampling of vegetation, littering, possible vandalism and temporary disturbance to wildlife in the area of the group. These impacts are minor in light of the appreciation and knowledge gained by participants in these activities. The known presence of a threatened or endangered species will preclude the use of an area until the refuge manager determines otherwise. Public Review and Comment: The compatibility determination was included in the Draft CCP/EA. The Draft CCP/EA was available for comment from July 20 through September 3, 2003. Refuge staff held four public meetings to collect public comments, written and verbal, on the draft CCP/EA, including all compatibility determinations. Determination: Use is not compatible ___. Use is Compatible with the following stipulations _X_. The following stipulations are required to ensure compatibility: An SUP will be issued to the organization conducting the tours. A fee may be charged for the special use permit. The areas used by such tours will be closely monitored to evaluate the impacts on the resource. If adverse impacts appear, the activity will be moved to secondary locations or curtailed entirely. Specific conditions may apply depending upon the requested activity and will be addressed through the SUP. Law enforcement patrol of public use areas should minimize the above-mentioned types of violations. The current “Refuge open ½ hour before sunrise to ½ hour after sunset” regulation restricts entry after daylight hours, and should be maintained along with “Public Use Restricted to Trails Only”, unless specifically authorized by an SUP. Justification: The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (P.L. 105- 57) identifies six legitimate and appropriate uses of wildlife refuges: environmental education, interpretation, hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and wildlife photography. These priority public uses are dependent upon healthy wildlife populations. Where these uses are determined to be compatible, they are to receive enhanced consideration over other uses in planning and management. Natural history activities generally support refuge purposes and impacts can largely be minimized. The minor resource impacts attributed to these activities are generally outweighed by the benefits gained by educating present and future generations about refuge resources. Natural history activities are a public use management tool used to develop a resource protection ethic within society. This tool allows us to educate Refuge visitors about endangered and threatened species management, wildlife management and ecological principles and communities. A secondary benefit of natural history activities is that it instills an ‘ownership’ or ‘stewardship’ ethic in visitors and most likely reduces vandalism, littering and poaching. It also strengthens Service visibility in the local community. - 222 - Assabet River NWR
Appendix G: Final Compatibility Determinations These activities will not materially interfere with or detract from the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System or the purposes for which the refuge was established. Signature - Refuge Manager: /s/ Elizabeth A. Herland 12/21/2004 (Signature and Date) Concurrence - Regional Chief: /s/ Anthony D. Léger 12/27/2004 (Signature and Date) Mandatory 15-year Re-evaluation Date: December 27, 2019 Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 223 -
- Page 180 and 181: - 172 - Appendix D: Species Lists B
- Page 182 and 183: - 174 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
- Page 184 and 185: - 176 - Appendix D: Species Lists 7
- Page 186 and 187: - 178 - Appendix D: Species Lists T
- Page 188 and 189: - 180 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
- Page 190 and 191: - 182 - Appendix D: Species Lists o
- Page 192 and 193: - 184 - Appendix D: Species Lists M
- Page 194 and 195: - 186 - Appendix D: Species Lists H
- Page 196 and 197: - 188 - Appendix D: Species Lists A
- Page 198 and 199: - 190 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
- Page 200 and 201: - 192 - Appendix D: Species Lists L
- Page 202 and 203: - 194 - Appendix D: Species Lists E
- Page 204 and 205: - 196 - Appendix D: Species Lists R
- Page 206 and 207: - 198 - Appendix D: Species Lists L
- Page 208 and 209: - 200 - Appendix D: Species Lists U
- Page 210 and 211: - 202 - Appendix E: RONS and MMS Pr
- Page 212 and 213: - 204 - Appendix E: RONS and MMS (T
- Page 214 and 215: - 206 - Appendix F: Staffing Charts
- Page 216 and 217: Appendix F: Staffing Charts - 208 -
- Page 218 and 219: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Compati
- Page 220 and 221: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Compati
- Page 222 and 223: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Special
- Page 224 and 225: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Public
- Page 226 and 227: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Compati
- Page 228 and 229: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Determi
- Page 232 and 233: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Compati
- Page 234 and 235: Appendix F: Staffing Charts Compati
- Page 236 and 237: Appendix F: Staffing Charts and Wil
- Page 238 and 239: Appendix F: Staffing Charts non-Ser
- Page 240 and 241: Appendix F: Staffing Charts before
- Page 242 and 243: Appendix F: Staffing Charts wildlif
Appendix G: <strong>Final</strong> Compatibility Determinations<br />
These activities will not materially interfere with or detract from the mission of the<br />
National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge System or the purposes for which the refuge was established.<br />
Signature - Refuge Manager: /s/ Elizabeth A. Herl<strong>and</strong> 12/21/2004<br />
(Signature <strong>and</strong> Date)<br />
Concurrence - Regional Chief: /s/ Anthony D. Léger 12/27/2004<br />
(Signature <strong>and</strong> Date)<br />
M<strong>and</strong>atory 15-year Re-evaluation Date: December 27, 2019<br />
Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 223 -