Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft CCP/EA November 26, 2003 Some respondents point out the economic benefits of horseback riding, stating that equine activities are engaged in by a large number of Massachusetts citizens and also make a significant contribution to the Massachusetts economy. For example, they assert that equine agriculture provides over $200 million per year in direct spending into the Massachusetts economy, over 5,000 jobs and more than $13.2 million in state and local tax revenues. Limiting horseback riding would harm the economy. Equestrians state that they oppose expansion of the refuge’s boundaries as long as it limits horseback riding. Dog-Walking Many respondents assert that given the popularity and demand for areas to walk dogs, and the fact that parts of the refuge have been used responsibly for decades by dog-walkers; FWS should make part of the refuge available for this pastime. These dog walking enthusiasts request that leashed dog-walking be allowed on refuge trails in appropriate areas, and that strict fines are in place for anyone releasing a dog or failing to pick up after their animal. Others are willing to allow an exclusion of dogs during the most sensitive times, when wildlife surveys identify an impact on nesting birds or other animal life. Many of these respondents view dog-walking as meditative and a way of connecting to the natural beauty of the earth, something that is consistent with refuge goals. These respondents assert that without substantial evidence that dog-walkers are threatening the integrity of the refuge it is unjust and an act of discrimination to prohibit dog-walking. On the other hand, one respondent would like to see dogs banned from the refuge, stating that many dog owners don’t obey leash rules to the detriment of wildlife, and further, even on a leash dogs frighten animals. Birdwatching Birdwatchers and nature photographers are concerned that they will be confined strictly to trails when observing wildlife, while hunters would not. If hunters are allowed off trail, they assert, birders should be allowed off trail as well. Trapping Some respondents ask that the Refuge be open to beaver and muskrat trapping, asserting that modern traps are instant and humane, and arguing that small game threatens children, pets, and livestock, and that beavers “cause extensive property damage.” Some respondents ask whether and under what circumstances which furbearers could be trapped, and what constitutes an invasive species and appropriate control methods. Some respondents oppose trapping on the grounds that it is inhumane; other respondents perceive trapping as ham-fisted interference in natural systems that function best on their own. Summary of Comments 25
Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft CCP/EA November 26, 2003 Socioeconomic Concerns Several respondents applaud Alternative B for helping to make Maynard a “destination.” One respondent requests permission to graze in the Oxbow unit, and one requests continued cooperative farming. Several area residents request development of an “abutter policy,” without clearly articulating what the components of such a policy would be. Several respondents urge consideration of impacts to area parking, specifically at Monsen Road at Great Meadows, and at the east gate of Assabet River off Old Marlborough Road. Some respondents are concerned about refuse at entry points. Summary of Comments 26
- Page 90 and 91: - 80 - Glossary protection on servi
- Page 92 and 93: - 82 - Glossary Geographic Informat
- Page 94 and 95: - 84 - Glossary responsible for the
- Page 96 and 97: - 86 - Glossary “candidate specie
- Page 98 and 99: - 88 - Glossary (This page intentio
- Page 100 and 101: - 90 - List of Preparers John Eaton
- Page 102 and 103: - 92 - Appendices (This page intent
- Page 104 and 105: - 94 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws se
- Page 106 and 107: - 96 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws Na
- Page 108 and 109: - 98 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws No
- Page 110 and 111: - 100 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws T
- Page 112 and 113: CAT Content Analysis Team November
- Page 114 and 115: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 116 and 117: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 118 and 119: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 120 and 121: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 122 and 123: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 124 and 125: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 126 and 127: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 128 and 129: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 130 and 131: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 132 and 133: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 134 and 135: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 136 and 137: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 138 and 139: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 142 and 143: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 144 and 145: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 146 and 147: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 148 and 149: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 150 and 151: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 152 and 153: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 154 and 155: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 156 and 157: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 158 and 159: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 160 and 161: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 162 and 163: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
- Page 164 and 165: - 154 - Appendix B: U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 166 and 167: - 158 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 168 and 169: - 160 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 170 and 171: - 162 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 172 and 173: - 164 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 174 and 175: - 166 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 176 and 177: - 168 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 178 and 179: - 170 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
- Page 180 and 181: - 172 - Appendix D: Species Lists B
- Page 182 and 183: - 174 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
- Page 184 and 185: - 176 - Appendix D: Species Lists 7
- Page 186 and 187: - 178 - Appendix D: Species Lists T
- Page 188 and 189: - 180 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
Eastern Massachusetts National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge Complex Draft <strong>CCP</strong>/EA November 26, 2003<br />
Socioeconomic Concerns<br />
Several respondents applaud Alternative B for helping to make Maynard a “destination.” One<br />
respondent requests permission to graze in the Oxbow unit, <strong>and</strong> one requests continued<br />
cooperative farming.<br />
Several area residents request development of an “abutter policy,” without clearly<br />
articulating what the components of such a policy would be.<br />
Several respondents urge consideration of impacts to area parking, specifically at Monsen<br />
Road at Great Meadows, <strong>and</strong> at the east gate of <strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> off Old Marlborough Road.<br />
Some respondents are concerned about refuse at entry points.<br />
Summary of Comments 26