PCC MarchApril Final Draft
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Continued from Page 37<br />
Responses Regarding<br />
Biostimulants<br />
The responses indicated that over half<br />
of respondents (40) know some knowledge<br />
about biostimulants, of which 37<br />
applied biostimulants to at least one or<br />
two of their vegetable crops. There were<br />
nine growers who claimed having the<br />
highest knowledge level (very well), but<br />
two of them did not use biostimulants<br />
to any of their vegetable crops. There is<br />
no surprise that the majority of growers<br />
who responded with just a little knowledge<br />
or not knowing anything about<br />
crop biostimulants did not apply any<br />
biostimulant to any of their vegetable<br />
crops. The respondents were almost<br />
equally distributed by the application<br />
level of biostimulants (Table 2). The<br />
survey also asked the previous experience<br />
or future impression regarding the<br />
efficacy of biostimulants on improving<br />
vegetable growth. From the results,<br />
50 growers, representing 68% of total<br />
respondents, shared the experience or<br />
impression that biostimulants could<br />
conditionally confer their efficacy. Less<br />
than 20% of the respondents indicated<br />
a consistent, positive performance on<br />
improving their vegetable crops, while<br />
only 13% gave the negative impression<br />
on biostimulant efficacy (Figure 1).<br />
Concerns and Hopes<br />
I have received numerous questions in<br />
the past years from vegetable growers,<br />
their advisors and colleagues regarding<br />
the biostimulant selection, effect evaluation,<br />
quality control and incompatibility<br />
with other field activities. “Going<br />
in blind”, “Unable to identify the<br />
benefits”, and “Snake oil” are common<br />
complaints. One of the main objectives<br />
for the survey is to identify the biggest<br />
concerns of using biostimulants on<br />
vegetable crops among growers. The<br />
survey results showed that about half of<br />
the respondents identified the difficulty<br />
of choosing a proper product as one of<br />
the main concerns followed by the risk<br />
of low or no return on investment. In<br />
addition, concerns of incomplete label<br />
Continued on Page 40<br />
Application level<br />
of biostimulants<br />
Apply to most<br />
vegetables.<br />
Apply to certain<br />
vegetables.<br />
Apply to one or<br />
two vegetables.<br />
I don’t use to<br />
any vegetables.<br />
Sub-total<br />
Figure 2.<br />
38 Progressive Crop Consultant March / April 2021<br />
Stanislaus<br />
Kern<br />
Santa Barbara<br />
San Luis Obispo<br />
San Joaquin<br />
Fresno<br />
Monterey<br />
Imperial<br />
Yolo<br />
Sutter<br />
Merced<br />
Sacramento<br />
Madera<br />
Yuba<br />
Riverside<br />
San Bernardino<br />
San Diego<br />
Santa Cruz<br />
Santa Clara<br />
Ventura<br />
Solano<br />
Understanding level of biostimulants<br />
Very well Some A little Nothing<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
9<br />
Table 2. Number of grower responses to the understanding/knowledge level of<br />
biostimulants and how much of vegetable crops growers apply biostimulants to.<br />
10<br />
14<br />
13<br />
3<br />
40<br />
34<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
14<br />
5<br />
3<br />
3<br />
7<br />
2<br />
10<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
Figure 1. Responses to previous experience or future impression regarding<br />
biostimulant efficacy.<br />
5<br />
6<br />
9<br />
20<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Sub-totoal<br />
18<br />
17<br />
20<br />
19<br />
Total: 74<br />
Figure 2. Growers’ concerns regarding the use of crop biostimulants on vegetable crops.