19.02.2021 Views

bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1406

bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1406

bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1406

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Politics<br />

Fig. 5: Disposable plastic products stand<br />

for waste and littering (Photo: Kaeb)<br />

The difference between a carrier bag and a biowaste<br />

bag is very simple: Consumers get and buy biowaste bags<br />

intentionally for the purpose of composting. Buying a<br />

compostable shopping bag is not linked to that intention.<br />

The added value and second life of a compostable shopping<br />

bag is a main argument, but it would need that composting<br />

infrastructure to be available and accessible at regional /<br />

MS level. Although European waste legislation has set<br />

targets for separate collection and treatment of biowaste,<br />

practice shows that many countries and regions are<br />

lagging quite far behind (see Fig 2). The same is true for the<br />

intended but very slow phasing out of landfill of untreated<br />

waste. Implementation and control of legislation is much<br />

more challenging than putting targets on paper. National<br />

waste management policy and infrastructure must be the<br />

guiding principle when designing Bagislation to make it fit<br />

for purpose.<br />

The discussions and debates on the role of biodegradable<br />

and compostable plastics in the EU Bagislation have<br />

revealed many open questions. How to recycle them if<br />

organic recycling is not in place, or is in place but refuses<br />

acceptance of compostable plastic products? Several<br />

studies were made, or are ongoing. What about home<br />

compostability? What happens to biodegradable bags<br />

if littered on the land, in rivers, in sea water? Experts<br />

know the speed and extend of biodegradability is heavily<br />

dependent on various parameters of the environmental<br />

conditions (industrial composting occurs under optimum<br />

conditions). What happens to marine life if ingested, what<br />

about the risks of entanglement? Some of these questions<br />

are addressed in running standardisation processes or<br />

research projects (KBBPPS, OpenBio), some are not yet<br />

tackled at all. It would be worth reviewing these questions<br />

and actions in a detailed review article to better understand<br />

the situation and the implications.<br />

Advocates of privileges for Biodegradables had to learn<br />

that most NGOs (non-governmental organizations) in<br />

Europe wanted a complete ban or very wide reduction of<br />

all types of single-use plastic bags. Even if these NGOs<br />

acknowledge the benefits of biodegradability they prefer the<br />

switch to reusable bags. They learned that biodegradability<br />

is not synonymous with compostability and doubt it will<br />

happen fast enough to prevent wildlife from potential<br />

damages. The advocates of biodegradable single-use bags<br />

stress their advantages, e.g. to contribute to better organic<br />

waste management and less contamination of recycling<br />

streams with food waste. Positioning biodegradable bags<br />

as “a good alternative” to conventional single-use plastic<br />

bag and finding acceptance is not easy. A more general<br />

view says: If markets are destroyed or created by legislation<br />

the arguments need to be bullet-proof. Expect them to<br />

be scrutinized and put under the microscope by affected<br />

(opposing) parties.<br />

To summarize and conclude: It is good to see that<br />

biodegradable and compostable bags were recognized<br />

as beneficial for proper organic waste collection. It is at<br />

least a bit frightening to see them sometimes recognized<br />

as a contribution to solving (marine) littering problems<br />

– because of lack of knowledge and comprehensive<br />

test methods. Biobased plastic bags, i.e. reusable and<br />

recyclable products from Bio-PE or BioPET30, have not been<br />

addressed directly but would suffer from extreme national<br />

reduction targets and measures, i.e. if the scope addresses<br />

reusable bags. At EU level nothing is carved in stone yet,<br />

and implementation has to occur at national level in any<br />

case. The list of legal measures targeting the consumption<br />

of plastic carrier bags and promotion of biodegradable<br />

alternatives is revealing a scattered landscape – which also<br />

is true for the existing waste management and recycling<br />

schemes in place. Biodegradable single-use plastic bags<br />

should not fail to meet the expectations of awarded legal<br />

privileges when put under the microscope.<br />

Literature<br />

[1] EU Plastic Bags Impact Assessment http://ec.europa.eu/environment/<br />

waste/packaging/legis.htm#plastic_bags<br />

[2] EC Proposal http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1017_en.htm<br />

[3] Procedure http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.<br />

do?lang=en&reference=2013/0371(COD)<br />

[4] Enzo Favoino, Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza and International<br />

Solid Waste Association ISWA, presentation 3rd Baltic Biowaste<br />

Conference, 23/24 Nov. 2011, Vilnius<br />

bioplastics MAGAZINE [06/14] Vol. 9 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!