bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1406
bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1406
bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1406
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Politics<br />
Fig. 5: Disposable plastic products stand<br />
for waste and littering (Photo: Kaeb)<br />
The difference between a carrier bag and a biowaste<br />
bag is very simple: Consumers get and buy biowaste bags<br />
intentionally for the purpose of composting. Buying a<br />
compostable shopping bag is not linked to that intention.<br />
The added value and second life of a compostable shopping<br />
bag is a main argument, but it would need that composting<br />
infrastructure to be available and accessible at regional /<br />
MS level. Although European waste legislation has set<br />
targets for separate collection and treatment of biowaste,<br />
practice shows that many countries and regions are<br />
lagging quite far behind (see Fig 2). The same is true for the<br />
intended but very slow phasing out of landfill of untreated<br />
waste. Implementation and control of legislation is much<br />
more challenging than putting targets on paper. National<br />
waste management policy and infrastructure must be the<br />
guiding principle when designing Bagislation to make it fit<br />
for purpose.<br />
The discussions and debates on the role of biodegradable<br />
and compostable plastics in the EU Bagislation have<br />
revealed many open questions. How to recycle them if<br />
organic recycling is not in place, or is in place but refuses<br />
acceptance of compostable plastic products? Several<br />
studies were made, or are ongoing. What about home<br />
compostability? What happens to biodegradable bags<br />
if littered on the land, in rivers, in sea water? Experts<br />
know the speed and extend of biodegradability is heavily<br />
dependent on various parameters of the environmental<br />
conditions (industrial composting occurs under optimum<br />
conditions). What happens to marine life if ingested, what<br />
about the risks of entanglement? Some of these questions<br />
are addressed in running standardisation processes or<br />
research projects (KBBPPS, OpenBio), some are not yet<br />
tackled at all. It would be worth reviewing these questions<br />
and actions in a detailed review article to better understand<br />
the situation and the implications.<br />
Advocates of privileges for Biodegradables had to learn<br />
that most NGOs (non-governmental organizations) in<br />
Europe wanted a complete ban or very wide reduction of<br />
all types of single-use plastic bags. Even if these NGOs<br />
acknowledge the benefits of biodegradability they prefer the<br />
switch to reusable bags. They learned that biodegradability<br />
is not synonymous with compostability and doubt it will<br />
happen fast enough to prevent wildlife from potential<br />
damages. The advocates of biodegradable single-use bags<br />
stress their advantages, e.g. to contribute to better organic<br />
waste management and less contamination of recycling<br />
streams with food waste. Positioning biodegradable bags<br />
as “a good alternative” to conventional single-use plastic<br />
bag and finding acceptance is not easy. A more general<br />
view says: If markets are destroyed or created by legislation<br />
the arguments need to be bullet-proof. Expect them to<br />
be scrutinized and put under the microscope by affected<br />
(opposing) parties.<br />
To summarize and conclude: It is good to see that<br />
biodegradable and compostable bags were recognized<br />
as beneficial for proper organic waste collection. It is at<br />
least a bit frightening to see them sometimes recognized<br />
as a contribution to solving (marine) littering problems<br />
– because of lack of knowledge and comprehensive<br />
test methods. Biobased plastic bags, i.e. reusable and<br />
recyclable products from Bio-PE or BioPET30, have not been<br />
addressed directly but would suffer from extreme national<br />
reduction targets and measures, i.e. if the scope addresses<br />
reusable bags. At EU level nothing is carved in stone yet,<br />
and implementation has to occur at national level in any<br />
case. The list of legal measures targeting the consumption<br />
of plastic carrier bags and promotion of biodegradable<br />
alternatives is revealing a scattered landscape – which also<br />
is true for the existing waste management and recycling<br />
schemes in place. Biodegradable single-use plastic bags<br />
should not fail to meet the expectations of awarded legal<br />
privileges when put under the microscope.<br />
Literature<br />
[1] EU Plastic Bags Impact Assessment http://ec.europa.eu/environment/<br />
waste/packaging/legis.htm#plastic_bags<br />
[2] EC Proposal http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1017_en.htm<br />
[3] Procedure http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.<br />
do?lang=en&reference=2013/0371(COD)<br />
[4] Enzo Favoino, Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza and International<br />
Solid Waste Association ISWA, presentation 3rd Baltic Biowaste<br />
Conference, 23/24 Nov. 2011, Vilnius<br />
bioplastics MAGAZINE [06/14] Vol. 9 47